AzTrials
AzTrials

InfluenzaNCT00142077

Electronic Health Records for Health Promotion

A study testing Electronic health record and messaging system in people with Influenza, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether personally controlled electronic health records can be used for health promotion in a workplace setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Influenza
What is being tested?
Electronic health record and messaging system
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
700 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2005to May 2006
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The subject is a part-time or full-time employee at a major corporation.
  • The subject is eighteen years of age or older.
  • The subject is comfortable reading and writing in English.
  • The subject has reliable internet access at home, at school, or at work.
  • The subject uses email regularly (i.e. at least once every 2 days)
  • The subject does not have a known allergy to chicken eggs or a history of a severe reaction to an influenza vaccination in the past.

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Children's Hospital Boston

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02116

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Health Promotion in the Workplace Using Personally Controlled Health Records

The purpose of this study is to determine whether personally controlled electronic health records can be used for health promotion in a workplace setting.

Read the detailed description

In response to the call for research of the new Health Protection Research Initiative at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), we propose to adapt newly mature informatics technology to shift the paradigm for health alerting and health promotion in the workplace. The goal is to firmly ground these activities on real time information collected from and delivered to employees, in an interactive, secure, electronic environment. We will study influenza prevention and control, an archetype of public health practice requiring surveillance, communication, and timely influence of health-related behaviors. Complex information gleaned from surveillance will be processed, translated and provided to employees. The goal is to provide employees with timely, individualized health promotion messages to improve their knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding influenza and to increase the rate of seasonal influenza immunization for them and their household members. The approach will be evaluated in a group randomized design at several worksites of a major corporation.

Conditions
Influenza
Being tested
Electronic health record and messaging system
Keywords
Influenza, Electronic health record, Behavior modification
Medical subject headings
Influenza, Human

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electronic health record and messaging systemDevice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. - Rate of influenza immunization among subjects

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in knowledge, attitutes, and beliefs regarding influenza and influenza immunization.

  2. Changes in health behaviors around influenza (e.g. hand washing and cough etiquette).

  3. General health outcomes related to respiratory illnesses (e.g. number of influenza-like illnesses, number of physician visits, number of missed work days).

  4. Rate of influenza immunization among subject household members.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2005
  3. Study completionMay 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Enrolment
700 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00142077
Sponsor's protocol ID
1 R01 CDC 000065-01
Status last verified
Jan 2006
First submitted
31 Aug 2005
Last updated
5 Apr 2007
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Nichol KL. Cost-benefit analysis of a strategy to vaccinate healthy working adults against influenza. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Mar 12;161(5):749-59. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.5.749.

    PubMed 11231710
  • Keech M, Scott AJ, Ryan PJ. The impact of influenza and influenza-like illness on productivity and healthcare resource utilization in a working population. Occup Med (Lond). 1998 Feb;48(2):85-90. doi: 10.1093/occmed/48.2.85.

    PubMed 9614766
  • Harper SA, Fukuda K, Uyeki TM, Cox NJ, Bridges CB; Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention and control of influenza. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005 Jul 29;54(RR-8):1-40.

    PubMed 16086456
  • Bridges CB, Thompson WW, Meltzer MI, Reeve GR, Talamonti WJ, Cox NJ, Lilac HA, Hall H, Klimov A, Fukuda K. Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000 Oct 4;284(13):1655-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.13.1655.

    PubMed 11015795
  • Mandl KD, Szolovits P, Kohane IS. Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. BMJ. 2001 Feb 3;322(7281):283-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.283. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11157533
  • Riva A, Mandl KD, Oh DH, Nigrin DJ, Butte A, Szolovits P, Kohane IS. The personal internetworked notary and guardian. Int J Med Inform. 2001 Jun;62(1):27-40. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(00)00136-2.

    PubMed 11340004
  • Mandl KD, Overhage JM, Wagner MM, Lober WB, Sebastiani P, Mostashari F, Pavlin JA, Gesteland PH, Treadwell T, Koski E, Hutwagner L, Buckeridge DL, Aller RD, Grannis S. Implementing syndromic surveillance: a practical guide informed by the early experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):141-50. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1356. Epub 2003 Nov 21.

    PubMed 14633933
  • Heffernan R, Mostashari F, Das D, Karpati A, Kulldorff M, Weiss D. Syndromic surveillance in public health practice, New York City. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 May;10(5):858-64. doi: 10.3201/eid1005.030646.

    PubMed 15200820
  • Bourgeois FT, Simons WW, Olson K, Brownstein JS, Mandl KD. Evaluation of influenza prevention in the workplace using a personally controlled health record: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Mar 14;10(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/jmir.984.

    PubMed 18343794

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Electronic health record and messaging system in people with Influenza, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

- Rate of influenza immunization among subjects. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00142077, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in