Pancreatic CancerPhase 2/3NCT00064207
Gemcitabine and Radiation Therapy Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer
A Phase 2/3 study testing gemcitabine hydrochloride, adjuvant therapy and radiation therapy in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 59 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy such as gemcitabine use different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- gemcitabine hydrochloride, adjuvant therapy and radiation therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 97 participants
- Where
- 59 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- May 2003to Jan 2007
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed pancreatic head adenocarcinoma
- Prior pancreaticoduodenectomy required
- Documented histological examination of surgical margins (R0), including retroperitoneal margin
- Performed within the past 8 weeks
- Any number of lymph nodes (less than 10 OR 10 or more) allowed
- No periampullary cancer
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- 18 and over
Performance status
- ECOG 0-2 OR
- WHO 0-2
Life expectancy
- Not specified
Hematopoietic
- WBC greater than 3,500/mm^3
- Platelet count greater than 150,000/mm^3
- Hemoglobin greater than 9.0 g/dL
Hepatic
- Bilirubin less than 1.5 times normal
- AST and ALT less than 3.0 times normal
Renal
- Creatinine less than 1.2 mg/dL
Other
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- No other prior or concurrent malignancy except basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- No psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition that would preclude study compliance and follow-up
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- No concurrent immunotherapy
Chemotherapy
- No prior chemotherapy
- No other concurrent chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy
- Not specified
Radiotherapy
- No prior radiotherapy
Surgery
- See Disease Characteristics
- Recovered from prior surgery
Other
- No other concurrent anticancer agents
Trial locations and contacts
59 sites in 6 countries.
59 sites in 6 countries
France45 sites
Centre Hospitalier d'Abbeville
Abbeville, 80101
Centre Hospitalier d'Annecy
Annecy, 74011 Cedex
Institut Sainte Catherine
Avignon, 84082
Hopital Duffaut
Avignon, 84902
C.H.G. Beauvais
Beauvais, 60021
Centre Hospitalier de Blois
Blois, 41016
Clinique Tivoli
Bordeaux, F-33000
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
Boucher, 33300
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Pare - Boulogne
Boulogne-Billancourt, F-92104
Centre Hospitalier Docteur Duchenne
Boulogne-sur-Mer, 62200
Centre Hospitalier Pierre Oudot
Bourgoin, 38300
CHU de Caen
Caen, 14033
CHR Clermont Ferrand, Hotel dieu
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003
Hopital Beaujon
Clichy, 92118
Louis Mourier Hospital
Colombes, 92701
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010
Centre Hospitalier de Dax
Dax, 40107
Hopital Du Bocage
Dijon, 21034
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal St. Aubin les Elbeuf
Elbeuf, 76503
CHU de Grenoble - Hopital de la Tronche
Grenoble, 38043
Centre Hospitalier Departemental
La Roche-sur-Yon, F-85025
Clinique Victor Hugo
Le Mans, F-72000
Hopital Robert Boulin
Libourne, 33500
Centre Hospital Regional Universitaire de Limoges
Limoges, 87042
Clinique Saint Jean
Lyon, 69008
Centre Leon Berard
Lyon, 69373
CHU de la Timone
Marseille, 13385
Centre Hospitalier General de Mont de Marsan
Mont-de-Marsan, 40000
Centre Regional de Lutte Contre le Cancer - Centre Val d'Aurelle
Montpellier, 34298
Centre Hospitalier de Mulhouse
Mulhouse, 68051
C.H.U. de Nimes - Groupe Hospitals-Universitaire Caremeau
Nîmes, 30029
Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
Paris, 75015
Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard
Paris, 75018
Hopital Saint Antoine
Paris, 75571
CHU Pitie-Salpetriere
Paris, 75651
Hopital Cochin
Paris, 75674
Hopital Tenon
Paris, 75970
C.H.G. De Pau
Pau, 64000
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
CHU Poitiers
Poitiers, 86021
Hopital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76031
Centre Paul Strauss
Strasbourg, 67065
Hopital Universitaire Hautepierre
Strasbourg, 67098
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bretonneau de Tours
Tours, 37044
Centre Alexis Vautrin
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Belgium6 sites
Hopital Universitaire Erasme
Brussels, 1070
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, B-9000
Hopital de Jolimont
Haine-Saint-Paul, 7100
Cazk Groeninghe - Campus St-Niklaas
Kortrijk, B-8500
CHU Liege - Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman
Liège, B-4000
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Augustinus
Wilrijk, 2610
Germany5 sites
Charite - Campus Charite Mitte
Berlin, D-10117
Robert Roessle Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Berlin - Charite Campus Buch
Berlin, D-13122
Universitaetsklinikum Duesseldorf
Düsseldorf, D-40225
Johannes Gutenberg University
Mainz, D-55101
Munich Oncologic Practice at Elisenhof
Munich, D-80335
Netherlands1 site
Academisch Medisch Centrum at University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
Switzerland1 site
Hopital Cantonal Universitaire de Geneve
Geneva, CH-1211
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase II/III Study Comparing Gemcitabine Followed by Gemcitabine Plus Concomitant Radiation (50.4 Gy) Versus Control After Curative Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy such as gemcitabine use different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving these treatments after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery. It is not yet known whether giving gemcitabine together with radiation therapy is more effective than gemcitabine alone following surgery in treating pancreatic cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying how well giving gemcitabine together with radiation therapy works and compares it to gemcitabine alone in treating patients who have undergone surgery for pancreatic cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Phase II:
- Determine the feasibility of gemcitabine followed by chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone after prior curative resection in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.
