Graft vs Host DiseasePhase 1/2NCT00146978
Intra-Arterial Catheter Directed Therapy for Severe Graft vs. Host Disease (GVHD)
A Phase 1/2 study testing intra-arterial treatment in people with Graft vs Host Disease, run by Hadassah Medical Organization at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), resulting in death in the majority of steroid resistant patients. The study was designed to assess the efficacy of regional intra-arterial treatment in patients with resistant hepatic and/or gastro-intestinal GVHD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Graft vs Host Disease
- What is being tested?
- intra-arterial treatment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- Dec 2000to Aug 2005
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Recipient of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. AGVHD of liver and or GI tract, grade 2-4. Resistant AGVHD. Signed a written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Not fulfilling any of the inclusion criteria. Active life-threatening infection. Inability to comply with study requirements. Contraindication to arterial catheterization. Has been diagnosed with multi organ failure.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate Intra-Arterial Catheter Directed Therapy for Severe Gastro-Intestinal and/or Hepatic Graft vs. Host Disease (GVHD)
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), resulting in death in the majority of steroid resistant patients. The study was designed to assess the efficacy of regional intra-arterial treatment in patients with resistant hepatic and/or gastro-intestinal GVHD.
Read the detailed description
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is the most ominous side effect of allogeneic bone marrow or blood stem cell transplantation (BMT). GVHD causes a severe inflammatory process, which affects primarily the skin and the GI) system, including the liver. Pharmacological treatment of GVHD includes various immunosuppressive and immune-modulating drugs, including steroids, cyclosporin, tacrolimus, methotrexate and anti-lymphocyte agents. These agents can aggravate immunologic incompetence, exposing the patient to infections and secondary malignancy, as well as reducing the efficacy of graft versus leukemia / graft versus tumor (GVL / GVT) effects induced by alloreactive donor lymphocytes. In spite of this effect on the immune system, only 50-70% of the patients achieve partial control of GVHD, which can rapidly deteriorate and result in death. Despite the use of innovative immunosuppressive modalities, the prognosis of steroid resistant GVHD is usually poor. GVHD can be mostly localized to a specific organ (skin, liver, GI) with liver involvement tending to be more chronic and resistant. The bile ducts are the main target for GVHD, with their blood supply originating from the hepatic artery. This may explain the ineffective nature of oral steroids absorbed through the gut into the portal vein.
Sato et al reported that an infusion of steroids to the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries induced remission in a patient with refractory GI GVHD. This method has never been tested in patients with fulminant liver GVHD. We decided to test this approach in a larger cohort of patients with steroid resistant hepatic and intestinal GVHD.
Patients were eligible for inclusion if they developed grade 3-4 hepatic and/or GI GVHD unresponsive to treatment with IV cyclosporin 3 mg/kg and IV methylprednisolone (MP) 2 mg/kg. GVHD diagnosis was based upon clinical criteria and in some of the patients supported by biopsy. GVHD grading was graded according to the Seattle severity index.
Patients with hepatic GVHD were first treated with slow intra-arterial (hepatic artery) infusion of methotrexate (Pharmachemie, Netherland) (10mg/m2) and MP (Pharmacia and Upjohn, Belgium) (75mg/m2). The protocol was later on changed with the exclusion of methotrexate and increase of MP dose to 1000mg.
Patients with GI GVHD were treated with intra-arterial (SMA, IMA) infusion of MP (40-60 mg/vessel). In cases of upper GI GVHD intra-arterial infusion of MP was given to the gastro-duodenal artery (GDA). Later on, injections to the internal iliacs were added.
Technique Angiography was performed using standard sterile technique, local anesthesia with lidocaine 1% and conscious intravenous sedation. Visceral arteriography was performed in order to determine anatomy and identify variant arterial blood supply to the gut. A selection of 3 - 5 Fr. angiographic catheters was used at the discretion of the angiographer performing the procedure. The most frequently used catheters were 4 Fr. \& 5 Fr. Cobra 2 and Rim catheters (Cook Inc., Bloomington, In.). Other catheters used included the Sos 2 (Angiodynamics Inc., Queensbury, NY.) and the 3Fr. Terumo SP co-axial catheter (Terumo Europe, N.V., Leuven, Belgium.). Once the catheter was in position, each drug was injected into the artery over approximately three minutes. After completion of the procedure, the catheter was removed and direct manual pressure over the arteriotomy maintained until hemostasis was achieved. Patients remained on complete bed rest with the involved extremity extended for 6 hours, in accordance with standard angiographic practice. Compression devices were not used.
