Lung CancerPhase 3NCT00003606
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and epirubicin hydrochloride in people with Lung Cancer, run by UNICANCER at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether combination chemotherapy with or without epirubicin and cyclophosphamide is more effective in treating patients… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and epirubicin hydrochloride
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 216 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Mar 1996to Jun 2001
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically proven extensive stage small cell lung cancer Extends beyond hemithorax and supraclavicular lymph nodes Pleural effusions allowed Bidimensionally measurable disease Bone marrow metastases allowed No symptomatic CNS metastases or carcinomatous meningitis
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 18 to 75 Performance status: 0-2 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Neutrophil count at least 2,000/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times normal Renal: Creatinine less than 1.24 mg/dL OR Creatinine clearance greater than 60 mL/min Cardiovascular: No cardiac insufficiency No uncontrolled cardiac disease LVEF greater than 50% OR ECHO greater than 30% Other: Not pregnant Fertile patients must use effective contraception No psychoses No active infection No loss of weight greater than 10% during the last 3 months No other malignancy except nonmelanomatous skin cancer or stage I cervical cancer
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: No prior or concurrent immunotherapy Chemotherapy: No prior or other concurrent chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No prior or concurrent radiotherapy Surgery: No prior or concurrent surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Phase III Randomized Study of Cisplatin and Etoposide With or Without Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether combination chemotherapy with or without epirubicin and cyclophosphamide is more effective in treating patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with or without epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in treating patients who have extensive stage small cell lung cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the overall survival and survival without recurrence of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer after receiving cisplatin and etoposide with or without epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. II. Compare the relative dose and intensity of cisplatin and etoposide between the two groups of patients. III. Compare the complete and objective response rate and quality of life of these patients. IV. Compare the toxic effects of these 2 regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive etoposide IV on days 1 and 3 and cisplatin IV on day 2. Arm II: Patients receive etoposide and cisplatin as in arm I, plus epirubicin IV on day 1 and cyclophosphamide IV on days 1 and 3. Treatment is repeated in both arms every 28 days for up to 6 courses. Patients who achieve a partial or complete response receive cerebral and/or thoracic radiotherapy. Patients with residual tumor may receive oral etoposide for 3 of every 4 weeks. Patients are followed every 3 months.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 216 patients will be accrued for this study within 2.5 years.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin hydrochloride, etoposide, radiation therapy
- Keywords
- extensive stage small cell lung cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
cyclophosphamideDrug
epirubicin hydrochlorideDrug
etoposideDrug
radiation therapyRadiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2004 (estimated)
- Study startMar 1996
- Primary completion1 Oct 1999
- Study completionJun 2001
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UNICANCERThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UNICANCER
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean Louis Pujol, MD, Study chair, Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003606
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000066683
- Other IDs
- FRE-FNCLCC-95012, EU-98021
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 21 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Pujol JL, Daures JP, Riviere A, Quoix E, Westeel V, Quantin X, Breton JL, Lemarie E, Poudenx M, Milleron B, Moro D, Debieuvre D, Le Chevalier T. Etoposide plus cisplatin with or without the combination of 4'-epidoxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in treatment of extensive small-cell lung cancer: a French Federation of Cancer Institutes multicenter phase III randomized study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Feb 21;93(4):300-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.4.300.
PubMed 11181777Pujol JL, Duares JP, Riviere A, et al.: Doublet etoposide - cisplatin (EP) versus quadruplet cisplatin - cyclophosphamide - epirubicin - etoposide (PCDE) in extensive disease small cell lung cancer (Ed-SCLC): a FNCLCC phase III multicenter study. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 19: A-1892, 2000.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III Randomized Study of Cisplatin and Etoposide With or Without Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003606
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000066683
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- extensive stage small cell lung cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- UNICANCERUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 1996 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 1999 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2001 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 May 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether combination chemotherapy with or without epirubicin and cyclophosphamide is more effective in treating patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with or without epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in treating patients who have extensive stage small cell lung cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the overall survival and survival without recurrence of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer after receiving cisplatin and etoposide with or without epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. II. Compare the relative dose and intensity of cisplatin and etoposide between the two groups of patients. III. Compare the complete and objective response rate and quality of life of these patients. IV. Compare the toxic effects of these 2 regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive etoposide IV on days 1 and 3 and cisplatin IV on day 2. Arm II: Patients receive etoposide and cisplatin as in arm I, plus epirubicin IV on day 1 and cyclophosphamide IV on days 1 and 3. Treatment is repeated in both arms every 28 days for up to 6 courses. Patients who achieve a partial or complete response receive cerebral and/or thoracic radiotherapy. Patients with residual tumor may receive oral etoposide for 3 of every 4 weeks. Patients are followed every 3 months.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 216 patients will be accrued for this study within 2.5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
| epirubicin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| etoposide | Drug | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Feb 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 11181777Pujol JL, Daures JP, Riviere A, Quoix E, Westeel V, Quantin X, Breton JL, Lemarie E, Poudenx M, Milleron B, Moro D, Debieuvre D, Le Chevalier T. Etoposide plus cisplatin with or without the combination of 4'-epidoxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in treatment of extensive small-cell lung cancer: a French Federation of Cancer Institutes multicenter phase III randomized study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Feb 21;93(4):300-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.4.300.
- Results publicationPujol JL, Duares JP, Riviere A, et al.: Doublet etoposide - cisplatin (EP) versus quadruplet cisplatin - cyclophosphamide - epirubicin - etoposide (PCDE) in extensive disease small cell lung cancer (Ed-SCLC): a FNCLCC phase III multicenter study. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 19: A-1892, 2000.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Testing the Safety of Dapagliflozin Prior to Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma
Lung Adenocarcinoma, Stage IA1 Lung Cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) v8
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Screening for Hematology Branch Protocols
Hematologic Disease and Disorders, Donors
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation for NCI Surgery Branch Clinical Research Protocols
Synovial Cell Cancer, Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046054/SGN-PDL1V Versus Docetaxel in Adult Participants With Previously-Treated Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Non-small Cell Carcinoma, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean Louis Pujol, MD study chair
Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and epirubicin hydrochloride in people with Lung Cancer, run by UNICANCER at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00003606, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2021.