- Compare the tolerability of these regimens, in terms of acute and late toxicity, in these patients.
Phase III:
- Compare the disease-free and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens .
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
- Determine the sites of recurrence in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to ECOG/WHO performance status (0-1 vs 2), participating center, and N stage (N0 vs N1 vs NX). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Within 8 weeks after prior surgical resection, patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 2 courses.
Patients then receive additional gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 57, 64, 71, 78, 85, and 92. Beginning on day 57, patients also undergo radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week, for 6 weeks. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 4 courses.
Quality of life (QOL) is assessed in both arms, according to the following schedules:
- Arm I: QOL is assessed at baseline; at 3 weeks after the beginning of chemoradiotherapy; after the completion of chemoradiotherapy; every 3 months for 2 years; and then every 6 months for 1 year.
- Arm II: QOL is assessed at baseline; at 12 weeks; at 16 weeks; every 3 months for 2 years; and then every 6 months for 1 year.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 538 patients (269 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 3 years.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Being tested
- gemcitabine hydrochloride, adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, stage I pancreatic cancer, stage II pancreatic cancer, stage III pancreatic cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
adjuvant therapyProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of full completion of treatment as measured by the number of patients completing treatment 1 month after treatment in phase II
Tolerability in terms of acute toxicity as measured by NCI-CTC v2.0 1 month after completion of treatment in phase II
Tolerability in terms of late toxicity as measured by EORTC and RTOG 1 month after completion of treatment in phase II
Overall survival as measured by Logrank every 3 months in years 1-2, and every 6 months thereafter in phase III
Secondary outcomes (4)
Disease-free survival as measured by Logrank every 3 months in years 1-2, and every 6 months thereafter
Acute toxicity as measured by NCI-CTC v2.0 every 3 months in years 1-2, and every 6 months thereafter
Late toxicity as measured by EORTC and RTOG every 3 months in years1-2, and every 6 months thereafter
Quality of life as measured by Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) v3.0 and EORTC QLQ PAN-26 every 3 months in years 1-2 and every 6 months thereafter
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jul 2003 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2003
- Primary completionJan 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 97 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean-Luc Van Laethem, MD, PhD, Study chair, Erasme University HospitalVolker G. Budach, MD, PhD, Study chair, Charite University, Berlin, GermanyPascal Hammel, MD, PhD, Study chair, Hopital Beaujon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00064207
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EORTC-40013-22012
- Other IDs
- EORTC-40013, EORTC-22012, FFCD-0304, EU-20540
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 8 Jul 2003
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2012
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Van Laethem JL, Hammel P, Mornex F, Azria D, Van Tienhoven G, Vergauwe P, Peeters M, Polus M, Praet M, Mauer M, Collette L, Budach V, Lutz M, Van Cutsem E, Haustermans K. Adjuvant gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy after curative resection for pancreatic cancer: a randomized EORTC-40013-22012/FFCD-9203/GERCOR phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 10;28(29):4450-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.3446. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
PubMed 20837948Van Laethem JL, Mornex F, Azria D, et al.: Adjuvant gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine-based chemoradiation after curative resection for pancreatic cancer: updated results of a randomized EORTC/FFCD/GERCOR phase II study (40013-22012/9203). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 27 (Suppl 15): A-4527, 2009.
