Cervical DystoniaPhase 2NCT00165776
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel, Group Dose-Response, Study of E2014 in Patients WIth Spasmodic Torticollis
A Phase 2 study testing BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE B in people with Cervical Dystonia and Spasmodic Torticollis, run by Eisai Co., Ltd. at 21 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
To evaluate efficacy and safety of E2014 (2500U, 5000U, 10000U, placebo) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparative study by intramuscularly administering to patients with spasmodic torticollis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 74 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Dystonia, Spasmodic Torticollis
- What is being tested?
- BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE B
- How many people
- 133 participants
- Where
- 21 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- Jun 2004to Nov 2006
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 74 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who can give written informed consent and aged between greater than or equal to 20 years and less than 75 years at the time of obtaining prior consent (irrespective of gender).
- Patients with dystonic symptoms at least 2 or more lesions in the following cervical muscles.
- Sternocleidomastoid
- Scalenus complex (scalenus anterior, scalenus medius, and scalenus posterior)
- Trapezius
- Levator scapulae
Show all 15Show fewer
- Splenius capitis
- Semispinalis capitis
- Patients who persistently have symptoms in the above (2) for 1 year or longer.
- Patients weighing greater than or equal to 40 kg.
- Patients whose TWSTRS total score at baseline is greater than or equal to 20.
- Patients whose TWSTRS-severity score at baseline is greater than or equal to 10.
- Patients whose TWSTRS-disability score at baseline is greater than or equal to 3.
- Patients whose TWSTRS-pain score at baseline is greater than or equal to 1.
- Patients who are judged to be eligible for study entry by the investigator or subinvestigator based on their physical and neurological findings, laboratory parameters, and ECG results.
Who cannot join
- Patients who are botulinum toxin-resistant in previous exposures (primary no-responder*)
- If patients who were once responder to botulinum toxin treatment but thereafter became non-responder can be included in this study.
- Patients whose passive range of motion in the neck is significantly narrowed due to cervical contracture or spondylosis.
- Patients having only pure retrocollis- or anterocollis-associated symptoms.
- Patients who received botulinum toxin agents within 4 months prior to study treatment of E2014, or those who show carry-over effect of previous treatment with botulinum toxin at the time of starting study administration even though the previous treatment was given 4 months or earlier.
- Patients who were treated with narcotics or antibiotics that may potentiate effects of muscle relaxation (spectinomycin hydrochloride preparations, aminoglycosides, polypeptides, tetracyclines, lincomycins) within 4 months prior to study treatment.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Patients who started or altered the dose levels of the following agents (musculoskeletal relaxants, antispasm drugs, strong tranquilizers, benzodiazepines including similar drugs, anticholinergic drugs, antiparkinsonian drugs, antidepressants) within 4 weeks prior to study treatment.
- Patients who received medical care(s) other than pharmacotherapies (surgical interventions, MAB, acupuncture, relaxation, etc.) prior to study treatment showing carry-over effect of these cares or unstable condition at the time of starting study treatment.
- Patients who have a history of myectomy or neurectomy in the neck and/or shoulder.
- Patients who have a history of hypersensitivity to E2014's ingredients (botulinum toxin type B, human serum albumin, sodium succinate buffer solution), or other type of botulinum toxins.
- Patients with complication(s) or history of serious neurological or musculoskeletal disease (myasthenia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, etc.), cardiovascular disease (acute myocardial infarction, etc.), respiratory disease (COPD, etc.), renal disease (acute or chronic renal failure, etc.), hepatic disease (cirrhosis, etc.), gastrointestinal disease (paralytic ileus, etc.), dermatological disease (toxic epidermal necrosis, etc.), psychiatric disease (schizophrenia, alcohol or drug dependence, etc.), hematological disease (aplastic anemia, etc.), and/or infectious disease (hepatitis, syphilis, AIDS, etc.).
- Patients with complication or history of malignant tumor(s).
- Patients who participated in another clinical study within 30 days prior to obtaining informed consent for this study.
- Women of pregnant, childbearing potential, childbearing intension during the study period, or lactating.
- Others who are judged to be ineligible for study entry by the investigator or subinvestigator
Trial locations and contacts
21 sites in 1 country.
21 sites in 1 country
Japan21 sites
Study site
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033
Study site
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 430-0906
Study site
Ichihara, Chiba, 290-0003
Study site
Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, 890-0075
Study site
Kashihara, Nara, 634-0813
Study site
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-0015
Study site
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-0804
Study site
Kyoto, Kyoto, 601-1434
Study site
Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-0802
Study site
Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-0044
Study site
Moriguchi, Osaka, 570-0074
Study site
Osaka, Osaka, 553-0003
Study site
Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 228-0829
Study site
Saitama, Saitama, 338-0002
Study site
Saitama, Saitama, 338-0003
Study site
Sakai, Osaka, 590-0132
Study site
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0061
Study site
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0814
Study site
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0054
Study site
Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1141
Study site
Tokushima, Tokushima, 770-0042
About this study
To evaluate efficacy and safety of E2014 (2500U, 5000U, 10000U, placebo) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparative study by intramuscularly administering to patients with spasmodic torticollis. Primary endpoint for efficacy evaluation is changes in TWSTRS total scores from baseline measured at Week 4 and the clinical recommended dose will be examined with Williams multiple comparison. For safety evaluation, an inter group comparison (active drug and placebo) will be performed mainly focusing on incidence of adverse events, adverse drug reactions, and abnormal changes in laboratory parameters.
