Leukemia, Myeloid, AcutePhase 2NCT00143975
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Combination With A-HAM in Refractory AML (GO-A-HAM)
A Phase 2 study testing Cytarabine, Mitoxantrone and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in people with Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, run by University of Ulm at 27 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
GO-A-HAM: Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin 3g/m² day 1 Cytarabine 3g/m² bid days 1-3 Mitoxantrone 12mg/m² days 2,3 All-trans Retinoic acid 45mg/m² days 4-6 and 15 mg/m² days 7-28 Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
- What is being tested?
- Cytarabine, Mitoxantrone and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 95 participants
- Where
- 27 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2004to Jun 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Acute myeloid leukemia defined according the WHO classification not responding to first induction therapy
- Age 18-60 years
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Uncontrolled infection
- Transfusion-refractory thrombocytopenia
- Pregnancy, breast-feeding, insufficient contraception
- Organ insufficiency: kidneys, liver, lungs, heart
- Severe neurological and psychiatrical interfering with informed consent
- No consent for the registration, storage and processing of data concerning the characteristics of the AML and the individual course
- Performance status > grad 2 according the WHO classification
Trial locations and contacts
27 sites in 2 countries.
27 sites in 2 countries
Germany24 sites
Medical Department II, Central Hospital of Augsburg
Augsburg, 86156
Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Bonn
Bonn, 53127
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Essen-Süd, Ev. Hospital of Essen-Werden
Essen, 45239
Department of Internal Medicine III, City Hospital Frankfurt am Main - Höchst
Frankfurt, 65929
Medical Department IV, University Hospital of Gießen
Giessen, 35392
Department of Internal Medicine, Wilhelm-Anton-Hospital gGmbH
Goch, 47574
Centre of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Göttingen
Göttingen, 37075
Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
Medical Department III, Clinical Center Hanau
Hanau, 63450
Medical Department III, Clinical Center Hannover-Siloah
Hanover, 30449
Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology and Oncology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, 30625
Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Saarland
Homburg, 66421
Medical Department II, City Hospital Karlsruhe gGmbH
Karlsruhe, 76133
Medical Department II, University Hospital of Kiel
Kiel, 24116
Department of Internal Medicine / Hematology and Oncology, Caritas Hospital Lebach
Lebach, 66822
Department of Hematology / Oncology, Clinical center of Lüdenscheid
Lüdenscheid, 58515
Department of Hematology and internal Oncology, University Hospital of Mainz
Mainz, 55101
Medical Department III, Clinical Center rechts der Isar
München, 81675
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Clinical Center of Oldenburg gGmbH
Oldenburg, 26133
Department of Hematology and Oncology / Caritas Hospital St. Theresia
Saarbrücken, 66113
Department of Oncology / Clinical Center of Stuttgart
Stuttgart, 70174
Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Tübingen
Tübingen, 72076
Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm
Ulm, 89070
Medical Department I, Helios Hospital Wuppertal
Wuppertal, 42283
Austria3 sites
Department of Hematology / Oncology, University Hospital of Innsbruck
Innsbruck, A-6020
St. Johann Hospital, Clinical Center of Salzburg
Salzburg, A-5020
Medical Department III, Hanusch-Hospital
Vienna, A-1140
About this study
Official title: Phase II Study on Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Combination With All-trans-Retinoic Acid, High-dose Cytarabine and Mitoxantrone in Patients With Primary Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
GO-A-HAM:
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin 3g/m² day 1 Cytarabine 3g/m² bid days 1-3 Mitoxantrone 12mg/m² days 2,3 All-trans Retinoic acid 45mg/m² days 4-6 and 15 mg/m² days 7-28
Read the detailed description
Primary refractory AML is associated with an extremely poor prognosis [1,2]. In the AMLHD93 trial conducted by the AMLSG ULM, patients refractory to the first induction therapy with ICE (idarubicin, cytarabine, etoposide) had an overall survival of 12% after 5 years [1]. All patients alive in this cohort had received allogeneic transplantation. Therefore, we assigned allogeneic transplantation in our consecutive trial, AMLHD98A, to all primary refractory patients [3]. However, the main problem in this patient group remains achieving a partial (PR) or complete (CR) remission to a salvage therapy. Additionally, the pre-transplant disease status is an important prognostic factor in most studies of allogeneic transplantation, regardless dose intensified or dose reduced conditioning regimens are used [4,5,6]. Since 1993, in all studies of the German-Austrian-AMLSG response-adapted treatment strategies had been used. Within the AMLHD93 trial, refractory patients were assigned to an intensified second induction regimen with S-HAM (age<55 years) [7] or HAM (age 55 to 60 years) [1], and in the AMLHD98A trial, with A-HAM [3]. The incorporation of all-trans-retinoic acid was based on in vitro data [8-13] and by our randomised AMLHD98B study for elderly AML-patients showing a benefit in primary response and survival for patients assigned to standard induction therapy in combination with ATRA [14].
