Depressive DisordersNCT00153959
Psychiatric Day Hospital Treatment
A study testing acute psychiatric day care in people with Depressive Disorders and Schizophrenia, run by Technische Universität Dresden at 5 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of acute psychiatric day care to conventional inpatient care within a cross-national multi-site randomised controlled trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Depressive Disorders, Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorders
- What is being tested?
- acute psychiatric day care
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 5 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Start not givento not given
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have presented with a mental disorder with current symptoms that had either led to at least a moderate disturbance in performance in more than one area of daily living or had jeopardized the residential, financial or occupational status of the patient or his family
- Treatments other than inpatient or day hospital care must have been inadequate or not sufficiently effective for the patient's current mental state
Who cannot join
- Temporary admission for diagnostic purposes or for other reasons
- Under 18 or over 65 years
- Admission without consent of the patient (according to country-specific legal regulations)
- One-way journey to hospital longer than 60 minutes
- Suicidal risk
- Risk to others
Show all 14Show fewer
- Degree of severity of the disorder requires measures restrictive of the patient's freedom on the day of admission, or a 1:1 supervision, or deems such probable
- Acute intoxication
- Main clinical diagnosis: addictive disorder
- Presence of a somatic disorder requiring inpatient care
- Direct transfer from a different hospital
- Homelessness
- Need for constant pick-up and delivery service
- Inability to give informed consent with respect to participating in the study
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 5 countries.
5 sites in 5 countries
Czechia1 site
Department of Psychiatry, First Medical Faculty, Charles University of Prague
Prague, 12801
Germany1 site
Department of Psychiatry at Dresden University of Technology
Dresden, Saxony, 01304
Poland1 site
Department of Psychiatry, Wroclaw University of Medicine
Wroclaw, 50-367
United Kingdom1 site
Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts' and The London School of Medicine
London, E138 SP
About this study
The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of acute psychiatric day care to conventional inpatient care within a cross-national multi-site randomised controlled trial.
- Conditions
- Depressive Disorders, Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorders, Personality Disorders, Adjustment Disorders
- Being tested
- acute psychiatric day care
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorders, Personality Disorders, Adjustment Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
acute psychiatric day careBehavioural
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2005 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Depressive DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Technische Universität DresdenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Technische Universität Dresden
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Thomas W. Kallert, Prof.Dr., Principal investigator, Department of Psychiatry at Dresden University of Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00153959
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QLG4-CT-2000-01700
- Status last verified
- Sep 2005
- First submitted
- 7 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 12 Sep 2005
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Gibbon S, Khalifa NR, Cheung NH, Vollm BA, McCarthy L. Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 3;9(9):CD007668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007668.pub3.
PubMed 32880104Kallert TW, Priebe S, McCabe R, Kiejna A, Rymaszewska J, Nawka P, Ocvar L, Raboch J, Starkova-Kalisova L, Koch R, Schutzwohl M. Are day hospitals effective for acutely ill psychiatric patients? A European multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;68(2):278-87. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0214.
PubMed 17335327
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Sep 2005. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Psychiatric Day Hospital Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00153959
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QLG4-CT-2000-01700
- Conditions
- Depressive Disorders, Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorders, Personality Disorders, Adjustment Disorders
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Technische Universität DresdenUniversity, hospital or other
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of acute psychiatric day care to conventional inpatient care within a cross-national multi-site randomised controlled trial.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients must have presented with a mental disorder with current symptoms that had either led to at least a moderate disturbance in performance in more than one area of daily living or had jeopardized the residential, financial or occupational status of the patient or his family
- Treatments other than inpatient or day hospital care must have been inadequate or not sufficiently effective for the patient's current mental state
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Temporary admission for diagnostic purposes or for other reasons
- Under 18 or over 65 years
- Admission without consent of the patient (according to country-specific legal regulations)
- One-way journey to hospital longer than 60 minutes
- Suicidal risk
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| acute psychiatric day care | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Sep 2005.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32880104Gibbon S, Khalifa NR, Cheung NH, Vollm BA, McCarthy L. Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 3;9(9):CD007668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007668.pub3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 17335327Kallert TW, Priebe S, McCabe R, Kiejna A, Rymaszewska J, Nawka P, Ocvar L, Raboch J, Starkova-Kalisova L, Koch R, Schutzwohl M. Are day hospitals effective for acutely ill psychiatric patients? A European multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;68(2):278-87. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0214.
Related trials for Depressive Disorders
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Impact of Psychological Symptoms in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SSCD): a National Cross-sectional Study
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Recruiting
Cultural Adaptation of an Online Parenting Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents
Risk of Depression and Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas W. Kallert, Prof.Dr. principal investigator
Department of Psychiatry at Dresden University of Technology
5 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing acute psychiatric day care in people with Depressive Disorders and Schizophrenia, run by Technische Universität Dresden at 5 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Czechia, Germany, Poland, Slovakia, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00153959, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2005.