Fallopian Tube CancerPhase 3NCT00003636
Chemotherapy Plus Surgery in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Ovarian, Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing carboplatin, cisplatin and conventional surgery in people with Fallopian Tube Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 65 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining surgery with chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Fallopian Tube Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer
- What is being tested?
- carboplatin, cisplatin and conventional surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 704 participants
- Where
- 65 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 1998to Jan 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically proven stage IIIC or IV ovarian epithelial carcinoma, peritoneal carcinoma, or fallopian tube carcinoma
- If biopsy is not available, evidence of adenocarcinoma by fine needle aspiration allowed if all of the following are true:
- Presence of pelvic ovarian mass
- Omental cake or other metastasis larger than 2 cm in the upper abdomen and/or regional lymph node metastasis
- CA 125/carcinoembryonic antigen ratio greater than 25 (if ratio less than 25, barium enema or colonoscopy AND gastroscopy or radiological examination of the stomach must be negative for primary tumor)
- Normal mammography (if CA 125/carcinoembryonic antigen ratio less than 25)
- Tumor greater than 2 cm, excluding ovaries, on laparoscopy or CT scan
- No brain or leptomeningeal metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- Not specified
Performance status:
- WHO 0-2
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- WBC greater than 3,000/mm^3
- Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm^3
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin less than 1.25 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
Renal:
- Creatinine less than 1.25 times ULN
Other:
- No other serious disabling diseases contraindicating primary cytoreductive surgery or primary platin-based chemotherapy
- No other prior primary malignancies except carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
- No psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition potentially preventing protocol compliance or follow-up
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- Not specified
Endocrine therapy
- Not specified
Radiotherapy
- Not specified
Surgery
- No other prior procedures except diagnostic biopsy by laparotomy or laparoscopy
Trial locations and contacts
65 sites in 15 countries.
65 sites in 15 countries
Canada12 sites
Tom Baker Cancer Centre - Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
CHUS-Hopital Fleurimont
Fleurimont, Quebec, J1H 5N4
Hopital Charles Lemoyne
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1
Nova Scotia Cancer Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7
Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9
McGill Cancer Centre at McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6
Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM
Montreal, Quebec, H4L 2M1
Saint John Regional Hospital
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2
Doctor H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3V6
BCCA - Fraser Valley Cancer Centre
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2
British Columbia Cancer Agency - Vancouver Cancer Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
United Kingdom10 sites
Royal United Hospital
Bath, England, BA1 3NG
Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham, England, GL53 7AN
Western Infirmary
Glasgow, Scotland, G11 6NT
University College of London Hospitals
London, England, WIT 3AA
Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital
Margate, CT9 4AN
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology NHS Trust
Merseyside, England, CH63 4JY
James Cook University Hospital
Middlesbrough, England, TS4 3BW
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital
Northwood, England, HA6 2RN
Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust
Nottingham, England, NG5 1PB
Staffordshire General Hospital
Stafford, England, ST16 3SA
Netherlands8 sites
Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, 1007 MB
Akademisch Ziekenhuis Vrije Universiteit - Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, 1091 HA
Academisch Medisch Centrum at University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, 2300 CA
Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud - Nijmegen
Nijmegen, NL-6500 HB
Daniel Den Hoed Cancer Center at Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, 3008 AE
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital
Rotterdam, 3015 GJ
Italy5 sites
Spedali Civili di Brescia
Brescia, 25124
Mirano General Hospital
Mirano-Venice, 30035
Libero Istituto Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
Rome, 00155
Azienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano
Torino, 10128
Clinica Universitaria
Turin, 10138
Austria4 sites
Karl-Franzens-University Graz
Graz, A-8010
Innsbruck Universitaetsklinik
Innsbruck, A-6020
Allgemeines Krankenhaus - Universitatskliniken
Vienna, A-1090
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Applied Cancer Research at Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital
Vienna, A-1100
Belgium4 sites
Academisch Ziekenhuis der Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Brussels, 1090
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Edegem, B-2650
Cazk Groeninghe - Campus Maria's Voorzienigheid
Kortrijk, B-8500
U.Z. Gasthuisberg
Leuven, B-3000
France4 sites
Institut Bergonie
Bordeaux, 33076
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, 59020
Centre Hospitalier Regional et Universitaire de Lille
Lille, 59037
Institut Claudius Regaud
Toulouse, 31052
Spain4 sites
Institut d'Oncologia Corachan
Barcelona, 08.017
Hospital Universitario San Carlos
Madrid, 28040
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, 33006
Sweden4 sites
Lund University Hospital
Lund, SE-22185
Karolinska University Hospital - Huddinge
Stockholm, S - 141 86
Umea Universitet
Umeå, SE-901 87
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, SE-75185
Argentina2 sites
Hospital de Clinicas "Jose De San Martin"
Buenos Aires, 1120
Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Buenos Aires, 1120
Ireland2 sites
Coombe Women's Hospital
Dublin, 8
St. James's Hospital
Dublin, 8
Norway2 sites
Haukeland Hospital - University of Bergen
Bergen, N-5021
Norwegian Radium Hospital
Oslo, N-0310
Portugal2 sites
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC)
Coimbra, 3049
Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Francisco Gentil - Centro Regional de Oncologia de Lisboa, S.A.
