AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00187083

A Study of Children With Refractory or Relapsed ALL

A Phase 3 study testing Topotecan, dexamethasone, vincristine, E. coli Asparaginase, PEG-L-asparaginase and erwinia asparaginase in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main purpose of this study is to find out which form of asparaginase (the native E. coli/Erwinia) or PEG-asparaginase) is more effective during induction treatment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia that has come back after treatment (relapsed) or is resistant to treatment (refractory) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
What is being tested?
Topotecan, dexamethasone, vincristine, E. coli Asparaginase, PEG-L-asparaginase and erwinia asparaginase
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 1997to Dec 2003
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • For patients treated on frontline protocols at St. Jude:
  • ALL in isolated bone marrow relapse, or combined marrow and extramedullary relapse, during or after treatment with multi-agent chemotherapy (TOTAL XI, XII, XIIIA, XIIIB), or isolated extramedullary relapse after treatment on TOTXII.
  • Patients with recurrent T-Cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who relapse in the bone marrow with >25% blasts
  • For patients not treated on front-line St. Jude protocols:
  • ALL in isolated bone marrow relapse, or isolated extramedullary relapse, or combined marrow and extramedullary relapse.
  • All patients:
Show all 10Show fewer
  • First relapse after receiving primary therapy or during primary therapy
  • Life expectance of at least 8 weeks
  • ECOG score 0-2 Exclusion criteria
  • Life expectancy < 8 weeks

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38105

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Study of Children With Refractory or Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALLR16)

The main purpose of this study is to find out which form of asparaginase (the native E. coli/Erwinia) or PEG-asparaginase) is more effective during induction treatment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia that has come back after treatment (relapsed) or is resistant to treatment (refractory)

Read the detailed description

The present protocol will compare the biologic effects of PEG-asparaginase vs native-forms of asparaginase in a randomized trial using the same dosages and schedules used in the POG 9411 study. Comprehensive studies, including the measurement of antibodies and asparagine levels as well as the pharmacokinetics of L-asparaginase, will be performed. This protocol will also study the changes in topoisomerase I and topoisomerase II levels and the fractions of topoisomerase I/II translocations in malignant lymphoblasts after upfront window topotecan therapy, and correlate oncolytic response with these changes.

Secondary objectives include:

  • To compare changes in asparagine levels 28 days after initiation of treatment with asparaginase between the two groups.
  • To estimate the pharmacokinetics of L-asparaginase, compare the pharmacokinetics between the two groups of patients, and correlate the pharmacokinetics with the development of antibody to asparaginase and depletion of asparagine.
  • To measure the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan in patients with recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • To determine whether the frequency of recombinogenesis in lymphocytes is increased during or after etoposide therapy relative to the pre-therapy level, and to explore whether etoposide pharmacokinetics are related to the Day 7 or post-therapy level of recombinogenesis.

Detailed Description of Treatment Plan

WINDOW Topotecan 2.4 mg/m2 ; IV over 30 min in 5 doses Days 1-5

STANDARD INDUCTION Dexamethasone 6 mg/m2/day orally Days 8-35 Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 (max 2.0 mg) days 8, 15, 22, 29

RANDOMIZE E. coli asparaginase 10,000 U/m2/day IM (or Erwinia if previous allergy to E. coli) Days 8, 11, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25, 27, 29, 32, 34

OR

PEG-Asparaginase 2500 U/m2/day IM Days 8, 15, 22, 29

ITHMA Days 8, 22, 36

CONSOLIDATION

Fludarabine: 15 mg/m2 IV over 30 min; days 1,2,3,4 Ara-C: 2 g/m2 IV days 1,2,3,4

Patients who achieve remission on R16 induction or consolidation may be eligible for either a matched sibling or a fully matched/one-antigen-mismatched unrelated donor transplant

For patients not undergoing bone marrow transplant:

SECONDARY CONSOLIDATION

VP 16: 50 mg/m2 PO qd for 14 days. Vincristine: 1.5 mg/m2 (max 2.0 mg) IV; days 1, 8. IT MHA day 1

CONTINUATION CHEMOTHERAPY

Cycle 1:

Cyclophosphamide 1 g/m2 IV on days 1 and 2 Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 IV on day 1 (max 2.0 mg)

Cycle 2:

VP-16 50 mg/m2 day PO daily x 14 days Decadron 6 mg/m2 PO daily ) TID x 14 days Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 IV (max 2 mg) on days 1 and 8.

