AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 4NCT00111566

BRIEF-PCI: Brief Infusion of Eptifibatide Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

A Phase 4 study testing eptifibatide in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Infarction, run by Cardiology Research UBC at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This trial was designed to examine the efficacy of a brief versus a standard prolonged (18 hours) infusion of eptifibatide in preventing troponin I release following successful coronary stenting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
eptifibatide
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
624 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Dec 2004to Aug 2007
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male and non-pregnant female subjects
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Received aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin (unfractionated or low molecular weight [LMW]) and eptifibatide
  • Had a successful PCI procedure with at least one stent deployed
  • Availability of a hospital bed

Who cannot join

  • Use of alternative anti-thrombin therapy during PCI (e.g. bivalirudin)
  • High risk patients:
  • Acute ST elevation MI < 48 hours (either direct PCI or rescue PCI)
  • Unprotected left main PCI
  • Obvious large thrombus on angiography
  • Use of rotablation, atherectomy, or thrombectomy devices
Show all 23Show fewer
  • Unsatisfactory PCI results:
  • Final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow < 3
  • High grade dissection (> type B, if not completely resolved at completion of PCI)
  • Evident or suspected thrombus
  • Distal embolization
  • Suboptimal stenting (> 20% residual stenosis)
  • Side branch closure (≥ 1.5 mm branch or with associated symptoms)
  • Abrupt closure during procedure (if prolonged > 15 min or not resolved at completion of PCI)
  • Clinical instability
  • Prolonged ischemia during PCI (> 15 min)
  • Increased hazard of eptifibatide infusion:
  • Unsatisfactory deployment of a closure device (if used)
  • Large peri-procedure hematoma making the continuation of eptifibatide hazardous
  • Any condition that will increase the hazard of continuing eptifibatide
  • Operator discretion
  • No informed consent
  • Active participation in other research studies (unless with special exemption)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Vancouver General Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1L8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Brief Infusion of Eptifibatide Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

This trial was designed to examine the efficacy of a brief versus a standard prolonged (18 hours) infusion of eptifibatide in preventing troponin I release following successful coronary stenting.

Read the detailed description

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common treatment for patients with severe ischemic heart disease. In the majority of cases, the potent anti-platelet agent eptifibatide is administered (bolus followed by infusion for 18 hours). The principal reason to use eptifibatide for PCI is to prevent platelet aggregation and the associated ischemia and myocardial infarction (MI). With improved laminar flow following stenting, prolonged infusion of eptifibatide may no longer be necessary. We hypothesize that after successful stenting with good angiographic results, patients can have eptifibatide discontinued immediately without a higher risk of adverse ischemic outcome, i.e. death, MI or unplanned target vessel revascularization (TVR) by 30 days. MI is defined as creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) concentrations elevated to more than three times the upper limit of normal or new pathologic Q wave as seen on electrocardiograms (ECG). In order to prove this hypothesis, we estimate a sample size of 2,100 patients.

Before embarking on a large-scale clinical trial, we propose a pilot study using serum troponin I elevation as a surrogate end-point. Troponin I is a sensitive biomarker of ischemic injury. The absence of troponin I release following PCI would suggest excellent short and intermediate term prognosis. For the pilot study, we seek to prove the hypothesis that following successful PCI with stenting, an abbreviated regimen of eptifibatide is not inferior to the standard infusion in preventing ischemic injury, defined as troponin I release if baseline value is normal, or as CK-MB more than 3 times upper limit of normal if baseline troponin I is elevated. For this pilot study, we estimate a sample size of 620 patients.

Being tested
eptifibatide
Keywords
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade, Ischemic complications following PCI
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Infarction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • eptifibatideDrug

Study groups in NCT00111566
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
18 Hour infusionActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: eptifibatide
4 hour infusionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: eptifibatide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ischemic injury is defined as troponin I release by 24 hours when the baseline troponin I is normal or by measuring creatine kinase (CK-MB) when the baseline troponin I is elevated.

    Measured: 24 Hours

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. 30-day all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned target vessel revascularization (TVR)

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Composite event rate of non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) major bleeding, all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI, and urgent TVR at 30 days post PCI.

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 May 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2004
  3. Primary completionJul 2007
  4. Study completionAug 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
624 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00111566
Sponsor's protocol ID
C04-0359
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
23 May 2005
Last updated
28 Nov 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Saw J, Densem C, Walsh S, Jokhi P, Starovoytov A, Fox R, Wong G, Buller C, Ricci D, Mancini GB, Fung A. The effects of aspirin and clopidogrel response on myonecrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: a BRIEF-PCI (Brief Infusion of Intravenous Eptifibatide Following Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec;1(6):654-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.08.017.

    PubMed 19463380
  • Fung AY, Saw J, Starovoytov A, Densem C, Jokhi P, Walsh SJ, Fox RS, Humphries KH, Aymong E, Ricci DR, Webb JG, Hamburger JN, Carere RG, Buller CE. Abbreviated infusion of eptifibatide after successful coronary intervention The BRIEF-PCI (Brief Infusion of Eptifibatide Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Mar 10;53(10):837-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.060.

    PubMed 19264239

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing eptifibatide in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Infarction, run by Cardiology Research UBC at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ischemic injury is defined as troponin I release by 24 hours when the baseline troponin I is normal or by measuring creatine kinase (CK-MB) when the baseline troponin I is elevated. (time frame: 24 Hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00111566, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in