Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePhase 3NCT00114426
Effects of NIMV on the Health Status of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD )Patients
A Phase 3 study testing non-invasive mechanical ventilation in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
In this proposal, we will implement a randomized controlled trial to determine whether nocturnal NIMV applied for 3 months: 1) improves (disease-specific) health related quality of life (HRQL) of COPD patients compared to a control group of patients treated with sham NIMV therapy (primary outcome); 2) improves… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- non-invasive mechanical ventilation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jan 2002to Dec 2004
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A clinical diagnosis of COPD and meeting the American Thoracic Society's definition of COPD
- Age 55 years of age or older;
- A history of 10 pack-years or more of cigarette smoking;
- FEV1 to FVC ratio of less than 70% and a postbronchodilator FEV1 of less than 50% of predicted (at baseline and after the run-in);
- PaC02 of 45 mm Hg or greater measured at rest on room air (at baseline and after run-in)
Who cannot join
- Coexisting medical conditions that make survival for at least 6 months unlikely;
- Refusal to participate;
- Cognitive impairment which makes it impossible to obtain informed consent;
- Patient on a lung transplant list;
- Clinical history of left ventricular heart failure;
- Body mass index of 35 kg/m2 or greater;
Show all 10Show fewer
- (Obstructive) apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of > 15 on polysomnography;
- Evidence of Cheyne-Stokes respiration on polysomnography;
- Impaired left ventricular ejection (LVEF of < 40% as determined on 2-D echocardiography);
- Patients who require rehospitalization, or an emergency visit for COPD during the run-in phase
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Nocturnal Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation on the Health Status of Patients With COPD
In this proposal, we will implement a randomized controlled trial to determine whether nocturnal NIMV applied for 3 months: 1) improves (disease-specific) health related quality of life (HRQL) of COPD patients compared to a control group of patients treated with sham NIMV therapy (primary outcome); 2) improves exercise tolerance and walking capacity of COPD patients; and 3) improves heart rate variability and decreases sympathetic tone in COPD.
Read the detailed description
COPD is one of the fastest growing conditions in the world, affecting over 16 million people in the US and over 1 million in Canada and costing society over $23 billion per annum (in the US). Its prevalence has risen by 41% since 1982, and the age-adjusted death rate has increased by 17% between 1966 and 1982 (in contrast to the decline in the age-adjusted death rates from all other causes during the same time period). By 2020, COPD will become the third leading cause of death (currently 4th representing 5% of all deaths worldwide) and 5th leading cause of disability (currently 12th) worldwide. Ironically, despite the rapidly growing public health burden of COPD, it is the most underfunded disease among all major causes of mortality in North America. Despite some progress in the management of COPD over the past two decades, there is still a paucity of efficacious therapies that can effectively modify the natural course of this disease.
There is a growing interest in nocturnal non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) therapy for long-term COPD management for several reasons. It may restore inspiratory rate, which diminishes by 30% during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, improve gas exchange, and rest chronically tired respiratory muscles in COPD. Indeed, several uncontrolled studies have provided some empirical evidence to support the use of nocturnal NIMV in COPD. However, there is a paucity of well-designed controlled trials evaluating this novel therapy particularly for COPD patients at a high-risk for morbidity and mortality.
In this proposal, we will implement a randomized controlled trial to determine whether nocturnal NIMV applied for 3 months: 1) improves (disease-specific) health related quality of life (HRQL) of COPD patients compared to a control group of patients treated with sham NIMV therapy (primary outcome); 2) improves exercise tolerance and walking capacity of COPD patients; 3) reduces the number of clinical relapses in COPD patients; 4) improves heart rate variability and decreases sympathetic tone in COPD; and 5) is a "cost-effective" therapy.
We will carefully select COPD patients ready for discharge from an acute care hospital and will be invited to participate in this trial. Participants will then undergo a "run-in" phase of 4 weeks during which their clinical status will be stabilized. Patients experiencing a clinical exacerbation during the "run-in" phase will be excluded from the study. After the "run-in" phase, patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: nocturnal NIMV therapy + standard medical therapy or "sham" + standard medical therapy. The Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and the Health Utilities Index Mark 2/3 (HUI 2 and HUI 3) will be used to measure HRQL of study participants at baseline and then at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks. We will also measure the study participants' exacerbation rate during the study period. A six-minute walk test will be used to determine the walking capacity of the study participants. In addition, 2-D echocardiography and 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring will be used to determine the effect of nocturnal NIMV on cardiac performance over a 3 month period. Finally, we will perform a comprehensive economic analysis to determine the costs as well as the benefits associated with the nocturnal NIMV therapy.
We anticipate that this study will show that those treated with nocturnal NIMV therapy will have better HRQL at 3 months compared to those on sham therapy and this will be associated with improved walking capacity and decreased rates of exacerbation. We also anticipate that nocturnal NIMV therapy will improve heart rate variability and lower pulmonary arterial pressure (during daytime).
