Esophageal CancerNCT00004867
Positron Emission Tomography in Determining Stage of Esophageal Cancer
A study testing conventional surgery, positron emission tomography and radionuclide imaging in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 35 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Imaging procedures such as positron emission tomography may improve the ability to determine the stage of esophageal cancer. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography determines tumor stage in patients with esophageal cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- conventional surgery, positron emission tomography and radionuclide imaging
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 235 participants
- Where
- 35 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 1999to Jan 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient must be ≥ 18 years of age.
- Patient must have histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (greater than or equal to 20 cm from incisors) or gastroesophageal junction. (Pathology report must be submitted).
- Patient must be deemed medically fit for surgical staging procedures and esophagectomy following the thoracic surgeon's evaluation of general medical fitness.
- Patient's clinical staging data (clinical examination, laboratory tests, and standard radiological staging assessments) must be obtained within 60 days prior to registration and must suggest that the tumor is potentially resectable, including tumors staged T1-3, N0-1, M0.
- Patient must be able to tolerate FDG-PET scan (e.g., not claustrophobic and able to lie supine for 1.5 hrs).
- Female patient of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to FDG-PET.
Show all 14Show fewer
- NOTE: Pregnancy test is required to avoid unnecessary fetal radiation exposure and because the use of furosemide is contraindicated in pregnancy.
- Patient or the patient's legally acceptable representative must provide a signed and dated written informed consent prior to registration and any study related procedures.
- Patient must provide written authorization to allow the use and disclosure of their protected health information.
- NOTE: This may be obtained in either the study-specific informed consent or in a separate authorization form and must be obtained from the patient prior to study pre-registration.
- A cancer survivor is eligible provided that ALL of the following criteria are met and documented:
- the patient has undergone potentially curative therapy for all prior malignancies and
- there has been no evidence of any prior malignancies for at least five years (except for completely resected cervical or non-melanoma skin cancer) and
- the patient is deemed by their treating physician to be at low risk for recurrence from prior malignancies.
Who cannot join
- Patient has proximal esophageal cancer (less than 20 cm from incisors) potentially requiring pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy.
- Patient has unresectable lesions (stage M1b, with biopsy confirmation of distant metastatic disease; or those with unresectable locoregional invasion, T4 Nx Mx).
- Patient has evidence of metastatic disease.
- NOTE: Obvious metastasis that is based on clinical evaluation includes any or all of the following: positive cytology of pleura, pericardium, or peritoneum; metastasis to brain, bone, lung, liver, or adrenals; positive biopsy or cytology of metastasis to supraclavicular lymph nodes; and involvement of the tracheobronchial tree (positive bronchoscopic biopsy or overt esophago-respiratory fistula).
- Patient has had a prior FDG-PET scan for evaluation of their esophageal cancer.
- Patient has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, as evidenced by a fasting blood glucose value >200 mg/dL, within 12 hours of FDG-PET scan.
- Patient has received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy PRIOR to FDG-PET scan being performed.
Trial locations and contacts
35 sites in 1 country.
35 sites in 1 country
United States35 sites
McDowell Cancer Center at Akron General Medical Center
Akron, Ohio, 44302
University of Colorado Cancer Center at University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80010
Greenebaum Cancer Center at University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Cancer Center at Greater Baltimore Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204
Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-3300
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Hollings Cancer Center at Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Bethesda North Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Tri-Health Good Samaritan Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 90027
Morton Plant Hospital
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Westmoreland Regional Hospital
Greensburg, Pennsylvania, 15601-2282
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781
University of Tennessee, Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee, 38163
Mobile Infirmary Medical Center
Mobile, Alabama, 36640-0460
University of South Alabama Cancer Research Institute
Mobile, Alabama, 36688
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Tennessee Valley Healthcare System - Nashville Campus
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center at Vanderbilt Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6838
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212-4772
Western Pennsylvania Cancer Institute at Western Pennsylvania Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
St. Clair Memorial Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15243-1899
Providence Cancer Center at Providence Portland Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97213-2967
Massey Cancer Center at Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298-0037
William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
LDS Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84143
UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
Swedish Cancer Institute at Swedish Medical Center - First Hill Campus
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stanford Cancer Center at Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305-5407
SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital
Syracuse, New York, 13210
About this study
Official title: The Utility of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Staging of Patients With Potentially Operable Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus
RATIONALE: Imaging procedures such as positron emission tomography may improve the ability to determine the stage of esophageal cancer.
PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography determines tumor stage in patients with esophageal cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary Objective:
To evaluate whether FDG-PET imaging can detect lesions that would preclude surgery (esophagectomy) in patients found to be surgical candidates by standard imaging procedures.
Secondary Objective:
To use the collected data to generate hypotheses to be used in future studies, such as which types of previously undetected lesions FDG-PET imaging is best able to identify.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Being tested
- conventional surgery, positron emission tomography, radionuclide imaging, fludeoxyglucose F 18, chemotherapy
- Keywords
- stage I esophageal cancer, stage II esophageal cancer, stage III esophageal cancer, stage IV esophageal cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
conventional surgeryProcedure or surgery
positron emission tomographyProcedure or surgery
radionuclide imagingProcedure or surgery
fludeoxyglucose F 18Radiation
chemotherapyDrug
RadiotherapyRadiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FDG-PET scan +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery | Experimental | Patients receive fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG) IV followed 45-60 minutes later by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Confirmatory studies, such as biopsy or other imaging studies, are then conducted to confirm the FDG PET imaging results. Patients with no metastases identified by FDG PET imaging may undergo esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy within 1 month of evaluation.
