Transplant, KidneyMPANCT00187915
Pilot Trial for Implementation of a MPA PK Monitoring Strategy
A study testing Mycophenolate mofetil + Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate mofetil + Cyclosporin in people with Transplant, Kidney, run by University of Florida at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is a prospective interventional trial of de novo renal transplant recipients, aiming to validate a strategy which combines the use of early post transplant MPA AUC sampling, and subsequent MPA trough level monitoring to implement MPA PK monitoring in a clinically applicable fashion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Transplant, Kidney
- What is being tested?
- Mycophenolate mofetil + Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate mofetil + Cyclosporin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2003to Dec 2004
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- primary or secondary cadaveric or living donor kidney recipients
- On Cellcept
Who cannot join
- Multi organ recipients
- Documented non-compliance
- Not on a calcineurin inhibitor
- GFR <25 ml/min by Cockcroft Gault equation
- Serum albumin <2.5 mg/dl
- Pregnant
- Active serious digestive disorder
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study is a prospective interventional trial of de novo renal transplant recipients, aiming to validate a strategy which combines the use of early post transplant MPA AUC sampling, and subsequent MPA trough level monitoring to implement MPA PK monitoring in a clinically applicable fashion.
Read the detailed description
Mycophenolate mofetil or MMF (CellCept® by Roche) is the mofetil ester of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active immunosuppressant.
MMF significantly decreases the episodes of acute rejection in kidney transplant patients; but as with any medication without adequate pharmacokinetic drug monitoring, the issue of under or over immunosuppression arises. For this reason, the biggest challenge lies with establishing a feasible mean of MPA pharmacokinetic monitoring. Thus far no study has shown that measuring MPA trough levels alone correlates with rejection, unlike MPA Area Under the concentration time Curve (AUC), due to the large incidence of inter- and intra-patient variability.
This is the first prospective blinded trial set up to analyze the correlation between individualized MPA AUC and trough levels of kidney transplant patients in hopes of establishing a more efficacious way of monitoring MPA. MPA target trough levels that correspond to AUC greater than 30 mg x h/L could then be utilized as maintenance measurements.
- Conditions
- Transplant, Kidney
- Being tested
- Mycophenolate mofetil + Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate mofetil + Cyclosporin
- Keywords
- Renal transplant, Cellcept, Therapeutic drug level, Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), Mycophenolate Acid (MPA), Oral Bioavailability, Immunosuppression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mycophenolate mofetil + TacrolimusDrug
Also called MMF, CellCept, Ro 70-0003, Prograf
Target MPA exposure to 30-60 mg/L/h during first month post-transplant
Mycophenolate mofetil + CyclosporinDrug
Also called MMF, CellCept, RO 70-0003, Neoral
Target MPA exposure to 30-60 mg/L/h during first month post-transplant
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CellCept + Prograf | Other | Standard of Care Regime Receives: Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil + Tacrolimus |
| CellCept + Neoral | Other | Standard of Care Regime Receives: Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil + Cyclosporin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of subjects with an average AUC between 30-60 ng x hr/mL
Measured: 7 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Rate of acute rejection of transplanted kidney
Measured: 7 months
Number of MPA related toxicities
Measured: 7 months
Number of dose changes required to obtain MPA AUC target in the first month
Measured: 7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2003
- Primary completionNov 2004
- Study completionDec 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Transplant, KidneyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of FloridaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Florida
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche, MD, Principal investigator, University of Florida
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00187915
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEL330
- Other IDs
- 20030499
- Acronym
- MPA
- Status last verified
- Oct 2011
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin and corticosteroids for prevention of acute rejection. European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. Lancet. 1995 May 27;345(8961):1321-5.
PubMed 7752752Sollinger HW. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. U.S. Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group. Transplantation. 1995 Aug 15;60(3):225-32. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199508000-00003.
PubMed 7645033A blinded, randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation. The Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group. Transplantation. 1996 Apr 15;61(7):1029-37.
PubMed 8623181Meier-Kriesche HU, Steffen BJ, Hochberg AM, Gordon RD, Liebman MN, Morris JA, Kaplan B. Long-term use of mycophenolate mofetil is associated with a reduction in the incidence and risk of late rejection. Am J Transplant. 2003 Jan;3(1):68-73. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.30112.x.
PubMed 12492713Meier-Kriesche HU, Steffen BJ, Hochberg AM, Gordon RD, Liebman MN, Morris JA, Kaplan B. Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine therapy is associated with a significant protection against long-term renal allograft function deterioration. Transplantation. 2003 Apr 27;75(8):1341-6. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000062833.14843.4B.