To compare the different salvage therapy strategies, we performed an as-treated analysis in primary refractory patients of the different cohorts. Although refractory to the first induction therapy with ICE, nine patients received a second cycle ICE. The results summarized in table 1 showed an improved response rate (CR and PR) for patients treated with the A-HAM protocol and thus leading to a higher proportion of patients receiving an allogeneic transplantation. Survival analysis showed so far no difference between the 4 different groups. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is a humanized anti-CD33 conjugated to Calicheamicin. The efficacy and the toxicity profile has been evaluated in several studies, so far the substance is approved for the monotherapy in relapsed AML-patients in a dose of 9mg/m² q 14d [15]. However, used as a single agent the efficacy is limited and not durable. Therefore, several trials have evaluated GO in combination with conventional chemotherapy [16,17]. In the MRC study a dose of 6 mg/m² given once at day 1 was associated with an increased liver toxicity and therefore the study continues with a dose of 3 mg/m² once at day 1 of induction therapy [17]. In summary, the available data for combination therapy showed efficacy of GO in phase II trials. The dose limiting toxicity was defined in the MRC trial at 6 mg/m². Therefore we consider GO in combination with A-HAM for primary refractory adult AML patients. Because all primary refractory patients are candidates for an allogeneic transplantation special considerations have to be taken with respect to the development of VOD after allogeneic transplantation. One recent report suggests a substantial risk for VOD for patients receiving an allogeneic transplantation after a therapy with GO [18]. In this report the odds ratio for VOD after a therapy with GO within 3.5 months before allogeneic transplantation was 21.6 (95%-confidence interval 4.2-112.2%). However, this report is based on 62 patients and the dosage of GO used was 6mg/m² and 9mg/m². Therefore, holding in mind the risk of VOD after GO exposure and the extremely poor prognosis of primary refractory patients the treatment approach combining A-HAM with GO with a dose of 3mg/m² is justified.
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
- Being tested
- Cytarabine, Mitoxantrone, Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin, All-trans-Retinoid Acid
- Keywords
- Acute myeloid leukemia, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, refractory disease
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CytarabineDrug
3 g/m2 bid. i.v day 1-3
MitoxantroneDrug
12 mg/m2 i.v. day 2 and 3
Gemtuzumab OzogamicinDrug
3mg/m² i.v. day 1
All-trans-Retinoid AcidDrug
45 mg/m2 p.o. day 4-6 15 mg/m2 p.o. day 7-28
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CR-rate after therapy with GO-A-HAM
Measured: day 30
Secondary outcomes (3)
kind, incidence, severity, temporal sequence and correlation of side effects of the study-drugs
Measured: 30 days
rate of veno occlusive disease (VOD) after allogene transplantation
Measured: 100 days after allogene transplantation
overall survival
Measured: two years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2004
- Primary completionJul 2007
- Study completionJun 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 95 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Ulm
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Richard F Schlenk, Dr. med., Principal investigator, University of Ulm / Department of Internal Medicine III
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00143975
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AMLSG05-04
- Status last verified
- Aug 2010
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2010
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Schlenk RF, Benner A, Hartmann F, del Valle F, Weber C, Pralle H, Fischer JT, Gunzer U, Pezzutto A, Weber W, Grimminger W, Preiss J, Hensel M, Frohling S, Dohner K, Haas R, Dohner H; AML Study Group Ulm (AMLSG ULM). Risk-adapted postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the German multicenter AML HD93 treatment trial. Leukemia. 2003 Aug;17(8):1521-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403009.
PubMed 12886238Wheatley K, Burnett AK, Goldstone AH, Gray RG, Hann IM, Harrison CJ, Rees JK, Stevens RF, Walker H. A simple, robust, validated and highly predictive index for the determination of risk-directed therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia derived from the MRC AML 10 trial. United Kingdom Medical Research Council's Adult and Childhood Leukaemia Working Parties. Br J Haematol. 1999 Oct;107(1):69-79. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01684.x.