Patients are followed within 6 months after surgery. Receives: Procedure: conventional surgery; Procedure: positron emission tomography; Procedure: radionuclide imaging; Radiation: fludeoxyglucose F 18; Drug: chemotherapy; Radiation: Radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of these patients with FDG-PET findings that contraindicate surgery
Measured: Up to 1 month post-FDG-PET scan
Secondary outcomes (1)
The proportion of false positive lesions found by FDG-PET.
Measured: Up to 6 months post-surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startNov 1999
- Primary completionJul 2005
- Study completionJan 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 235 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bryan F. Meyers, MD, MPH, Study chair, Washington University Siteman Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00004867
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACOSOG-Z0060
- Other IDs
- CDR0000067526
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 7 Mar 2000
- Last updated
- 24 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Veeramachaneni NK, Zoole JB, Decker PA, Putnam JB Jr, Meyers BF; American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 Trial. Lymph node analysis in esophageal resection: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Aug;86(2):418-21; discussion 421. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.043.
PubMed 18640307
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Utility of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Staging of Patients With Potentially Operable Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00004867
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACOSOG-Z0060
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Keywords
- stage I esophageal cancer, stage II esophageal cancer, stage III esophageal cancer, stage IV esophageal cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 235 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Nov 1999
- Primary completion
- Jul 2005 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Imaging procedures such as positron emission tomography may improve the ability to determine the stage of esophageal cancer.
PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography determines tumor stage in patients with esophageal cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary Objective:
To evaluate whether FDG-PET imaging can detect lesions that would preclude surgery (esophagectomy) in patients found to be surgical candidates by standard imaging procedures.
Secondary Objective:
To use the collected data to generate hypotheses to be used in future studies, such as which types of previously undetected lesions FDG-PET imaging is best able to identify.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FDG-PET scan +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery | Experimental | Procedure: conventional surgery, Procedure: positron emission tomography, Procedure: radionuclide imaging, Radiation: fludeoxyglucose F 18, Drug: chemotherapy, Radiation: RadiotherapyPatients receive fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG) IV followed 45-60 minutes later by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Confirmatory studies, such as biopsy or other imaging studies, are then conducted to confirm the FDG PET imaging results. Patients with no metastases identified by FDG PET imaging may undergo esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy within 1 month of evaluation. Patients are followed within 6 months after surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Patient must be ≥ 18 years of age.
- Patient must have histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (greater than or equal to 20 cm from incisors) or gastroesophageal junction. (Pathology report must be submitted).
- Patient must be deemed medically fit for surgical staging procedures and esophagectomy following the thoracic surgeon's evaluation of general medical fitness.
- Patient's clinical staging data (clinical examination, laboratory tests, and standard radiological staging assessments) must be obtained within 60 days prior to registration and must suggest that the tumor is potentially resectable, including tumors staged T1-3, N0-1, M0.
- Patient must be able to tolerate FDG-PET scan (e.g., not claustrophobic and able to lie supine for 1.5 hrs).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient has proximal esophageal cancer (less than 20 cm from incisors) potentially requiring pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy.
- Patient has unresectable lesions (stage M1b, with biopsy confirmation of distant metastatic disease; or those with unresectable locoregional invasion, T4 Nx Mx).
- Patient has evidence of metastatic disease.
- Patient has had a prior FDG-PET scan for evaluation of their esophageal cancer.
- Patient has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, as evidenced by a fasting blood glucose value >200 mg/dL, within 12 hours of FDG-PET scan.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| conventional surgery | Procedure or surgery | FDG-PET scan +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery |
| positron emission tomography | Procedure or surgery | FDG-PET scan +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery |
| radionuclide imaging | Procedure or surgery | FDG-PET scan +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery |
| fludeoxyglucose F 18 | Radiation | FDG-PET scan +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery |
| chemotherapy | Drug | FDG-PET scan +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery |
| Radiotherapy | Radiation | FDG-PET scan +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery |
Primary outcome
Proportion of these patients with FDG-PET findings that contraindicate surgery
Time frame: Up to 1 month post-FDG-PET scan
1 secondary outcome
The proportion of false positive lesions found by FDG-PET.
Time frame: Up to 6 months post-surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jan 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 18640307Veeramachaneni NK, Zoole JB, Decker PA, Putnam JB Jr, Meyers BF; American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 Trial. Lymph node analysis in esophageal resection: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Aug;86(2):418-21; discussion 421. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.043.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bryan F. Meyers, MD, MPH study chair
Washington University Siteman Cancer Center
35 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing conventional surgery, positron emission tomography and radionuclide imaging in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 35 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 35 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of these patients with FDG-PET findings that contraindicate surgery (time frame: Up to 1 month post-FDG-PET scan). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00004867, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2017.