Lisbon, 1099-023 Codex
Denmark1 site
Herlev Hospital - University Hospital of Copenhagen
Copenhagen, DK-2730
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Upfront Debulking Surgery Versus Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage IIIC or IV Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining surgery with chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether chemotherapy before surgery is more effective than chemotherapy after surgery in treating ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying chemotherapy given before surgery to see how well it works compared to chemotherapy given after surgery with or without additional surgery in treating patients with stage III or stage IV ovarian cancer, peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with stage IIIC or IV ovarian epithelial, peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery versus upfront cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy with or without interval debulking surgery.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the different treatment complications in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, method of biopsy, stage, largest tumor size before surgery, and intent to also randomize on EORTC-55012. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo upfront maximal cytoreductive surgery followed by cisplatin or carboplatin IV every 3 weeks for 3 courses. Patients with non-optimal primary debulking may undergo interval debulking surgery at the physician's discretion. All patients then receive an additional 3 courses of the same regimen of chemotherapy.
- Arm II: Patients receive chemotherapy as in arm I. Patients with stable or responding disease undergo interval debulking surgery followed by an additional 3 courses of the same regimen of chemotherapy.
Second-look surgery is allowed for both arms if clinically indicated.
Quality of life (QOL) is assessed prior to treatment, after the third and sixth course of chemotherapy, and at 6 and 12 months after study. Patients who are also randomized on EORTC-55012 follow the QOL assessment schedule for EORTC-55012 only.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 704 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years.
- Being tested
- carboplatin, cisplatin, conventional surgery, neoadjuvant therapy
- Keywords
- stage III ovarian epithelial cancer, stage IV ovarian epithelial cancer, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cavity cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Fallopian Tube Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
carboplatinDrug
cisplatinDrug
conventional surgeryProcedure or surgery
neoadjuvant therapyProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival as measured by Kaplan Meier every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually
Secondary outcomes (3)
Progression-free survival as measured by Kaplan Meier and RECIST every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually
Health-related quality of life as measured by Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 after courses 1, 3 and 6, then at 6 and 12 months
Toxicity as measured by NCIC Common Toxicity Criteria v2.0 within 4 weeks of surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startSep 1998
- Primary completionJan 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Fallopian Tube CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 704 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ignace B. Vergote, MD, PhD, Study chair, U.Z. Gasthuisberg, Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003636
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EORTC-55971
- Other IDs
- EORTC-55971
- Status last verified
- Aug 2013
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2015
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Chi DS, Musa F, Dao F, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM, Levine DA, Gardner GJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jan;124(1):10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
PubMed 21917306Verleye L, Ottevanger PB, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, van der Burg ME, Reed NS, Verheijen RH, Gaarenstroom KN, Mosgaard B, Seoane JM, van der Velden J, Lotocki R, van der Graaf W, Penninckx B, Coens C, Stuart G, Vergote I. Quality of pathology reports for advanced ovarian cancer: are we missing essential information? An audit of 479 pathology reports from the EORTC-GCG 55971/NCIC-CTG OV13 neoadjuvant trial. Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jan;47(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.08.008. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
PubMed 20850296Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, Verheijen RH, van der Burg ME, Lacave AJ, Panici PB, Kenter GG, Casado A, Mendiola C, Coens C, Verleye L, Stuart GC, Pecorelli S, Reed NS; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group; NCIC Clinical Trials Group. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 2;363(10):943-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908806.
PubMed 20818904Fruehauf JP, Yu I, Parker R: In vitro drug response and biomarker profiles for ovarian cancer specimens obtained at initial debulking or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (EORTC 55971). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-2177, 2002.
Tajik P, van de Vrie R, Zafarmand MH, Coens C, Buist MR, Vergote I, Bossuyt PMM, Kenter GG. The FIGO Stage IVA Versus IVB of Ovarian Cancer: Prognostic Value and Predictive Value for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Mar;28(3):453-458. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001186.
PubMed 29324537Vizzielli G, Fanfani F, Chiantera V, Tortorella L, Lucidi A, Petrillo M, Costantini B, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Does the diagnosis center influence the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Anticancer Res. 2015 May;35(5):3027-32.
