Respiratory Distress Syndrome, AdultNCT00113685
Hypertonic Saline With Dextran for Treating Hypovolemic Shock and Severe Brain Injury
A study testing Hypertonic Saline-Dextran Solution and Lactated Ringer's Solution in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult and Head Injuries, Closed, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients following blunt traumatic injury with hypovolemic shock, who receive either lactated ringer's solution or hypertonic saline with dextran (HSD) resuscitation; also, to focus specifically on neurologic outcome in patients with brain injury and on… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, Head Injuries, Closed, Shock
- What is being tested?
- Hypertonic Saline-Dextran Solution and Lactated Ringer's Solution
- How many people
- 209 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2003to Mar 2007
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Recent blunt trauma
- Of adult size if age is unknown
- Pre-hospital systolic bloood pressure 90 mm Hg or less
- Altered mental status
- Transported directly to Harborview Medical Center from the injury event
Who cannot join
- Ongoing CPR
- Transferred from outside hospitals
- Pregnant or suspected pregnancy
- Presence of injuries from penetrating trauma
- Receiving more than 2000 cc of crystaloid prior to study fluid administration
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98104-2499
About this study
Official title: Effect of Hypertonic Resuscitation for Blunt Trauma
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients following blunt traumatic injury with hypovolemic shock, who receive either lactated ringer's solution or hypertonic saline with dextran (HSD) resuscitation; also, to focus specifically on neurologic outcome in patients with brain injury and on the effect of HSD resuscitation on inflammatory cell responsiveness.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Trauma is the leading cause of death among Americans between the ages of 1 and 35 years. The majority of these deaths result from hypovolemic shock, a type of shock in which the heart is unable to supply enough blood to the body, and the resulting severe brain injury. Patients in hypovolemic shock develop a state of systemic tissue ischemia with a subsequent reperfusion injury at the time of fluid resuscitation. Conventional resuscitation of these patients involves the intravenous administration of a large volume of isotonic or slightly hypotonic (lactated ringers) solutions beginning in the pre-hospital environment. Previous studies have suggested that an alternative resuscitation fluid, HSD, may reduce mortality in these patients; but these studies have not been conclusive. Furthermore, HSD may have specific advantages in the brain-injured patient, as it may aid in the rapid restoration of cerebral perfusion, prevent extravascular fluid sequestration, and thus, limit secondary brain injury. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that hypertonicity significantly alters the activation of inflammatory cells, which may result in a reduction in subsequent organ injury following whole body ischemia/reperfusion and ultimately decrease nosocomial infection rates.
Blunt trauma victims with low blood pressures will be identified by pre-hospital providers (paramedics and flight nurses) and randomized to receive either 250 cc of HSD or 250 cc of isotonic solution (lactated ringer's solution). Lactated ringer's solution is the current standard of care with which the ambulances and helicopters will be supplied. All bags of study solution will be prepared by the Harborview Medical Center pharmacy.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
This randomized clinical trial seeks to evaluate the clinical outcome and inflammatory cell function of patients in shock following blunt traumatic injury who are randomized to receive either 7.5% hypertonic saline/6% dextran (HSD) followed by lactated ringer's solution or lactated ringer's solution alone. It is hypothesized that HSD resuscitation will inhibit the initial excessive systemic activation of the inflammatory response, which will translate into a reduction in the incidence of organ dysfunction typically induced by this response. Furthermore, the study will evaluate the impact of HSD resuscitation on recovery following traumatic brain injury, as previous studies suggest that this subgroup has the greatest survival advantage from HSD intervention. The specific aims for this study include the following: Aim 1: To determine the impact of pre-hospital administration of HSD on the development of organ failure following blunt traumatic injury with hypovolemic shock. Aim 2: To determine the impact of pre-hospital administration of HSD on the neurologic outcome following brain injury for patients in hypovolemic shock. Aim 3a: To determine the effect of pre-hospital administration of HSD on the activation of circulating neutrophils and monocytes. Aim 3b: To determine the effect of pre-hospital administration of HSD on the activation of T lymphocytes. The study builds upon previous research that has demonstrated the safety and practicality of this resuscitation strategy in the pre-hospital environment. A more detailed understanding of the immuno-inflammatory effects of hypertonicity for all patients and the long-term neurologic outcome for patients with brain injury is critical for determining the role of this resuscitation approach in such critically injured patients.
- Being tested
- Hypertonic Saline-Dextran Solution, Lactated Ringer's Solution
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Head Injuries, Closed, Shock, Shock, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hypertonic Saline-Dextran SolutionDrug
Lactated Ringer's SolutionDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adult respiratory distress syndrome symptoms (measured 28 days post-injury)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Multiple organ failure syndrome
28 day mortality
Nosocomial infections
Duration of hospital and ICU stay
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Neurologic outcome for patients with traumatic brain injury based on the Glasgow Outcome Score and Disability Rating Score (measured at 6 and 12 months post-injury)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2003
- Study completionMar 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, AdultStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 209 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eileen Bulger, University of Washington
- Investigators
- Eileen Bulger, Study chair, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00113685
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20737
- Other IDs
- R01HL073233
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2005
- Last updated
- 3 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Bulger EM, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Copass MK, Hanson S, Cooper C, Liu PY, Neff M, Awan AB, Warner K, Maier RV. Hypertonic resuscitation of hypovolemic shock after blunt trauma: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):139-48; discussion 149. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.41.
