Pancreatic CancerPhase 3NCT00058149
Gemcitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group at 61 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy such as gemcitabine and oxaliplatin use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 61 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2003to Jul 2006
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma
- Ineligible for curative resection
- Measurable and/or nonmeasurable disease
- Must have evidence of disease outside prior radiation fields OR radiologically confirmed progression of disease within the radiation fields after completion of radiotherapy
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- 18 and over
Performance status
- ECOG 0-2
Life expectancy
- Not specified
Hematopoietic
- WBC ≥ 3,500/mm^3 OR
- Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm^3
- Platelet count ≥ 125,000/mm^3
Hepatic
- Bilirubin < 2.0 mg/dL
- AST < 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
Renal
- Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN
Cardiovascular
- No uncontrolled cardiac disease
Other
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Negative vaginal ultrasound for patients with an elevated beta human chorionic gonadotropin level
- Fertile patients must use effective nonhormonal contraception
- No other malignancies within the past 5 years except nonmetastatic, nonmelanoma skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or cancer cured by surgery or small field radiotherapy
- No active or uncontrolled infection
- No other active illness that would preclude study participation
- No symptomatic sensory peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- No prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease
- No prior (including adjuvant) gemcitabine or oxaliplatin
- Prior adjuvant chemotherapy allowed provided there was more than 6 months between the last dose of adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence of pancreatic cancer
- Prior chemotherapy as a radiosensitizing agent allowed* NOTE: *To the primary site
Endocrine therapy
- Not specified
Radiotherapy
- See Disease Characteristics
- At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy to the primary tumor site and recovered
- No prior radiotherapy to more than 25% of the functional bone marrow
Surgery
- See Disease Characteristics
- Prior surgical resection allowed
Other
- No concurrent participation in supportive care trials
- Concurrent enrollment on protocol ECOG-E1Y03 allowed
Trial locations and contacts
61 sites in 2 countries.
61 sites in 2 countries
United States60 sites
MBCCOP - University of New Mexico HSC
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Medical Center of Aurora - South Campus
Aurora, Colorado, 80012-0000
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231
Cancer Center at Tufts - New England Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Boulder Community Hospital
Boulder, Colorado, 80301-9019
CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403-1206
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Lakeside Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611-4494
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
MetroHealth's Cancer Care Center at MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109
Penrose Cancer Center at Penrose Hospital
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80933
CCOP - Columbus
Columbus, Ohio, 43206
CCOP - Geisinger Clinic and Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-2001
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Atlanta (Decatur)
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
CCOP - Central Illinois
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
Decatur Memorial Hospital Cancer Care Institute
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
Porter Adventist Hospital
Denver, Colorado, 80210
St. Joseph Hospital
Denver, Colorado, 80218-1191
Presbyterian - St. Luke's Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers - Denver Rose
Denver, Colorado, 80220
CCOP - Colorado Cancer Research Program, Incorporated
Denver, Colorado, 80224
CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309-1016
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - East Orange
East Orange, New Jersey, 07018
Swedish Medical Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80112
CCOP - Merit Care Hospital
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
CCOP - St. Vincent Hospital Cancer Center, Green Bay
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54301
Hinsdale Hematology Oncology Associates
Hinsdale, Illinois, 60521
Comprehensive Cancer Institute
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5289
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Indianapolis (Roudebush)
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
West Michigan Cancer Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007-3731
La Grange Oncology Associates
La Grange, Illinois, 60525
CCOP - Southern Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Sky Ridge Medical Center
Lone Tree, Colorado, 80124
Hope Cancer Care Center at Longmont United Hospital
Longmont, Colorado, 80501
University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792-0001
CCOP - Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center at Vanderbilt Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6307
Cancer Institute of New Jersey at UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903
MBCCOP - LSU Health Sciences Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
NYU Cancer Institute at New York University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016
Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111-2497
Hillman Cancer Center at University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15236
St. Mary-Corwin Regional Medical Center
Pueblo, Colorado, 81004
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Swedish-American Regional Cancer Center
Rockford, Illinois, 61104-2315
CCOP - Metro-Minnesota
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
CCOP - Mayo Clinic Scottsdale Oncology Program
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5404
CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104
CCOP - Scott and White Hospital
Temple, Texas, 76508
Albert Einstein Cancer Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers - Thornton
Thornton, Colorado, 80229
CCOP - Oklahoma
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
CCOP - Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, 67214-3882
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, 67218
CCOP - MainLine Health
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
Lankenau Cancer Center at Lankenau Hospital
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Randomized Study of Gemcitabine (Fixed-Dose Rate Infusion) and Oxaliplatin (NSC 266046) Versus Gemcitabine (Fixed-Dose Rate Infusion) Versus Gemcitabine (30-Minute Infusion) in Pancreatic Carcinoma
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy such as gemcitabine and oxaliplatin use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine is more effective with or without oxaliplatin in treating pancreatic cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of gemcitabine with or without oxaliplatin in treating patients who have locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare survival of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with prolonged infusion gemcitabine with vs without oxaliplatin vs standard infusion gemcitabine.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare the objective response in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the patterns of failure and progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the reported frequency of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the changes in quality of life, including improved symptom control and/or additional side effects of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to ECOG performance status (0 or 1 vs 2) and disease stage (locally advanced vs metastatic). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Arm I (standard treatment): Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes once weekly for 7 weeks followed by 1 week of rest for course 1 only. In all subsequent courses, patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15, with courses repeating every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 150 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Courses repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm III: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 100 minutes on day 1 and oxaliplatin IV over 120 minutes on day 2. Courses repeat every 2 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then at 8 and 16 weeks.