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia, Spasmodic Torticollis
- Being tested
- BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE B
- Medical subject headings
- Torticollis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE BDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) -Total Score at Week 4 After Treatment
The TWSTRS-Total score is the sum of scores of the three components of the scale:
- TWSTRS-Severity score which ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity)
- TWSTRS-Pain score which ranges from 0 (=no pain) to 20 (=maximum pain)
- TWSTRS-Disability score which ranges from 0 (=no disability) to 30 (=maximum disability).
The TWSTRS total score ranges from 0 (=best value) to 85 (=worst value). The change from baseline was calculated as the score at the corresponding visit minus the baseline score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Secondary outcomes (6)
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment - Visual Analog Scale (PtGA-VAS) at Week 4 After Treatment
Change from Baseline in PtGA-VAS is computed as Week 4 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your cervical dystonia affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Disease Assessment - Visual Analog Scale (PGA-VAS) at Week 4 After Treatment
Change from Baseline in PGA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as Week 4 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in the TWSTRS - Functional Disability Score at Week 4 After Treatment
TWSTRS-Disability score which ranges from 0 (=no disability)to 30 (=maximum disability). The change from baseline was calculated as the score at the corresponding visit minus the baseline score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in the TWSTRS - Pain Score at Week 4 After Treatment
TWSTRS-Pain score which ranges from 0 (=no pain) to 20 (=maximum pain). The change from baseline was calculated as the score at the corresponding visit minus the baseline score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in the TWSTRS - Severity Score at Week 4 After Treatment
TWSTRS-Severity score which ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity). The change from baseline was calculated as the score at the corresponding visit minus the baseline score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Assessment (VAS) at Week 4 After Treatment
Change from Baseline in Patient's Pain Assessment-VAS is computed as Week 4 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. The patient's assessment of pain was performed using a 100 mm VAS)ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). The distance in mm from the left edge of the scale was measured. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in pain intensity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2004
- Primary completionMay 2006
- Study completionNov 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Cervical DystoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 133 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Co., Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00165776
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E2014-J081-131
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel, Group Dose-Response, Study of E2014 in Patients WIth Spasmodic Torticollis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00165776
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E2014-J081-131
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia, Spasmodic Torticollis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 133 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Co., Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2004
- Primary completion
- May 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jan 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate efficacy and safety of E2014 (2500U, 5000U, 10000U, placebo) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparative study by intramuscularly administering to patients with spasmodic torticollis. Primary endpoint for efficacy evaluation is changes in TWSTRS total scores from baseline measured at Week 4 and the clinical recommended dose will be examined with Williams multiple comparison. For safety evaluation, an inter group comparison (active drug and placebo) will be performed mainly focusing on incidence of adverse events, adverse drug reactions, and abnormal changes in laboratory parameters.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 74 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patients who can give written informed consent and aged between greater than or equal to 20 years and less than 75 years at the time of obtaining prior consent (irrespective of gender).
- Patients with dystonic symptoms at least 2 or more lesions in the following cervical muscles.
- Sternocleidomastoid
- Scalenus complex (scalenus anterior, scalenus medius, and scalenus posterior)
- Trapezius
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patients who are botulinum toxin-resistant in previous exposures (primary no-responder*)
- If patients who were once responder to botulinum toxin treatment but thereafter became non-responder can be included in this study.
- Patients whose passive range of motion in the neck is significantly narrowed due to cervical contracture or spondylosis.
- Patients having only pure retrocollis- or anterocollis-associated symptoms.
- Patients who received botulinum toxin agents within 4 months prior to study treatment of E2014, or those who show carry-over effect of previous treatment with botulinum toxin at the time of starting study administration even though the previous treatment was given 4 months or earlier.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE B | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) -Total Score at Week 4 After Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
The TWSTRS-Total score is the sum of scores of the three components of the scale: * TWSTRS-Severity score which ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity) * TWSTRS-Pain score which ranges from 0 (=no pain) to 20 (=maximum pain) * TWSTRS-Disability score which ranges from 0 (=no disability) to 30 (=maximum disability). The TWSTRS total score ranges from 0 (=best value) to 85 (=worst value). The change from baseline was calculated as the score at the corresponding visit minus the baseline score.
6 secondary outcomes
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment - Visual Analog Scale (PtGA-VAS) at Week 4 After Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Disease Assessment - Visual Analog Scale (PGA-VAS) at Week 4 After Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in the TWSTRS - Functional Disability Score at Week 4 After Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in the TWSTRS - Pain Score at Week 4 After Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in the TWSTRS - Severity Score at Week 4 After Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Assessment (VAS) at Week 4 After Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Cervical Dystonia
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VIM0423 in Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Dystonia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of Cervical Range of Motion Restrictions in Infants With Arthrogenic Torticollis - A Feasibility Study
Torticollis (Arthrogenic)
Recruiting
Effect of Vibro-tactile Stimulation Intensity on Head Posture in Cervical Dystonia
Cervical Dystonia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An Observational Study of Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Isolated/Primary Dystonia That Affects More Than One Region of the Body
Recruiting
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Cervical Dystonia
Cervical Dystonia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
21 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE B in people with Cervical Dystonia and Spasmodic Torticollis, run by Eisai Co., Ltd. at 21 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 21 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jan 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) -Total Score at Week 4 After Treatment (time frame: Baseline, Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2014.