Carotid Artery StenosisNCT00177346
A Randomized Trial of Carotid Artery Stenting With and Without Cerebral Protection
A study testing CAS with cerebral protection and CAS without cerebral protection in people with Carotid Artery Stenosis, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate carotid artery stenting (CAS) with and without cerebral protection (CP) to determine if CP improves safety and effectiveness of CAS. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carotid Artery Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- CAS with cerebral protection and CAS without cerebral protection
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2003to Jan 2007
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- To participate in this study, the subject MUST have all of the following for inclusion in the study:
- The subject (male or non-pregnant female) must be > 18 years of age.
- The subject should have a stenosis in the common or internal carotid artery of at least 70% determined by one of the modalities listed below.
- The subject should be considered a relatively high risk for carotid endarterectomy. This determination has to be made and documented by two physicians, at least one of who must be a vascular surgeon acting as an investigator on this trial. High risk considerations should include at least one of the following:
- Cardiac dysfunction. NYHA class III or above, compensated or active congestive heart failure (CHF), incomplete coronary revascularization, ejection fraction of <35%, pulmonary hypertension, or recommendation of a cardiologist against open CEA.
- Pulmonary dysfunction, history of respiratory failure, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary Disease (COPD) on bronchodilators or recommendation of a pulmonary specialist against open CEA.
Show all 24Show fewer
- Multi-system dysfunction, defined as any combination of medical problems in three distinct systems.
- Anatomic issues: previous CEA or neck dissection, neck irradiation, inaccessible lesions, neck fusion or other anatomic considerations increasing the risk of CEA.
- Age >80 AND symptomatic (defined below)
- General debilitation documented by the subject's primary physician.
- Increased anesthetic risk as documented by an anesthesiologist.
- Subjects can be either clinically symptomatic or asymptomatic (less than 80 years of age). Symptomatic subjects will have experienced an event within the previous 120 days in the ipsilateral carotid artery distribution. The event will be classified as either 1) one or more TIAs, characterized by distinct focal neurologic dysfunction or monocular blindness with clearing of signs and symptoms within 24 hours, or 2) one or more completed strokes (as defined by this protocol) with persistence of symptoms or signs for more than 24 hours (the most recent event is used as the qualifying event).
- Patients with major non-hemorrhagic strokes will be included if their clinical status has been stable for 5 days (based on an exam performed by a neurologist participating as a Co-Investigator in this trial).
- If an angiogram is performed to qualify the subject, it should be as recent as feasible and will not be acceptable if done > 120 days from study entry. Angiograms from other institutions will be acceptable.
- Other non-invasive qualifying imaging modalities include:
- <!-- -->
- Duplex ultrasound (DU) performed at UPMC Presbyterian or Shadyside hospitals.
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) performed at UPMC Presbyterian or Shadyside hospitals.
- Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) performed at UPMC Presbyterian or Shadyside hospitals.
- The degree of stenosis from these non-invasive studies has to be confirmed on the pre-deployment diagnostic angiography prior to proceeding with stent deployment.
- However, if two of the non-invasive studies listed above report a stenosis of >70%, AND the pre-deployment angiogram reveals a 50 -70% stenosis, the patient will be randomized and entered into the trial as the angiogram can on occasion underestimate the stenosis.
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a documented negative pregnancy test during the index hospitalization.
- The subject must sign a written informed consent, prior to the procedure, using a form that is approved by the local Institutional Review Board or Medical Ethics Committee.
- If a patient's creatinine is 3.5 or greater, their nephrologist must clear them to participate in the trial.
Who cannot join
- To participate in this study, the subject may NOT HAVE any of the following at enrollment to the study:
- The subject has had an intracranial hemorrhage, hemorrhagic stroke, or any stroke with mass effect demonstrated on CT scan or MRI within 30 days of the index procedure.
- The subject has a persisting ischemic stroke (defined as either a score > 15 on the NIH stroke scale, a Rankin score > 3 or a Barthel score < 60 measured within one week prior to study entry).
- The subject has an intracranial mass lesion (i.e., abscess, tumor, or other infection).
- The subject has known allergies to heparin, to both ticlopidine and clopidogrel or to metals used in stents.
- There is any visual angiographic evidence of intraluminal thrombus thought to increase the risk of plaque fragmentation and distal embolization.
Show all 13Show fewer
- The subject has peripheral vascular, supra-aortic or internal carotid artery tortuosity precluding use of catheter-based techniques required for successful results.
- The subject, if female, has a positive pregnancy test.
- The subject has an arterio-venous malformation in the territory of the target carotid artery.
- Subjects with highly calcified lesions resistant to predilation by PTA
- The subject has unstable angina (defined as Class IV or at rest), evolving MI or recent MI (within 14 days).
- The subject has any condition that precludes adequate local hemostasis.
- Patients who are not candidates for MRI scanning (pacemaker, etc).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian &Shadyside Hospitals
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
About this study
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate carotid artery stenting (CAS) with and without cerebral protection (CP) to determine if CP improves safety and effectiveness of CAS.
Read the detailed description
This study is a single center, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of CAS with and without CP. The study population will be comprised of subjects with atherosclerotic, post endarterectomy restenotic or other obstructive lesions in native carotid arteries. Other carotid artery pathology not amenable to surgical repair (for example carotid artery dissection) will also be considered. Subjects at high risk for complications from standard CEA will be the target population for this study. High risk status will be confirmed by two physicians, one of whom is a vascular surgeon. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects will be enrolled. This will ensure that the proportion of symptomatic subjects is the same in the two arms of the study. "Symptomatic" is defined in the exclusion criteria. The expected duration of this clinical trial is 3 years.