Definitions Hepatic response: initial response - the day in which bilirubin level began to decrease, partial response - the day in which bilirubin level decreased below 70% of basal level, complete response - the day in which bilirubin level decreased below 30% of basal level.
GI response: initial response - the day in which symptom amelioration appeared (diarrhea volume and abdominal pain). Complete response - the day in which symptoms resolved.
- Conditions
- Graft vs Host Disease
- Being tested
- intra-arterial treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Graft vs Host Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
intra-arterial treatmentProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To assess the efficacy of intra-arterial Methylprednisolone treatment in decreasing the severity of acute GVHD.
Secondary outcomes (1)
1. Time to GVHD response. 2. Overall survival. 3. Disease free survival. 4. Acute toxicity.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2000
- Study completionAug 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Graft vs Host DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hadassah Medical OrganizationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hadassah Medical Organization
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Michael Y Shapira, MD, Principal investigator, Hadassah Medical Organization
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00146978
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 903/11/0-HMO-CTIL
- Status last verified
- Mar 2006
- First submitted
- 4 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2006
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Bloom AI, Shapira MY, Or R, Sasson T, Resnick IB, Zilberman I, Verstandig A, Aker M, Slavin S, Muszkat M. Intrahepatic arterial administration of low-dose methotrexate in patients with severe hepatic graft-versus-host disease: an open-label, uncontrolled trial. Clin Ther. 2004 Mar;26(3):407-14. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90036-7.
PubMed 15110133Shapira MY, Bloom AI, Or R, Sasson T, Nagler A, Resnick IB, Aker M, Zilberman I, Slavin S, Verstanding A. Intra-arterial catheter directed therapy for severe graft-versus-host disease. Br J Haematol. 2002 Dec;119(3):760-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03923.x.
PubMed 12437655
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate Intra-Arterial Catheter Directed Therapy for Severe Gastro-Intestinal and/or Hepatic Graft vs. Host Disease (GVHD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00146978
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 903/11/0-HMO-CTIL
- Conditions
- Graft vs Host Disease
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Hadassah Medical OrganizationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2000
- Study completion
- Aug 2005
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), resulting in death in the majority of steroid resistant patients. The study was designed to assess the efficacy of regional intra-arterial treatment in patients with resistant hepatic and/or gastro-intestinal GVHD.
Detailed description
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is the most ominous side effect of allogeneic bone marrow or blood stem cell transplantation (BMT). GVHD causes a severe inflammatory process, which affects primarily the skin and the GI) system, including the liver. Pharmacological treatment of GVHD includes various immunosuppressive and immune-modulating drugs, including steroids, cyclosporin, tacrolimus, methotrexate and anti-lymphocyte agents. These agents can aggravate immunologic incompetence, exposing the patient to infections and secondary malignancy, as well as reducing the efficacy of graft versus leukemia / graft versus tumor (GVL / GVT) effects induced by alloreactive donor lymphocytes. In spite of this effect on the immune system, only 50-70% of the patients achieve partial control of GVHD, which can rapidly deteriorate and result in death. Despite the use of innovative immunosuppressive modalities, the prognosis of steroid resistant GVHD is usually poor. GVHD can be mostly localized to a specific organ (skin, liver, GI) with liver involvement tending to be more chronic and resistant. The bile ducts are the main target for GVHD, with their blood supply originating from the hepatic artery. This may explain the ineffective nature of oral steroids absorbed through the gut into the portal vein.
Sato et al reported that an infusion of steroids to the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries induced remission in a patient with refractory GI GVHD. This method has never been tested in patients with fulminant liver GVHD. We decided to test this approach in a larger cohort of patients with steroid resistant hepatic and intestinal GVHD.
Patients were eligible for inclusion if they developed grade 3-4 hepatic and/or GI GVHD unresponsive to treatment with IV cyclosporin 3 mg/kg and IV methylprednisolone (MP) 2 mg/kg. GVHD diagnosis was based upon clinical criteria and in some of the patients supported by biopsy. GVHD grading was graded according to the Seattle severity index.
