AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaPhase 2NCT00074737

Dosing Study of Ara-C/EL625/Idarubicin in Refractory and Relapsed AML

A Phase 2 study testing cenersen, Idarubicin and Cytarabine in people with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Eleos, Inc. at 6 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The principal goal of this clinical trial is to assess the ability of cenersen sodium (EL625) to improve cancer responsiveness to the established AML therapeutic agent Idarubicin used alone or in combination with Cytarabine (Ara-C). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
What is being tested?
cenersen, Idarubicin and Cytarabine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
53 participants
Where
6 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2004to May 2007
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects with either refractory AML (not achieving a CR after a single course of induction), or relapsed AML that have a CR for less than one year.
  • greater or equal to 18 years old.
  • Life expectancy of more than 4 weeks following initiation of treatment.
  • Performance status (Zubrod) less or equal to 3.
  • Total Bilirubin less or equal to 1.5 x upper normal limit (UNL) unless attributable to organ infiltration by leukemia, and ALT(SGPT) less or equal to 2.5 x UNL.
  • Creatinine less or equal to 1.5 x UNL unless attributable to organ infiltration by leukemia.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • If plasma creatinine value is borderline, creatinine clearance greater or equal to 60 ml/min (actual or calculated), serum magnesium should be within the normal value.
  • Subjects with liver and/or renal dysfunction due to organ infiltration by leukemia are eligible.
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Volume (LVEF) of >50% as determined by multi-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram.
  • Able to comply with scheduled follow-up and with management of toxicity.
  • Sexually active patients must use an effective method of contraception during the study dosing period. The following are considered acceptable methods of contraception: (i) oral contraceptive pill, (ii) condom, (iii) diaphragm plus spermicide, (iv) patient or partner surgically sterile, (v) patient or partner more than 2 years post-menopausal or (vi) injectable or implantable agent/device.
  • Informed consent form obtained, signed and dated prior to initiation of treatment

Who cannot join

  • Subjects with M3 AML.
  • Subjects receiving other anti-leukemia investigational agents (i.e., unapproved drugs). However, individual cases will be considered on a case-by-case basis for other investigational agents (e.g., antibiotics, antifungals).
  • Pregnant or lactating subjects. Chemotherapy (including hydroxyurea) within three (3) weeks prior to initiation of therapy, unless there is evidence of rapidly progressive disease; then subjects may be enrolled with a minimum of two (2) weeks from previous treatments.
  • Prohibited Medications during the first week of each course:
  • Acetaminophen
  • Hi-Dose antioxidants (e.g., Vitamins C, E; Multivitamins)

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

United States6 sites
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute

    Buffalo, New York, 14263

  • M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of California, San Diego

    La Jolla, California, 92093-0960

  • North Shore University Hospital

    Lake Success, New York, 11041

  • University of Miami Health Center

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Washington University Medical Center (Siteman Cancer Center)

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Open Label, Phase II Dosing Study of Ara-C Chemotherapy in Combination With EL625 and Idarubicin in Refractory and Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

The principal goal of this clinical trial is to assess the ability of cenersen sodium (EL625) to improve cancer responsiveness to the established AML therapeutic agent Idarubicin used alone or in combination with Cytarabine (Ara-C).

Cenersen sodium is a drug that is designed to block the effects of a protein called p53. Laboratory evidence shows that blocking p53 will make many types of cancer, including acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), more sensitive to a variety of established cancer therapeutics while making normal tissues more resistant to the toxic effects of these agents.

Read the detailed description

This clinical trial is designed to assess the ability of cenersen sodium (EL625) in combination with Idarubicin alone or with Cytarabine to either: (1) induce remissions in patients who have previously failed to go into remission in response to chemotherapy; or (2) provide patents who have relapsed after going into a chemotherapy-induced remission with a longer remission.

Cenersen sodium is one of a new class of drugs called antisense oligonucleotides (oligos). Oligos are designed to block the production of specific proteins and thereby inhibit their function. Cenersen sodium targets p53, a widely studied protein.

