AzTrials
AzTrials

Sepsis - to Reduce Mortality in the Intensive Care UnitNCT00144638

Procalcitonin Increase Identifies Critically Ill Patients at High Risk of Mortality

An observational study of Sepsis - to Reduce Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit, run by Danish Procalcitonin Study Group at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Procalcitonin, a marker of infection has often been compared to clinical pictures as for instance "clinical sepsis". This has given som problems in the interpretation of these studies, because of the lack of good Gold Standards for "clinical sepsis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 0 years and older
How many people
450 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Jan 2002to Jan 2003
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 0 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Recent (< 3 months) liver transplantation
  • Expected admission < 24 h

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Dept. 4131, Rigshospitalet, Cph University Hosp., DK

    Copenhagen, DK-2100

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Procalcitonin, a marker of infection has often been compared to clinical pictures as for instance "clinical sepsis". This has given som problems in the interpretation of these studies, because of the lack of good Gold Standards for "clinical sepsis. We have decided to investigate the development from day to day of Procalcitonin in the blood of intensive care patients, compared to the mortality.

Hypothesis: Procalcitonin increase after reaching a certain level predicts mortality in the Intensive Care Unit.

Read the detailed description

Sepsis is a major cause of mortality in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Efforts have been made to reduce the time needed to diagnose sepsis in order to reduce mortality from sepsis-related multi-organ dysfunction .

Markers of inflammation such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and White Blood Cell count (WBC) have proved far from ideal in identifying critically ill patients who need antimicrobial therapy, because the sensitivity and specificity for bacterial infection is low.

Procalcitonin (PCT) is a 13 kDa 116 amino acid polypeptide, initially described as a prohormone of Calcitonin, a hormone of the calcium metabolism produced in the medullary C-cells of the Thyroid gland5-7. However, recent studies demonstrated that the variant PCT associated with infection can be produced by other tissues.

As kinetic studies on baboons and humans have shown a rapid release within 2-4 hours after injection of bacteria or bacterial toxins, PCT is a substance which is released more rapidly than CRP. The plasma half-life of PCT is close to 24 hours. Measurements of PCT in healthy individuals have shown very low serum levels (<0.05 ng/ml).

In 1993, Assicot et al. reported that elevated levels of serum procalcitonin were closely related to the onset of bacterial infection and seemingly correlated to severity of infection.

Several clinical studies have detected a high PCT level in patients with evidence of systemic bacterial infection, while relatively low PCT levels, on the other hand, occur in patients with only local bacterial infection or viral infection.

Other studies have shown low to only moderately elevated PCT in uninfected patients after major surgery, trauma and after myocardial infarction.

A reduced usage of antimicrobial therapy has been demonstrated when treatment was guided by PCT in patients with suspected lower respiratory tract infection, who were admitted to a medical emergency department. Only few studies, however, have investigated the PCT day-to-day changes for several days in respect of the clinical outcome in a population at risk of contracting serious infections.

The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of PCT-, CRP- and leucocyte measurements in early identification of critically ill patients, who are at high risk of mortality. The study was a one-year study.

Methods Patients From January 2 through December 2002, we conducted an observational study including all patients (except livertransplanted patients) admitted to the multi-disciplinary intensive care unit 4131 at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, a secondary and tertiary reference hospital. Patients were included on admittance to the ICU. In cases of re-admittance, only measurements from the first admittance were included in the study.

When sepsis was suspected, we performed culture samples from all suspected sites before antibiotic therapy was initiated. Surveillance culture samples were performed twice a week from all patients, including blood cultures from indwelling catheters.

Data of co-morbidity and mortality were registered real-time and were verified via the central hospital register for Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital.

In all analyses, mortality was defined as all-cause mortality. The primary endpoint was 90-day survival; secondary endpoints were survival while admitted to the ICU and 30-day survival.

Blood samples Blood samples for PCT measurements were collected by the nursing staff in the ICU on a daily basis between 6.00 a.m. and 7.30 a.m. in accordance with the assumed half life of PCT. PCT analyses were performed by laboratory technicians at the Department of Clinical Microbiology, using an immunoluminometric assay (Lumitest-PCT, B.R.A.H.M.S. Diagnostica, Berlin, Germany). The threshold of detection was 0.1 ng/ml serum, according to the manufacturer.

Blood samples were collected as a routine test in accordance with the ethical procedures of the hospital.

All blood samples were stored at 4o Celsius, and were analysed within maximally 72 hours. As a control of the PCT analysis and storage, we made double determinations. Ten blood samples were analysed single-blinded three times daily at a standardised time for three days.

PCT-day-to-day change analysis Standard empiric antimicrobial treatment of sepsis in this ICU includes: Meropenem and Ciprofloxacin, when relevant supplemented with: Metronidazole, Vancomycin, Linezolid and occasionally other antibiotics according to clinical findings, patient tolerance, suspected site of infection and bacterial cultures from foci and from surveillance cultures combined with susceptibility patterns. Treatment of invasive fungal infection included Caspofungin, Liposomal Amphotericin B or Voriconazole, or combination therapy with these according to Candida species identification and susceptibility pattern from Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) in surveillance cultures.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2002
  3. Study completionJan 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Defined population
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
450 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00144638
Sponsor's protocol ID
DPSG1
Status last verified
Feb 2005
First submitted
1 Sep 2005
Last updated
5 Sep 2005
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Sepsis - to Reduce Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit, run by Danish Procalcitonin Study Group at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2005.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in