Carcinoma of Unknown PrimaryPhase 2NCT00148135
Combination of Carboplatin, Gemcitabine, and Capecitabine in Patients With Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site
A Phase 2 study testing Carboplatin, Gemcitabine and Capecitabine in people with Carcinoma of Unknown Primary, run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is for patients with a type of cancer called carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP), meaning that the site of the body where the tumor has originated is not clear. Currently, carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) accounts for about 5% of all newly diagnosed malignancies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
- What is being tested?
- Carboplatin, Gemcitabine and Capecitabine
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2001to Oct 2007
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of carcinoma, with clinical evidence of metastasis and the primary site not clear after the following work-up:
- Complete history and physical
- Laboratory evaluation including serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), serum alpha-fetoprotein for undifferentiated or poorly differentiated carcinomas and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) in men.
- Directed radiologic evaluation including, at a minimum, computerized tomography (CT) of chest, abdomen and pelvis and bilateral mammography for female patients.
- Pathologic immunohistochemistry studies of the surgical or biopsy specimen, including studies for estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor and PSA stains when clinically appropriate.
- Patients must be at least 18 years of age and have a Zubrod performance status 0-2.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Adequate organ function, defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1500/ul, platelet count of > 100,000/ul, serum creatinine less than or equal to 2.0 mg/dl, serum bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dl.
- Patients must have measurable disease. (Partial response [PR] - at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD.)
- Patients may be previously untreated or have received one chemotherapy regimen provided it did not include carboplatin, gemcitabine or capecitabine.
- Patients must have no serious intercurrent medical or psychiatric illness that would limit their ability to provide informed consent or receive protocol therapy.
- Patients must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and provide written informed consent in accordance with institutional and federal guidelines prior to the initiation of therapy.
Who cannot join
- Patients with previous invasive malignancy within the preceding 5 years are ineligible unless clinicopathologic information regarding the current neoplasm is clearly discordant from prior disease. Patients with non-melanoma skin cancer or in situ cancer of any site are eligible.
- Patients with brain metastasis are not eligible.
- No concurrent chemotherapy, biological or radiotherapy is allowed.
- Pregnant or lactating women are not eligible. Women and men of childbearing potential must agree to use effective contraception throughout the treatment period, and for six months after treatment has been discontinued.
- The following groups of patients will not be eligible for the study as they represent populations of patients with CUP for whom more specific treatment approaches are available:
- Patients presenting with squamous carcinoma isolated to middle and high cervical lymph nodes
Show all 9Show fewer
- Women presenting with isolated axillary lymphadenopathy
- Women presenting with predominant peritoneal carcinomatosis
- Men < 50 years of age presenting with predominant mediastinal and/or retroperitoneal nodal involvement and biopsy showing undifferentiated or poorly differentiated carcinoma.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Trial Evaluating the Combination of Carboplatin, Gemcitabine, and Capecitabine in Patients With Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site
This study is for patients with a type of cancer called carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP), meaning that the site of the body where the tumor has originated is not clear. Currently, carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) accounts for about 5% of all newly diagnosed malignancies. The stage of the tumor is such that it is not treatable by surgery. Currently, the standard treatment for such a type of cancer at that stage is chemotherapy. However, the overall prognosis for patients with metastatic CUP remains poor, even if treated with conventional chemotherapy. Through ongoing research at medical centers around the world, doctors are trying to improve on the presently available chemotherapy regimens. The purpose of the investigators' study is similar: it is trying to determine whether a combination of three chemotherapy drugs - carboplatin, gemcitabine, and capecitabine - will improve the treatment of patients with metastatic CUP. The reason the investigators are interested in the above combination of chemotherapy agents is that each one of them is already used in patients with a variety of specific tumors, such as lung cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon cancer, etc.
This research study will help determine whether the combination of carboplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine can be used and is effective in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site.
Read the detailed description
Carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) accounts for approximately 5% of all newly diagnosed malignancies. The overall prognosis for patients with CUP remains poor, with median survival less than one year with modern chemotherapy combinations and virtually no long-term survivors.
