PainPhase 2NCT00050362
Rofecoxib and Bupivacaine to Prevent Pain After Third Molar (Wisdom Tooth) Extraction
A Phase 2 study testing Rofecoxib and Bupivacaine in people with Pain and Tooth Extraction, run by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the ability of the drugs rofecoxib and bupivacaine to prevent pain following third molar (wisdom tooth) extraction. Rofecoxib is approved to treat pain of arthritis and menstrual cramps. Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic similar to lidocaine, but longer acting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Tooth Extraction
- What is being tested?
- Rofecoxib and Bupivacaine
- How many people
- 136 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2002to Oct 2004
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female volunteers referred for third molar extraction willing to undergo 3 visits: 1 screening visit, 1 surgical appointment, and 1 follow-up research-related appointment.
- Between the ages of 16-35 years (based upon eruption patterns and age-related complications associated with surgical extraction of third molars).
- In general good health-American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I or II (healthy subjects based upon criteria for safe administration of out-patient conscious sedation).
- Willing to undergo observation period for four hours postoperatively.
- Willing to complete a 100 mm visual analog scale and a category scale every 20 minutes for the first 4 postoperative hours, and later at 24 and 48 hours.
- Willing to have a microdialysis probe placed beneath the surgical flap over the first 4 hours post-surgery.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Willing to have a preoperative biopsy on the day of surgery and a postoperative biopsy at 48 hours.
- Willing to return 48 hours post-operation to turn in completed pain diaries and for the postoperative biopsy.
- Must have two lower partial (rating\&eq;3) or fully impacted (rating\&eq;4) wisdom teeth (mandibular third molars).
- As assessed at the screening visit, the sum of the mandibular third molar surgical difficulty ratings must be between 6 to 8 in order to evaluate subjects experiencing similar pain levels.
Who cannot join
- Allergy to aspirin, NSAIDs, or sulfites, amide anesthetics.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- History of peptic ulcers and/or GI bleeding.
- Chronic use of medications confounding the assessment of the inflammatory response or analgesia, for example, NSAIDS, COX-2 inhibitors, antihistamines, steroids, antidepressants.
- Presence of a clinical sign suggestive of infection, inflammation or pre-existing pain.
- Unusual surgical difficulty (determined from panoramic radiograph or during the actual surgery.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
National Institute of Dental And Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of a Long-Acting Local Anesthesia (Bupivacaine) and a Selective COX-2 Inhibitor (Rofecoxib) in Suppression of Central Sensitization
This study will evaluate the ability of the drugs rofecoxib and bupivacaine to prevent pain following third molar (wisdom tooth) extraction. Rofecoxib is approved to treat pain of arthritis and menstrual cramps. Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic similar to lidocaine, but longer acting.
Healthy normal volunteers between 16 and 35 years of age who are in general good health and require extraction of their two lower wisdom teeth may be eligible for this study.
Read more
Participants will have their two lower wisdom teeth extracted, and a biopsy (removal of a small piece of tissue) will be taken from the inside of the cheek around the area behind one of the extraction sites. Ninety minutes before surgery, patients will take a dose of either rofecoxib, or a placebo (a pill with no active ingredient) by mouth. Just before surgery, they will receive an injection of either lidocaine or bupivacaine to numb the mouth and a sedative called midazolam (Versed® (Registered Trademark)) through an arm vein to cause drowsiness. After surgery, a small piece of tubing will be placed into one of the two extraction sites. Samples will be collected from the tubing to measure chemicals involved in pain and inflammation.
Patients will remain in the clinic for up to 4 hours after surgery to monitor pain and drug side effects while the anesthetic wears off. During this time, they will complete pain questionnaires every 20 minutes. (Patients whose pain is unrelieved an hour after surgery may request and receive acetaminophen (Tylenol) and codeine.) The tubing then will be removed and they will be discharged with pain medicines (Tylenol, codeine and the study drug) and forms to record pain ratings. They will be given detailed instructions on how and when to take the medicines and how to record information in the pain diary.
Patients will return to the clinic 48 hours after surgery with the pain diary and pain relievers. At this visit, another biopsy will be taken under local anesthetic (lidocaine).
Read the detailed description
Central sensitization refers to persistent post-injury changes in the central nervous system resulting in greater pain sensitivity. The concept of preemptive analgesia is defined as a treatment that prevents establishment of central sensitization by providing analgesic coverage during the perioperative period of surgery. Previous acute pain studies using the oral surgery model have shown that suppression of postoperative pain, not intra-operative nociceptive barrage, diminishes the development of sensitization at 24 to 48 hours post-surgery. During the intermediate postoperative period, the nociceptive input from both surgical insult and inflammation leads to central sensitization, yet their relative contributions have not been clearly evaluated. The proposed study is designed to evaluate the relative impact of surgical insult and the subsequent inflammation on postoperative pain. The relative contribution of each of these nociceptive processes provides a basis for postoperative pain management and the development of preemptive strategies.
