AzTrials
AzTrials

Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-PhasePhase 3NCT00123474

Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) - Follow on: Study of BMS-354825 in Subjects With CML

A Phase 3 study testing dasatinib in people with Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-Phase, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 137 sites in 31 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a phase III study of BMS-354825 in subjects with chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL positive chronic myelogenous leukemia, who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib mesylate (Gleevec). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-Phase
What is being tested?
dasatinib
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
724 participants
Where
137 sitesin 31 countries
Study dates
Jul 2005to Jul 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) (or BCR/ABL+) chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia whose disease has primary or acquired hematologic resistance to imatinib mesylate or who are intolerant of imatinib mesylate.
  • Men and women, 18 years or older
  • Adequate hepatic function
  • Adequate renal function
  • Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for a period of at least 1 month before and at least 3 months after the study in such a manner that the risk of pregnancy is minimized.

Who cannot join

  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Subjects who are eligible and willing to undergo transplantation during the screening period
  • A serious uncontrolled medical disorder or active infection that would impair the ability of the subject to receive protocol therapy
  • Uncontrolled or significant cardiovascular disease
  • Medications that increase bleeding risk
  • Medications that change heart rhythms
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Dementia or altered mental status that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent
  • History of significant bleeding disorder unrelated to CML
  • Concurrent incurable malignancy other than CML
  • Evidence of organ dysfunction or digestive dysfunction that would prevent administration of study therapy
  • Prisoners or subjects who are compulsorily detained (involuntarily incarcerated) for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (e.g., infectious disease) illness must not be enrolled into this study

Trial locations and contacts

137 sites in 31 countries.

137 sites in 31 countries

United States40 sites
  • Central Hematology Oncology Medical Group Inc.

    Alhambra, California, 91801

  • Pacific Cancer Medical Center Inc

    Anaheim, California, 92801

  • Emory University School Of Medicine

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Georgia Cancer Specialists

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30341

  • University Of Maryland

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201

  • University Of Alabama At Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Dana Faber Cancer Institute

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • Northwestern University Feinberg School Of Medicine

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • University Of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Ut Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • Karmanos Cancer Institute

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • University Of Florida

    Gainesville, Florida, 32610

  • The Cancer Center At Hackensack University Medical Center

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • The University Of Texas Md Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Indiana University Cancer Center

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Nevada Cancer Institute

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89135

  • Gwinnett Hospital System Inc.

    Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30046

  • University Of Kentucky

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536

  • Loma Linda University Cancer Center

    Loma Linda, California, 92354

  • Pacific Shores Medical Group

    Long Beach, California, 90813

  • Ucla Dept. Of Medicine

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • University Of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Sarah Cannon Research Institute

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • The Cancer Institute Of New Jersey

    New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903

  • New York Presbyterian Hospital

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Nebraska Methodist Hospital

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68114

  • Devetten, Marcel

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68198

  • Md Anderson Cancer Center Orlando

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Ventura County Hematology-Oncology Specialists

    Oxnard, California, 93030

  • Oncology Hematology Associates Of Central Illinois, Pc

    Peoria, Illinois, 61615

  • Western Pennsylvania Cancer Institute

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224

  • Oregon Health & Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance

    Seattle, Washington, 98109

  • Washington University School Of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Kaiser Permanente Medical Center

