Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaPhase 2NCT00074737
Dosing Study of Ara-C/EL625/Idarubicin in Refractory and Relapsed AML
A Phase 2 study testing cenersen, Idarubicin and Cytarabine in people with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Eleos, Inc. at 6 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The principal goal of this clinical trial is to assess the ability of cenersen sodium (EL625) to improve cancer responsiveness to the established AML therapeutic agent Idarubicin used alone or in combination with Cytarabine (Ara-C). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- cenersen, Idarubicin and Cytarabine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2004to May 2007
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with either refractory AML (not achieving a CR after a single course of induction), or relapsed AML that have a CR for less than one year.
- greater or equal to 18 years old.
- Life expectancy of more than 4 weeks following initiation of treatment.
- Performance status (Zubrod) less or equal to 3.
- Total Bilirubin less or equal to 1.5 x upper normal limit (UNL) unless attributable to organ infiltration by leukemia, and ALT(SGPT) less or equal to 2.5 x UNL.
- Creatinine less or equal to 1.5 x UNL unless attributable to organ infiltration by leukemia.
Show all 12Show fewer
- If plasma creatinine value is borderline, creatinine clearance greater or equal to 60 ml/min (actual or calculated), serum magnesium should be within the normal value.
- Subjects with liver and/or renal dysfunction due to organ infiltration by leukemia are eligible.
- Left Ventricular Ejection Volume (LVEF) of >50% as determined by multi-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram.
- Able to comply with scheduled follow-up and with management of toxicity.
- Sexually active patients must use an effective method of contraception during the study dosing period. The following are considered acceptable methods of contraception: (i) oral contraceptive pill, (ii) condom, (iii) diaphragm plus spermicide, (iv) patient or partner surgically sterile, (v) patient or partner more than 2 years post-menopausal or (vi) injectable or implantable agent/device.
- Informed consent form obtained, signed and dated prior to initiation of treatment
Who cannot join
- Subjects with M3 AML.
- Subjects receiving other anti-leukemia investigational agents (i.e., unapproved drugs). However, individual cases will be considered on a case-by-case basis for other investigational agents (e.g., antibiotics, antifungals).
- Pregnant or lactating subjects. Chemotherapy (including hydroxyurea) within three (3) weeks prior to initiation of therapy, unless there is evidence of rapidly progressive disease; then subjects may be enrolled with a minimum of two (2) weeks from previous treatments.
- Prohibited Medications during the first week of each course:
- Acetaminophen
- Hi-Dose antioxidants (e.g., Vitamins C, E; Multivitamins)
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
United States6 sites
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92093-0960
North Shore University Hospital
Lake Success, New York, 11041
University of Miami Health Center
Miami, Florida, 33136
Washington University Medical Center (Siteman Cancer Center)
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
Official title: Open Label, Phase II Dosing Study of Ara-C Chemotherapy in Combination With EL625 and Idarubicin in Refractory and Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
The principal goal of this clinical trial is to assess the ability of cenersen sodium (EL625) to improve cancer responsiveness to the established AML therapeutic agent Idarubicin used alone or in combination with Cytarabine (Ara-C).
Cenersen sodium is a drug that is designed to block the effects of a protein called p53. Laboratory evidence shows that blocking p53 will make many types of cancer, including acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), more sensitive to a variety of established cancer therapeutics while making normal tissues more resistant to the toxic effects of these agents.
Read the detailed description
This clinical trial is designed to assess the ability of cenersen sodium (EL625) in combination with Idarubicin alone or with Cytarabine to either: (1) induce remissions in patients who have previously failed to go into remission in response to chemotherapy; or (2) provide patents who have relapsed after going into a chemotherapy-induced remission with a longer remission.
Cenersen sodium is one of a new class of drugs called antisense oligonucleotides (oligos). Oligos are designed to block the production of specific proteins and thereby inhibit their function. Cenersen sodium targets p53, a widely studied protein.
In cancer, p53 occurs either in the un-mutated ("normal") or mutated forms. The majority of participants in this trial are expected to have un-mutated p53. Cenersen sodium is anticipated to sensitize cancers with un-mutated p53 to most established cancer therapeutics.
p53 has a pivotal role in protecting the body from cells that have suffered genetic damage and, as a result, do not function properly. The protein first senses the level of the damage and then forces the damaged cell to respond to the damage either by repairing itself or committing suicide. In general, the greater the level of damage the more likely the cellular response will be suicide.
Many cancer therapeutics, including both chemotherapy and radiation, cause the types of genetic damage that activate p53 and, consequently, cause either damage repair or cellular suicide. Laboratory studies suggest that cancer cells have a host of defenses that reduce the chances that these cells will respond to genetic damage by committing suicide. So compared to normal cells, cancer cells are more likely to repair the damage caused by cancer therapeutics while normal cells are more likely to commit suicide. Thus, blocking un-mutated p53 is more likely to prevent repair in cancer cells while preventing suicide in normal cells. This provides the basis for a differential effect of cenersen sodium on cancer cells verses normal cells.
