AzTrials
AzTrials

Sinus PauseMAPNCT07908927

Multimodality Location Prediction Accuracy of Leadless Pacemaker Positioning

A study testing Cardiac Imaging by TTE or CTA in people with Sinus Pause and Sinus Sick Syndrome, run by Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute) at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

One of the most serious complications with leadless pacemaker (LP) implants is right ventricle (RV) perforation. Understanding the accuracy of fluoroscopic guidance of implants compared to transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the heart will help guide future implant… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 89 years
Conditions the study is for
Sinus Pause, Sinus Sick Syndrome, Heart Block
What is being tested?
Cardiac Imaging by TTE or CTA
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 May 2026to 31 May 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 89 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female patients aged 18-89, inclusive.
  • All patients undergoing implant of a new Micra VR or AV2 leadless pacemaker.

Who cannot join

  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Existing device implant
  • Breast or Pectoral Implants
  • Patients with a GFR less than 45, unless the patient is on dialysis (in which case, may be included)
  • Known allergy to iodinated contrast.
  • Any other condition or finding that, in the opinion of the investigator, would contraindicate participation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Caitlin Phalunas, MSBME contact

412-359-3747

caitlin.phalunas@ahn.org

Joshua Silverstein, MD contact

412-359-3457

Joshua.Silverstein@ahn.org

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Allegheny Health Network

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212

    Heather McDonald, MHA, 412-359-3660, heather.mcdonald@ahn.org

    Joshua Silverstein, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Multimodality Location Prediction Accuracy of Leadless Pacemaker Positioning (MAP)

One of the most serious complications with leadless pacemaker (LP) implants is right ventricle (RV) perforation. Understanding the accuracy of fluoroscopic guidance of implants compared to transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the heart will help guide future implant techniques. We hypothesize that TTE-guided implantation would lead to improved safety and accuracy of leadless pacemaker implants.

The implanter and two independent electrophysiologists will estimate the location of the implant based on standard fluoroscopic views using RV site nomenclature after the procedure. Each participant will then undergo a TTE and have 3 independent assessments of the implant site. Within 48 hours of the implant, a CTA of the heart will then be performed with contrast, which will serve as the gold standard to determine the actual implant site.

The primary endpoint will compare implanting electrophysiologist, fluoroscopy, and TTE predicted location of a new implanted Micra VR or AV2 leadless pacemaker to the implant location found on a gold standard CTA of the heart. The secondary endpoints will compare implant technique (Jugular vs. Femoral) by defining timing of implant procedure, repositioning, and accuracy of predicted implant location. The other secondary endpoints will compare baseline and demographic characteristics (BMI, COPD, LVEF, implant technique) to EKG parameters at final position, fluoroscopy and TTE image quality, acquisition of triangle or Koch and Bachmann area view during TTE.

Being tested
Cardiac Imaging by TTE or CTA
Medical subject headings
Atrial Standstill, Sick Sinus Syndrome, Heart Block, Arrhythmias, Cardiac

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cardiac Imaging by TTE or CTADiagnostic test

    After a standard care pacemaker implantation, participants will undergo two standard care imaging procedures which will be compared.

Study groups in NCT07908927
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InvestigationalExperimentalAll patients undergoing a new Micra VR or AV2 leadless pacemaker implant will be considered for recruitment. After the consent and screening processes, eligible participants will undergo their standard-care implantation procedure according to clinical guidelines. After the implantation procedure is complete, the study investigation will start when the participant undergoes a TTE and CTA imaging of the heart.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Cardiac Imaging by TTE or CTA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assess accuracy predicted implant locations to CTA

    Compare implanting electrophysiologist-, fluoroscopy-, and TTE-predicted location of a new implanted Micra VR or AV2 leadless pacemaker to the implant location found on a gold standard modality, CTA of the heart. [measure: location accuracy]

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Implant technique timing

    Compare time required for Jugular vs. Femoral implant techniques [measure: minutes}

    Measured: 1 hour

  2. Implant technique repositioning

    Compare Jugular vs. Femoral implant techniques by defining repositioning attempts [measure: number of attempts]

    Measured: 1 hour

  3. Implant technique prediction accuracy

    Compare Jugular vs. Femoral implant techniques by defining the accuracy of predicted implant location [measure: percentage]

    Measured: 1 hour

  4. Baseline characteristics

    Compare baseline characteristics (BMI, COPD, LVEF, implant technique) to EKG parameters at final position, fluoroscopy and TTE image quality, acquisition of triangle or Koch and Bachmann area view during TTE [measure: scale 1-5]

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Nov 2026
  2. Study start13 May 2026
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
This is a single center, prospective, pilot study comparing fluoroscopy (standard of care) and echocardiography to gold standard CTA to evaluate Micra device implant location.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07908927
Sponsor's protocol ID
MAP
Acronym
MAP
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
13 Oct 2026
Last updated
2 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cardiac Imaging by TTE or CTA in people with Sinus Pause and Sinus Sick Syndrome, run by Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute) at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Caitlin Phalunas, MSBME (412-359-3747, caitlin.phalunas@ahn.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assess accuracy predicted implant locations to CTA (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in