    Vallejo, California, 94589

  • Georgetown University Med Ctr

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007

  • Washington Cancer Institute At Washington Hospital Center

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

  • University Of Kansas Medical Center

    Westwood, Kansas, 66205

Other trials in United States

France11 sites
  • Local Institution

    Caen, 14000

  • Local Institution

    Cedex, Pierre Benite, 69495

  • Local Institution

    Créteil, 94010

  • Local Institution

    Grenoble, 38043

  • Local Institution

    Lille, 59037

  • Local Institution

    Marseille, 13273

  • Local Institution

    Nantes, 44000

  • Local Institution

    Paris, 75475

  • Local Institution

    Poitiers, 86021

  • Local Institution

    Strasbourg, 67091

  • Local Institution

    Toulouse, 31059

Other trials in France

Australia6 sites
  • Local Institution

    Adelaide, South Australia, SA 5000

  • Local Institution

    Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050

  • Local Institution

    East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002

  • Local Institution

    Perth, Western Australia, WA 6000

  • Local Institution

    South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101

  • Local Institution

    St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065

Other trials in Australia

Belgium6 sites
  • Local Institution

    B-leuven, 3000

  • Local Institution

    Bruges, 8000

  • Local Institution

    Brussels, 1000

  • Local Institution

    Charleroi, 6000

  • Local Institution

    Edegem, 2650

  • Local Institution

    Yvoir, 5530

Other trials in Belgium

Germany6 sites
  • Local Institution

    Dresden, 01307

  • Local Institution

    Frankfurt am Main, 60590

  • Local Institution

    Hamburg, 20246

  • Local Institution

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Local Institution

    Mainz, 55131

  • Local Institution

    Mannheim, 68167

Other trials in Germany

Italy6 sites
  • Local Institution

    Bari, 70124

  • Local Institution

    Monza (mi), 20052

  • Local Institution

    Naples, 80131

  • Local Institution

    Orbassano, 10043

  • Local Institution

    Roma, 00144

  • Local Institution

    Roma, 00161

Other trials in Italy

Poland6 sites
  • Local Institution

    Gdansk, 80 211

  • Local Institution

    Katowice, 40032

  • Local Institution

    Krakow, 31501

  • Local Institution

    Lodz, 93510

  • Local Institution

    Lublin, 20 950

  • Local Institution

    Warsaw, 02097

Other trials in Poland

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Local Institution

    Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TH

  • Local Institution

    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 2XY

  • Local Institution

    Glasgow, G12 0ZD

  • Local Institution

    Liverpool, Merseyside, L7 8XP

  • Local Institution

    London, Greater London, W12 OHS

  • Local Institution

    Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, NE2 2DR

Other trials in United Kingdom

Brazil5 sites
  • Local Institution

    CEP - Campinas, 13083

  • Local Institution

    Curitiba, Paraná, 80060

  • Local Institution

    Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20231

  • Local Institution

    San Paulo, Sp, 05403

  • Local Institution

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05652

Other trials in Brazil

South Africa5 sites
  • Local Institution

    Bloemfontein, Free State, 9301

  • Local Institution

    Groenkloof, Gauteng, 0181

  • Local Institution

    Observatory, Western Cape, 7925

  • Local Institution

    Parktown, Gauteng, 2193

  • Local Institution

    Soweto, Gauteng, 2013

Other trials in South Africa

Argentina4 sites
  • Local Institution

    Buenos Aires, 1221

  • Local Institution

    Capital Federal, 1280

  • Local Institution

    Córdoba, X5016KEH

  • Local Institution

    La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1900

Other trials in Argentina

South Korea4 sites
  • Local Institution

    Jeollanam-do, 519-809

  • Local Institution

    Kyunggi-do, 480-130

  • Local Institution

    Seoul, 110-744

  • Local Institution

    Seoul, 138-736

Other trials in South Korea

Canada3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Local Institution

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5

  • Local Institution

    Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6

Other trials in Canada

Denmark3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Aarhus C, 8000

  • Local Institution

    Herlev, 2730

  • Local Institution

    Odense C, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

Spain3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Madrid, 28006

  • Local Institution

    Madrid, 28034

  • Local Institution

    Pamplona, 31008

Other trials in Spain

Czechia2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Brno, 625 00

  • Local Institution

    Prague, 128 20

Other trials in Czechia

Ireland2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Co Galway, Galway

  • Local Institution

    Dublin, 8

Other trials in Ireland

Netherlands2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Nijmegen, 6525 GA

  • Local Institution

    Rotterdam, 3075 EA

Other trials in Netherlands

Peru2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Jesus Maria, Lima region, 11

  • Local Institution

    Lima, Lima Province, 34

Other trials in Peru

Russia2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Moscow, 125167

  • Local Institution

    Saint Petersburg, 197022

Other trials in Russia

Sweden2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Lund, 22185

  • Local Institution

    Uppsala, 751 85

Other trials in Sweden

Taiwan2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Taipei, 100

  • Local Institution

    Taoyuan County, 333

Other trials in Taiwan

Austria1 site
  • Local Institution

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Finland1 site
  • Local Institution