It has been recognized that patients with CUP represent a heterogeneous group of tumors. Managing patients with CUP requires a complete medical history, careful consideration of findings on physical exam, targeted radiologic studies and pathologic analysis of biopsy and/or surgical specimens. Within this heterogeneous group there exist at least four subsets of patients with CUP, that based on clinicopathologic features are treated with regimens which have demonstrated efficacy in tumors originating in the most likely primary site of that CUP; squamous carcinoma involving mid or high levels of cervical lymph nodes, women with isolated axillary adenopathy containing adenocarcinoma, women with a predominant presentation of peritoneal carcinomatosis and young men with extragonadal germ cell syndrome.
Unfortunately, a majority of patients with CUP do not fall into any of the above subsets and these represent a therapeutic dilemma, as there is no single regimen to date that has shown significant activity or has resulted in prolonged survival for these patients with particularly poor prognosis. Thus, new therapeutic combinations need to be investigated for treatment of these patients with CUP.
Platinum compounds have been the cornerstone of chemotherapy regimens for a wide variety of solid tumors, including lung, urothelial, head and neck, ovarian and endometrial carcinomas, as well as testicular carcinomas. Cisplatin and its analog carboplatin are currently used in chemotherapy combinations to treat CUP. Carboplatin has fewer non-hematologic side effects compared to cisplatin including less nausea and vomiting, peripheral neuropathy, nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity making it an attractive agent to combine with other drugs.
In recent years, new agents active in solid malignancies have been developed. Gemcitabine is one such agent. It is a deoxycytidine analogue structurally related to cytosine arabinoside. Gemcitabine is activated by deoxycytidine kinase in three steps of phosphorylation into difluorodeoxycytidine triphosphate, which when incorporated into DNA, leads to chain termination. Gemcitabine has been shown to have activity in pancreatic, breast, non-small cell lung carcinomas as well as in carcinomas of unknown primary site. Because of its mild toxicity profile, gemcitabine has been used in combination with other chemotherapy agents. There is evidence of in vitro and in vivo synergy between gemcitabine and the platinum compounds.
Capecitabine is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine that undergoes a three-step conversion into 5-FU, with pharmacokinetics that mimic low dose continuous infusion 5-FU. The oral formulation allows for convenient continuous therapy, avoiding a need for central venous catheters and external infusion pumps.
The final step of conversion of capecitabine into 5-FU is catalyzed by thymidine phosphorylase (TP), an enzyme which has been shown to be over expressed in colorectal tumors. This selective tumor activation has been demonstrated to lead to higher concentrations of 5-FU in tumor cells as compared to normal tissue, suggesting tumor targeting by the oral drug. Capecitabine was initially approved by the FDA for treatment of refractory breast carcinoma and has shown activity in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Capecitabine is an attractive agent for use in combination chemotherapy due to its non-overlapping toxicity profile with many agents and lack of hematologic toxicity.
Gemcitabine has been combined with 5-FU, and may enhance the activity of 5-FU in vivo. Gemcitabine is an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase, an enzyme needed for synthesis of deoxynucleotides, and 5-FU interferes with dTTP synthesis by inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS). It is plausible that concomitant administration of gemcitabine and capecitabine, may result in increased cytotoxicity by reducing intracellular dTTP thru two different mechanisms, thereby inhibiting DNA replication and repair. Platinum compounds lead to cell death by forming DNA adducts and causing double strand breaks. By inhibiting DNA synthesis and repair, both gemcitabine and 5-FU analogues could potentiate the activity of carboplatin. These interactions may underlie the clinical synergism that has been observed with platinum/5-FU and platinum/gemcitabine combinations.
We propose to combine carboplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine as a palliative treatment for patients with CUP. Programs evaluating the incorporation of newer chemotherapy agents into combinations are reasonable in an attempt to improve outcome in patients with CUP. In addition to anticipated anti-tumor activity, the proposed combination provides a convenient schedule of brief intravenous treatment, the use of the oral agent capecitabine, and a toxicity profile which is expected to be mild, characteristics which are important in palliative treatment programs.