PubMed 10520026Schlenk RF, Fröhling S, Del Valle F, Dreger P, Fischer JTh, Glasmacher A, Götze K, Grimminger W, Germing U, Hartmann F, Koller E, Mergenthaler HG, Salwender H, Waterhouse C, Döhner K, Bunjes D, Döhner H. Early Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients with High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Defined by Karyotype and Response To Induction Therapy: First Results of the AML HD98A Trial. Blood 98: 2822, abstract
Bunjes D, Buchmann I, Duncker C, Seitz U, Kotzerke J, Wiesneth M, Dohr D, Stefanic M, Buck A, Harsdorf SV, Glatting G, Grimminger W, Karakas T, Munzert G, Dohner H, Bergmann L, Reske SN. Rhenium 188-labeled anti-CD66 (a, b, c, e) monoclonal antibody to intensify the conditioning regimen prior to stem cell transplantation for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: results of a phase I-II study. Blood. 2001 Aug 1;98(3):565-72. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.3.565.
PubMed 11468151Schlenk RF, Hartmann F, Hensel M, Jung W, Weber-Nordt R, Gabler A, Haas R, Ho AD, Trumper L, Dohner H. Less intense conditioning with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, idarubicin and etoposide (FCIE) followed by allogeneic unselected peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with leukemia. Leukemia. 2002 Apr;16(4):581-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402423.
PubMed 11960336Sierra J, Storer B, Hansen JA, Martin PJ, Petersdorf EW, Woolfrey A, Matthews D, Sanders JE, Storb R, Appelbaum FR, Anasetti C. Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: an update of the Seattle experience. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Aug;26(4):397-404. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702519.
PubMed 10982286Hiddemann W, Buchner T, Essink M, Koch O, Stenzinger W, van de Loo J. High-dose cytosine arabinoside and mitoxantrone: preliminary results of a pilot study with sequential application (S-HAM) indicating a high antileukemic activity in refractory acute leukemias. Onkologie. 1988 Feb;11(1):10-2. doi: 10.1159/000216471.
PubMed 3283619Hu ZB, Minden MD, McCulloch EA. Direct evidence for the participation of bcl-2 in the regulation by retinoic acid of the Ara-C sensitivity of leukemic stem cells. Leukemia. 1995 Oct;9(10):1667-73.
PubMed 7564507Bradbury DA, Aldington S, Zhu YM, Russell NH. Down-regulation of bcl-2 in AML blasts by all-trans retinoic acid and its relationship to CD34 antigen expression. Br J Haematol. 1996 Sep;94(4):671-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.d01-1838.x.
PubMed 8826891Benito A, Grillot D, Nunez G, Fernandez-Luna JL. Regulation and function of Bcl-2 during differentiation-induced cell death in HL-60 promyelocytic cells. Am J Pathol. 1995 Feb;146(2):481-90.
PubMed 7856757Yang GS, Minden MD, McCulloch EA. Influence of schedule on regulated sensitivity of AML blasts to cytosine arabinoside. Leukemia. 1993 Jul;7(7):1012-9.
PubMed 7686602Zheng A, Mantymaa P, Saily M, Savolainen E, Vahakangas K, Koistinen P. p53 pathway in apoptosis induced by all-trans-retinoic acid in acute myeloblastic leukaemia cells. Acta Haematol. 2000;103(3):135-43. doi: 10.1159/000041036.
PubMed 10940651Schlenk RF, Frohling S, Hartmann F, Fischer JT, Glasmacher A, del Valle F, Grimminger W, Gotze K, Waterhouse C, Schoch R, Pralle H, Mergenthaler HG, Hensel M, Koller E, Kirchen H, Preiss J, Salwender H, Biedermann HG, Kremers S, Griesinger F, Benner A, Addamo B, Dohner K, Haas R, Dohner H; AML Study Group Ulm. Phase III study of all-trans retinoic acid in previously untreated patients 61 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2004 Nov;18(11):1798-803. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403528.
PubMed 15385923Sievers EL, Larson RA, Stadtmauer EA, Estey E, Lowenberg B, Dombret H, Karanes C, Theobald M, Bennett JM, Sherman ML, Berger MS, Eten CB, Loken MR, van Dongen JJ, Bernstein ID, Appelbaum FR; Mylotarg Study Group. Efficacy and safety of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jul 1;19(13):3244-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.13.3244.
