Fallopian Tube CancerPhase 3NCT00004934
Paclitaxel and Carboplatin With or Without Epirubicin in Treating Patients With Stage IIB, Stage III, or Stage IV Invasive Ovarian Epithelial, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing carboplatin, epirubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel in people with Fallopian Tube Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, run by Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology - Clinical Trials Unit at 18 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin with epirubicin is more effective than paclitaxel and carboplatin alone for ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Fallopian Tube Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer
- What is being tested?
- carboplatin, epirubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 18 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 1999to May 2003
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically proven stage IIB, III, or IV invasive ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer
- No symptomatic brain metastasis
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 18 and over
Performance status:
- WHO/ECOG 0-2
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- WBC at least 3,000/mm^3
- Neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm^3
- Platelet count at least 100,000/mm^3
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin no greater than 2 times upper limit of normal
Renal:
- Glomerular filtration rate at least 50 mL/min
Cardiovascular:
- No ventricular arrhythmia (LOWN class II or worse)
- No myocardial infarction within the past year
- No severe or uncontrolled hypertension
- No history of congestive heart disease (no New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease) even if medically controlled
- LVEF at least 50%
Other:
- No other primary malignancies except carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell skin cancer
- No worse than grade I preexisting motor or sensory neurologic pathology or symptoms
- No active infection or other serious underlying medical condition that would prevent compliance
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- No prior chemotherapy
- No other concurrent antineoplastic agents
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- No prior radiotherapy
Surgery:
- Not specified
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 10 countries.
18 sites in 10 countries
Canada5 sites
Tom Baker Cancer Center - Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
CHUS-Hopital Fleurimont
Fleurimont, Quebec, J1H 5N4
Cancer Care Ontario-Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
Italy3 sites
Spedali Civili
Brescia, 25123
Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori
Milano (Milan), 20133
Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi
Varese, 21100
Denmark2 sites
Aalborg Hospital
Aalborg, 9100
Odense University Hospital
Odense, DK-5000
Portugal2 sites
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC)
Coimbra, 3049
Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Francisco Gentil - Centro de Lisboa
Lisbon, 1099-023 Codex
United States1 site
St. Mary's/Duluth Clinic Cancer Center
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel/Epirubicin/Carboplatin Combination (TEC) Versus Paclitaxel/Carboplatin (TC) in the Treatment of Women With Advanced Ovarian Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin with epirubicin is more effective than paclitaxel and carboplatin alone for ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without epirubicin in treating patients who have stage IIB, stage III, or stage IV invasive ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare progression free survival and overall survival in patients with stage IIB, III, or IV invasive ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without epirubicin.
- Compare the toxicity of these 2 regimens in these patients.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these 2 regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by center and type of surgery (delayed surgery: 3 courses of chemotherapy before surgery vs primary surgery: optimally debulked stage IIB or III [residual tumor less than 1 cm] vs primary surgery: suboptimally debulked stage IV [residual tumor 1 cm or greater]).
Surgery
- Patients are assigned to one of two surgery groups:
- Group A: Patients undergo primary surgery comprised of hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), omentectomy, and resection of all tumor masses, if possible, before beginning chemotherapy. Patients with residual disease greater than 1 cm after completion of primary surgery receive 3 courses of chemotherapy, followed within 6 weeks by interval debulking surgery, followed within 3 weeks by the fourth course of chemotherapy.
- Group B: Patients undergo delayed surgery comprised of hysterectomy, BSO, omentectomy, and resection of all tumor masses, if possible, after completion of 3 courses of chemotherapy.
Chemotherapy
- Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 chemotherapy arms:
- Arm I: Patients receive epirubicin IV over 15-20 minutes, paclitaxel IV over 3 hours, and carboplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 6 courses. Patients with residual tumor after completion of 6 courses may receive 3 additional courses.
