NeuroblastomaPhase 2NCT00017368
Combination Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Children With Newly Diagnosed Neuroblastoma
A Phase 2 study testing filgrastim, sargramostim and carboplatin in people with Neuroblastoma, run by Children's Oncology Group at 9 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. Peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 30 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuroblastoma
- What is being tested?
- filgrastim, sargramostim and carboplatin
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2001to Jan 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 30 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma
- Histologically proven AND/OR
- Bone marrow specimen showing clumps of tumor cells accompanied by elevated urinary catecholamines
- Age 1-30:
- Must meet one of the following INSS staging criteria:
- Stage IV regardless of biologic factors
- Stage IIa/IIb with MYCN oncogene amplification (greater than 10) and unfavorable pathology
- Stage III with MYCN oncogene amplification (greater than 10) or unfavorable pathology
- Initially stage I, II, or IVS, that has progressed without interval chemotherapy
- Under age 1:
- INSS stage III, IV, or IVS with MYCN amplification (greater than 10)
- Must enter neuroblastoma biology study COG-ANBL00B1 within 2 weeks of diagnosis and before entry on this study
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 30 and under at original diagnosis
Performance status:
- Not specified
Life expectancy:
- Not specified
Hematopoietic:
- Not specified
Hepatic:
- Not specified
Renal:
- Not specified
Other:
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No more than 1 prior course of chemotherapy on the intergroup low- or intermediate-risk neuroblastoma studies prior to determination of MYCN status and Shimada histology
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- Prior emergent radiotherapy to sites of function- or life-threatening neuroblastoma allowed
Surgery:
- Not specified
Other:
- No other prior systemic therapy for neuroblastoma
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 2 countries.
9 sites in 2 countries
United States8 sites
AFLAC Cancer Center and Blood Disorders Service of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta - Scottish RiteCampus
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Floating Hospital for Children
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center at Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
CCOP - Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
CCOP - Columbia River Oncology Program
Portland, Oregon, 97225
CCOP - Scott and White Hospital
Temple, Texas, 76508
Australia1 site
Princess Margaret Hospital for Children
Perth, Western Australia, 6001
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Study Of Tandem High Dose Chemotherapy With Stem Cell Rescue Following Induction Therapy In Children With High Risk Neuroblastoma
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. Peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells.
PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy followed by peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating children who have newly diagnosed neuroblastoma.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Determine the toxicity and feasibility of high-dose thiotepa and cyclophosphamide with autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation and sargramostim (GM-CSF) followed by high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan with second PBSC transplantation, GM-CSF, and isotretinoin after induction in children with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma.
- Determine the role of the meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan in assessing response to tandem transplantation and minimal residual disease therapy in these patients.
- Determine the feasibility of quantitative polymerase chain reaction for neuroblastoma-specific ribonucleic acids at specific stages of treatment as a prognostic indicator of outcome in these patients.
- Determine the immune recovery by quantitation of lymphocyte subsets in these patients and limited functional analysis after completion of this regimen.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) selection (selected PBSCs vs unselected PBSCs). (Selected PBSC stratum closed to accrual as of 7/17/02.)
- Induction/harvest:
- Course 1: Patients receive etoposide (VP-16) IV over 1 hour on days 2-4, cisplatin IV over 6 hours (beginning after VP-16 infusion) on days 1-5, and filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) beginning on day 6 and continuing until blood counts recover.
- Course 2: Patients receive vincristine IV and doxorubicin IV over 15 minutes on day 1, cyclophosphamide IV over 6 hours on days 1 and 2, and sargramostim (GM-CSF) SC beginning on day 3 and continuing until PBSC are harvested. Beginning after completion of course 2 and when blood counts recover, autologous PBSC are harvested.
- Course 3: Patients receive VP-16 IV over 1 hour and ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5 and G-CSF SC beginning on day 6 and continuing until blood counts recover.
- Course 4: Patients receive VP-16 IV over 1 hour on days 1-3, carboplatin IV over 2 hours (beginning after VP-16 infusion) on days 1 and 2, and G-CSF SC beginning on day 4 and continuing until blood counts recover.
- Course 5: Patients receive treatment as in course 2 but supported by G-CSF. Courses 1-5 each last 3-4 weeks. Patients undergo resection of the primary tumor after course 4 or 5 unless primary resection was completed at diagnosis (which is not recommended), no primary site is found, or the primary site is unresectable. Patients complete courses 1-5 and then proceed to the first conditioning/PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- First conditioning/PBSCT: Patients receive high-dose thiotepa IV on days -7 to -5 and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days -5 to -2. CD34+ PBSC are reinfused on day 0. GM-CSF is administered SC beginning on day 5 and continuing until blood counts recover. If blood counts have not recovered by day 28, unselected PBSC are reinfused. In the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, patients proceed to the second conditioning/PBSCT.
