MycosesPhase 3NCT00001757
An Open Label, Non-Comparative, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of the Efficacy, Safety and Toleration of Voriconazole in the Primary or Secondary Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections
A Phase 3 study testing Voriconazole in people with Mycoses, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Invasive fungal infections are often life-threatening in persons with immunocompromise. Persons with prolonged neutropenia secondary to cytotoxic chemotherapies are at high risk for these infections. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Mycoses
- What is being tested?
- Voriconazole
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 1997to Jul 2000
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Males or (non-pregnant) females must be at least 18 Years of age.
Subjects must have one of the following systemic or invasive fungal infections at baseline: (1) systemic or invasive infection due to a fungal pathogen for which there is no currently licensed treatment; (2) systemic or invasive fungal infection, with evidence of failure and/or intolerance/toxicity to treatment with approved systemic antifungal agents. Definition of failure to treatment with approved systemic antifungal agents: a) for invasive aspergillosis and other invasive fungal infections: lack of clinical response after at least 7 days of systemic antifungal treatment at adequate doses; or b) for Candida esophagitis only: lack of clinical response after at least 14 days of fluconazole at a dose of greater than or equal to 200 mg/day. Definition of intolerance/toxicity to treatment with approved systemic antifungal agents: a) intolerance to the infusion-related toxicities of amphotericin B preparations despite appropriate supportive therapy; b) nephrotoxicity defined as a serum creatinine that had increased by greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dl while receiving amphotericin B therapy or c) preexisting renal impairment defined as a serum creatinine that increased to greater than or equal to 2.0 mg/dl due to reasons other than amphotericin B.
The systemic or invasive fungal infection must be present at baseline and documented within four weeks preceding study entry as follows: (1) positive histopathology with evidence of tissue invasion by fungal elements, or (2) positive serology where diagnostic (CSF cryptococcal antigen; serum or CSF Coccidioides antibody; serum, CSF or urine Histoplasma antigen), or (3) positive mycologic culture from a normally sterile site, taken during the current episode of infection.
Women of child bearing potential (or less than 2 years post-menopausal) must have a negative serum pregnancy test at baseline, and must agree to use barrier methods of contraception during the study.
Medical history must be obtained at baseline.
Signed written informed consent must be obtained at baseline.
Subjects must not have previously participated in this trial.
Subjects must not be taking and are unable to discontinue the following drugs at least 24 hours prior to randomization: terfenadine, cisapride, astemizole, and sulphonylureas.
Subjects must not have received any of the following drugs within 14 days prior to randomization: rifampin, carbamazepine, and barbiturates as these are potent inducers of hepatic enzymes and will result in undetectable levels of voriconazole.
Subjects must not have the following abnormalities of liver function tests (LFT's): AST, ALT greater than 5 times upper limit normal; alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin greater than 5 times upper limit normal.
Subjects must not have a serum creatinine greater than 3.5 mg/dl or end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis.
Subjects must not have allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, aspergilloma, zygomycoses, candiduria, and/or catheter- or device-related candidemia.
Subjects must not have fungal infections which are not considered to be invasive or systemic including dermatophytosis and oropharyngeal candidiasis.
Subjects must not be receiving or are likely to receive any investigational drug (any unlicensed new chemical entity), except one of the following classes of medications: Cancer chemotherapeutic agents, antiretrovirals, therapies for HIV/AIDS-related opportunistic infections.
Subjects must not be receiving or are likely to receive the following medications or treatments during the study period: G-CSF or GM-CSF (for other than treatment of granulocytopenia), any systemic antifungal medication or white blood cell transfusions.
Subjects must not have a history of hypersensitivity or intolerance to azole antifungal agents including miconazole, ketoconazole, fluconazole, or itraconazole.
Subjects must not have a life expectancy of less than 72 hours.
Subjects must not have any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect subject safety, preclude evaluation of response, or render it unlikely that the contemplated course of therapy can be completed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
About this study
Invasive fungal infections are often life-threatening in persons with immunocompromise. Persons with prolonged neutropenia secondary to cytotoxic chemotherapies are at high risk for these infections. Patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, receiving prolonged corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive therapies, and persons with HIV infection and AIDS are also at risk. With the use of currently approved antifungal therapy, many of these infections may still be associated with a high mortality. Amphotericin B in its conventional form, is the current standard treatment for most life-threatening fungal infections. Because of its nephrotoxicity and other adverse effects, alternatives to conventional amphotericin B have been sought. Alternated agents include three lipid formulations of amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole. Although all of these agents are associated with a decrease in adverse effects, their efficacy in most life-threatening fungal infections has not been shown to be equivalent to conventional amphotericin B.
Voriconazole is an investigational antifungal drug currently being brought to phase III trials in the US. This azole has been shown active against many fungal pathogens in vitro. In animal models and early human trials this new agent has been shown to be effective against aspergillosis. It has been shown to be well-tolerated and is available in an intravenous and oral formulation.
This is a non-comparative, open label study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and toleration of voriconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. This agent will be used as primary therapy in those fungal infections in which no antifungal agent is currently approved or in patients unable to tolerate the approved agent. Voriconazole will also be used as a secondary treatment in those patients who have failed therapy with the primary approved agent or are unable to tolerate that agent or have unacceptable toxicity.