PubMed 18283138
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Hypertonic Resuscitation for Blunt Trauma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00113685
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20737
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 209 participants
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Apr 2003
- Study completion
- Mar 2007
- First posted
- 10 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients following blunt traumatic injury with hypovolemic shock, who receive either lactated ringer's solution or hypertonic saline with dextran (HSD) resuscitation; also, to focus specifically on neurologic outcome in patients with brain injury and on the effect of HSD resuscitation on inflammatory cell responsiveness.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Trauma is the leading cause of death among Americans between the ages of 1 and 35 years. The majority of these deaths result from hypovolemic shock, a type of shock in which the heart is unable to supply enough blood to the body, and the resulting severe brain injury. Patients in hypovolemic shock develop a state of systemic tissue ischemia with a subsequent reperfusion injury at the time of fluid resuscitation. Conventional resuscitation of these patients involves the intravenous administration of a large volume of isotonic or slightly hypotonic (lactated ringers) solutions beginning in the pre-hospital environment. Previous studies have suggested that an alternative resuscitation fluid, HSD, may reduce mortality in these patients; but these studies have not been conclusive. Furthermore, HSD may have specific advantages in the brain-injured patient, as it may aid in the rapid restoration of cerebral perfusion, prevent extravascular fluid sequestration, and thus, limit secondary brain injury. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that hypertonicity significantly alters the activation of inflammatory cells, which may result in a reduction in subsequent organ injury following whole body ischemia/reperfusion and ultimately decrease nosocomial infection rates.
Blunt trauma victims with low blood pressures will be identified by pre-hospital providers (paramedics and flight nurses) and randomized to receive either 250 cc of HSD or 250 cc of isotonic solution (lactated ringer's solution). Lactated ringer's solution is the current standard of care with which the ambulances and helicopters will be supplied. All bags of study solution will be prepared by the Harborview Medical Center pharmacy.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
This randomized clinical trial seeks to evaluate the clinical outcome and inflammatory cell function of patients in shock following blunt traumatic injury who are randomized to receive either 7.5% hypertonic saline/6% dextran (HSD) followed by lactated ringer's solution or lactated ringer's solution alone. It is hypothesized that HSD resuscitation will inhibit the initial excessive systemic activation of the inflammatory response, which will translate into a reduction in the incidence of organ dysfunction typically induced by this response. Furthermore, the study will evaluate the impact of HSD resuscitation on recovery following traumatic brain injury, as previous studies suggest that this subgroup has the greatest survival advantage from HSD intervention. The specific aims for this study include the following: Aim 1: To determine the impact of pre-hospital administration of HSD on the development of organ failure following blunt traumatic injury with hypovolemic shock. Aim 2: To determine the impact of pre-hospital administration of HSD on the neurologic outcome following brain injury for patients in hypovolemic shock. Aim 3a: To determine the effect of pre-hospital administration of HSD on the activation of circulating neutrophils and monocytes. Aim 3b: To determine the effect of pre-hospital administration of HSD on the activation of T lymphocytes. The study builds upon previous research that has demonstrated the safety and practicality of this resuscitation strategy in the pre-hospital environment. A more detailed understanding of the immuno-inflammatory effects of hypertonicity for all patients and the long-term neurologic outcome for patients with brain injury is critical for determining the role of this resuscitation approach in such critically injured patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Recent blunt trauma
- Of adult size if age is unknown
- Pre-hospital systolic bloood pressure 90 mm Hg or less
- Altered mental status
- Transported directly to Harborview Medical Center from the injury event
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Ongoing CPR
- Transferred from outside hospitals
- Pregnant or suspected pregnancy
- Presence of injuries from penetrating trauma
- Receiving more than 2000 cc of crystaloid prior to study fluid administration
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hypertonic Saline-Dextran Solution | Drug | – |
| Lactated Ringer's Solution | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Adult respiratory distress syndrome symptoms (measured 28 days post-injury)
6 secondary outcomes
Multiple organ failure syndrome
28 day mortality
Nosocomial infections
Duration of hospital and ICU stay
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Neurologic outcome for patients with traumatic brain injury based on the Glasgow Outcome Score and Disability Rating Score (measured at 6 and 12 months post-injury)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18283138Bulger EM, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Copass MK, Hanson S, Cooper C, Liu PY, Neff M, Awan AB, Warner K, Maier RV. Hypertonic resuscitation of hypovolemic shock after blunt trauma: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):139-48; discussion 149. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.41.
- Click here for the University of Washinton Harborview Medical Center websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Early Switch in Moderate ARDS
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab in Patients Hospitalised for Viral Lung Infection Requiring Supplemental Oxygen
Viral Lung Infection and Acute Respiratory Failure
RecruitingPhase 2
PirfenidoneVsPlacebo as Prophylaxis Against Acute Radiation-induced Lung Injury Following HFRT in Breast Cancer Patients
Acute Lung Injury, Prevention
Not yet recruiting
The Hemodynamic Impact of High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Periodic Sighs in Preterm Infants
Preterm, Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Fostamatinib for Treating Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in Hospitalized Adults
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDS
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eileen Bulger study chair
University of Washington
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hypertonic Saline-Dextran Solution and Lactated Ringer's Solution in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult and Head Injuries, Closed, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adult respiratory distress syndrome symptoms (measured 28 days post-injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00113685, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2021.