When p53-dependent repair is prevented in cancer cells they begin to copy their damaged genetic information in preparation for cell division. This copying of the genetic damage triggers a p53-independent backup suicide mechanism and, as a result, the cancer cells are eliminated. This is the presumed mechanism whereby cenersen sodium is able to sensitize cancer cells with normal p53 function to numerous cancer therapeutics.
At higher doses however, chemotherapy sometimes blocks cells from copying their genes in preparation for division. Thus, it is possible that a chemotherapeutic agent used at a high dose could block any sensitizing effect that cenersen sodium might otherwise have on the cancer.
The chemotherapeutic agent Idarubicin is known to produce the type of genetic damage that effects p53 expression, causes p53-dependent responses and has been shown to be made more effective at killing cancer cells by cenersen sodium. Cytarabine (Ara-C) is the most widely used chemotherapeutic agent for AML. Cenersen sodium does not appear to sensitize cancer cells to Cytarabine and at higher doses Cytarabine may reduce the capacity of cenersen sodium to sensitize cancer cells.
Hence, this AML study will examine the effects of Cenersen sodium used in combination with Idarubicin and one of three different doses of Cytarabine (i.e. 0, 0.1 and 1.0 gm/m2/day), on the responsiveness of participants to these chemotherapeutic agents.
- Conditions
- Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- Being tested
- cenersen, Idarubicin, Cytarabine
- Keywords
- Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), Antisense
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cenersenDrug
Also called cenersen sodium, Ol(1)p53, EL625, Aezea
cenersen with standard of care
IdarubicinDrug
Also called idamycin
standard of care for AML
CytarabineDrug
Also called Ara-C, HDAC
standard of care Ara-C and High dose Ara-C
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| cenersen, idarubicin | Active comparator | cenersen, idarubicin, no cytarabine Receives: Drug: cenersen; Drug: Idarubicin |
| cenersen, idarubicin, cytarabine | Active comparator | cenersen, idarubicin, standard dose cytarabine Receives: Drug: cenersen; Drug: Idarubicin; Drug: Cytarabine |
| cenersen, idarubicin, HDAC | Active comparator | cenersen, idarubicin, HDAC (high dose cytarabine) Receives: Drug: cenersen; Drug: Idarubicin; Drug: Cytarabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Determine the effective dose of Cytarabine chemotherapy to be used in combination with EL625 and Idarubicin.
Cenersen plus standard of care
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Determine the safety profile for the combination of EL625 and Idarubicin +/- Cytarabine.
Standard of care plus cenersen
Measured: 6 months
Determine the Complete Response Rate and Time to Progression.
Standard of care plus cenersen
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2003 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2004
- Primary completionMay 2007
- Study completionMay 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eleos, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jorge E Cortes, MD, Principal investigator, M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterEdward D. Ball, MD, Principal investigator, University of California, San DiegoJohn DiPersio, MD, Principal investigator, Washington University Medical Center, Siteman Cancer CenterMaria Baer, Principal investigator, Roswell Park Cancer InstituteJonathan Kolitz, MD, FACP, Principal investigator, North Shore University HospitalHugo Fernandez, MD, Principal investigator, University of Miami
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00074737
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ELP1001
- Other IDs
- 2003-0475 (MD Anderson)
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2003
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Open Label, Phase II Dosing Study of Ara-C Chemotherapy in Combination With EL625 and Idarubicin in Refractory and Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00074737
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ELP1001
- Conditions
- Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- Keywords
- Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), Antisense
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eleos, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2004
- Primary completion
- May 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The principal goal of this clinical trial is to assess the ability of cenersen sodium (EL625) to improve cancer responsiveness to the established AML therapeutic agent Idarubicin used alone or in combination with Cytarabine (Ara-C).
Cenersen sodium is a drug that is designed to block the effects of a protein called p53. Laboratory evidence shows that blocking p53 will make many types of cancer, including acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), more sensitive to a variety of established cancer therapeutics while making normal tissues more resistant to the toxic effects of these agents.
Detailed description
This clinical trial is designed to assess the ability of cenersen sodium (EL625) in combination with Idarubicin alone or with Cytarabine to either: (1) induce remissions in patients who have previously failed to go into remission in response to chemotherapy; or (2) provide patents who have relapsed after going into a chemotherapy-induced remission with a longer remission.
Cenersen sodium is one of a new class of drugs called antisense oligonucleotides (oligos). Oligos are designed to block the production of specific proteins and thereby inhibit their function. Cenersen sodium targets p53, a widely studied protein.
In cancer, p53 occurs either in the un-mutated ("normal") or mutated forms. The majority of participants in this trial are expected to have un-mutated p53. Cenersen sodium is anticipated to sensitize cancers with un-mutated p53 to most established cancer therapeutics.
p53 has a pivotal role in protecting the body from cells that have suffered genetic damage and, as a result, do not function properly. The protein first senses the level of the damage and then forces the damaged cell to respond to the damage either by repairing itself or committing suicide. In general, the greater the level of damage the more likely the cellular response will be suicide.