PubMed 25964591van Meurs HS, Tajik P, Hof MH, Vergote I, Kenter GG, Mol BW, Buist MR, Bossuyt PM. Which patients benefit most from primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer? An exploratory analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 55971 randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
PubMed 23850170
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Upfront Debulking Surgery Versus Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage IIIC or IV Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00003636
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EORTC-55971
- Keywords
- stage III ovarian epithelial cancer, stage IV ovarian epithelial cancer, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cavity cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 704 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCResearch network
- Study start
- Sep 1998
- Primary completion
- Jan 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining surgery with chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether chemotherapy before surgery is more effective than chemotherapy after surgery in treating ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying chemotherapy given before surgery to see how well it works compared to chemotherapy given after surgery with or without additional surgery in treating patients with stage III or stage IV ovarian cancer, peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with stage IIIC or IV ovarian epithelial, peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery versus upfront cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy with or without interval debulking surgery.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the different treatment complications in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, method of biopsy, stage, largest tumor size before surgery, and intent to also randomize on EORTC-55012. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo upfront maximal cytoreductive surgery followed by cisplatin or carboplatin IV every 3 weeks for 3 courses. Patients with non-optimal primary debulking may undergo interval debulking surgery at the physician's discretion. All patients then receive an additional 3 courses of the same regimen of chemotherapy.
- Arm II: Patients receive chemotherapy as in arm I. Patients with stable or responding disease undergo interval debulking surgery followed by an additional 3 courses of the same regimen of chemotherapy.
Second-look surgery is allowed for both arms if clinically indicated.
Quality of life (QOL) is assessed prior to treatment, after the third and sixth course of chemotherapy, and at 6 and 12 months after study. Patients who are also randomized on EORTC-55012 follow the QOL assessment schedule for EORTC-55012 only.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 704 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| carboplatin | Drug | – |
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| conventional surgery | Procedure or surgery | – |
| neoadjuvant therapy | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Overall survival as measured by Kaplan Meier every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually
3 secondary outcomes
Progression-free survival as measured by Kaplan Meier and RECIST every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually
Health-related quality of life as measured by Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 after courses 1, 3 and 6, then at 6 and 12 months
Toxicity as measured by NCIC Common Toxicity Criteria v2.0 within 4 weeks of surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2015.
- Background: PubMed 21917306Chi DS, Musa F, Dao F, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM, Levine DA, Gardner GJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jan;124(1):10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 20850296Verleye L, Ottevanger PB, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, van der Burg ME, Reed NS, Verheijen RH, Gaarenstroom KN, Mosgaard B, Seoane JM, van der Velden J, Lotocki R, van der Graaf W, Penninckx B, Coens C, Stuart G, Vergote I. Quality of pathology reports for advanced ovarian cancer: are we missing essential information? An audit of 479 pathology reports from the EORTC-GCG 55971/NCIC-CTG OV13 neoadjuvant trial. Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jan;47(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.08.008. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 20818904Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, Verheijen RH, van der Burg ME, Lacave AJ, Panici PB, Kenter GG, Casado A, Mendiola C, Coens C, Verleye L, Stuart GC, Pecorelli S, Reed NS; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group; NCIC Clinical Trials Group. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 2;363(10):943-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908806.
- Results publicationFruehauf JP, Yu I, Parker R: In vitro drug response and biomarker profiles for ovarian cancer specimens obtained at initial debulking or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (EORTC 55971). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-2177, 2002.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29324537Tajik P, van de Vrie R, Zafarmand MH, Coens C, Buist MR, Vergote I, Bossuyt PMM, Kenter GG. The FIGO Stage IVA Versus IVB of Ovarian Cancer: Prognostic Value and Predictive Value for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Mar;28(3):453-458. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001186.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25964591Vizzielli G, Fanfani F, Chiantera V, Tortorella L, Lucidi A, Petrillo M, Costantini B, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Does the diagnosis center influence the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Anticancer Res. 2015 May;35(5):3027-32.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23850170van Meurs HS, Tajik P, Hof MH, Vergote I, Kenter GG, Mol BW, Buist MR, Bossuyt PM. Which patients benefit most from primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer? An exploratory analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 55971 randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
Related trials for Fallopian Tube Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Surgery and Chemotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy After Surgery in Treating Patients With Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Uterine, or Peritoneal Cancer
FIGO Stage IVA Ovarian Cancer, FIGO Stage IVB Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of Raludotatug Deruxtecan (R-DXd) in Subjects With Platinum-resistant, High-grade Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer
Solid Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Hydrochloride With Atezolizumab and/or Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
Fallopian Tube High Grade Serous Adenocarcinoma, Ovarian High Grade Serous Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Targeted Therapy Directed by Genetic Testing in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Advanced Solid Tumors, The ComboMATCH Screening Trial
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8
RecruitingObservational study
Radiotherapy for Gynecologic Cancer With Up to 10 Active Metastatic Lesions
Cervical Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ignace B. Vergote, MD, PhD study chair
U.Z. Gasthuisberg, Leuven
65 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing carboplatin, cisplatin and conventional surgery in people with Fallopian Tube Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 65 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 65 sites in Canada, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Austria and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival as measured by Kaplan Meier every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00003636, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2015.