In this study there are there are two arms that a subject may be randomized to:
Group1: CAS with the use of the RX ACCUNET Group 2: CAS without the use of the RX ACCUNET This study has been designed to test whether the addition of CP enhances the safety and effectiveness of CAS.
- Conditions
- Carotid Artery Stenosis
- Being tested
- CAS with cerebral protection, CAS without cerebral protection
- Medical subject headings
- Carotid Stenosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CAS with cerebral protectionDevice
CAS without cerebral protectionDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CAS with cerebral protection | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: CAS with cerebral protection |
| CAS without cerebral protection | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: CAS without cerebral protection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Endpoint
Safety: The 30-day composite of stroke or death,
Effectiveness: The percentage of subjects who show evidence of new ischemic injury on diffusion MRI imaging, as well as the amount of infarcted tissue
Secondary outcomes (7)
Secondary Endpoints
Successful stent deployment at the target lesion,
Successful CP device deployment and retrieval,
Successful resolution of the stenosis (<30% residual stenosis) determined by angiography immediately post-stent placement,
Access site vascular complications, defined as need for surgical repair or blood transfusion,
Restenosis (>50% diameter reduction) rates both in-stent or of the adjacent artery determined by carotid ultrasound imaging at 1 year post-procedure,
Ipsilateral neurologic deficits on neurologic assessments at 24 hours and 30 days post-procedure.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2003
- Primary completionJan 2007
- Study completionJan 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Carotid Artery StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PittsburghThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michel S Makaroun, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Pittsburgh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00177346
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MakarounIDE
- Other IDs
- 0
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 7 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial of Carotid Artery Stenting With and Without Cerebral Protection
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00177346
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MakarounIDE
- Conditions
- Carotid Artery Stenosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PittsburghUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2003
- Primary completion
- Jan 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate carotid artery stenting (CAS) with and without cerebral protection (CP) to determine if CP improves safety and effectiveness of CAS.
Detailed description
This study is a single center, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of CAS with and without CP. The study population will be comprised of subjects with atherosclerotic, post endarterectomy restenotic or other obstructive lesions in native carotid arteries. Other carotid artery pathology not amenable to surgical repair (for example carotid artery dissection) will also be considered. Subjects at high risk for complications from standard CEA will be the target population for this study. High risk status will be confirmed by two physicians, one of whom is a vascular surgeon. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects will be enrolled. This will ensure that the proportion of symptomatic subjects is the same in the two arms of the study. "Symptomatic" is defined in the exclusion criteria. The expected duration of this clinical trial is 3 years.
In this study there are there are two arms that a subject may be randomized to:
Group1: CAS with the use of the RX ACCUNET Group 2: CAS without the use of the RX ACCUNET This study has been designed to test whether the addition of CP enhances the safety and effectiveness of CAS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CAS with cerebral protection | Experimental | Device: CAS with cerebral protection |
| CAS without cerebral protection | Active comparator | Device: CAS without cerebral protection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (24 listed)
- To participate in this study, the subject MUST have all of the following for inclusion in the study:
- Patients with major non-hemorrhagic strokes will be included if their clinical status has been stable for 5 days (based on an exam performed by a neurologist participating as a Co-Investigator in this trial).
- <!-- -->
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- To participate in this study, the subject may NOT HAVE any of the following at enrollment to the study:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CAS with cerebral protection | Device | CAS with cerebral protection |
| CAS without cerebral protection | Device | CAS without cerebral protection |
Primary outcome
Primary Endpoint
Safety: The 30-day composite of stroke or death,
Effectiveness: The percentage of subjects who show evidence of new ischemic injury on diffusion MRI imaging, as well as the amount of infarcted tissue
7 secondary outcomes
Secondary Endpoints
Successful stent deployment at the target lesion,
Successful CP device deployment and retrieval,
Successful resolution of the stenosis (<30% residual stenosis) determined by angiography immediately post-stent placement,
Access site vascular complications, defined as need for surgical repair or blood transfusion,
Restenosis (>50% diameter reduction) rates both in-stent or of the adjacent artery determined by carotid ultrasound imaging at 1 year post-procedure,
Ipsilateral neurologic deficits on neurologic assessments at 24 hours and 30 days post-procedure.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jan 2016.
Related trials for Carotid Artery Stenosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Symptomatic Carotid Outcomes Registry
Carotid Stenosis, Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruitingObservational study
PET-MR Imaging of Natriuretic Peptide Receptor C (NPR-C) in Carotid Atherosclerosis With 64Cu-NODAGA-CANF (Multisite)
Carotid Atherosclerosis, Carotid Artery Stenosis Asymptomatic
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Arm Registry of ENROUTE NPS in Conjunction With Carotid WALLSTENT in Chinese Population
Carotid Artery Stenosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Vascular Health and Function in Cystic Fibrosis
Cystic Fibrosis, Endothelial Dysfunction
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michel S Makaroun, M.D. principal investigator
University of Pittsburgh
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CAS with cerebral protection and CAS without cerebral protection in people with Carotid Artery Stenosis, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 24 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Endpoint. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2016.