Cycle 3:

HD MTX 5 gm/m2 continuous infusion over 24 hrs E. coli Asparaginase 10,000 U/m2/dose IM qod x3 or PEG Asparaginase 2500 U/m2/dose IM x 1 (maintain same randomization for Asparaginase preparation as during induction)

Cycle 4:

High Dose Ara-C 2 g/m2/dose IV over 2 hrs q 12 hrs x 3 doses.[Total dose 6 gm/m2] Idarubicin 12 mg/m2 IV over 30 min X 1 [after completion of first dose of Ara-C] IT MHA on day 1 prior to the HDARA-C (dose of ITMHA is age adjusted as outlined in section 7.3)

STANDARD CONTINUATION CHEMOTHERAPY

Patients will receive 4-week rotational cycles of chemotherapy with the following pairs of drugs for total treatment duration of 17 months.

Week #1 Cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2 IV) + VCR (1.5 mg/m2 IV; max 2 mg). Week #2 VM26 (200 mg/m2 IV) + Ara C (300 mg/m2 IV). Week #3 MTX (MTX should be given IM or as a 2 hr IV infusion if the patient has had previous cranial iradiation) (40 mg/m2 IV/IM) + 6 MP (75 mg/m2 PO q HS x 7) Week #4 MTX (MTX should be given IM or as a 2 hr IV infusion if the patient has had previous cranial irradiation)(40 mg/m2 IV/IM) + 6 MP (75 mg/m2 PO q HS x 7)

IT MHA: Given every 8 weeks throughout standard continuation chemotherapy for patients with CNS 1 status Given every 4 weeks for patients with CNS 2/3 status who will receive CSI at the end of chemotherapy

Being tested
Topotecan, dexamethasone, vincristine, E. coli Asparaginase, PEG-L-asparaginase, erwinia asparaginase, fludarabine, methotrexate, mercaptopurine, idarubicin, etoposide, cytarbine, teniposide
Keywords
Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Medical subject headings
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, Leukemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Topotecan, dexamethasone, vincristineDrug

    See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

  • E. coli Asparaginase, PEG-L-asparaginaseDrug

    See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

  • erwinia asparaginaseDrug

    See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

  • fludarabine, methotrexate, mercaptopurineDrug

    See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

  • idarubicin, etoposide, cytarbine, teniposideDrug

    See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

  • chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, steroid therapyProcedure or surgery

    See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

Study groups in NCT00187083
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNative asparaginase
Receives: Drug: Topotecan, dexamethasone, vincristine; Drug: E. coli Asparaginase, PEG-L-asparaginase; Drug: erwinia asparaginase; Drug: fludarabine, methotrexate, mercaptopurine; Drug: idarubicin, etoposide, cytarbine, teniposide; Procedure: chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, steroid therapy
2ExperimentalPEG-asparaginase
Receives: Drug: Topotecan, dexamethasone, vincristine; Drug: E. coli Asparaginase, PEG-L-asparaginase; Drug: erwinia asparaginase; Drug: fludarabine, methotrexate, mercaptopurine; Drug: idarubicin, etoposide, cytarbine, teniposide; Procedure: chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, steroid therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To compare in a randomized trial the depletion of asparagine in patients who receive the native form of asparaginase or PEG-asparaginase during induction therapy.

    Measured: December 2003

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 1997
  3. Primary completionDec 2003
  4. Study completionDec 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00187083
Sponsor's protocol ID
ALLR16
Status last verified
Jun 2008
First submitted
12 Sep 2005
Last updated
4 Jun 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Topotecan, dexamethasone, vincristine, E. coli Asparaginase, PEG-L-asparaginase and erwinia asparaginase in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To compare in a randomized trial the depletion of asparagine in patients who receive the native form of asparaginase or PEG-asparaginase during induction therapy. (time frame: December 2003). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in