Knee OsteoarthritisPhase 3NCT00110474
Glucosamine Unum In Die [Once A Day] Efficacy (GUIDE) Trial: Glucosamine Sulfate in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
A Phase 3 study testing Glucosamine sulfate and Acetaminophen in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Rottapharm at 13 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucosamine sulfate versus placebo on the symptoms of knee osteoarthritis after 6 months of treatment, using acetaminophen as a reference symptomatic medication. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Glucosamine sulfate and Acetaminophen
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- May 2000to Dec 2002
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis according to the clinical and radiological criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), with minimum symptom severity/characteristics
Who cannot join
- Standard exclusions apply
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 2 countries.
13 sites in 2 countries
Spain10 sites
Complejo Hospitalario Juan Canalejo
A Coruña
Hospital Clinic
Barcelona
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona
Completo Hospitalario de Ciudad Real
Ciudad Real
Hospital Donostia
Donostia / San Sebastian
Fundacíón Jiménez Díaz
Madrid
Hospital de La Pricesa
Madrid
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid
Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme
Seville
Hospital Dr. Peset
Valencia
Portugal3 sites
Hospital Universitario de Coimbra
Coimbra
Hospital Egaz Moniz
Lisbon
Hospital Conde do Bertiandos
Ponte de Lima
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Glucosamine Sulfate Versus a Pure Analgesic (Acetaminophen/Paracetamol) and Placebo in Patients Suffering From Osteoarthritis of the Knee
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucosamine sulfate versus placebo on the symptoms of knee osteoarthritis after 6 months of treatment, using acetaminophen as a reference symptomatic medication.
Read the detailed description
Osteoarthritis is a common degenerative joint disease, affecting a large proportion of the general population. Its severity is progressive and often requires long-term treatment courses.
Medications for osteoarthritis may affect symptoms (pain and function limitation) and/or modify joint structure.
Pharmacological agents usually employed to treat symptoms generally include unspecific drugs such as pure analgesics and non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as well as compounds that are possibly disease specific, since they probably interact with some of the osteoarthritis pathogenetic factors: glucosamine sulfate is one of these agents.
Glucosamine sulfate has recently attracted the attention of the scientific community and of patients, because two long-term (3 years) clinical trials in comparison with placebo, showed that this is the first agent able to retard the progression of anatomic joint structure changes in knee osteoarthritis, besides controlling the progression of symptoms.
Earlier studies had shown that glucosamine sulfate is effective in relieving the symptoms of osteoarthritis also over shorter treatment courses (few weeks or months), in comparison with placebo. In addition, glucosamine sulfate efficacy in short studies was at least comparable to that of unspecific symptomatic medications such as conventional NSAIDs, whilst being better tolerated. However, all practice guidelines for the treatment of osteoarthritis suggest acetaminophen (paracetamol) as the oral analgesic to try first and, if successful, the preferred long-term symptomatic medication.
This trial was therefore designed to confirm the efficacy of glucosamine sulfate in comparison with placebo and to assess its relative value compared with acetaminophen. In fact, superiority of a well tolerated drug such as glucosamine sulfate and with the long-term treatment potential shown in other trials, may represent a major therapeutic advantage.
The treatment has a duration of 6 months, that is believed to be the minimum length to assess the effects of a symptomatic medication in osteoarthritis.
The study is performed according to a multicenter, randomised, placebo- and reference-controlled, double-blind (double-dummy), parallel group, prospective design.
The sample size has been calculated on the basis of the expected efficacy of the test drug on the primary outcome (Lequesne index).
Following a screening visit and a short baseline period to check adherence to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of at least 300 patients with knee osteoarthritis are randomised to receive either oral glucosamine sulfate soluble powder 1500 mg once-a-day, or acetaminophen tablets 1000 mg three times a day (total 3g/day, as recommended in Europe), or placebo, for 6 months. The rescue medication for flare episodes consists of the standardized use (according to specific instructions given to the patients) of ibuprofen 400 mg tablets, whose consumption is recorded in a patient daily diary.
The primary efficacy outcome measure is represented by the change in the Lequesne algo-functional index (assessed at clinic visits) after 6 months in the intention-to treat population, analysed by the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure for ANOVA, with Dunnet's pairwise comparisons versus placebo. Efficacy in patients completing treatment according to the protocol (per-protocol completers) will be also assessed. Secondary efficacy outcome measures include the changes in the WOMAC index and the calculation of the proportion of patients that can be defined responders to treatment according to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) criteria (2000). The use of the rescue medication is also assessed.