In cancer, p53 occurs either in the un-mutated ("normal") or mutated forms. The majority of participants in this trial are expected to have un-mutated p53. Cenersen sodium is anticipated to sensitize cancers with un-mutated p53 to most established cancer therapeutics.

p53 has a pivotal role in protecting the body from cells that have suffered genetic damage and, as a result, do not function properly. The protein first senses the level of the damage and then forces the damaged cell to respond to the damage either by repairing itself or committing suicide. In general, the greater the level of damage the more likely the cellular response will be suicide.

Many cancer therapeutics, including both chemotherapy and radiation, cause the types of genetic damage that activate p53 and, consequently, cause either damage repair or cellular suicide. Laboratory studies suggest that cancer cells have a host of defenses that reduce the chances that these cells will respond to genetic damage by committing suicide. So compared to normal cells, cancer cells are more likely to repair the damage caused by cancer therapeutics while normal cells are more likely to commit suicide. Thus, blocking un-mutated p53 is more likely to prevent repair in cancer cells while preventing suicide in normal cells. This provides the basis for a differential effect of cenersen sodium on cancer cells verses normal cells.

When p53-dependent repair is prevented in cancer cells they begin to copy their damaged genetic information in preparation for cell division. This copying of the genetic damage triggers a p53-independent backup suicide mechanism and, as a result, the cancer cells are eliminated. This is the presumed mechanism whereby cenersen sodium is able to sensitize cancer cells with normal p53 function to numerous cancer therapeutics.

At higher doses however, chemotherapy sometimes blocks cells from copying their genes in preparation for division. Thus, it is possible that a chemotherapeutic agent used at a high dose could block any sensitizing effect that cenersen sodium might otherwise have on the cancer.

The chemotherapeutic agent Idarubicin is known to produce the type of genetic damage that effects p53 expression, causes p53-dependent responses and has been shown to be made more effective at killing cancer cells by cenersen sodium. Cytarabine (Ara-C) is the most widely used chemotherapeutic agent for AML. Cenersen sodium does not appear to sensitize cancer cells to Cytarabine and at higher doses Cytarabine may reduce the capacity of cenersen sodium to sensitize cancer cells.

Hence, this AML study will examine the effects of Cenersen sodium used in combination with Idarubicin and one of three different doses of Cytarabine (i.e. 0, 0.1 and 1.0 gm/m2/day), on the responsiveness of participants to these chemotherapeutic agents.

Being tested
cenersen, Idarubicin, Cytarabine
Keywords
Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), Antisense
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cenersenDrug

    Also called cenersen sodium, Ol(1)p53, EL625, Aezea

    cenersen with standard of care

  • IdarubicinDrug

    Also called idamycin

    standard of care for AML

  • CytarabineDrug

    Also called Ara-C, HDAC

    standard of care Ara-C and High dose Ara-C

Study groups in NCT00074737
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
cenersen, idarubicinActive comparatorcenersen, idarubicin, no cytarabine
Receives: Drug: cenersen; Drug: Idarubicin
cenersen, idarubicin, cytarabineActive comparatorcenersen, idarubicin, standard dose cytarabine
Receives: Drug: cenersen; Drug: Idarubicin; Drug: Cytarabine
cenersen, idarubicin, HDACActive comparatorcenersen, idarubicin, HDAC (high dose cytarabine)
Receives: Drug: cenersen; Drug: Idarubicin; Drug: Cytarabine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Determine the effective dose of Cytarabine chemotherapy to be used in combination with EL625 and Idarubicin.

    Cenersen plus standard of care

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Determine the safety profile for the combination of EL625 and Idarubicin +/- Cytarabine.

    Standard of care plus cenersen

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Determine the Complete Response Rate and Time to Progression.

    Standard of care plus cenersen

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Dec 2003 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2004
  3. Primary completionMay 2007
  4. Study completionMay 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
53 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00074737
Sponsor's protocol ID
ELP1001
Other IDs
2003-0475 (MD Anderson)
Status last verified
Sep 2014
First submitted
19 Dec 2003
Last updated
18 Sep 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing cenersen, Idarubicin and Cytarabine in people with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Eleos, Inc. at 6 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Determine the effective dose of Cytarabine chemotherapy to be used in combination with EL625 and Idarubicin. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in