All subjects (N = 136) will be healthy volunteers scheduled for third molar extractions. Using a double-blinded, randomized, parallel study design, subjects will be randomized into four groups. All patients will receive local anesthesia injections preoperatively (either 2% lidocaine or 0.5% bupivacaine) to manage surgical pain in conjunction with a preemptive medication (either 50 mg of rofecoxib or placebo) to control postoperative inflammation. The first dose of preemptive medication will be taken by mouth 90 minutes prior to conscious sedation and extractions, and later self-administered once a day for the next 48 hours. The analgesic effect of the drugs will be assessed in the clinic every 20 minutes for the first four hours after extractions, and then self-assessed at 24, and 48 hours after surgery using two pain intensity assessment instruments: category scale and visual analog scale (VAS). Microdialysis will be performed with sample collection concurrent with pain report over the immediate postoperative period of four hours. Two biopsies will be performed: preoperatively, and postoperatively at 48 hours. The combination regimen with bupivacaine and rofecoxib is predicted to maximally suppress the onset and intensity of postoperative dental pain to a greater extent than all other groups through a blockade of the nociceptive input from both surgery and inflammation. It is hypothesized that this preemptive treatment will maximally inhibit the development of central sensitization following tissue injury which manifests as hyperalgesia at later time points. It is also hypothesized that the administration of rofecoxib (a cyclooxygenase-2 selective anti-inflammatory medication) will reduce post-surgical pain experienced at later time points to a greater extent than suppression of the intra-operative nociceptive barrage alone (by bupivacaine), suggesting that suppression of inflammation plays a more pivotal role than attenuating nociception due to tissue injury in diminishing central sensitization.
- Conditions
- Pain, Tooth Extraction
- Being tested
- Rofecoxib and Bupivacaine
- Keywords
- Pain, NSAID, Oral Surgery, Hyperalgesia, Preemptive Analgesia
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Hyperalgesia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rofecoxib and BupivacaineDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2002 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2002
- Study completionOct 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Enrolment
- 136 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00050362
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 030055
- Other IDs
- 03-D-0055
- Status last verified
- Oct 2004
- First submitted
- 4 Dec 2002
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2008
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature. 1983 Dec 15-21;306(5944):686-8. doi: 10.1038/306686a0.
PubMed 6656869Woolf CJ, Wall PD. Morphine-sensitive and morphine-insensitive actions of C-fibre input on the rat spinal cord. Neurosci Lett. 1986 Feb 28;64(2):221-5. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(86)90104-7.
PubMed 3960401Cook AJ, Woolf CJ, Wall PD, McMahon SB. Dynamic receptive field plasticity in rat spinal cord dorsal horn following C-primary afferent input. Nature. 1987 Jan 8-14;325(7000):151-3. doi: 10.1038/325151a0.
PubMed 3808072
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of a Long-Acting Local Anesthesia (Bupivacaine) and a Selective COX-2 Inhibitor (Rofecoxib) in Suppression of Central Sensitization
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00050362
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 030055
- Conditions
- Pain, Tooth Extraction
- Keywords
- Pain, NSAID, Oral Surgery, Hyperalgesia, Preemptive Analgesia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 136 participants
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Dec 2002
- Study completion
- Oct 2004
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2002 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the ability of the drugs rofecoxib and bupivacaine to prevent pain following third molar (wisdom tooth) extraction. Rofecoxib is approved to treat pain of arthritis and menstrual cramps. Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic similar to lidocaine, but longer acting.
Healthy normal volunteers between 16 and 35 years of age who are in general good health and require extraction of their two lower wisdom teeth may be eligible for this study.
Participants will have their two lower wisdom teeth extracted, and a biopsy (removal of a small piece of tissue) will be taken from the inside of the cheek around the area behind one of the extraction sites. Ninety minutes before surgery, patients will take a dose of either rofecoxib, or a placebo (a pill with no active ingredient) by mouth. Just before surgery, they will receive an injection of either lidocaine or bupivacaine to numb the mouth and a sedative called midazolam (Versed® (Registered Trademark)) through an arm vein to cause drowsiness. After surgery, a small piece of tubing will be placed into one of the two extraction sites. Samples will be collected from the tubing to measure chemicals involved in pain and inflammation.