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- non-invasive mechanical ventilation
- Keywords
- randomized controlled trial; COPD
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
non-invasive mechanical ventilationDevice
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Health Status
Secondary outcomes (1)
Heart Rate Variability
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2002
- Study completionDec 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 40 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Investigators
- Don D Sin, MD, Principal investigator, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00114426
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MCT-52684
- Status last verified
- Feb 2005
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2005
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2005
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2005. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Nocturnal Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation on the Health Status of Patients With COPD
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00114426
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MCT-52684
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- randomized controlled trial; COPD
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 40 participants
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- Jan 2002
- Study completion
- Dec 2004
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this proposal, we will implement a randomized controlled trial to determine whether nocturnal NIMV applied for 3 months: 1) improves (disease-specific) health related quality of life (HRQL) of COPD patients compared to a control group of patients treated with sham NIMV therapy (primary outcome); 2) improves exercise tolerance and walking capacity of COPD patients; and 3) improves heart rate variability and decreases sympathetic tone in COPD.
Detailed description
COPD is one of the fastest growing conditions in the world, affecting over 16 million people in the US and over 1 million in Canada and costing society over $23 billion per annum (in the US). Its prevalence has risen by 41% since 1982, and the age-adjusted death rate has increased by 17% between 1966 and 1982 (in contrast to the decline in the age-adjusted death rates from all other causes during the same time period). By 2020, COPD will become the third leading cause of death (currently 4th representing 5% of all deaths worldwide) and 5th leading cause of disability (currently 12th) worldwide. Ironically, despite the rapidly growing public health burden of COPD, it is the most underfunded disease among all major causes of mortality in North America. Despite some progress in the management of COPD over the past two decades, there is still a paucity of efficacious therapies that can effectively modify the natural course of this disease.
There is a growing interest in nocturnal non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) therapy for long-term COPD management for several reasons. It may restore inspiratory rate, which diminishes by 30% during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, improve gas exchange, and rest chronically tired respiratory muscles in COPD. Indeed, several uncontrolled studies have provided some empirical evidence to support the use of nocturnal NIMV in COPD. However, there is a paucity of well-designed controlled trials evaluating this novel therapy particularly for COPD patients at a high-risk for morbidity and mortality.
In this proposal, we will implement a randomized controlled trial to determine whether nocturnal NIMV applied for 3 months: 1) improves (disease-specific) health related quality of life (HRQL) of COPD patients compared to a control group of patients treated with sham NIMV therapy (primary outcome); 2) improves exercise tolerance and walking capacity of COPD patients; 3) reduces the number of clinical relapses in COPD patients; 4) improves heart rate variability and decreases sympathetic tone in COPD; and 5) is a "cost-effective" therapy.
We will carefully select COPD patients ready for discharge from an acute care hospital and will be invited to participate in this trial. Participants will then undergo a "run-in" phase of 4 weeks during which their clinical status will be stabilized. Patients experiencing a clinical exacerbation during the "run-in" phase will be excluded from the study. After the "run-in" phase, patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: nocturnal NIMV therapy + standard medical therapy or "sham" + standard medical therapy. The Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and the Health Utilities Index Mark 2/3 (HUI 2 and HUI 3) will be used to measure HRQL of study participants at baseline and then at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks. We will also measure the study participants' exacerbation rate during the study period. A six-minute walk test will be used to determine the walking capacity of the study participants. In addition, 2-D echocardiography and 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring will be used to determine the effect of nocturnal NIMV on cardiac performance over a 3 month period. Finally, we will perform a comprehensive economic analysis to determine the costs as well as the benefits associated with the nocturnal NIMV therapy.
We anticipate that this study will show that those treated with nocturnal NIMV therapy will have better HRQL at 3 months compared to those on sham therapy and this will be associated with improved walking capacity and decreased rates of exacerbation. We also anticipate that nocturnal NIMV therapy will improve heart rate variability and lower pulmonary arterial pressure (during daytime).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- A clinical diagnosis of COPD and meeting the American Thoracic Society's definition of COPD
- Age 55 years of age or older;
- A history of 10 pack-years or more of cigarette smoking;
- FEV1 to FVC ratio of less than 70% and a postbronchodilator FEV1 of less than 50% of predicted (at baseline and after the run-in);
- PaC02 of 45 mm Hg or greater measured at rest on room air (at baseline and after run-in)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Coexisting medical conditions that make survival for at least 6 months unlikely;
- Refusal to participate;
- Cognitive impairment which makes it impossible to obtain informed consent;
- Patient on a lung transplant list;
- Clinical history of left ventricular heart failure;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| non-invasive mechanical ventilation | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Health Status
1 secondary outcome
Heart Rate Variability
Results and safety
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2005.
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Don D Sin, MD principal investigator
University of British Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing non-invasive mechanical ventilation in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Health Status. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2005.