PubMed 12717227Hale MD, Nicholls AJ, Bullingham RE, Hene R, Hoitsma A, Squifflet JP, Weimar W, Vanrenterghem Y, Van de Woude FJ, Verpooten GA. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Dec;64(6):672-83. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(98)90058-3.
PubMed 9871432van Gelder T, Hilbrands LB, Vanrenterghem Y, Weimar W, de Fijter JW, Squifflet JP, Hene RJ, Verpooten GA, Navarro MT, Hale MD, Nicholls AJ. A randomized double-blind, multicenter plasma concentration controlled study of the safety and efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 1999 Jul 27;68(2):261-6. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199907270-00018.
PubMed 10440399van Gelder T, Shaw LM. The rationale for and limitations of therapeutic drug monitoring for mycophenolate mofetil in transplantation. Transplantation. 2005 Oct 15;80(2 Suppl):S244-53. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000186380.61251.fc.
PubMed 16251857Shaw LM, Mick R, Nowak I, Korecka M, Brayman KL. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant patients with delayed graft function. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Mar;38(3):268-75. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04424.x.
PubMed 9549665van Gelder T, Klupp J, Barten MJ, Christians U, Morris RE. Comparison of the effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid. Ther Drug Monit. 2001 Apr;23(2):119-28. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200104000-00005.
PubMed 11294511Srinivas TR, Meier-Kriesche HU, Kaplan B. Pharmacokinetic principles of immunosuppressive drugs. Am J Transplant. 2005 Feb;5(2):207-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00748.x.
PubMed 15643980Yamani MH, Starling RC, Goormastic M, Van Lente F, Smedira N, McCarthy P, Young JB. The impact of routine mycophenolate mofetil drug monitoring on the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection. Transplantation. 2000 Jun 15;69(11):2326-30. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200006150-00018.
PubMed 10868634Shaw LM, Pawinski T, Korecka M, Nawrocki A. Monitoring of mycophenolic acid in clinical transplantation. Ther Drug Monit. 2002 Feb;24(1):68-73. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200202000-00012. No abstract available.
PubMed 11805725Mourad M, Wallemacq P, Konig J, de Frahan EH, Eddour DC, De Meyer M, Malaise J, Squifflet JP. Therapeutic monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in organ transplant recipients: is it necessary? Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(5):319-27. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241050-00001.
PubMed 12036390Cattaneo D, Perico N, Gaspari F, Gotti E, Remuzzi G. Glucocorticoids interfere with mycophenolate mofetil bioavailability in kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2002 Sep;62(3):1060-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00531.x.
PubMed 12164891
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Trial for Implementation of a MPA PK Monitoring Strategy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00187915
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MPA / CEL330
- Conditions
- Transplant, Kidney
- Keywords
- Renal transplant, Cellcept, Therapeutic drug level, Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), Mycophenolate Acid (MPA), Oral Bioavailability, Immunosuppression
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of FloridaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Study start
- Jul 2003
- Primary completion
- Nov 2004 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2004 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a prospective interventional trial of de novo renal transplant recipients, aiming to validate a strategy which combines the use of early post transplant MPA AUC sampling, and subsequent MPA trough level monitoring to implement MPA PK monitoring in a clinically applicable fashion.
Detailed description
Mycophenolate mofetil or MMF (CellCept® by Roche) is the mofetil ester of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active immunosuppressant.
MMF significantly decreases the episodes of acute rejection in kidney transplant patients; but as with any medication without adequate pharmacokinetic drug monitoring, the issue of under or over immunosuppression arises. For this reason, the biggest challenge lies with establishing a feasible mean of MPA pharmacokinetic monitoring. Thus far no study has shown that measuring MPA trough levels alone correlates with rejection, unlike MPA Area Under the concentration time Curve (AUC), due to the large incidence of inter- and intra-patient variability.