- Second conditioning/PBSCT: Beginning within 6-8 weeks after initiating the first conditioning, patients receive high-dose carboplatin IV continuously and etoposide phosphate IV continuously on days -7 to -4 and melphalan IV on days -7 to -5. PBSC and GM-CSF are administered as in the first PBSCT.
Beginning no earlier than day 28 after the second PBSCT, patients undergo local radiotherapy to the primary site and sites that are positive by meta-iodobenzylguanidine scan after induction twice a day for 7 days (or once a day for 12 days if twice daily dosing is not possible). Beginning on day 90 after the second PBSCT, patients receive oral isotretinoin twice a day for 2 weeks. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 1 year, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 31-39 patients will be accrued for this study within 22 months.
- Conditions
- Neuroblastoma
- Being tested
- filgrastim, sargramostim, carboplatin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide
- Keywords
- regional neuroblastoma, disseminated neuroblastoma, localized unresectable neuroblastoma, stage 4S neuroblastoma
- Medical subject headings
- Neuroblastoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
filgrastimBiological
sargramostimBiological
carboplatinDrug
cisplatinDrug
cyclophosphamideDrug
etoposideDrug
etoposide phosphateDrug
ifosfamideDrug
isotretinoinDrug
melphalanDrug
thiotepaDrug
conventional surgeryProcedure or surgery
peripheral blood stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| All Patients | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: filgrastim; Biological: sargramostim; Drug: carboplatin; Drug: cisplatin; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride; Drug: etoposide; Drug: etoposide phosphate; Drug: ifosfamide; Drug: isotretinoin; Drug: melphalan; Drug: thiotepa; Drug: vincristine sulfate; Procedure: conventional surgery; Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; Radiation: radiation therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Transplant-related mortality
The endpoint used for early stopping rule 9.51 will be transplant-related mortality (TRM). A TRM is defined as any death occurring within 30 days after either the first or second HDC/SCR. The acceptable TRM rate is 7.5%. This rate is based on TRM rates previously observed in the prior CCG study 594, CCG study 3891, and POG study 9640 of 7%, 6%, and 0%, respectively.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Incidence of symptomatic CMV, disseminated adenovirus infection, or EBV-LPD
The endpoint to be used in assessing early stopping rule 9.52 will be the incidence of symptomatic CMV, disseminated adenovirus infection, or EBV-LPD. Patients with positive CMV antigenemia or CMV urine culture only (without symptoms of CMV infection), or patients who have a positive culture for adenovirus without evidence of dissemination, or patients with a positive EBV PCR who do not exhibit significant clinical signs (such as adenopathy) or symptoms will not trigger the stopping rule.
Event-free Survival
Assessment of feasibility and toxicity at the end of the study is time to event. Time to event is defined as the time from registration on the study until the first of the following events occurs: relapse, progression, secondary malignancy, or death, including toxic death. If none of those events occurs, then the time of last contact with the patient is used. Time to event will be used to calculate the one-year Event-free Survival (EFS) rate.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2003 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2001
- Primary completionSep 2005
- Study completionJan 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NeuroblastomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Children's Oncology GroupThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephan A. Grupp, MD, PhD, Study chair, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00017368
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ANBL00P1
- Other IDs
- COG-ANBL00P1, CDR0000068681
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2001
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Marcus KJ, Shamberger R, Litman H, von Allmen D, Grupp SA, Nancarrow CM, Goldwein J, Grier HE, Diller L. Primary tumor control in patients with stage 3/4 unfavorable neuroblastoma treated with tandem double autologous stem cell transplants. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003 Dec;25(12):934-40. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200312000-00005.
PubMed 14663275Kletzel M, Katzenstein HM, Haut PR, Yu AL, Morgan E, Reynolds M, Geissler G, Marymount MH, Liu D, Kalapurakal JA, Shore RM, Bardo DM, Schmoldt J, Rademaker AW, Cohn SL. Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with triple-tandem high-dose therapy and stem-cell rescue: results of the Chicago Pilot II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2002 May 1;20(9):2284-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.06.060.
PubMed 11980999Donovan J, Temel J, Zuckerman A, Gribben J, Fang J, Pierson G, Ross A, Diller L, Grupp SA. CD34 selection as a stem cell purging strategy for neuroblastoma: preclinical and clinical studies. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2000 Dec;35(6):677-82. doi: 10.1002/1096-911x(20001201)35:63.0.co;2-h.