Patients with hepatic GVHD were first treated with slow intra-arterial (hepatic artery) infusion of methotrexate (Pharmachemie, Netherland) (10mg/m2) and MP (Pharmacia and Upjohn, Belgium) (75mg/m2). The protocol was later on changed with the exclusion of methotrexate and increase of MP dose to 1000mg.
Patients with GI GVHD were treated with intra-arterial (SMA, IMA) infusion of MP (40-60 mg/vessel). In cases of upper GI GVHD intra-arterial infusion of MP was given to the gastro-duodenal artery (GDA). Later on, injections to the internal iliacs were added.
Technique Angiography was performed using standard sterile technique, local anesthesia with lidocaine 1% and conscious intravenous sedation. Visceral arteriography was performed in order to determine anatomy and identify variant arterial blood supply to the gut. A selection of 3 - 5 Fr. angiographic catheters was used at the discretion of the angiographer performing the procedure. The most frequently used catheters were 4 Fr. \& 5 Fr. Cobra 2 and Rim catheters (Cook Inc., Bloomington, In.). Other catheters used included the Sos 2 (Angiodynamics Inc., Queensbury, NY.) and the 3Fr. Terumo SP co-axial catheter (Terumo Europe, N.V., Leuven, Belgium.). Once the catheter was in position, each drug was injected into the artery over approximately three minutes. After completion of the procedure, the catheter was removed and direct manual pressure over the arteriotomy maintained until hemostasis was achieved. Patients remained on complete bed rest with the involved extremity extended for 6 hours, in accordance with standard angiographic practice. Compression devices were not used.
Definitions Hepatic response: initial response - the day in which bilirubin level began to decrease, partial response - the day in which bilirubin level decreased below 70% of basal level, complete response - the day in which bilirubin level decreased below 30% of basal level.
GI response: initial response - the day in which symptom amelioration appeared (diarrhea volume and abdominal pain). Complete response - the day in which symptoms resolved.
Study design
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Recipient of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. AGVHD of liver and or GI tract, grade 2-4. Resistant AGVHD. Signed a written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Not fulfilling any of the inclusion criteria. Active life-threatening infection. Inability to comply with study requirements. Contraindication to arterial catheterization. Has been diagnosed with multi organ failure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| intra-arterial treatment | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
To assess the efficacy of intra-arterial Methylprednisolone treatment in decreasing the severity of acute GVHD.
1 secondary outcome
1. Time to GVHD response. 2. Overall survival. 3. Disease free survival. 4. Acute toxicity.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2006.
- Results publication: PubMed 15110133Bloom AI, Shapira MY, Or R, Sasson T, Resnick IB, Zilberman I, Verstandig A, Aker M, Slavin S, Muszkat M. Intrahepatic arterial administration of low-dose methotrexate in patients with severe hepatic graft-versus-host disease: an open-label, uncontrolled trial. Clin Ther. 2004 Mar;26(3):407-14. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90036-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 12437655Shapira MY, Bloom AI, Or R, Sasson T, Nagler A, Resnick IB, Aker M, Zilberman I, Slavin S, Verstanding A. Intra-arterial catheter directed therapy for severe graft-versus-host disease. Br J Haematol. 2002 Dec;119(3):760-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03923.x.
Related trials for Graft vs Host Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Improved Methods of Cell Selection for Bone Marrow Transplant Alternatives
Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Graft-versus-leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of Pacritinib, A JAK2/IRAK1/CSF1R Inhibitor, in Refractory Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
Graft vs Host Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
De-escalated Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and Ruxolitinib for Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis
Graft-versus-host Disease
RecruitingPhase 1/2
PTCy, Bortezomib and Sitagliptin for Prevention of GvHD Following Allogeneic HSCT
GVHD - Graft-Versus-Host Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Y Shapira, MD principal investigator
Hadassah Medical Organization
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing intra-arterial treatment in people with Graft vs Host Disease, run by Hadassah Medical Organization at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To assess the efficacy of intra-arterial Methylprednisolone treatment in decreasing the severity of acute GVHD.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00146978, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2006; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.