PubMed 11432892De Angelo, D., et al., Interim analysis of a phase II study of the safety and efficacy of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (Mylotarg) given in combination with Cytarabine and Daunorubicin in patients< 60years old with untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 100:745a.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Aug 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Study on Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Combination With All-trans-Retinoic Acid, High-dose Cytarabine and Mitoxantrone in Patients With Primary Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00143975
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMLSG05-04
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
- Keywords
- Acute myeloid leukemia, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, refractory disease
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 95 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of UlmUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2004
- Primary completion
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
GO-A-HAM:
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin 3g/m² day 1 Cytarabine 3g/m² bid days 1-3 Mitoxantrone 12mg/m² days 2,3 All-trans Retinoic acid 45mg/m² days 4-6 and 15 mg/m² days 7-28
Detailed description
Primary refractory AML is associated with an extremely poor prognosis [1,2]. In the AMLHD93 trial conducted by the AMLSG ULM, patients refractory to the first induction therapy with ICE (idarubicin, cytarabine, etoposide) had an overall survival of 12% after 5 years [1]. All patients alive in this cohort had received allogeneic transplantation. Therefore, we assigned allogeneic transplantation in our consecutive trial, AMLHD98A, to all primary refractory patients [3]. However, the main problem in this patient group remains achieving a partial (PR) or complete (CR) remission to a salvage therapy. Additionally, the pre-transplant disease status is an important prognostic factor in most studies of allogeneic transplantation, regardless dose intensified or dose reduced conditioning regimens are used [4,5,6]. Since 1993, in all studies of the German-Austrian-AMLSG response-adapted treatment strategies had been used. Within the AMLHD93 trial, refractory patients were assigned to an intensified second induction regimen with S-HAM (age<55 years) [7] or HAM (age 55 to 60 years) [1], and in the AMLHD98A trial, with A-HAM [3]. The incorporation of all-trans-retinoic acid was based on in vitro data [8-13] and by our randomised AMLHD98B study for elderly AML-patients showing a benefit in primary response and survival for patients assigned to standard induction therapy in combination with ATRA [14].
To compare the different salvage therapy strategies, we performed an as-treated analysis in primary refractory patients of the different cohorts. Although refractory to the first induction therapy with ICE, nine patients received a second cycle ICE. The results summarized in table 1 showed an improved response rate (CR and PR) for patients treated with the A-HAM protocol and thus leading to a higher proportion of patients receiving an allogeneic transplantation. Survival analysis showed so far no difference between the 4 different groups. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is a humanized anti-CD33 conjugated to Calicheamicin. The efficacy and the toxicity profile has been evaluated in several studies, so far the substance is approved for the monotherapy in relapsed AML-patients in a dose of 9mg/m² q 14d [15]. However, used as a single agent the efficacy is limited and not durable. Therefore, several trials have evaluated GO in combination with conventional chemotherapy [16,17]. In the MRC study a dose of 6 mg/m² given once at day 1 was associated with an increased liver toxicity and therefore the study continues with a dose of 3 mg/m² once at day 1 of induction therapy [17]. In summary, the available data for combination therapy showed efficacy of GO in phase II trials. The dose limiting toxicity was defined in the MRC trial at 6 mg/m². Therefore we consider GO in combination with A-HAM for primary refractory adult AML patients. Because all primary refractory patients are candidates for an allogeneic transplantation special considerations have to be taken with respect to the development of VOD after allogeneic transplantation. One recent report suggests a substantial risk for VOD for patients receiving an allogeneic transplantation after a therapy with GO [18]. In this report the odds ratio for VOD after a therapy with GO within 3.5 months before allogeneic transplantation was 21.6 (95%-confidence interval 4.2-112.2%). However, this report is based on 62 patients and the dosage of GO used was 6mg/m² and 9mg/m². Therefore, holding in mind the risk of VOD after GO exposure and the extremely poor prognosis of primary refractory patients the treatment approach combining A-HAM with GO with a dose of 3mg/m² is justified.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Acute myeloid leukemia defined according the WHO classification not responding to first induction therapy
- Age 18-60 years
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Uncontrolled infection
- Transfusion-refractory thrombocytopenia
- Pregnancy, breast-feeding, insufficient contraception
- Organ insufficiency: kidneys, liver, lungs, heart
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cytarabine3 g/m2 bid. i.v day 1-3 | Drug | – |
| Mitoxantrone12 mg/m2 i.v. day 2 and 3 | Drug | – |
| Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin3mg/m² i.v. day 1 | Drug | – |
| All-trans-Retinoid Acid45 mg/m2 p.o. day 4-6 15 mg/m2 p.o. day 7-28 | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
CR-rate after therapy with GO-A-HAM
Time frame: day 30
3 secondary outcomes
kind, incidence, severity, temporal sequence and correlation of side effects of the study-drugs
Time frame: 30 days
rate of veno occlusive disease (VOD) after allogene transplantation
Time frame: 100 days after allogene transplantation
overall survival
Time frame: two years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Aug 2010.
