Lung DiseasesNCT00005422
Longitudinal Analysis of Spirometry in Black Children
An observational study of Lung Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Trial summary
To conduct a longitudinal investigation of early childhood lower respiratory illness (LRI) and patterns of lung growth using an existing electronic dataset generated by an 18-year study (1972-1990) of a population of 102 Black children followed from birth at the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 100 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Diseases
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 1992to Mar 1995
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 100 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
No eligibility criteria
About this study
To conduct a longitudinal investigation of early childhood lower respiratory illness (LRI) and patterns of lung growth using an existing electronic dataset generated by an 18-year study (1972-1990) of a population of 102 Black children followed from birth at the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
The study should improve knowledge of the patterns of functional lung development during childhood and factors that influence both relative level and growth rate of lung function in Black children and should offer new understanding of the predictive value of spirometric tests of lung function performed at an early age.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The study used a previously existing database which was of unique value because it included comprehensive respiratory illness data collected on-site during the children's tenure in the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center's daycare facility and spirometric data collected longitudinally from three to 13 years of age. Furthermore, the measurements were for children in a racial group for whom limited cross-sectional or longitudinal spirometric data were available.
The longitudinal analyses had two primary objectives. The first was to characterize patterns of functional lung development in Black children from three to 13 years of age and relate these patterns to potentially influential factors such as (a) wheezing and non-wheezing associated LRI experience during the infant (ages 0 to two) and preschool (ages two to five) years, (b) ages of occurrence of first and subsequent LRI episodes, and (c) respiratory syncytial virus etiology of LRI. Potentially confounding factors included prenatal and childhood exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and allergies. The second objective was to determine the degree to which spirometric parameters 'track' for individual children and for populations of children over the interval from three to 13 years of age. This objective required assessment of the degree to which spirometric evaluations during the preschool years were predictive of later lung function.
The statistical analyses for achieving these objectives used recently developed statistical methods based on the general linear mixed model. By design, these methods for longitudinal data handled unbalanced data with missing values, incorporated time-varying covariates, and provided more exactly the extent to which the level of lung function of individual children was maintained relative to that of other study children and determined the value of preschool spirometric measurements as predictors of levels of spirometric performance during later childhood and adolescence. These analyses utilized methods developed by Stewart, Pekow, Burchinal, and Helms in 1991 that were unique in that they were designed to handle incomplete, inconsistently-timed data as well as complete, balanced data.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.
- Conditions
- Lung Diseases
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Diseases
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Study startApr 1992
- Study completionMar 1995
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005422
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4340
- Other IDs
- R03HL048400
- Status last verified
- Jun 2000
- First submitted
- 25 May 2000
- Last updated
- 13 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Longitudinal Analysis of Spirometry in Black Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00005422
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4340
- Conditions
- Lung Diseases
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Apr 1992
- Study completion
- Mar 1995 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2000 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To conduct a longitudinal investigation of early childhood lower respiratory illness (LRI) and patterns of lung growth using an existing electronic dataset generated by an 18-year study (1972-1990) of a population of 102 Black children followed from birth at the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
The study should improve knowledge of the patterns of functional lung development during childhood and factors that influence both relative level and growth rate of lung function in Black children and should offer new understanding of the predictive value of spirometric tests of lung function performed at an early age.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The study used a previously existing database which was of unique value because it included comprehensive respiratory illness data collected on-site during the children's tenure in the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center's daycare facility and spirometric data collected longitudinally from three to 13 years of age. Furthermore, the measurements were for children in a racial group for whom limited cross-sectional or longitudinal spirometric data were available.
The longitudinal analyses had two primary objectives. The first was to characterize patterns of functional lung development in Black children from three to 13 years of age and relate these patterns to potentially influential factors such as (a) wheezing and non-wheezing associated LRI experience during the infant (ages 0 to two) and preschool (ages two to five) years, (b) ages of occurrence of first and subsequent LRI episodes, and (c) respiratory syncytial virus etiology of LRI. Potentially confounding factors included prenatal and childhood exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and allergies. The second objective was to determine the degree to which spirometric parameters 'track' for individual children and for populations of children over the interval from three to 13 years of age. This objective required assessment of the degree to which spirometric evaluations during the preschool years were predictive of later lung function.
The statistical analyses for achieving these objectives used recently developed statistical methods based on the general linear mixed model. By design, these methods for longitudinal data handled unbalanced data with missing values, incorporated time-varying covariates, and provided more exactly the extent to which the level of lung function of individual children was maintained relative to that of other study children and determined the value of preschool spirometric measurements as predictors of levels of spirometric performance during later childhood and adolescence. These analyses utilized methods developed by Stewart, Pekow, Burchinal, and Helms in 1991 that were unique in that they were designed to handle incomplete, inconsistently-timed data as well as complete, balanced data.
The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.
Study design
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 100 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2016.
Related trials for Lung Diseases
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Adult Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Testing the Safety of Dapagliflozin Prior to Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma
Lung Adenocarcinoma, Stage IA1 Lung Cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) v8
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Screening for Hematology Branch Protocols
Hematologic Disease and Disorders, Donors
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation for NCI Surgery Branch Clinical Research Protocols
Synovial Cell Cancer, Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046054/SGN-PDL1V Versus Docetaxel in Adult Participants With Previously-Treated Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Non-small Cell Carcinoma, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Diseases, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2016.