Van Laethem J, Van Cutsem E, Hammel P, et al.: Adjuvant chemotherapy alone versus chemoradiation after curative resection for pancreatic cancer : feasibility results of a randomised EORTC/FFCD/GERCOR phase II/III study (40013/22012/0304). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-4514, 2008.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase II/III Study Comparing Gemcitabine Followed by Gemcitabine Plus Concomitant Radiation (50.4 Gy) Versus Control After Curative Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00064207
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EORTC-40013-22012
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, stage I pancreatic cancer, stage II pancreatic cancer, stage III pancreatic cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 97 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCResearch network
- Collaborators
- Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
- Study start
- May 2003
- Primary completion
- Jan 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jul 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy such as gemcitabine use different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving these treatments after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery. It is not yet known whether giving gemcitabine together with radiation therapy is more effective than gemcitabine alone following surgery in treating pancreatic cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying how well giving gemcitabine together with radiation therapy works and compares it to gemcitabine alone in treating patients who have undergone surgery for pancreatic cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Phase II:
- Determine the feasibility of gemcitabine followed by chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone after prior curative resection in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.
- Compare the tolerability of these regimens, in terms of acute and late toxicity, in these patients.
Phase III:
- Compare the disease-free and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens .
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
- Determine the sites of recurrence in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to ECOG/WHO performance status (0-1 vs 2), participating center, and N stage (N0 vs N1 vs NX). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Within 8 weeks after prior surgical resection, patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 2 courses.
Patients then receive additional gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 57, 64, 71, 78, 85, and 92. Beginning on day 57, patients also undergo radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week, for 6 weeks. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 4 courses.
Quality of life (QOL) is assessed in both arms, according to the following schedules:
- Arm I: QOL is assessed at baseline; at 3 weeks after the beginning of chemoradiotherapy; after the completion of chemoradiotherapy; every 3 months for 2 years; and then every 6 months for 1 year.
- Arm II: QOL is assessed at baseline; at 12 weeks; at 16 weeks; every 3 months for 2 years; and then every 6 months for 1 year.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 538 patients (269 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 3 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| gemcitabine hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| adjuvant therapy | Procedure or surgery | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of full completion of treatment as measured by the number of patients completing treatment 1 month after treatment in phase II
Tolerability in terms of acute toxicity as measured by NCI-CTC v2.0 1 month after completion of treatment in phase II
Tolerability in terms of late toxicity as measured by EORTC and RTOG 1 month after completion of treatment in phase II
Overall survival as measured by Logrank every 3 months in years 1-2, and every 6 months thereafter in phase III
4 secondary outcomes
Disease-free survival as measured by Logrank every 3 months in years 1-2, and every 6 months thereafter
Acute toxicity as measured by NCI-CTC v2.0 every 3 months in years 1-2, and every 6 months thereafter
Late toxicity as measured by EORTC and RTOG every 3 months in years1-2, and every 6 months thereafter
Quality of life as measured by Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) v3.0 and EORTC QLQ PAN-26 every 3 months in years 1-2 and every 6 months thereafter
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2012.
- Results publication: PubMed 20837948Van Laethem JL, Hammel P, Mornex F, Azria D, Van Tienhoven G, Vergauwe P, Peeters M, Polus M, Praet M, Mauer M, Collette L, Budach V, Lutz M, Van Cutsem E, Haustermans K. Adjuvant gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy after curative resection for pancreatic cancer: a randomized EORTC-40013-22012/FFCD-9203/GERCOR phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 10;28(29):4450-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.3446. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
- Results publicationVan Laethem JL, Mornex F, Azria D, et al.: Adjuvant gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine-based chemoradiation after curative resection for pancreatic cancer: updated results of a randomized EORTC/FFCD/GERCOR phase II study (40013-22012/9203). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 27 (Suppl 15): A-4527, 2009.
- Results publicationVan Laethem J, Van Cutsem E, Hammel P, et al.: Adjuvant chemotherapy alone versus chemoradiation after curative resection for pancreatic cancer : feasibility results of a randomised EORTC/FFCD/GERCOR phase II/III study (40013/22012/0304). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-4514, 2008.
Related trials for Pancreatic Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Luc Van Laethem, MD, PhD study chair
Erasme University Hospital
Volker G. Budach, MD, PhD study chair
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Pascal Hammel, MD, PhD study chair
Hopital Beaujon
59 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing gemcitabine hydrochloride, adjuvant therapy and radiation therapy in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC at 59 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 59 sites in France, Belgium, Germany, Israel, Netherlands and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of full completion of treatment as measured by the number of patients completing treatment 1 month after treatment in phase II. The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00064207, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2012.