- Conditions
- Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
- Being tested
- Carboplatin, Gemcitabine, Capecitabine
- Keywords
- Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site (CUP)
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Unknown Primary
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CarboplatinDrug
GemcitabineDrug
CapecitabineDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2001
- Primary completionApr 2006
- Study completionOct 2007
Why it stopped: recruitment goals met
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Carcinoma of Unknown PrimaryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Investigators
- Mark Zalupski, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00148135
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UMCC 2001-021
- Status last verified
- Dec 2007
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 10 Jan 2008
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jan 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Trial Evaluating the Combination of Carboplatin, Gemcitabine, and Capecitabine in Patients With Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00148135
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UMCC 2001-021
- Conditions
- Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
- Keywords
- Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site (CUP)
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: recruitment goals met
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Study start
- May 2001
- Primary completion
- Apr 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is for patients with a type of cancer called carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP), meaning that the site of the body where the tumor has originated is not clear. Currently, carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) accounts for about 5% of all newly diagnosed malignancies. The stage of the tumor is such that it is not treatable by surgery. Currently, the standard treatment for such a type of cancer at that stage is chemotherapy. However, the overall prognosis for patients with metastatic CUP remains poor, even if treated with conventional chemotherapy. Through ongoing research at medical centers around the world, doctors are trying to improve on the presently available chemotherapy regimens. The purpose of the investigators' study is similar: it is trying to determine whether a combination of three chemotherapy drugs - carboplatin, gemcitabine, and capecitabine - will improve the treatment of patients with metastatic CUP. The reason the investigators are interested in the above combination of chemotherapy agents is that each one of them is already used in patients with a variety of specific tumors, such as lung cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon cancer, etc.
This research study will help determine whether the combination of carboplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine can be used and is effective in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site.
Detailed description
Carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) accounts for approximately 5% of all newly diagnosed malignancies. The overall prognosis for patients with CUP remains poor, with median survival less than one year with modern chemotherapy combinations and virtually no long-term survivors.
It has been recognized that patients with CUP represent a heterogeneous group of tumors. Managing patients with CUP requires a complete medical history, careful consideration of findings on physical exam, targeted radiologic studies and pathologic analysis of biopsy and/or surgical specimens. Within this heterogeneous group there exist at least four subsets of patients with CUP, that based on clinicopathologic features are treated with regimens which have demonstrated efficacy in tumors originating in the most likely primary site of that CUP; squamous carcinoma involving mid or high levels of cervical lymph nodes, women with isolated axillary adenopathy containing adenocarcinoma, women with a predominant presentation of peritoneal carcinomatosis and young men with extragonadal germ cell syndrome.
Unfortunately, a majority of patients with CUP do not fall into any of the above subsets and these represent a therapeutic dilemma, as there is no single regimen to date that has shown significant activity or has resulted in prolonged survival for these patients with particularly poor prognosis. Thus, new therapeutic combinations need to be investigated for treatment of these patients with CUP.
Platinum compounds have been the cornerstone of chemotherapy regimens for a wide variety of solid tumors, including lung, urothelial, head and neck, ovarian and endometrial carcinomas, as well as testicular carcinomas. Cisplatin and its analog carboplatin are currently used in chemotherapy combinations to treat CUP. Carboplatin has fewer non-hematologic side effects compared to cisplatin including less nausea and vomiting, peripheral neuropathy, nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity making it an attractive agent to combine with other drugs.
In recent years, new agents active in solid malignancies have been developed. Gemcitabine is one such agent. It is a deoxycytidine analogue structurally related to cytosine arabinoside. Gemcitabine is activated by deoxycytidine kinase in three steps of phosphorylation into difluorodeoxycytidine triphosphate, which when incorporated into DNA, leads to chain termination. Gemcitabine has been shown to have activity in pancreatic, breast, non-small cell lung carcinomas as well as in carcinomas of unknown primary site. Because of its mild toxicity profile, gemcitabine has been used in combination with other chemotherapy agents. There is evidence of in vitro and in vivo synergy between gemcitabine and the platinum compounds.
