Pancreatic CancerPhase 3NCT00032175
Gemcitabine With or Without Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing capecitabine and gemcitabine hydrochloride in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Cancer Research UK at 30 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known if gemcitabine is more effective with or without capecitabine in treating pancreatic cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- capecitabine and gemcitabine hydrochloride
- How many people
- 508 participants
- Where
- 30 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Apr 2002to May 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
- Locally advanced or metastatic disease not amenable to curative surgical resection
- Macroscopic residual disease after prior resection with histological confirmation is allowed
- Unidimensionally measurable disease
- No intracerebral metastases or meningeal carcinomatosis
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- Over 18
Performance status:
- WHO 0-2
Life expectancy:
- More than 3 months
Hematopoietic:
- WBC greater than 3,000/mm3
- Neutrophil count greater than 1,500/mm3
- Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm3
Hepatic:
- Bilirubin less than 2 mg/dL
Renal:
- Creatinine less than 2 mg/dL
- Creatinine clearance greater than 50 mL/min
Cardiovascular:
- No New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease
- No uncontrolled angina pectoris
Other:
- No other prior malignancy except nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- No other concurrent uncontrolled medical condition
- No other medical or psychiatric condition that would preclude study
- No known hypersensitivity to fluorouracil
- No dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
- No known malabsorption syndromes
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- No prior chemotherapy (including preoperative or adjuvant) for this disease
- No other concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- No prior radiotherapy (including preoperative or adjuvant) for this disease
Surgery:
- See Disease Characteristics
Other:
- No prior investigational drugs (including preoperative or adjuvant) for this disease
- No other concurrent investigational drugs
- No concurrent dipyridamole or allopurinol
- No concurrent sorivudine or sorivudine analogs (e.g., brivudine) (capecitabine arm only)
Trial locations and contacts
30 sites in 1 country.
30 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom30 sites
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZN
Royal United Hospital
Bath, England, BA1 3NG
Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Bournemouth, England, BH7 7DW
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, England, BS2 8ED
Addenbrooke's Hospital at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, England, CB2 2QQ
Derbyshire Royal Infirmary
Derby, England, DE1 2QY
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
Exeter, England, EX2 5DW
Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust
Ipswich, England, IP4 5PD
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Kings Lynn, England, PE30 4ET
Cookridge Hospital at Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust
Leeds, England, LS16 6QB
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester, England, LE1 5WW
Lincoln County Hospital
Lincoln, England, LN2 5QY
Cancer Research UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit
Liverpool, England, L3 9TA
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Liverpool, England, L69 3GA
St. Thomas' Hospital
London, England, SE1 7EH
Christie Hospital NHS Trust
Manchester, England, M20 4BX
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology NHS Trust
Merseyside, England, CH63 4JY
James Cook University Hospital at South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust
Middlesbrough, Cleveland, England, TS4 3BW
Northern Centre for Cancer Treatment at Newcastle General Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE4 6BE
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
Norwich, England, NR4 7UY
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, England, PL6 8DH
Poole Hospital NHS Trust
Poole Dorset, England, BH15 2JB
Whiston Hospital
Prescot Merseyside, England, L35 5DR
Royal Preston Hospital
Preston, England, PR2 9HT
Salisbury District Hospital
Salisbury, England, SP2 8BJ
Royal South Hants Hospital
Southampton, England, SO14 0YG
University Hospital of North Staffordshire
Stoke-on-Trent, England, ST4 7LN
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust - Surrey
Sutton, England, SM2 5PT
Singleton Hospital of the Swansea NHS Trust
Swansea, Wales, SA2 8QA
Warrington Hospital NHS Trust
Warrington, England, WA5 1QG
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Gemcitabine Alone Or In Combination With Capecitabine For The Treatment Of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known if gemcitabine is more effective with or without capecitabine in treating pancreatic cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of gemcitabine with or without capecitabine in treating patients who have locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the 1-year survival rate of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine with or without capecitabine.
- Compare the median and 2-year survival rates and the objective response rates of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is an randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease stage (locally advanced vs metastatic) and performance status (0 and 1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 during the first course. After a 1-week rest period, patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Subsequent courses repeat every 28 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 3 months for 1 year, and then annually thereafter.
Patients are followed every 3 months.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 508 patients (254 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Being tested
- capecitabine, gemcitabine hydrochloride
- Keywords
- stage III pancreatic cancer, duct cell adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, stage IV pancreatic cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Survival at 1 year
Secondary outcomes (5)
Quality of life
Median survival rate
Survival rate at 2 years
Toxicity
Objective response rate
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2002
- Study completionMay 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 508 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cancer Research UK
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Emily Owen, Cancer Research UK
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00032175
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRUK-GEM-CAP
- Other IDs
- CDR0000069263, EU-20116, ISRCTN11513444
- Status last verified
- Apr 2007
- First submitted
- 8 Mar 2002
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD, Valle JW, Smith D, Steward W, Harper PG, Dunn J, Tudur-Smith C, West J, Falk S, Crellin A, Adab F, Thompson J, Leonard P, Ostrowski J, Eatock M, Scheithauer W, Herrmann R, Neoptolemos JP. Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20;27(33):5513-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2446. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
PubMed 19858379
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Gemcitabine Alone Or In Combination With Capecitabine For The Treatment Of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00032175
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRUK-GEM-CAP
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Keywords
- stage III pancreatic cancer, duct cell adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, stage IV pancreatic cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 508 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cancer Research UKUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2002
- Study completion
- May 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known if gemcitabine is more effective with or without capecitabine in treating pancreatic cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of gemcitabine with or without capecitabine in treating patients who have locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the 1-year survival rate of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine with or without capecitabine.
- Compare the median and 2-year survival rates and the objective response rates of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is an randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease stage (locally advanced vs metastatic) and performance status (0 and 1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 during the first course. After a 1-week rest period, patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Subsequent courses repeat every 28 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 3 months for 1 year, and then annually thereafter.
Patients are followed every 3 months.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 508 patients (254 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| capecitabine | Drug | – |
| gemcitabine hydrochloride | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Survival at 1 year
5 secondary outcomes
Quality of life
Median survival rate
Survival rate at 2 years
Toxicity
Objective response rate
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 19858379Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD, Valle JW, Smith D, Steward W, Harper PG, Dunn J, Tudur-Smith C, West J, Falk S, Crellin A, Adab F, Thompson J, Leonard P, Ostrowski J, Eatock M, Scheithauer W, Herrmann R, Neoptolemos JP. Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20;27(33):5513-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2446. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
Related trials for Pancreatic Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emily Owen
Cancer Research UK
30 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing capecitabine and gemcitabine hydrochloride in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Cancer Research UK at 30 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 30 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Survival at 1 year. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00032175, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2013.