PubMed 11107145Grupp SA, Stern JW, Bunin N, Nancarrow C, Adams R, Gorlin JB, Griffin G, Diller L. Rapid-sequence tandem transplant for children with high-risk neuroblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2000 Dec;35(6):696-700. doi: 10.1002/1096-911x(20001201)35:63.0.co;2-0.
PubMed 11107149Grupp SA, Stern JW, Bunin N, Nancarrow C, Ross AA, Mogul M, Adams R, Grier HE, Gorlin JB, Shamberger R, Marcus K, Neuberg D, Weinstein HJ, Diller L. Tandem high-dose therapy in rapid sequence for children with high-risk neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jul;18(13):2567-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.13.2567.
PubMed 10893288
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Study Of Tandem High Dose Chemotherapy With Stem Cell Rescue Following Induction Therapy In Children With High Risk Neuroblastoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00017368
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ANBL00P1
- Conditions
- Neuroblastoma
- Keywords
- regional neuroblastoma, disseminated neuroblastoma, localized unresectable neuroblastoma, stage 4S neuroblastoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Apr 2001
- Primary completion
- Sep 2005 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. Peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells.
PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy followed by peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating children who have newly diagnosed neuroblastoma.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Determine the toxicity and feasibility of high-dose thiotepa and cyclophosphamide with autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation and sargramostim (GM-CSF) followed by high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan with second PBSC transplantation, GM-CSF, and isotretinoin after induction in children with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma.
- Determine the role of the meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan in assessing response to tandem transplantation and minimal residual disease therapy in these patients.
- Determine the feasibility of quantitative polymerase chain reaction for neuroblastoma-specific ribonucleic acids at specific stages of treatment as a prognostic indicator of outcome in these patients.
- Determine the immune recovery by quantitation of lymphocyte subsets in these patients and limited functional analysis after completion of this regimen.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) selection (selected PBSCs vs unselected PBSCs). (Selected PBSC stratum closed to accrual as of 7/17/02.)
- Induction/harvest:
- Course 1: Patients receive etoposide (VP-16) IV over 1 hour on days 2-4, cisplatin IV over 6 hours (beginning after VP-16 infusion) on days 1-5, and filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) beginning on day 6 and continuing until blood counts recover.
- Course 2: Patients receive vincristine IV and doxorubicin IV over 15 minutes on day 1, cyclophosphamide IV over 6 hours on days 1 and 2, and sargramostim (GM-CSF) SC beginning on day 3 and continuing until PBSC are harvested. Beginning after completion of course 2 and when blood counts recover, autologous PBSC are harvested.
- Course 3: Patients receive VP-16 IV over 1 hour and ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5 and G-CSF SC beginning on day 6 and continuing until blood counts recover.
- Course 4: Patients receive VP-16 IV over 1 hour on days 1-3, carboplatin IV over 2 hours (beginning after VP-16 infusion) on days 1 and 2, and G-CSF SC beginning on day 4 and continuing until blood counts recover.
- Course 5: Patients receive treatment as in course 2 but supported by G-CSF. Courses 1-5 each last 3-4 weeks. Patients undergo resection of the primary tumor after course 4 or 5 unless primary resection was completed at diagnosis (which is not recommended), no primary site is found, or the primary site is unresectable. Patients complete courses 1-5 and then proceed to the first conditioning/PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- First conditioning/PBSCT: Patients receive high-dose thiotepa IV on days -7 to -5 and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days -5 to -2. CD34+ PBSC are reinfused on day 0. GM-CSF is administered SC beginning on day 5 and continuing until blood counts recover. If blood counts have not recovered by day 28, unselected PBSC are reinfused. In the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, patients proceed to the second conditioning/PBSCT.
- Second conditioning/PBSCT: Beginning within 6-8 weeks after initiating the first conditioning, patients receive high-dose carboplatin IV continuously and etoposide phosphate IV continuously on days -7 to -4 and melphalan IV on days -7 to -5. PBSC and GM-CSF are administered as in the first PBSCT.
