Clinical trials: Conventional Wound Closure
Operative Time, Wound Heal
Subcuticular Absorbable Staples Versus Conventional Skin Closure in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
Despite the high numbers of cesareans being performed, scientific evidence behind which surgical techniques are best remains uncertain.
- Trial name
- NCT05112640
- Testing
- INSORB: subcuticular stapling device, Subcuticular monocryl suture manufactured by Ethicon
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 117 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
Breast Ptosis, Obesity
Evaluation of Dermal Closure With an Absorbable Barbed Suture as Compared to a Conventional Absorbable Suture
The objective of this study is to evaluate the use of an absorbable barbed suture as compared to a conventional absorbable suture when used for dermal closure during certain body contouring procedures.
- Trial name
- NCT00959374
- Testing
- V-Loc 180/90 Wound Closure Device, 3-0 Monocryl Absorbable Sutures
- Where
- 8 sites in United States, Germany
- Volunteers
- 229 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- Medtronic - MITG
Arthroplasty, Knee Replacement, Wound Healing
Zip® Surgical Skin Closure Device vs. Staples for Skin Closure in Subjects Having Undergone Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty
Study designed to compare the Zip Surgical Skin Closure device vs. conventional staples for wound closure following bi lateral knee replacement surgery.
- Trial name
- NCT02460172
- Testing
- Zip Surgical Skin Closure, Steel Staples
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 25 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- ZipLine Medical Inc.