Capecitabine is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine that undergoes a three-step conversion into 5-FU, with pharmacokinetics that mimic low dose continuous infusion 5-FU. The oral formulation allows for convenient continuous therapy, avoiding a need for central venous catheters and external infusion pumps.
The final step of conversion of capecitabine into 5-FU is catalyzed by thymidine phosphorylase (TP), an enzyme which has been shown to be over expressed in colorectal tumors. This selective tumor activation has been demonstrated to lead to higher concentrations of 5-FU in tumor cells as compared to normal tissue, suggesting tumor targeting by the oral drug. Capecitabine was initially approved by the FDA for treatment of refractory breast carcinoma and has shown activity in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Capecitabine is an attractive agent for use in combination chemotherapy due to its non-overlapping toxicity profile with many agents and lack of hematologic toxicity.
Gemcitabine has been combined with 5-FU, and may enhance the activity of 5-FU in vivo. Gemcitabine is an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase, an enzyme needed for synthesis of deoxynucleotides, and 5-FU interferes with dTTP synthesis by inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS). It is plausible that concomitant administration of gemcitabine and capecitabine, may result in increased cytotoxicity by reducing intracellular dTTP thru two different mechanisms, thereby inhibiting DNA replication and repair. Platinum compounds lead to cell death by forming DNA adducts and causing double strand breaks. By inhibiting DNA synthesis and repair, both gemcitabine and 5-FU analogues could potentiate the activity of carboplatin. These interactions may underlie the clinical synergism that has been observed with platinum/5-FU and platinum/gemcitabine combinations.
We propose to combine carboplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine as a palliative treatment for patients with CUP. Programs evaluating the incorporation of newer chemotherapy agents into combinations are reasonable in an attempt to improve outcome in patients with CUP. In addition to anticipated anti-tumor activity, the proposed combination provides a convenient schedule of brief intravenous treatment, the use of the oral agent capecitabine, and a toxicity profile which is expected to be mild, characteristics which are important in palliative treatment programs.
Study design
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of carcinoma, with clinical evidence of metastasis and the primary site not clear after the following work-up:
- Patients must be at least 18 years of age and have a Zubrod performance status 0-2.
- Adequate organ function, defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1500/ul, platelet count of > 100,000/ul, serum creatinine less than or equal to 2.0 mg/dl, serum bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dl.
- Patients must have measurable disease. (Partial response [PR] - at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD.)
- Patients may be previously untreated or have received one chemotherapy regimen provided it did not include carboplatin, gemcitabine or capecitabine.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with previous invasive malignancy within the preceding 5 years are ineligible unless clinicopathologic information regarding the current neoplasm is clearly discordant from prior disease. Patients with non-melanoma skin cancer or in situ cancer of any site are eligible.
- Patients with brain metastasis are not eligible.
- No concurrent chemotherapy, biological or radiotherapy is allowed.
- Pregnant or lactating women are not eligible. Women and men of childbearing potential must agree to use effective contraception throughout the treatment period, and for six months after treatment has been discontinued.
- The following groups of patients will not be eligible for the study as they represent populations of patients with CUP for whom more specific treatment approaches are available:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Carboplatin | Drug | – |
| Gemcitabine | Drug | – |
| Capecitabine | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: recruitment goals met). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jan 2008.
Related trials for Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing the Addition of Anti-Cancer Drug, Cetuximab, to Standard of Care Treatment (Pembrolizumab) for Returning or Spreading Head and Neck Cancer After Previous Treatment
Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Metastatic Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Recruiting
Studying the PAGODA Algorithm for Chemotherapy Dose Changes to Prevent Unplanned Treatment Delays
Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma, Appendix Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary, Recurrent Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Determining the Biodistribution of an Imaging Tracer (68Ga-FAPi-46) in Patients With Solid Tumors or Hematologic Cancers
Anal Carcinoma, Bladder Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark Zalupski, M.D. principal investigator
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Carboplatin, Gemcitabine and Capecitabine in people with Carcinoma of Unknown Primary, run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: recruitment goals met). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2008.