Beginning no earlier than day 28 after the second PBSCT, patients undergo local radiotherapy to the primary site and sites that are positive by meta-iodobenzylguanidine scan after induction twice a day for 7 days (or once a day for 12 days if twice daily dosing is not possible). Beginning on day 90 after the second PBSCT, patients receive oral isotretinoin twice a day for 2 weeks. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 1 year, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 31-39 patients will be accrued for this study within 22 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| All Patients | Experimental | Biological: filgrastim, Biological: sargramostim, Drug: carboplatin, Drug: cisplatin, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride, Drug: etoposide, Drug: etoposide phosphate, Drug: ifosfamide, Drug: isotretinoin, Drug: melphalan, Drug: thiotepa, Drug: vincristine sulfate, Procedure: conventional surgery, Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, Radiation: radiation therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| filgrastim | Biological | All Patients |
| sargramostim | Biological | All Patients |
| carboplatin | Drug | All Patients |
| cisplatin | Drug | All Patients |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | All Patients |
| doxorubicin hydrochloride | Drug | All Patients |
| etoposide | Drug | All Patients |
| etoposide phosphate | Drug | All Patients |
| ifosfamide | Drug | All Patients |
| isotretinoin | Drug | All Patients |
| melphalan | Drug | All Patients |
| thiotepa | Drug | All Patients |
| vincristine sulfate | Drug | All Patients |
| conventional surgery | Procedure or surgery | All Patients |
| peripheral blood stem cell transplantation | Procedure or surgery | All Patients |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | All Patients |
Primary outcome
Transplant-related mortality
The endpoint used for early stopping rule 9.51 will be transplant-related mortality (TRM). A TRM is defined as any death occurring within 30 days after either the first or second HDC/SCR. The acceptable TRM rate is 7.5%. This rate is based on TRM rates previously observed in the prior CCG study 594, CCG study 3891, and POG study 9640 of 7%, 6%, and 0%, respectively.
2 secondary outcomes
Incidence of symptomatic CMV, disseminated adenovirus infection, or EBV-LPD
Event-free Survival
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2014.
- Background: PubMed 14663275Marcus KJ, Shamberger R, Litman H, von Allmen D, Grupp SA, Nancarrow CM, Goldwein J, Grier HE, Diller L. Primary tumor control in patients with stage 3/4 unfavorable neuroblastoma treated with tandem double autologous stem cell transplants. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003 Dec;25(12):934-40. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200312000-00005.
- Background: PubMed 11980999Kletzel M, Katzenstein HM, Haut PR, Yu AL, Morgan E, Reynolds M, Geissler G, Marymount MH, Liu D, Kalapurakal JA, Shore RM, Bardo DM, Schmoldt J, Rademaker AW, Cohn SL. Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with triple-tandem high-dose therapy and stem-cell rescue: results of the Chicago Pilot II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2002 May 1;20(9):2284-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.06.060.
- Background: PubMed 11107145Donovan J, Temel J, Zuckerman A, Gribben J, Fang J, Pierson G, Ross A, Diller L, Grupp SA. CD34 selection as a stem cell purging strategy for neuroblastoma: preclinical and clinical studies. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2000 Dec;35(6):677-82. doi: 10.1002/1096-911x(20001201)35:63.0.co;2-h.
- Background: PubMed 11107149Grupp SA, Stern JW, Bunin N, Nancarrow C, Adams R, Gorlin JB, Griffin G, Diller L. Rapid-sequence tandem transplant for children with high-risk neuroblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2000 Dec;35(6):696-700. doi: 10.1002/1096-911x(20001201)35:63.0.co;2-0.
- Background: PubMed 10893288Grupp SA, Stern JW, Bunin N, Nancarrow C, Ross AA, Mogul M, Adams R, Grier HE, Gorlin JB, Shamberger R, Marcus K, Neuberg D, Weinstein HJ, Diller L. Tandem high-dose therapy in rapid sequence for children with high-risk neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jul;18(13):2567-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.13.2567.
Related trials for Neuroblastoma
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Comprehensive Molecular Analysis of Endocrine Neoplasms
Endocrine Tumors, Thyroid Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Genomic Structural Variation in Cancer Susceptibility
Breast Cancer, Colon Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Enasidenib in IDH2-Mutated Malignant Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumors
Metastatic Chondrosarcoma, Locally Advanced Chondrosarcoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Testing the Addition of Iberdomide to Therapy in People With Neuroblastoma That Has Come Back, Not Responded to Treatment, or Gotten Worse
Recurrent Ganglioneuroblastoma, Recurrent Neuroblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1
PEACH TRIAL- Precision Medicine and Adoptive Cellular Therapy
Neuroblastoma, Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephan A. Grupp, MD, PhD study chair
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
9 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing filgrastim, sargramostim and carboplatin in people with Neuroblastoma, run by Children's Oncology Group at 9 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United States, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Transplant-related mortality. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00017368, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2014.