    Helsinki, 00029

Other trials in Finland

Hungary1 site
  • Local Institution

    Budapest, 1135

Other trials in Hungary

Israel1 site
  • Local Institution

    Ramat Gan, 52621

Other trials in Israel

Mexico1 site
  • Local Institution

    Distrito Federal, 02990

Other trials in Mexico

Norway1 site
  • Local Institution

    Trondheim, 7006

Other trials in Norway

Philippines1 site
  • Local Institution

    Quezon City, 1102

Other trials in Philippines

Singapore1 site
  • Local Institution

    Singapore, 169608

Other trials in Singapore

Switzerland1 site
  • Local Institution

    Basel, 4031

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Two-by-Two, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase III Study of BMS-354825 Administered Orally at a Dose of 50 mg or 70 mg Twice Daily or 100 mg or 140 mg Once Daily in Subjects With Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome or BCR-ABL Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Who Are Resistant or Intolerant to Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec)

This is a phase III study of BMS-354825 in subjects with chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL positive chronic myelogenous leukemia, who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib mesylate (Gleevec).

Being tested
dasatinib
Keywords
Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • dasatinibDrug

    Also called Sprycel, BMS-354825

    Tablets, Oral, 50 mg BID, indefinitely, survival study

  • dasatinibDrug

    Also called Sprycel, BMS-354825

    Tablets, Oral, 70 mg BID, indefinitely, survival study

  • dasatinibDrug

    Also called Sprycel, BMS-354825

    Tablets, Oral, 100 mg QD, indefinitely, survival study

  • dasatinibDrug

    Also called Sprycel, BMS-354825

    Tablets, Oral, 140 mg QD, indefinitely, survival study

Study groups in NCT00123474
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: dasatinib
2ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: dasatinib
3ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: dasatinib
4ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: dasatinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) at 6 Months Follow-Up

    Cytogenetic response (CyR) was based on the number of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) metaphases among cells in metaphase on a Bone Marrow (BM) sample. The criteria for CyR were as follows: Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR): >0 to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minor cytogenetic response: >35 to 65% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minimal cytogenetic response: >65 to 95% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; No cytogenetic response: >95 to 100% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Best CyR was defined as the best response obtained at any time during the study; MCyR was defined as a best CyR of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or partial cytogenetic response (PCyR). Baseline=closest to, but no later than, the first day of study drug for treated participants and closest to, but no later than, the date of randomization, for those who were randomized but who never received treatment, unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Percent of Participants With MCyR At or Prior to 24 Months Follow-Up

    CyR was based on the number of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a Bone Marrow (BM) sample. The criteria for CyR were as follows: CCyR: 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; PCyR: >0 to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minor cytogenetic response: >35 to 65% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minimal cytogenetic response: >65 to 95% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; No cytogenetic response: >95 to 100% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Best CyR was defined as the best response obtained at any time during the study; MCyR was defined as a best CyR of CCyR or PCyR. Baseline=closest to, but no later than, the first day of study drug for treated participants and closest to, but no later than, the date of randomization, for those who were randomized but who never received treatment, unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: 24 months

  2. Percent of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) at 6 and 24 Months Follow-Up

    A complete hematologic response (CHR) was obtained when all the following criteria were met: White Blood Cells (WBC) ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); Platelets < 450,000/mm³; No blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; Basophils in PB < 20%; No extramedullary involvement (including no splenomegaly or hepatomegaly). Hematologic responses were counted anytime following 14 days after the dosing start date.

    Measured: 6 months, 24 months

  3. Time to MCyR in Participants With MCyR at 6 Months Follow-Up

    Time to MCyR was defined as the time from the first dosing date until criteria were first met for CCyR or PCyR, whichever occurred first. Non-responders were censored at the maximum time of all participants in their respective group (ie, maximum between time to MCyR response for responders and time to last cytogenetic assessment for non-responders).