Safety is assessed by reporting of adverse events and by routine laboratory tests.
The glucosamine sulfate substance used in this trial (crystalline glucosamine sulfate) is a prescription drug in Europe and elsewhere, mostly used in its 1500 mg powder for oral solution formulation to be administered once daily. This is the substance/formulation that was effective and safe in the vast majority of glucosamine clinical trials, including the long-term, 3-year studies.
Differently than in Europe and other countries, glucosamine formulations are marketed in the United States as dietary supplements. They include glucosamine sulfate substances different than the original prescription preparation, other glucosamine salts (mainly glucosamine hydrochloride), and are administered according to different dosage schemes (mainly as oral solid formulations that provide a total 1500 mg dose, but divided in three daily intakes, t.i.d.). In clinical trials conducted so far, these formulations failed to show the same efficacy of the original glucosamine sulfate prescription preparation.
The present study uses therefore the original prescription crystalline glucosamine sulfate given once-a-day (unum-in-die, u.i.d.) and it is therefore named the Glucosamine Unum In Die Efficacy (GUIDE) Trial.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- Glucosamine sulfate, Acetaminophen
- Keywords
- Glucosamine sulfate, Osteoarthritis, Acetaminophen, Paracetamol, Clinical trial
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Glucosamine sulfateDrug
AcetaminophenDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lequesne Index
Secondary outcomes (2)
WOMAC Index
OARSI Responder Criteria
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 May 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2000
- Study completionDec 2002
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 300 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rottapharm
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont, MD, Study director, Fundacíón Jiménez Díaz - Madrid - Spain
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00110474
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- JN151198
- Status last verified
- Sep 2006
- First submitted
- 9 May 2005
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2006
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Herrero-Beaumont G, Román JA, Trabado MC, Blanco FJ, Benito P, Martin-Mola E, et al. Effects of glucosamine sulfate on 6-month control of knee osteoarthritis symptoms vs. placebo and acetaminophen: results from the Glucosamine Unum In Die Efficacy (GUIDE) trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2005;9 Suppl: 1203.
Herrero-Beaumont G, Ivorra JA, Del Carmen Trabado M, Blanco FJ, Benito P, Martin-Mola E, Paulino J, Marenco JL, Porto A, Laffon A, Araujo D, Figueroa M, Branco J. Glucosamine sulfate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis symptoms: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study using acetaminophen as a side comparator. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Feb;56(2):555-67. doi: 10.1002/art.22371.
PubMed 17265490
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Glucosamine Sulfate Versus a Pure Analgesic (Acetaminophen/Paracetamol) and Placebo in Patients Suffering From Osteoarthritis of the Knee
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00110474
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- JN151198
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- Glucosamine sulfate, Osteoarthritis, Acetaminophen, Paracetamol, Clinical trial
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants
- Lead sponsor
- RottapharmIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2000
- Study completion
- Dec 2002
- First posted
- 10 May 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucosamine sulfate versus placebo on the symptoms of knee osteoarthritis after 6 months of treatment, using acetaminophen as a reference symptomatic medication.
Detailed description
Osteoarthritis is a common degenerative joint disease, affecting a large proportion of the general population. Its severity is progressive and often requires long-term treatment courses.
Medications for osteoarthritis may affect symptoms (pain and function limitation) and/or modify joint structure.
Pharmacological agents usually employed to treat symptoms generally include unspecific drugs such as pure analgesics and non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as well as compounds that are possibly disease specific, since they probably interact with some of the osteoarthritis pathogenetic factors: glucosamine sulfate is one of these agents.
Glucosamine sulfate has recently attracted the attention of the scientific community and of patients, because two long-term (3 years) clinical trials in comparison with placebo, showed that this is the first agent able to retard the progression of anatomic joint structure changes in knee osteoarthritis, besides controlling the progression of symptoms.
