Head TraumaPhase 1/2NCT00196131
Problems With Morphine Use in Patients With a Severe Brain Injury
A Phase 1/2 study testing morphine in people with Head Trauma and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, run by Dalhousie University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Hypothesis: During severe brain trauma (injury, surgery) the ensuing inflammatory response in the central nervous system (CNS) results in a decrease in the expression of the transporter protein p-glycoprotein (PGP) in the blood brain barrier. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Head Trauma, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Close Head Injury
- What is being tested?
- morphine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jan 2005to Apr 2008
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Sustained a head trauma (closed head injury or subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH])
- Fitted with a intraventricular drainage catheter
- Currently being treated with morphine
Who cannot join
- Patient is receiving another PGP inhibitor drug other than morphine or midazolam
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Changes in Morphine Handling and Response in Patients With Brain Trauma
Hypothesis: During severe brain trauma (injury, surgery) the ensuing inflammatory response in the central nervous system (CNS) results in a decrease in the expression of the transporter protein p-glycoprotein (PGP) in the blood brain barrier. This loss results in the penetration into the brain of certain drugs that are normally excluded by the transporter protein. In this study the working hypothesis is that the agitation observed in patients with CNS trauma treated with morphine is related to the inflammation evoked loss of PGP in the blood brain barrier and the accumulation of the morphine metabolite 3-morphine glucuronide.
Read the detailed description
It is well established that the metabolism, distribution and elimination of certain drugs is affected by inflammatory processes. This results from the expression of cytochrome and drug transporter proteins that are altered during the generation of host defense mechanisms. This has major implications in inflammation and infection when the capacity of the liver and other organs to handle drugs are severely compromised. From studies in animals individual cytochrome P450 isozymes and p-glycoprotein (PGP) are down regulated at the level of gene transcription with a resulting decrease in the corresponding mRNA, protein and enzyme/transporter activity. The loss in drug metabolism and transport is channeled predominantly through the production of cytokines which ultimately modify specific transcription factors. Other proposed mechanisms that apply to specific cytochrome P450s involve post translational steps including enzyme modification and increased degradation. When inflammatory responses are confined to the brain there is a loss of cytochrome P450 and PGP not only in the brain but also in peripheral tissues. This involves a yet to be identified mode of signaling between the brain and periphery but it does involve the production of cytokines from a peripheral source.
In clinical medicine there are numerous examples of a decreased capacity to handle drugs during infections and disease states that involve an inflammatory component. This often results in altered drug responses and increased toxicities. Inflammation mediated alterations in the metabolism of endogenous compounds can also lead to altered physiology. Recently it has been shown in rodents that inflammatory responses within the brain alter drug disposition in the brain and in peripheral systems. Of particular note to the use of drugs in patients with a brain trauma is a recent study in our laboratory carried out in rodents showing that the transport of some drugs across the blood brain barrier is dramatically changed during a CNS inflammatory response. The reason this occurs is the loss in expression of the drug transporter protein (PGP). This allows drugs which are normally transported out of the brain by PGP to enter and cause CNS toxicity. Such changes in drug handling capacity during inflammation/infection will continue to be one of the many factors that complicate therapeutics.
In humans with a severe CNS trauma (injury, surgery) an inflammatory response commonly occurs within the brain. It has also been our clinical observation that when these patients receive morphine as part of their care the drug is tolerated for a few days but many patients develop agitation that we believe is related to morphine therapy. Our working hypothesis is that a metabolite of morphine which is a CNS irritant (3-morphine glucuronide) can enter the brain in increased amounts because of the inflammation evoked loss in the transporter protein PGP in the blood brain barrier. In normal circumstances morphine is metabolized in the liver to two major metabolites (3-morphine glucuronide and 6-morphine glucuronide). These metabolites are excluded to some extent by a functioning PGP in the blood brain barrier. If the PGP diminishes in the blood brain barrier as a result of CNS inflammation then these morphine metabolites will increase in concentration in the brain. Some support for this idea can be taken from the recent studies showing that the inhibition of PGP by chemical means increases the concentration of the 6-glucuronide of morphine following the administration of morphine to rats. Although the 6-glucuronide is more potent than morphine with similar actions, the 3-glucuronide is a CNS irritant and may cause the agitation observed in these patients. We propose to measure these metabolites on both sides of the blood brain barrier in patients with CNS trauma/inflammation to determine if the agitation correlates with the build up of metabolites. If we can demonstrate that these metabolites increase in the CNS as a result of inflammation this study will have far reaching consequences to many other drugs that are normally excluded from the brain in this manner (eg digoxin, cyclosporine A, HIV protease inhibitors) during their use in any condition that involves an inflammatory component in the CNS.
- Conditions
- Head Trauma, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Close Head Injury
- Being tested
- morphine
- Keywords
- morphine, head injury, SAH
- Medical subject headings
- Craniocerebral Trauma, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Head Injuries, Closed
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
morphineDrug
only patients with a head injury currently receiving Morphine continuously or prm can and have an ICP drain can be enrolled into study
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No intervention | Not described Receives: Drug: morphine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
see the ratios of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/blood increase with time as the inflammation progresses
Measured: prospective
Secondary outcomes (1)
ratios of morphine and its metabolites in CSF and blood with the RASS will determine if observed CNS stimulation occurs at a time when the levels of 3-morphine glucuronide is high on the brain side of the blood brain barrier
Measured: prospective
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2005
- Study completionApr 2008 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Head TraumaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dalhousie University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Investigators
- Richard I Hall, MD, Principal investigator, Capital Health- QE II HSC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00196131
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Dal05-01
- Other IDs
- CIHRMOP-74451
- Status last verified
- Sep 2006
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Goralski KB, Hartmann G, Piquette-Miller M, Renton KW. Downregulation of mdr1a expression in the brain and liver during CNS inflammation alters the in vivo disposition of digoxin. Br J Pharmacol. 2003 May;139(1):35-48. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705227.
