Carcinoma of Unknown PrimaryPhase 3NCT00022178
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Cancer of an Unknown Site of Origin
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin hydrochloride in people with Carcinoma of Unknown Primary, run by The Christie NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective for metastatic cancer of an unknown site of origin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin hydrochloride
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Dec 1998to not given
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically confirmed metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary Adenocarcinoma or non-adenocarcinoma No axillary lymph node metastases as sole site of disease in female patients No peritoneal carcinomatosis as sole site of disease in female patients No squamous cell carcinoma in cervical lymph nodes as sole site of disease in male or female patients No neuroendocrine tumors No elevated alpha-fetoprotein, beta-HCG, or PSA
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 18 and over Performance status: Karnofsky 60-100% Life expectancy: More than 3 months Hematopoietic: WBC at least 3,000/mm3 Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hemoglobin at least 10 g/dL Hepatic: Bilirubin less than 1.8 mg/dL Renal: Creatinine less than 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) Urea less than 1.5 times ULN Glomerular filtration rate at least 60 mL/min Cardiovascular: LVEF at least 50% by echocardiogram or MUGA scan No uncontrolled angina pectoris No heart failure No clinically significant uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias No abnormal EKG Other: Not pregnant or nursing Negative pregnancy test Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 1 year after study No other prior malignancy except adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix No medical or psychiatric condition that would preclude study No other serious uncontrolled medical condition
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy for carcinoma of unknown primary Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: Prior radiotherapy allowed except to sole site of measurable or evaluable disease Concurrent palliative radiotherapy allowed except to sole site of measurable or evaluable disease Surgery: Not specified Other: No other concurrent experimental drugs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Christie Hospital N.H.S. Trust
Manchester, England, M20 4BX
About this study
Official title: An Open Label Prospective Randomised Study Comparing The Use Of Vincristine, Adriamycin And Cyclophosphamide (VAC) Versus Epirubicin, Cisplatin And Continuous 5-Flourouracil (ECF) In Patients With Unknown Primary Carcinoma (UPC)
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective for metastatic cancer of an unknown site of origin.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two combination chemotherapy regimens in treating patients who have metastatic cancer of an unknown site of origin.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the efficacy of the regimens, in terms of tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival of vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide vs epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil in patients with metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary. II. Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients. III. Compare quality of life and symptom control in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to presence of liver metastases (yes vs no) and type of tumor (adenocarcinoma vs non-adenocarcinoma). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive vincristine IV, doxorubicin IV, and cyclophosphamide IV on day 1. Arm II: Patients receive epirubicin IV and cisplatin IV over 4 hours on day 1 and fluorouracil IV continuously on days 1-21. Treatment in both arms repeats every 3 weeks for 3-6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at the end of courses 2, 4, and 6, and 1 month after completion of therapy. Patients are followed at 1 month and then until death.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 398 patients (199 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
- Being tested
- cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, epirubicin hydrochloride, fluorouracil
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of unknown primary, squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary, undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary, newly diagnosed carcinoma of unknown primary
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Unknown Primary
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
cyclophosphamideDrug
epirubicin hydrochlorideDrug
fluorouracilDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2004 (estimated)
- Study startDec 1998
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Carcinoma of Unknown PrimaryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Juan W. Valle, MD, Study chair, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00022178
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000068792
- Other IDs
- CHNT-VAC-VS-ECF, EU-20041
- Status last verified
- Feb 2002
- First submitted
- 10 Aug 2001
- Last updated
- 20 Sep 2013
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Sep 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open Label Prospective Randomised Study Comparing The Use Of Vincristine, Adriamycin And Cyclophosphamide (VAC) Versus Epirubicin, Cisplatin And Continuous 5-Flourouracil (ECF) In Patients With Unknown Primary Carcinoma (UPC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00022178
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000068792
- Conditions
- Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of unknown primary, squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary, undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary, newly diagnosed carcinoma of unknown primary
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Lead sponsor
- The Christie NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 1998
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective for metastatic cancer of an unknown site of origin.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two combination chemotherapy regimens in treating patients who have metastatic cancer of an unknown site of origin.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the efficacy of the regimens, in terms of tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival of vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide vs epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil in patients with metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary. II. Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients. III. Compare quality of life and symptom control in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to presence of liver metastases (yes vs no) and type of tumor (adenocarcinoma vs non-adenocarcinoma). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive vincristine IV, doxorubicin IV, and cyclophosphamide IV on day 1. Arm II: Patients receive epirubicin IV and cisplatin IV over 4 hours on day 1 and fluorouracil IV continuously on days 1-21. Treatment in both arms repeats every 3 weeks for 3-6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at the end of courses 2, 4, and 6, and 1 month after completion of therapy. Patients are followed at 1 month and then until death.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 398 patients (199 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
| doxorubicin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| epirubicin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| fluorouracil | Drug | – |
| vincristine sulfate | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Sep 2013.
Related trials for Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing the Addition of Anti-Cancer Drug, Cetuximab, to Standard of Care Treatment (Pembrolizumab) for Returning or Spreading Head and Neck Cancer After Previous Treatment
Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Metastatic Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Recruiting
Studying the PAGODA Algorithm for Chemotherapy Dose Changes to Prevent Unplanned Treatment Delays
Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma, Appendix Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary, Recurrent Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Determining the Biodistribution of an Imaging Tracer (68Ga-FAPi-46) in Patients With Solid Tumors or Hematologic Cancers
Anal Carcinoma, Bladder Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Juan W. Valle, MD study chair
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin hydrochloride in people with Carcinoma of Unknown Primary, run by The Christie NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2013.