This is the first prospective blinded trial set up to analyze the correlation between individualized MPA AUC and trough levels of kidney transplant patients in hopes of establishing a more efficacious way of monitoring MPA. MPA target trough levels that correspond to AUC greater than 30 mg x h/L could then be utilized as maintenance measurements.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CellCept + Prograf | Other | Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil + TacrolimusStandard of Care Regime |
| CellCept + Neoral | Other | Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil + CyclosporinStandard of Care Regime |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- primary or secondary cadaveric or living donor kidney recipients
- On Cellcept
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Multi organ recipients
- Documented non-compliance
- Not on a calcineurin inhibitor
- GFR <25 ml/min by Cockcroft Gault equation
- Serum albumin <2.5 mg/dl
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mycophenolate mofetil + TacrolimusAlso: MMF, CellCept, Ro 70-0003, PrografTarget MPA exposure to 30-60 mg/L/h during first month post-transplant | Drug | CellCept + Prograf |
| Mycophenolate mofetil + CyclosporinAlso: MMF, CellCept, RO 70-0003, NeoralTarget MPA exposure to 30-60 mg/L/h during first month post-transplant | Drug | CellCept + Neoral |
Primary outcome
Number of subjects with an average AUC between 30-60 ng x hr/mL
Time frame: 7 months
3 secondary outcomes
Rate of acute rejection of transplanted kidney
Time frame: 7 months
Number of MPA related toxicities
Time frame: 7 months
Number of dose changes required to obtain MPA AUC target in the first month
Time frame: 7 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2011.
- Background: PubMed 7752752Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin and corticosteroids for prevention of acute rejection. European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. Lancet. 1995 May 27;345(8961):1321-5.
- Background: PubMed 7645033Sollinger HW. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. U.S. Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group. Transplantation. 1995 Aug 15;60(3):225-32. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199508000-00003.
- Background: PubMed 8623181A blinded, randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation. The Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group. Transplantation. 1996 Apr 15;61(7):1029-37.
- Background: PubMed 12492713Meier-Kriesche HU, Steffen BJ, Hochberg AM, Gordon RD, Liebman MN, Morris JA, Kaplan B. Long-term use of mycophenolate mofetil is associated with a reduction in the incidence and risk of late rejection. Am J Transplant. 2003 Jan;3(1):68-73. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.30112.x.
- Background: PubMed 12717227Meier-Kriesche HU, Steffen BJ, Hochberg AM, Gordon RD, Liebman MN, Morris JA, Kaplan B. Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine therapy is associated with a significant protection against long-term renal allograft function deterioration. Transplantation. 2003 Apr 27;75(8):1341-6. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000062833.14843.4B.
- Background: PubMed 9871432Hale MD, Nicholls AJ, Bullingham RE, Hene R, Hoitsma A, Squifflet JP, Weimar W, Vanrenterghem Y, Van de Woude FJ, Verpooten GA. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Dec;64(6):672-83. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(98)90058-3.
- Background: PubMed 10440399van Gelder T, Hilbrands LB, Vanrenterghem Y, Weimar W, de Fijter JW, Squifflet JP, Hene RJ, Verpooten GA, Navarro MT, Hale MD, Nicholls AJ. A randomized double-blind, multicenter plasma concentration controlled study of the safety and efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 1999 Jul 27;68(2):261-6. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199907270-00018.
- Background: PubMed 16251857van Gelder T, Shaw LM. The rationale for and limitations of therapeutic drug monitoring for mycophenolate mofetil in transplantation. Transplantation. 2005 Oct 15;80(2 Suppl):S244-53. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000186380.61251.fc.
- Background: PubMed 9549665Shaw LM, Mick R, Nowak I, Korecka M, Brayman KL. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant patients with delayed graft function. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Mar;38(3):268-75. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04424.x.
- Background: PubMed 11294511van Gelder T, Klupp J, Barten MJ, Christians U, Morris RE. Comparison of the effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid. Ther Drug Monit. 2001 Apr;23(2):119-28. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200104000-00005.
- Background: PubMed 15643980Srinivas TR, Meier-Kriesche HU, Kaplan B. Pharmacokinetic principles of immunosuppressive drugs. Am J Transplant. 2005 Feb;5(2):207-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00748.x.
- Background: PubMed 10868634Yamani MH, Starling RC, Goormastic M, Van Lente F, Smedira N, McCarthy P, Young JB. The impact of routine mycophenolate mofetil drug monitoring on the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection. Transplantation. 2000 Jun 15;69(11):2326-30. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200006150-00018.
Related trials for Transplant, Kidney
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) After a Kidney Transplant
Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant Recipient
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche, MD principal investigator
University of Florida
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mycophenolate mofetil + Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate mofetil + Cyclosporin in people with Transplant, Kidney, run by University of Florida at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of subjects with an average AUC between 30-60 ng x hr/mL (time frame: 7 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00187915, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2011.