Earlier studies had shown that glucosamine sulfate is effective in relieving the symptoms of osteoarthritis also over shorter treatment courses (few weeks or months), in comparison with placebo. In addition, glucosamine sulfate efficacy in short studies was at least comparable to that of unspecific symptomatic medications such as conventional NSAIDs, whilst being better tolerated. However, all practice guidelines for the treatment of osteoarthritis suggest acetaminophen (paracetamol) as the oral analgesic to try first and, if successful, the preferred long-term symptomatic medication.
This trial was therefore designed to confirm the efficacy of glucosamine sulfate in comparison with placebo and to assess its relative value compared with acetaminophen. In fact, superiority of a well tolerated drug such as glucosamine sulfate and with the long-term treatment potential shown in other trials, may represent a major therapeutic advantage.
The treatment has a duration of 6 months, that is believed to be the minimum length to assess the effects of a symptomatic medication in osteoarthritis.
The study is performed according to a multicenter, randomised, placebo- and reference-controlled, double-blind (double-dummy), parallel group, prospective design.
The sample size has been calculated on the basis of the expected efficacy of the test drug on the primary outcome (Lequesne index).
Following a screening visit and a short baseline period to check adherence to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of at least 300 patients with knee osteoarthritis are randomised to receive either oral glucosamine sulfate soluble powder 1500 mg once-a-day, or acetaminophen tablets 1000 mg three times a day (total 3g/day, as recommended in Europe), or placebo, for 6 months. The rescue medication for flare episodes consists of the standardized use (according to specific instructions given to the patients) of ibuprofen 400 mg tablets, whose consumption is recorded in a patient daily diary.
The primary efficacy outcome measure is represented by the change in the Lequesne algo-functional index (assessed at clinic visits) after 6 months in the intention-to treat population, analysed by the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure for ANOVA, with Dunnet's pairwise comparisons versus placebo. Efficacy in patients completing treatment according to the protocol (per-protocol completers) will be also assessed. Secondary efficacy outcome measures include the changes in the WOMAC index and the calculation of the proportion of patients that can be defined responders to treatment according to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) criteria (2000). The use of the rescue medication is also assessed.
Safety is assessed by reporting of adverse events and by routine laboratory tests.
The glucosamine sulfate substance used in this trial (crystalline glucosamine sulfate) is a prescription drug in Europe and elsewhere, mostly used in its 1500 mg powder for oral solution formulation to be administered once daily. This is the substance/formulation that was effective and safe in the vast majority of glucosamine clinical trials, including the long-term, 3-year studies.
Differently than in Europe and other countries, glucosamine formulations are marketed in the United States as dietary supplements. They include glucosamine sulfate substances different than the original prescription preparation, other glucosamine salts (mainly glucosamine hydrochloride), and are administered according to different dosage schemes (mainly as oral solid formulations that provide a total 1500 mg dose, but divided in three daily intakes, t.i.d.). In clinical trials conducted so far, these formulations failed to show the same efficacy of the original glucosamine sulfate prescription preparation.
The present study uses therefore the original prescription crystalline glucosamine sulfate given once-a-day (unum-in-die, u.i.d.) and it is therefore named the Glucosamine Unum In Die Efficacy (GUIDE) Trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis according to the clinical and radiological criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), with minimum symptom severity/characteristics
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Standard exclusions apply
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Glucosamine sulfate | Drug | – |
| Acetaminophen | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Lequesne Index
2 secondary outcomes
WOMAC Index
OARSI Responder Criteria
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2006.
- Results publicationHerrero-Beaumont G, Román JA, Trabado MC, Blanco FJ, Benito P, Martin-Mola E, et al. Effects of glucosamine sulfate on 6-month control of knee osteoarthritis symptoms vs. placebo and acetaminophen: results from the Glucosamine Unum In Die Efficacy (GUIDE) trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2005;9 Suppl: 1203.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 17265490Herrero-Beaumont G, Ivorra JA, Del Carmen Trabado M, Blanco FJ, Benito P, Martin-Mola E, Paulino J, Marenco JL, Porto A, Laffon A, Araujo D, Figueroa M, Branco J. Glucosamine sulfate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis symptoms: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study using acetaminophen as a side comparator. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Feb;56(2):555-67. doi: 10.1002/art.22371.
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont, MD study director
Fundacíón Jiménez Díaz - Madrid - Spain
13 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Glucosamine sulfate and Acetaminophen in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Rottapharm at 13 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in Spain, Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lequesne Index. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00110474, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2006.