- Arm II: Patients receive paclitaxel and carboplatin as above but no epirubicin. Quality of life is assessed before beginning study, after completion of courses 3, 6, and 9 (if applicable), and then at 6 and 12 months after completion of study treatment.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 800 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Being tested
- carboplatin, epirubicin hydrochloride, paclitaxel, conventional surgery
- Keywords
- stage II ovarian epithelial cancer, stage III ovarian epithelial cancer, stage IV ovarian epithelial cancer, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cavity cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Fallopian Tube Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
carboplatinDrug
epirubicin hydrochlorideDrug
paclitaxelDrug
conventional surgeryProcedure or surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startAug 1999
- Study completionMay 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Fallopian Tube CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology - Clinical Trials Unit
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC, NCIC Clinical Trials Group
- Investigators
- Gunnar B. Kristensen, MD, PhD, Study chair, Norwegian Radium HospitalIgnace B. Vergote, MD, PhD, Study chair, University Hospital, GasthuisbergGavin C.E. Stuart, MD, Study chair, Tom Baker Cancer Centre - Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00004934
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000067620
- Other IDs
- NSGO-OC9804, CAN-NCIC-OV14, EORTC-55981
- Status last verified
- May 2003
- First submitted
- 7 Mar 2000
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Kristensen GB, Vergote I, Stuart G, Del Campo JM, Kaern J, Lopez AB, Eisenhauer E, Aavall-Lundquist E, Ridderheim M, Havsteen H, Mirza MR, Scheistroen M, Vrdoljak E. First-line treatment of ovarian cancer FIGO stages IIb-IV with paclitaxel/epirubicin/carboplatin versus paclitaxel/carboplatin. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 Nov-Dec;13 Suppl 2:172-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2003.13363.x.
PubMed 14656276Kristensen G, Vergote I, Stuart G, et al.: First line treatment of ovarian cancer FIGO stages IIb-IV with paclitaxel/epirubicin/carboplatin (TEC) vs. paclitaxel/carboplatin (TC). Interim results of an NSGO-EORTC-NCIC CTG Gynecological Cancer Intergroup phase III trial. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-805, 2002.
Lindemann K, Christensen RD, Vergote I, Stuart G, Izquierdo MA, Kaern J, Havsteen H, Eisenhauer E, Ridderheim M, Lopez AB, Hirte H, Aavall-Lundquvist E, Vrdoljak E, Green J, Kristensen GB. First-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without epirubicin (TEC versus TC)--a gynecologic cancer intergroup study of the NSGO, EORTC GCG and NCIC CTG. Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct;23(10):2613-2619. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds060. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
PubMed 22539562Kristensen GB, Vergote I, Stuart G, et al.: First-line treatment of ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer FIGO stage IIB-IV with paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without epirubicin (TEC vs TC). A gynecologic cancer intergroup study of the NSGO, EORTC GCG, and NCIC CTG. Results on progression-free survival. [Abstract] Int J Gynecol Cancer 15 (Suppl 3): 221, 2005.
Kristensen GB, Vergote I, Eisenhauer E, et al.: First line treatment of ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer FIGO stage IIb-IV with paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without epirubicin (TEC vs TC). A Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup study of the NSGO, EORTC GCG, and NCIC CTG. Results on progression free survival. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 22 (Suppl 14): A-5003, 449s, 2004.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel/Epirubicin/Carboplatin Combination (TEC) Versus Paclitaxel/Carboplatin (TC) in the Treatment of Women With Advanced Ovarian Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00004934
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000067620
- Keywords
- stage II ovarian epithelial cancer, stage III ovarian epithelial cancer, stage IV ovarian epithelial cancer, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cavity cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology - Clinical Trials UnitUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC, NCIC Clinical Trials Group
- Study start
- Aug 1999
- Study completion
- May 2003 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin with epirubicin is more effective than paclitaxel and carboplatin alone for ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without epirubicin in treating patients who have stage IIB, stage III, or stage IV invasive ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare progression free survival and overall survival in patients with stage IIB, III, or IV invasive ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without epirubicin.
- Compare the toxicity of these 2 regimens in these patients.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these 2 regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by center and type of surgery (delayed surgery: 3 courses of chemotherapy before surgery vs primary surgery: optimally debulked stage IIB or III [residual tumor less than 1 cm] vs primary surgery: suboptimally debulked stage IV [residual tumor 1 cm or greater]).
Surgery
- Patients are assigned to one of two surgery groups:
- Group A: Patients undergo primary surgery comprised of hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), omentectomy, and resection of all tumor masses, if possible, before beginning chemotherapy. Patients with residual disease greater than 1 cm after completion of primary surgery receive 3 courses of chemotherapy, followed within 6 weeks by interval debulking surgery, followed within 3 weeks by the fourth course of chemotherapy.