- Background: PubMed 12886238Schlenk RF, Benner A, Hartmann F, del Valle F, Weber C, Pralle H, Fischer JT, Gunzer U, Pezzutto A, Weber W, Grimminger W, Preiss J, Hensel M, Frohling S, Dohner K, Haas R, Dohner H; AML Study Group Ulm (AMLSG ULM). Risk-adapted postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the German multicenter AML HD93 treatment trial. Leukemia. 2003 Aug;17(8):1521-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403009.
- Background: PubMed 10520026Wheatley K, Burnett AK, Goldstone AH, Gray RG, Hann IM, Harrison CJ, Rees JK, Stevens RF, Walker H. A simple, robust, validated and highly predictive index for the determination of risk-directed therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia derived from the MRC AML 10 trial. United Kingdom Medical Research Council's Adult and Childhood Leukaemia Working Parties. Br J Haematol. 1999 Oct;107(1):69-79. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01684.x.
- BackgroundSchlenk RF, Fröhling S, Del Valle F, Dreger P, Fischer JTh, Glasmacher A, Götze K, Grimminger W, Germing U, Hartmann F, Koller E, Mergenthaler HG, Salwender H, Waterhouse C, Döhner K, Bunjes D, Döhner H. Early Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients with High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Defined by Karyotype and Response To Induction Therapy: First Results of the AML HD98A Trial. Blood 98: 2822, abstract
- Background: PubMed 11468151Bunjes D, Buchmann I, Duncker C, Seitz U, Kotzerke J, Wiesneth M, Dohr D, Stefanic M, Buck A, Harsdorf SV, Glatting G, Grimminger W, Karakas T, Munzert G, Dohner H, Bergmann L, Reske SN. Rhenium 188-labeled anti-CD66 (a, b, c, e) monoclonal antibody to intensify the conditioning regimen prior to stem cell transplantation for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: results of a phase I-II study. Blood. 2001 Aug 1;98(3):565-72. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.3.565.
- Background: PubMed 11960336Schlenk RF, Hartmann F, Hensel M, Jung W, Weber-Nordt R, Gabler A, Haas R, Ho AD, Trumper L, Dohner H. Less intense conditioning with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, idarubicin and etoposide (FCIE) followed by allogeneic unselected peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with leukemia. Leukemia. 2002 Apr;16(4):581-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402423.
- Background: PubMed 10982286Sierra J, Storer B, Hansen JA, Martin PJ, Petersdorf EW, Woolfrey A, Matthews D, Sanders JE, Storb R, Appelbaum FR, Anasetti C. Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: an update of the Seattle experience. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Aug;26(4):397-404. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702519.
- Background: PubMed 3283619Hiddemann W, Buchner T, Essink M, Koch O, Stenzinger W, van de Loo J. High-dose cytosine arabinoside and mitoxantrone: preliminary results of a pilot study with sequential application (S-HAM) indicating a high antileukemic activity in refractory acute leukemias. Onkologie. 1988 Feb;11(1):10-2. doi: 10.1159/000216471.
- Background: PubMed 7564507Hu ZB, Minden MD, McCulloch EA. Direct evidence for the participation of bcl-2 in the regulation by retinoic acid of the Ara-C sensitivity of leukemic stem cells. Leukemia. 1995 Oct;9(10):1667-73.
- Background: PubMed 8826891Bradbury DA, Aldington S, Zhu YM, Russell NH. Down-regulation of bcl-2 in AML blasts by all-trans retinoic acid and its relationship to CD34 antigen expression. Br J Haematol. 1996 Sep;94(4):671-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.d01-1838.x.
- Background: PubMed 7856757Benito A, Grillot D, Nunez G, Fernandez-Luna JL. Regulation and function of Bcl-2 during differentiation-induced cell death in HL-60 promyelocytic cells. Am J Pathol. 1995 Feb;146(2):481-90.
- Background: PubMed 7686602Yang GS, Minden MD, McCulloch EA. Influence of schedule on regulated sensitivity of AML blasts to cytosine arabinoside. Leukemia. 1993 Jul;7(7):1012-9.
- Background: PubMed 10940651Zheng A, Mantymaa P, Saily M, Savolainen E, Vahakangas K, Koistinen P. p53 pathway in apoptosis induced by all-trans-retinoic acid in acute myeloblastic leukaemia cells. Acta Haematol. 2000;103(3):135-43. doi: 10.1159/000041036.
Related trials for Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Richard F Schlenk, Dr. med. principal investigator
University of Ulm / Department of Internal Medicine III
27 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cytarabine, Mitoxantrone and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in people with Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, run by University of Ulm at 27 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 27 sites in Germany, Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CR-rate after therapy with GO-A-HAM (time frame: day 30). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00143975, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2010.