Patients are followed for 3 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 789 patients (263 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 18 months.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Being tested
- gemcitabine hydrochloride, oxaliplatin
- Keywords
- stage II pancreatic cancer, stage III pancreatic cancer, adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, stage IV pancreatic cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Apr 2003 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2003
- Primary completionJul 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Investigators
- Elizabeth A. Poplin, MD, Study chair, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00058149
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000287015
- Other IDs
- ECOG-6201
- Status last verified
- Apr 2004
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2003
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2011
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Poplin E, Feng Y, Berlin J, Rothenberg ML, Hochster H, Mitchell E, Alberts S, O'Dwyer P, Haller D, Catalano P, Cella D, Benson AB 3rd. Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3778-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9007. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
PubMed 19581537Liebes L, Levy DE, Poplin E, et al.: Gemcitabine (G) plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics in E6201: greater metabolite levels using fixed dosing rate (FDR) delivery. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-2024, 2006.
Poplin E, Levy DE, Berlin J, et al.: Phase III trial of gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose-rate infusion[FDR]) versus gemcitabine + oxaliplatin(GEMOX) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (E6201). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-LBA4004, 180s, 2006.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Randomized Study of Gemcitabine (Fixed-Dose Rate Infusion) and Oxaliplatin (NSC 266046) Versus Gemcitabine (Fixed-Dose Rate Infusion) Versus Gemcitabine (30-Minute Infusion) in Pancreatic Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00058149
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000287015
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Keywords
- stage II pancreatic cancer, stage III pancreatic cancer, adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, stage IV pancreatic cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Mar 2003
- Primary completion
- Jul 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Apr 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy such as gemcitabine and oxaliplatin use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine is more effective with or without oxaliplatin in treating pancreatic cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of gemcitabine with or without oxaliplatin in treating patients who have locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare survival of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with prolonged infusion gemcitabine with vs without oxaliplatin vs standard infusion gemcitabine.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare the objective response in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the patterns of failure and progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the reported frequency of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the changes in quality of life, including improved symptom control and/or additional side effects of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to ECOG performance status (0 or 1 vs 2) and disease stage (locally advanced vs metastatic). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Arm I (standard treatment): Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes once weekly for 7 weeks followed by 1 week of rest for course 1 only. In all subsequent courses, patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15, with courses repeating every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 150 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Courses repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm III: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 100 minutes on day 1 and oxaliplatin IV over 120 minutes on day 2. Courses repeat every 2 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then at 8 and 16 weeks.
Patients are followed for 3 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 789 patients (263 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 18 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| gemcitabine hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| oxaliplatin | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2011.
- Results publication: PubMed 19581537Poplin E, Feng Y, Berlin J, Rothenberg ML, Hochster H, Mitchell E, Alberts S, O'Dwyer P, Haller D, Catalano P, Cella D, Benson AB 3rd. Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3778-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9007. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
- Results publicationLiebes L, Levy DE, Poplin E, et al.: Gemcitabine (G) plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics in E6201: greater metabolite levels using fixed dosing rate (FDR) delivery. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-2024, 2006.
- Results publicationPoplin E, Levy DE, Berlin J, et al.: Phase III trial of gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose-rate infusion[FDR]) versus gemcitabine + oxaliplatin(GEMOX) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (E6201). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-LBA4004, 180s, 2006.
Related trials for Pancreatic Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elizabeth A. Poplin, MD study chair
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
61 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group at 61 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 61 sites in United States, South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00058149, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2011.