AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Low-back PainNCT07910669

The Effectiveness of Pilates Exercise on Chronic Low Back Pain of The Older Adults

A study testing Pilates exercise in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Low-back pain is one of the most common health conditions worldwide. It is defined as pain below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds. Due to aging, older adults experience pain, which can threaten their safety, autonomy, and independence, limit their social interactions, and reduce their… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 69 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Low-back Pain
What is being tested?
Pilates exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
1 Apr 2025to 1 Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 69 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Middle-aged and older adults aged 40-69 years.
  • Chief complaint of recurrent low back pain located below the costal margin and above the gluteal folds, persisting for more than 3 months (12 weeks) without evidence of structural damage.
  • Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for pain intensity greater than 30 mm within the past 7 days.
  • Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score greater than 11 points.
  • Diagnosis of chronic low back pain (CLBP) confirmed by a physician or a licensed physical therapist with at least 2 years of clinical experience.

Who cannot join

  • Exclusion criteria will consider both current and past conditions. Participants will be excluded if any of the following apply:
  • Contraindications, including:Electrocardiographic changes or history of myocardial infarction、Unstable angina、Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias、Aortic stenosis、Uncontrolled heart failure、Acute pulmonary embolism or pulmonary infarction、Acute myocarditis or pericarditis、Suspected or confirmed aortic dissection、Acute systemic infection with fever, generalized pain, or lymphadenopathy
  • Presence of severe spinal disorders, such as:Fracture
  • 、Tumor、.Inflammatory disease、Ankylosing spondylitis、Radiculopathy confirmed by neurological examination
  • History of or scheduled for spinal surgery.
  • Inability to walk independently (requiring walking aids or assistance from others).
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Engagement in regular physical activity, defined as ≥3 sessions per week of leisure-time exercise lasting ≥30 minutes each, within the past 2 weeks.
  • Diagnosis of cognitive impairment.
  • Presence of neurological or neuromuscular disorders affecting motor function, including:Multiple sclerosis、Parkinson's disease、Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)、Stroke

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Yoga Studio

    New Taipei City, Tamsui Dist, 251026

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Background: Low-back pain is one of the most common health conditions worldwide. It is defined as pain below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds. Due to aging, older adults experience pain, which can threaten their safety, autonomy, and independence, limit their social interactions, and reduce their quality of life. In exercise therapy, Pilates is considered effective for strengthening core muscles, improving muscle endurance, enhancing spinal control, and promoting trunk stability, thereby minimizing joint load. However, current research has focused on younger populations and lacks detailed descriptions of exercise interventions, making it unclear whether Pilates core exercises would benefit middle-aged and older adults.Therefore, this study incorporates resistance bands and yoga blocks into a Pilates regimen, emphasizing hip mobility exercises and gluteus medius strengthening to enhance the effectiveness of Pilates in treating chronic low back pain. This study aims to design a Pilates exercise therapy program for CLBP that includes hip mobility improvement and gluteus medius training to improve pain, disability level, hip mobility, gluteus medius strength, gluteal endurance, emotional function, participants' ratings of improvement and satisfaction, and participants' intention toward treatment.Purpose: This study targets individuals aged 40 to 69 with chronic low back pain and aims to:Develop an 8-week Pilates core exercise program focusing on gluteal strengthening and increased hip mobility, conducted three times per week for 60 minutes per session, to assess the effectiveness of primary outcome variables (pain, disability) and secondary outcome variables (emotional function, gluteus medius strength, gluteal endurance, hip mobility, satisfaction, self-efficacy).Methods: A single-blind randomized group design will be used in this study. Participants must be aged between 40 and 69 and have had low back pain for more than three months. They will be randomly assigned to either a control group or a Pilates intervention group.Outcome measurement:Outcome measurements include the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), gluteus medius strength measured by microFET3, hip mobility, self-efficacy for exercise (SEE-C), and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale.

Being tested
Pilates exercise
Keywords
chronic low back pain, low back pain, Pilates, middle-aged and elderly adults, hip mobility, gluteus medius, exercise, Pilates exercise
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pilates exerciseBehavioural

    Develop an 8-week Pilates core exercise program focusing on gluteal strengthening and increased hip mobility, conducted three times per week for 60 minutes per session.