Read the detailed description
Invasive fungal infections are often life-threatening in persons with immunocompromise. Persons with prolonged neutropenia secondary to cytotoxic chemotherapies are at high risk for these infections. Patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, receiving prolonged corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive therapies, and persons with HIV infection and AIDS are also at risk. With the use of currently approved antifungal therapy, many of these infections may still be associated with a high mortality. Amphotericin B in its conventional form, is the current standard treatment for most life-threatening fungal infections. Because of its nephrotoxicity and other adverse effects, alternatives to conventional amphotericin B have been sought. Alternate agents include three lipid formulations of amphotericin B, fluconazole, and itraconazole. Although all of these agents are associated with a decrease in adverse effects, their efficacy in most life-threatening fungal infections has not been shown to be equivalent to conventional amphotericin B.
Voriconazole is an investigational antifungal drug currently being brought to phase III trials in the US. This azole has been shown active against many fungal pathogens in vitro. In animal models and early human trials this new agent has been shown to be effective against aspergillosis. It has been shown to be well-tolerated and is available in an intravenous and oral formulation.
This is a non-comparative, open label study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and toleration of voriconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. This agent will be used as primary therapy in those fungal infections in which no antifungal agent is currently approved or in patients unable to tolerate the approved agent. Voriconazole will also be used as a secondary treatment in those patients who have failed therapy with the primary approved agent or are unable to tolerate that agent or have unacceptable toxicity.
- Conditions
- Mycoses
- Being tested
- Voriconazole
- Keywords
- Azole, Immunocompromised, Mycosis, Invasive Fungal Infection, Systemic Fungal Infection
- Medical subject headings
- Mycoses, Invasive Fungal Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VoriconazoleDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2002 (estimated)
- Study startNov 1997
- Study completionJul 2000
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MycosesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Enrolment
- 20 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00001757
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 980028
- Other IDs
- 98-I-0028
- Status last verified
- Dec 1999
- First submitted
- 3 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2008
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open Label, Non-Comparative, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of the Efficacy, Safety and Toleration of Voriconazole in the Primary or Secondary Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00001757
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 980028
- Conditions
- Mycoses
- Keywords
- Azole, Immunocompromised, Mycosis, Invasive Fungal Infection, Systemic Fungal Infection
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Nov 1997
- Study completion
- Jul 2000
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2002 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Invasive fungal infections are often life-threatening in persons with immunocompromise. Persons with prolonged neutropenia secondary to cytotoxic chemotherapies are at high risk for these infections. Patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, receiving prolonged corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive therapies, and persons with HIV infection and AIDS are also at risk. With the use of currently approved antifungal therapy, many of these infections may still be associated with a high mortality. Amphotericin B in its conventional form, is the current standard treatment for most life-threatening fungal infections. Because of its nephrotoxicity and other adverse effects, alternatives to conventional amphotericin B have been sought. Alternated agents include three lipid formulations of amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole. Although all of these agents are associated with a decrease in adverse effects, their efficacy in most life-threatening fungal infections has not been shown to be equivalent to conventional amphotericin B.
Voriconazole is an investigational antifungal drug currently being brought to phase III trials in the US. This azole has been shown active against many fungal pathogens in vitro. In animal models and early human trials this new agent has been shown to be effective against aspergillosis. It has been shown to be well-tolerated and is available in an intravenous and oral formulation.
This is a non-comparative, open label study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and toleration of voriconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. This agent will be used as primary therapy in those fungal infections in which no antifungal agent is currently approved or in patients unable to tolerate the approved agent. Voriconazole will also be used as a secondary treatment in those patients who have failed therapy with the primary approved agent or are unable to tolerate that agent or have unacceptable toxicity.
Detailed description
Invasive fungal infections are often life-threatening in persons with immunocompromise. Persons with prolonged neutropenia secondary to cytotoxic chemotherapies are at high risk for these infections. Patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, receiving prolonged corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive therapies, and persons with HIV infection and AIDS are also at risk. With the use of currently approved antifungal therapy, many of these infections may still be associated with a high mortality. Amphotericin B in its conventional form, is the current standard treatment for most life-threatening fungal infections. Because of its nephrotoxicity and other adverse effects, alternatives to conventional amphotericin B have been sought. Alternate agents include three lipid formulations of amphotericin B, fluconazole, and itraconazole. Although all of these agents are associated with a decrease in adverse effects, their efficacy in most life-threatening fungal infections has not been shown to be equivalent to conventional amphotericin B.
Voriconazole is an investigational antifungal drug currently being brought to phase III trials in the US. This azole has been shown active against many fungal pathogens in vitro. In animal models and early human trials this new agent has been shown to be effective against aspergillosis. It has been shown to be well-tolerated and is available in an intravenous and oral formulation.
This is a non-comparative, open label study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and toleration of voriconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. This agent will be used as primary therapy in those fungal infections in which no antifungal agent is currently approved or in patients unable to tolerate the approved agent. Voriconazole will also be used as a secondary treatment in those patients who have failed therapy with the primary approved agent or are unable to tolerate that agent or have unacceptable toxicity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Voriconazole | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2008.
Related trials for Mycoses
RecruitingObservational study
Training Protocol on the Natural History of Tuberculosis
Mycobacterium Infections, Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Quabodepistat-containing Regimens for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Rifampicin-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Safety of an Expanded Pneumococcal Vaccine in Healthy Infants
Pneumococcal Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Trisomy 8-Associated Autoinflammatory Disease (TRIAD) and Related Disorders
Trisomy 8 Mosaicism, Trisomy 8 Associated Autoinflammatory Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Modeling Host-Pathogen Interaction Using Lymphoid Organoids
Staphylococcal Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Voriconazole in people with Mycoses, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2008.