Patients will remain in the clinic for up to 4 hours after surgery to monitor pain and drug side effects while the anesthetic wears off. During this time, they will complete pain questionnaires every 20 minutes. (Patients whose pain is unrelieved an hour after surgery may request and receive acetaminophen (Tylenol) and codeine.) The tubing then will be removed and they will be discharged with pain medicines (Tylenol, codeine and the study drug) and forms to record pain ratings. They will be given detailed instructions on how and when to take the medicines and how to record information in the pain diary.
Patients will return to the clinic 48 hours after surgery with the pain diary and pain relievers. At this visit, another biopsy will be taken under local anesthetic (lidocaine).
Detailed description
Central sensitization refers to persistent post-injury changes in the central nervous system resulting in greater pain sensitivity. The concept of preemptive analgesia is defined as a treatment that prevents establishment of central sensitization by providing analgesic coverage during the perioperative period of surgery. Previous acute pain studies using the oral surgery model have shown that suppression of postoperative pain, not intra-operative nociceptive barrage, diminishes the development of sensitization at 24 to 48 hours post-surgery. During the intermediate postoperative period, the nociceptive input from both surgical insult and inflammation leads to central sensitization, yet their relative contributions have not been clearly evaluated. The proposed study is designed to evaluate the relative impact of surgical insult and the subsequent inflammation on postoperative pain. The relative contribution of each of these nociceptive processes provides a basis for postoperative pain management and the development of preemptive strategies.
All subjects (N = 136) will be healthy volunteers scheduled for third molar extractions. Using a double-blinded, randomized, parallel study design, subjects will be randomized into four groups. All patients will receive local anesthesia injections preoperatively (either 2% lidocaine or 0.5% bupivacaine) to manage surgical pain in conjunction with a preemptive medication (either 50 mg of rofecoxib or placebo) to control postoperative inflammation. The first dose of preemptive medication will be taken by mouth 90 minutes prior to conscious sedation and extractions, and later self-administered once a day for the next 48 hours. The analgesic effect of the drugs will be assessed in the clinic every 20 minutes for the first four hours after extractions, and then self-assessed at 24, and 48 hours after surgery using two pain intensity assessment instruments: category scale and visual analog scale (VAS). Microdialysis will be performed with sample collection concurrent with pain report over the immediate postoperative period of four hours. Two biopsies will be performed: preoperatively, and postoperatively at 48 hours. The combination regimen with bupivacaine and rofecoxib is predicted to maximally suppress the onset and intensity of postoperative dental pain to a greater extent than all other groups through a blockade of the nociceptive input from both surgery and inflammation. It is hypothesized that this preemptive treatment will maximally inhibit the development of central sensitization following tissue injury which manifests as hyperalgesia at later time points. It is also hypothesized that the administration of rofecoxib (a cyclooxygenase-2 selective anti-inflammatory medication) will reduce post-surgical pain experienced at later time points to a greater extent than suppression of the intra-operative nociceptive barrage alone (by bupivacaine), suggesting that suppression of inflammation plays a more pivotal role than attenuating nociception due to tissue injury in diminishing central sensitization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Male or female volunteers referred for third molar extraction willing to undergo 3 visits: 1 screening visit, 1 surgical appointment, and 1 follow-up research-related appointment.
- Between the ages of 16-35 years (based upon eruption patterns and age-related complications associated with surgical extraction of third molars).
- In general good health-American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I or II (healthy subjects based upon criteria for safe administration of out-patient conscious sedation).
- Willing to undergo observation period for four hours postoperatively.
- Willing to complete a 100 mm visual analog scale and a category scale every 20 minutes for the first 4 postoperative hours, and later at 24 and 48 hours.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Allergy to aspirin, NSAIDs, or sulfites, amide anesthetics.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- History of peptic ulcers and/or GI bleeding.
- Chronic use of medications confounding the assessment of the inflammatory response or analgesia, for example, NSAIDS, COX-2 inhibitors, antihistamines, steroids, antidepressants.
- Presence of a clinical sign suggestive of infection, inflammation or pre-existing pain.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rofecoxib and Bupivacaine | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2008.
- Background: PubMed 6656869Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature. 1983 Dec 15-21;306(5944):686-8. doi: 10.1038/306686a0.
- Background: PubMed 3960401Woolf CJ, Wall PD. Morphine-sensitive and morphine-insensitive actions of C-fibre input on the rat spinal cord. Neurosci Lett. 1986 Feb 28;64(2):221-5. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(86)90104-7.
- Background: PubMed 3808072Cook AJ, Woolf CJ, Wall PD, McMahon SB. Dynamic receptive field plasticity in rat spinal cord dorsal horn following C-primary afferent input. Nature. 1987 Jan 8-14;325(7000):151-3. doi: 10.1038/325151a0.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Rofecoxib and Bupivacaine in people with Pain and Tooth Extraction, run by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00050362, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2008.