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Time to CHR in Participants With CHR at 6 Months Follow-Up

    Time to CHR was defined as the time from the first dosing date until criteria are first met for the response. Non-responders were censored at the maximum time of all participants in their respective group (ie, maximum between time to CHR response for responders and time to last hematologic assessment for non-responders).

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Time to MCyR in Participants With MCyR at 24 Months Follow-Up

    Time to MCyR was defined as the time from the first dosing date until criteria were first met for CCyR or PCyR, whichever occurred first. Non-responders were censored at the maximum time of all participants in their respective group (ie, maximum between time to MCyR response for responders and time to last cytogenetic assessment for non-responders). Cytogenetic assessments were not done after the 2 Year Follow-up.

    Measured: 24 months

  6. Time to CHR in Participants With CHR At 24 Months Follow-Up

    Time to CHR was defined as the time from the first dosing date until criteria are first met for the response. Non-responders were censored at the maximum time of all participants in their respective group (ie, maximum between time to CHR response for responders and time to last hematologic assessment for non-responders). Cytogenetic assessments were not done after the 2 Year Follow-up.

    Measured: 24 months

  7. Number of Participants With MCyR Whose Disease Progressed by 24 Months

    Progression in a participant=participant achieved a CHR and no longer met the criteria consistently over consecutive 2-weeks after starting their maximum dose; had no CHR after receiving their maximum dose and had an increase in white blood count (WBC) defined as a doubling of the count from the lowest value to >20,000/mm^3 or an increase by > 50,000/mm^3 on two assessments performed at least 2 weeks apart; participant met criteria of accelerated or blast phase CML at any time; had a MCyR and subsequently no longer met the criteria for MCyR after starting their maximum dose; had a ≥ 30% absolute increase in the number of Ph+ metaphases. Although a related secondary endpoint was estimated duration of MCyR, medium duration of MCyR could not be estimated because the majority of participants with MCyR continued to respond, or could not be reliably estimated because of the large number of censored participants. Cytogenetic assessments were not done after the 24 month follow-up.

    Measured: 24 months

  8. Number of Participants With CHR Whose Disease Progressed by 24 Months

    Progression in a participant=achieved a CHR and subsequently no longer met the criteria consistently over a consecutive 2-week period after starting their maximum dose; had no CHR after receiving their maximum dose and had an increase in white blood count (WBC) defined as a doubling of the count from the lowest value to >20,000/mm^3 or an increase by > 50,000/mm^3 on two assessments performed at least 2 weeks apart; met the criteria of accelerated or blast phase CML at any time; had a MCyR and subsequently no longer met the criteria for MCyR after starting their maximum dose; had a ≥ 30% absolute increase in the number of Ph+ metaphases. Although a related secondary endpoint was estimated duration of CHR, medium duration of CHR could not be estimated because the majority of participants with CHR continued to respond, or could not be reliably estimated because of the large number of censored participants.

    Measured: 24 months

  9. Number of Participants With MCyR and Baseline BCR-ABL Gene Mutation - All Treated Participants

    BCR-ABL mutations were assessed in participants prior to the start of study drug (baseline) and at the time of disease progression or at end of therapy. Quantification of BCR-ABL transcripts in peripheral blood was evaluated using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR, RT-PCR).

    Measured: Baseline up to 24 months

  10. Percent of Imatinib-Resistant Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up

    PFS= time from randomization until: CHR achieved and participant subsequently no longer met criteria for CHR over 2 weeks; no CHR after receiving maximum dose and an increase in WBC (ie, doubling of the count from the lowest value to > 20,000/mm^3 or an increase by > 50,000/mm^3 on 2 assessments performed 2 weeks apart); participant met criteria of accelerated phase or blast phase CML; participant had MCyR and subsequently no longer met criteria for MCyR after starting maximum dose; participant had a ≥ 30% absolute increase in number of Ph+ metaphases. Deaths without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the date of death; those who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last cytogenetic or hematologic assessment. When first progression reported during follow-up, it was censored at last on-study assessment. If the first progression reported during follow-up was death, participant considered to have progressed at date of death.

    Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months

  11. Percent of Imatinib-Resistant Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up

    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization until death. Survival data were collected for up to 5 years on participants who had discontinued dasatinib treatment. Participants who did not die or who were lost to follow-up were censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.

    Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months

  12. Percent of Participants Intolerant to Imatinib With MCyR at 6 Months and at 24 Months Follow-Up, by QD and BID Schedules and by Total Daily Dose

    CyR was based on the number of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a BM sample. The criteria for CyR were as follows: complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; PCyR: >0 to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minor cytogenetic response: >35 to 65% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Minimal cytogenetic response: >65 to 95% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; No cytogenetic response: >95 to 100% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM; Best CyR was defined as the best response obtained at any time during the study; MCyR was defined as a best CyR of CCyR or PCyR.

    Measured: 6 months, 24 months

  13. Percent of Participants Intolerant to Imatinib With CHR at 6 Months and at 24 Months Follow-Up

    A CHR was obtained when all the following criteria were met: White Blood Cells (WBC) ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); Platelets < 450,000/mm³; No blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; Basophils in PB < 20%; No extramedullary involvement (including no splenomegaly or hepatomegaly). Hematologic responses were counted anytime following 14 days after the dosing start date.

    Measured: 6 months, 24 months

  14. Percent of Imatinib Intolerant Participants With Progression Free Survival After 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months of Follow-Up

    PFS= time from randomization until: CHR achieved and participant subsequently no longer met criteria for CHR over 2 weeks; no CHR after receiving maximum dose and an increase in WBC (ie, doubling of the count from the lowest value to > 20,000/mm^3 or an increase by > 50,000/mm^3 on 2 assessments performed 2 weeks apart); participant met criteria of accelerated phase or blast phase CML; participant had MCyR and subsequently no longer met criteria for MCyR after starting maximum dose; participant had a ≥ 30% absolute increase in number of Ph+ metaphases. Deaths without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the date of death; those who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last cytogenetic or hematologic assessment. When first progression reported during follow-up, it was censored at last on-study assessment. If the first progression reported during follow-up was death, participant considered to have progressed at date of death.

    Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months

  15. Percent of Imatinib Intolerant Participants With Overall Survival After 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months of Follow-up

    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization until death. Survival data were collected for up to 5 years on participants who had discontinued dasatinib treatment. Participants who did not die or who were lost to follow-up were censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.

    Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months

  16. Percent of All Randomized Participants With Cytogenic and Hematologic Response by Dosing Schedule (QD or BID) and by Total Daily Dose (100 mg or 140 mg) at 6 Months Follow-Up

    Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR): >0 to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. MCyR: best cytogenetic response of CCyR or PCyR. A complete hematologic response (CHR) was obtained when all the following criteria were met: White Blood Cells (WBC) ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); Platelets < 450,000/mm³; No blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; Basophils in PB < 20%; No extramedullary involvement (including no splenomegaly or hepatomegaly). Hematologic responses were counted anytime following 14 days after the dosing start date.

    Measured: 6 months

  17. Percent of All Randomized Participants With Cytogenic and Hematologic Response by Dosing Schedule (QD or BID) and by Total Daily Dose (100 mg or 140 mg) at 24 Months Follow-Up

    Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR): 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. Partial cytogenetic response (PCyR): >0 to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. MCyR: best cytogenetic response of CCyR or PCyR. A complete hematologic response (CHR) was obtained when all the following criteria were met: White Blood Cells (WBC) ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); Platelets < 450,000/mm³; No blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood (PB); < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in PB; Basophils in PB < 20%; No extramedullary involvement (including no splenomegaly or hepatomegaly). Hematologic responses were counted anytime following 14 days after the dosing start date. No cytogenic assessments were made after 2 years of follow-up.

    Measured: 24 months

  18. Percent of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up by Dose Schedule and Total Daily Dose - All Randomized Participants

    PFS= time from randomization until: CHR achieved and participant subsequently no longer met criteria for CHR over 2 weeks; no CHR after receiving maximum dose and an increase in WBC (ie, doubling of the count from the lowest value to > 20,000/mm^3 or an increase by > 50,000/mm^3 on 2 assessments performed 2 weeks apart); participant met criteria of accelerated phase or blast phase CML; participant had MCyR and subsequently no longer met criteria for MCyR after starting maximum dose; participant had a ≥ 30% absolute increase in number of Ph+ metaphases. Deaths without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the date of death; those who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of their last cytogenetic or hematologic assessment. When first progression reported during follow-up, it was censored at last on-study assessment. If the first progression reported during follow-up was death, participant considered to have progressed at date of death.

    Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months

  19. Percent of Participants Overall Survival at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 Months Follow-Up - All Randomized Participants

    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization until death. Survival data were collected for up to 5 years on participants who had discontinued dasatinib treatment. Participants who did not die or who were lost to follow-up were censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.

    Measured: 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months

  20. Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) That Led to Treatment Discontinuation at 24 Months of Follow-up

    AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. Baseline=closest to, but no later than, the first day of study drug for treated participants.

    Measured: Baseline to 30 days post last dose, up to 24 months

  21. Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) That Led toTreatment Discontinuation After 7 Year Follow-up

    AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. Baseline=closest to, but no later than, the first day of study drug for treated participants. After the 2-year analysis and Protocol Amendment 02, those on a BID dosing schedule were allowed to switch to a QD dosing schedule. Due to the large number of participants switching from BID dosing to QD dosing, the abbreviated dosing data collection method incorporated in Amendment 03, the overall safety data are presented for the 100 mg QD group and combined for the other treatment groups.

    Measured: Baseline to 30 days post last dose, up to 7 years (study closure July 2014)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2005
  3. Primary completionSep 2006
  4. Study completionJul 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
724 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00123474
Sponsor's protocol ID
CA180-034
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
21 Jul 2005
Last updated
25 Aug 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Porkka K, Khoury HJ, Paquette RL, Matloub Y, Sinha R, Cortes JE. Dasatinib 100 mg once daily minimizes the occurrence of pleural effusion in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase and efficacy is unaffected in patients who develop pleural effusion. Cancer. 2010 Jan 15;116(2):377-86. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24734.

    PubMed 19924787
  • Muller MC, Cortes JE, Kim DW, Druker BJ, Erben P, Pasquini R, Branford S, Hughes TP, Radich JP, Ploughman L, Mukhopadhyay J, Hochhaus A. Dasatinib treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: analysis of responses according to preexisting BCR-ABL mutations. Blood. 2009 Dec 3;114(24):4944-53. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-214221. Epub 2009 Sep 24.

    PubMed 19779040
  • Shah NP, Kantarjian HM, Kim DW, Rea D, Dorlhiac-Llacer PE, Milone JH, Vela-Ojeda J, Silver RT, Khoury HJ, Charbonnier A, Khoroshko N, Paquette RL, Deininger M, Collins RH, Otero I, Hughes T, Bleickardt E, Strauss L, Francis S, Hochhaus A. Intermittent target inhibition with dasatinib 100 mg once daily preserves efficacy and improves tolerability in imatinib-resistant and -intolerant chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 1;26(19):3204-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9260. Epub 2008 Jun 9.

    PubMed 18541900
  • Shah NP, Rousselot P, Schiffer C, Rea D, Cortes JE, Milone J, Mohamed H, Healey D, Kantarjian H, Hochhaus A, Saglio G. Dasatinib in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic-phase, chronic myeloid leukemia patients: 7-year follow-up of study CA180-034. Am J Hematol. 2016 Sep;91(9):869-74. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24423. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

    PubMed 27192969
  • Shah NP, Guilhot F, Cortes JE, Schiffer CA, le Coutre P, Brummendorf TH, Kantarjian HM, Hochhaus A, Rousselot P, Mohamed H, Healey D, Cunningham M, Saglio G. Long-term outcome with dasatinib after imatinib failure in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: follow-up of a phase 3 study. Blood. 2014 Apr 10;123(15):2317-24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-532341. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

    PubMed 24569263

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing dasatinib in people with Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic, Chronic-Phase, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 137 sites in 31 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 137 sites in United States, France, Australia, Belgium, Germany and 26 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Aug 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) at 6 Months Follow-Up (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00123474, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in