- Group B: Patients undergo delayed surgery comprised of hysterectomy, BSO, omentectomy, and resection of all tumor masses, if possible, after completion of 3 courses of chemotherapy.
Chemotherapy
- Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 chemotherapy arms:
- Arm I: Patients receive epirubicin IV over 15-20 minutes, paclitaxel IV over 3 hours, and carboplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 6 courses. Patients with residual tumor after completion of 6 courses may receive 3 additional courses.
- Arm II: Patients receive paclitaxel and carboplatin as above but no epirubicin. Quality of life is assessed before beginning study, after completion of courses 3, 6, and 9 (if applicable), and then at 6 and 12 months after completion of study treatment.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 800 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| carboplatin | Drug | – |
| epirubicin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| paclitaxel | Drug | – |
| conventional surgery | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 14656276Kristensen GB, Vergote I, Stuart G, Del Campo JM, Kaern J, Lopez AB, Eisenhauer E, Aavall-Lundquist E, Ridderheim M, Havsteen H, Mirza MR, Scheistroen M, Vrdoljak E. First-line treatment of ovarian cancer FIGO stages IIb-IV with paclitaxel/epirubicin/carboplatin versus paclitaxel/carboplatin. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 Nov-Dec;13 Suppl 2:172-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2003.13363.x.
- Results publicationKristensen G, Vergote I, Stuart G, et al.: First line treatment of ovarian cancer FIGO stages IIb-IV with paclitaxel/epirubicin/carboplatin (TEC) vs. paclitaxel/carboplatin (TC). Interim results of an NSGO-EORTC-NCIC CTG Gynecological Cancer Intergroup phase III trial. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-805, 2002.
- Results publication: PubMed 22539562Lindemann K, Christensen RD, Vergote I, Stuart G, Izquierdo MA, Kaern J, Havsteen H, Eisenhauer E, Ridderheim M, Lopez AB, Hirte H, Aavall-Lundquvist E, Vrdoljak E, Green J, Kristensen GB. First-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without epirubicin (TEC versus TC)--a gynecologic cancer intergroup study of the NSGO, EORTC GCG and NCIC CTG. Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct;23(10):2613-2619. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds060. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
- Results publicationKristensen GB, Vergote I, Stuart G, et al.: First-line treatment of ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer FIGO stage IIB-IV with paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without epirubicin (TEC vs TC). A gynecologic cancer intergroup study of the NSGO, EORTC GCG, and NCIC CTG. Results on progression-free survival. [Abstract] Int J Gynecol Cancer 15 (Suppl 3): 221, 2005.
- Results publicationKristensen GB, Vergote I, Eisenhauer E, et al.: First line treatment of ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer FIGO stage IIb-IV with paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without epirubicin (TEC vs TC). A Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup study of the NSGO, EORTC GCG, and NCIC CTG. Results on progression free survival. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 22 (Suppl 14): A-5003, 449s, 2004.
Related trials for Fallopian Tube Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Investigation of Ubamatamab Combination Therapy in Adult Participants With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Torvutatug Samrotecan Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Maintenance in Non-Homologous Recombination Deficiency (Non-HRD) Positive Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Clonal Hematopoiesis and Therapy-Emergent Myeloid Neoplasms in Patients With Cancers, CHANCES Study
Recurrent Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Sacituzumab Govitecan With Bevacizumab Compared to Usual Chemotherapy (Carboplatin, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin and Bevacizumab) for Treating Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer After PARP Inhibitor Maintenance Therapy
Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Fallopian Tube Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma, Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Fallopian Tube High Grade Serous Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gunnar B. Kristensen, MD, PhD study chair
Norwegian Radium Hospital
Ignace B. Vergote, MD, PhD study chair
University Hospital, Gasthuisberg
Gavin C.E. Stuart, MD study chair
Tom Baker Cancer Centre - Calgary
18 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing carboplatin, epirubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel in people with Fallopian Tube Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, run by Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology - Clinical Trials Unit at 18 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in Canada, Italy, Denmark, Portugal, United States and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00004934, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2013.