Study groups in NCT07910669
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimental8-week Pilates core exercise program focusing on gluteal strengthening and increased hip mobility, conducted three times per week for 60 minutes per session.
Receives: Behavioral: Pilates exercise
Control groupNo interventionParticipants in the control group will maintain their normal activities of daily living without any experimental intervention.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

    The visual analogue scale consists of a 10-cm line, each labelled at the left end as 'no pain' (0) and at the right end as 'very severe pain' (10).Patients were asked to draw a vertical mark on each line(Delgado et al., 2018).

    Measured: A total of three measurements were taken (one baseline and two post-tests at 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention).

  2. Disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

    Disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index. It contains ten items related to limitations in daily life activities, rating each on a 0-5 point scale; the points are added together and converted into a percentage:Minimally disabled (0-10%), moderately disabled(20-40%), severely disabled (40-60%), crippled (60-80%) or bedbound (80-100%)(Rocchi et al., 2005).

    Measured: A total of three measurements were taken (one baseline and two post-tests at 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention).

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. The Beck Depression Scale was used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms among patients(Dworkin et al., 2008).

    The BDI consists of 21 groups of four statements designed to assess the severity of current depressive symptoms, with a total score ranging from 0 to 63. Beck and Steer suggested that scores below 10 should be considered to reflect "mild or none" depression, 10 to 18, 19 to 29, and 30 to 63 to reflect "mild to moderate," "moderate to severe," and "severe" depression, respectively (Beck et al., 1988).

    Measured: A total of three measurements were taken (one baseline and two post-tests at 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention).

  2. Muscle power measured by microFET3.

    Muscle power measured by microFET3. Patient Position: Lying on their side with the test leg up. At the start of the test, the limb is slightly extended beyond the midline, and the pelvis is slightly rotated forward. The lower leg is bent for stability.

    Therapist Position: Standing behind the patient. The hand applying resistance is placed on the lateral side near the ankle. The hand used to palpate the gluteus medius is placed proximal to the greater trochanter of the femur.

    Instructions to the Patient:

    "Lift your leg. Hold it. Don't let me press it down."

    Measured: A total of three measurements were taken (one baseline and two post-tests at 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention).

  3. Hip mobility measured using a GEMRED brand, model: 82311-300 electronic protractor.

    The range of free movement a joint can make during body movement. It is the number of arc degrees of movement between the start and end of a movement on a specific plane.

    Measured: A total of three measurements were taken (one baseline and two post-tests at 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention).

  4. The Chinese version of the self-efficacy for exercise (SEE-C) scale

    The Chinese version of the self-efficacy for exercise (SEE-C) scale was designed to test people's confidence to continue exercising in the face of barriers to exercise (Lee et al., 2009).It attempts to predict and explain human behavior by referencing an individual's assessment of their ability or effectiveness in successfully performing a specific behavior. Self-efficacy theory suggests that the stronger an individual's self-efficacy and outcome expectations, the more likely they are to initiate and persist in a specific activity. Self-efficacy theory includes self-efficacy expectations, which are an individual's beliefs about their ability to perform a series of actions to achieve a desired outcome, and the belief that their actions will produce a certain result.

    Measured: A total of two measurements were taken ( baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention).

  5. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale

    Symptom improvement satisfaction is one of the core outcome indicators of overall improvement after treatment. This study used the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC). Participants were required to rate on a scale from -5 to 5, with each number representing a different condition: 0 represents "no change," -5 represents "very bad," -4 to -1 represent varying degrees of "worse," with lower numbers indicating a worse condition. 1 to 4 represent varying degrees of "recovery," with higher numbers indicating a better condition. 5 represents "complete recovery," meaning the patient has fully recovered to a normal state (Kamper et al., 2009). The Patient-Assessed Overall Improvement Scale is completed by the patient themselves to self-assess the severity of the disease or the effectiveness of the treatment.

    Measured: A total of two measurements were taken ( 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Nov 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2026
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07910669
Sponsor's protocol ID
NYCU113194AE
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
9 Jun 2026
Last updated
2 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pilates exercise in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS). (time frame: A total of three measurements were taken (one baseline and two post-tests at 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in