Many cancer therapeutics, including both chemotherapy and radiation, cause the types of genetic damage that activate p53 and, consequently, cause either damage repair or cellular suicide. Laboratory studies suggest that cancer cells have a host of defenses that reduce the chances that these cells will respond to genetic damage by committing suicide. So compared to normal cells, cancer cells are more likely to repair the damage caused by cancer therapeutics while normal cells are more likely to commit suicide. Thus, blocking un-mutated p53 is more likely to prevent repair in cancer cells while preventing suicide in normal cells. This provides the basis for a differential effect of cenersen sodium on cancer cells verses normal cells.
When p53-dependent repair is prevented in cancer cells they begin to copy their damaged genetic information in preparation for cell division. This copying of the genetic damage triggers a p53-independent backup suicide mechanism and, as a result, the cancer cells are eliminated. This is the presumed mechanism whereby cenersen sodium is able to sensitize cancer cells with normal p53 function to numerous cancer therapeutics.
At higher doses however, chemotherapy sometimes blocks cells from copying their genes in preparation for division. Thus, it is possible that a chemotherapeutic agent used at a high dose could block any sensitizing effect that cenersen sodium might otherwise have on the cancer.
The chemotherapeutic agent Idarubicin is known to produce the type of genetic damage that effects p53 expression, causes p53-dependent responses and has been shown to be made more effective at killing cancer cells by cenersen sodium. Cytarabine (Ara-C) is the most widely used chemotherapeutic agent for AML. Cenersen sodium does not appear to sensitize cancer cells to Cytarabine and at higher doses Cytarabine may reduce the capacity of cenersen sodium to sensitize cancer cells.
Hence, this AML study will examine the effects of Cenersen sodium used in combination with Idarubicin and one of three different doses of Cytarabine (i.e. 0, 0.1 and 1.0 gm/m2/day), on the responsiveness of participants to these chemotherapeutic agents.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| cenersen, idarubicin | Active comparator | Drug: cenersen, Drug: Idarubicincenersen, idarubicin, no cytarabine |
| cenersen, idarubicin, cytarabine | Active comparator | Drug: cenersen, Drug: Idarubicin, Drug: Cytarabinecenersen, idarubicin, standard dose cytarabine |
| cenersen, idarubicin, HDAC | Active comparator | Drug: cenersen, Drug: Idarubicin, Drug: Cytarabinecenersen, idarubicin, HDAC (high dose cytarabine) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Subjects with either refractory AML (not achieving a CR after a single course of induction), or relapsed AML that have a CR for less than one year.
- greater or equal to 18 years old.
- Life expectancy of more than 4 weeks following initiation of treatment.
- Performance status (Zubrod) less or equal to 3.
- Total Bilirubin less or equal to 1.5 x upper normal limit (UNL) unless attributable to organ infiltration by leukemia, and ALT(SGPT) less or equal to 2.5 x UNL.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subjects with M3 AML.
- Subjects receiving other anti-leukemia investigational agents (i.e., unapproved drugs). However, individual cases will be considered on a case-by-case basis for other investigational agents (e.g., antibiotics, antifungals).
- Pregnant or lactating subjects. Chemotherapy (including hydroxyurea) within three (3) weeks prior to initiation of therapy, unless there is evidence of rapidly progressive disease; then subjects may be enrolled with a minimum of two (2) weeks from previous treatments.
- Acetaminophen
- Hi-Dose antioxidants (e.g., Vitamins C, E; Multivitamins)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cenersenAlso: cenersen sodium, Ol(1)p53, EL625, Aezeacenersen with standard of care | Drug | cenersen, idarubicin, cenersen, idarubicin, HDAC, cenersen, idarubicin, cytarabine |
| IdarubicinAlso: idamycinstandard of care for AML | Drug | cenersen, idarubicin, cenersen, idarubicin, HDAC, cenersen, idarubicin, cytarabine |
| CytarabineAlso: Ara-C, HDACstandard of care Ara-C and High dose Ara-C | Drug | cenersen, idarubicin, HDAC, cenersen, idarubicin, cytarabine |
Primary outcome
Determine the effective dose of Cytarabine chemotherapy to be used in combination with EL625 and Idarubicin.
Time frame: 6 months
Cenersen plus standard of care
2 secondary outcomes
Determine the safety profile for the combination of EL625 and Idarubicin +/- Cytarabine.
Time frame: 6 months
Determine the Complete Response Rate and Time to Progression.
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2014.
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center's websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- University of Miami Medical CenterLink provided by the sponsor.
- Roswell Park Cancer InstituteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Moores Cancer CenterLink provided by the sponsor.
- Washington University Sch0ool of MedicineLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jorge E Cortes, MD principal investigator
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Edward D. Ball, MD principal investigator
University of California, San Diego
John DiPersio, MD principal investigator
Washington University Medical Center, Siteman Cancer Center
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing cenersen, Idarubicin and Cytarabine in people with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Eleos, Inc. at 6 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Determine the effective dose of Cytarabine chemotherapy to be used in combination with EL625 and Idarubicin. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2014.