AzTrials
AzTrials

Endoscopic Pituitary Transnasal ApproachNCT07907380

Endoscopic Pituitary Lesions Transnasal Approach and Minimally Invasive Eyebrow Incision Approach

An observational study of Endoscopic Pituitary Transnasal Approach and Minimally Invasive Eyebrow Incision, run by Kafrelsheikh University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare the effect of endoscopic transnasal approach versus minimally invasive eyebrow incision approach for pituitary lesions in terms of safety, efficacy and postoperative recovery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Endoscopic Transnasal Approach and Minimally Invasive Eyebrow Approach
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Jan 2022to 1 Aug 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: This retrospective comparative study will be conducted on 60 patients with selected pituitary lesions who underwent surgical treatment through either an endoscopic transnasal approach or a minimally invasive eyebrow incision approach at the Neurosurgery Department of KafrElsheikh University Hospitals. The study will include patients treated during the period from January 2022 to August 2026.

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients aged ≥18 years.
  • Both sexes.
  • Patients with selected pituitary lesions requiring surgical treatment.
  • Sellar or sellar and suprasellar lesions suitable for either surgical approach.
  • Patients with visual symptoms or radiological compression of the optic apparatus.

Who cannot join

  • Previous surgery for the same lesion.
  • Recurrent or residual lesions require complex revision surgery.
  • Extensive lateral or vascular extension unsuitable for either approach.
  • Lesions require a combined or staged approach.
  • Active infection.
  • Severe uncontrolled comorbidities contraindicating surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Kafrelsheikh University

    Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, 33516

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study Between Endoscopic Pituitary Lesions Transnasal Approach and Minimally Invasive Eyebrow Incision Approach

This study aims to compare the effect of endoscopic transnasal approach versus minimally invasive eyebrow incision approach for pituitary lesions in terms of safety, efficacy and postoperative recovery.

Read the detailed description

Pituitary lesions represent an important group of sellar and parasellar pathologies that may produce visual, neurological, and endocrinological manifestations. Surgical treatment is indicated in selected patients, particularly those with visual pathway compression, progressive neurological manifestations, hormonal hypersecretion, or lesions causing significant mass effect.

The endoscopic transnasal approach provides a direct route to the sellar region through the nasal cavity and sphenoid sinus, avoiding transcranial exposure and minimizing manipulation of the cerebral hemispheres.

The minimally invasive eyebrow approach may be particularly useful when the lesion has significant suprasellar or anterior extension that can be accessed directly through a low subfrontal trajectory.

Being tested
Endoscopic Transnasal Approach, Minimally Invasive Eyebrow Approach

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endoscopic Transnasal ApproachProcedure or surgery

    Patients underwent endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal surgery for removal of the pituitary lesion.

  • Minimally Invasive Eyebrow ApproachProcedure or surgery

    Patients underwent minimally invasive supraorbital eyebrow incision surgery for removal of the pituitary lesion.

Study groups in NCT07907380
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A (Endoscopic Transnasal Approach)Patients underwent endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal surgery for removal of the pituitary lesion.
Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic Transnasal Approach
Group B (Minimally Invasive Eyebrow Approach)Patients underwent minimally invasive supraorbital eyebrow incision surgery for removal of the pituitary lesion.
Receives: Procedure: Minimally Invasive Eyebrow Approach

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Successful Tumor Resection Rate

    Percentage of patients achieving successful tumor resection following endoscopic transnasal surgery or minimally invasive supraorbital eyebrow surgery, assessed using postoperative contrast-enhanced sellar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Visual Improvement Rate

    Percentage of patients with improvement in visual acuity and/or visual fields compared with preoperative findings, based on documented ophthalmological assessments.

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  2. Endocrinological Improvement Rate

    Percentage of patients with improvement of preoperative hormonal abnormalities, assessed using documented postoperative hormonal investigations and endocrinological assessments. Criteria for improvement and remission will be specified for each hormonal disorder.

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  3. Estimated Intraoperative Blood Loss

    Estimated volume of blood lost during surgery was expressed in milliliters and recorded.

    Measured: Intraoperatively

  4. Degree of pain

    Degree of pain was assessed using documented Visual Analog Scale scores ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  5. Incidence of Postoperative Hemorrhage

    Percentage of patients with postoperative hemorrhage was documented.

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  6. Incidence of Postoperative Wound Complications

    Incidence of postoperative wound complications were recorded.

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  7. Incidence of Residual Tumor

    Percentage of patients with residual tumor identified on postoperative contrast-enhanced sellar magnetic resonance imaging.

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  8. Incidence of Tumor Recurrence

    Percentage of patients with reappearance of tumor on follow-up contrast-enhanced sellar magnetic resonance imaging after previously documented complete resection.

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Oct 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2026
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07907380
Sponsor's protocol ID
KFSIRB200-1234
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
25 Oct 2026
Last updated
30 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Endoscopic Pituitary Transnasal Approach and Minimally Invasive Eyebrow Incision, run by Kafrelsheikh University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Successful Tumor Resection Rate (time frame: 3 months after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in