PubMed 12746221
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Changes in Morphine Handling and Response in Patients With Brain Trauma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00196131
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Dal05-01
- Conditions
- Head Trauma, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Close Head Injury
- Keywords
- morphine, head injury, SAH
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dalhousie UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- Jan 2005
- Study completion
- Apr 2008 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hypothesis: During severe brain trauma (injury, surgery) the ensuing inflammatory response in the central nervous system (CNS) results in a decrease in the expression of the transporter protein p-glycoprotein (PGP) in the blood brain barrier. This loss results in the penetration into the brain of certain drugs that are normally excluded by the transporter protein. In this study the working hypothesis is that the agitation observed in patients with CNS trauma treated with morphine is related to the inflammation evoked loss of PGP in the blood brain barrier and the accumulation of the morphine metabolite 3-morphine glucuronide.
Detailed description
It is well established that the metabolism, distribution and elimination of certain drugs is affected by inflammatory processes. This results from the expression of cytochrome and drug transporter proteins that are altered during the generation of host defense mechanisms. This has major implications in inflammation and infection when the capacity of the liver and other organs to handle drugs are severely compromised. From studies in animals individual cytochrome P450 isozymes and p-glycoprotein (PGP) are down regulated at the level of gene transcription with a resulting decrease in the corresponding mRNA, protein and enzyme/transporter activity. The loss in drug metabolism and transport is channeled predominantly through the production of cytokines which ultimately modify specific transcription factors. Other proposed mechanisms that apply to specific cytochrome P450s involve post translational steps including enzyme modification and increased degradation. When inflammatory responses are confined to the brain there is a loss of cytochrome P450 and PGP not only in the brain but also in peripheral tissues. This involves a yet to be identified mode of signaling between the brain and periphery but it does involve the production of cytokines from a peripheral source.
In clinical medicine there are numerous examples of a decreased capacity to handle drugs during infections and disease states that involve an inflammatory component. This often results in altered drug responses and increased toxicities. Inflammation mediated alterations in the metabolism of endogenous compounds can also lead to altered physiology. Recently it has been shown in rodents that inflammatory responses within the brain alter drug disposition in the brain and in peripheral systems. Of particular note to the use of drugs in patients with a brain trauma is a recent study in our laboratory carried out in rodents showing that the transport of some drugs across the blood brain barrier is dramatically changed during a CNS inflammatory response. The reason this occurs is the loss in expression of the drug transporter protein (PGP). This allows drugs which are normally transported out of the brain by PGP to enter and cause CNS toxicity. Such changes in drug handling capacity during inflammation/infection will continue to be one of the many factors that complicate therapeutics.
In humans with a severe CNS trauma (injury, surgery) an inflammatory response commonly occurs within the brain. It has also been our clinical observation that when these patients receive morphine as part of their care the drug is tolerated for a few days but many patients develop agitation that we believe is related to morphine therapy. Our working hypothesis is that a metabolite of morphine which is a CNS irritant (3-morphine glucuronide) can enter the brain in increased amounts because of the inflammation evoked loss in the transporter protein PGP in the blood brain barrier. In normal circumstances morphine is metabolized in the liver to two major metabolites (3-morphine glucuronide and 6-morphine glucuronide). These metabolites are excluded to some extent by a functioning PGP in the blood brain barrier. If the PGP diminishes in the blood brain barrier as a result of CNS inflammation then these morphine metabolites will increase in concentration in the brain. Some support for this idea can be taken from the recent studies showing that the inhibition of PGP by chemical means increases the concentration of the 6-glucuronide of morphine following the administration of morphine to rats. Although the 6-glucuronide is more potent than morphine with similar actions, the 3-glucuronide is a CNS irritant and may cause the agitation observed in these patients. We propose to measure these metabolites on both sides of the blood brain barrier in patients with CNS trauma/inflammation to determine if the agitation correlates with the build up of metabolites. If we can demonstrate that these metabolites increase in the CNS as a result of inflammation this study will have far reaching consequences to many other drugs that are normally excluded from the brain in this manner (eg digoxin, cyclosporine A, HIV protease inhibitors) during their use in any condition that involves an inflammatory component in the CNS.
Study design
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No intervention | Drug: morphine |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Sustained a head trauma (closed head injury or subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH])
- Fitted with a intraventricular drainage catheter
- Currently being treated with morphine
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patient is receiving another PGP inhibitor drug other than morphine or midazolam
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| morphineonly patients with a head injury currently receiving Morphine continuously or prm can and have an ICP drain can be enrolled into study | Drug | 0 |
Primary outcome
see the ratios of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/blood increase with time as the inflammation progresses
Time frame: prospective
1 secondary outcome
ratios of morphine and its metabolites in CSF and blood with the RASS will determine if observed CNS stimulation occurs at a time when the levels of 3-morphine glucuronide is high on the brain side of the blood brain barrier
Time frame: prospective
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2008.
- Background: PubMed 12746221Goralski KB, Hartmann G, Piquette-Miller M, Renton KW. Downregulation of mdr1a expression in the brain and liver during CNS inflammation alters the in vivo disposition of digoxin. Br J Pharmacol. 2003 May;139(1):35-48. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705227.
Related trials for Head Trauma
Not yet recruiting
The PIONEER Comparative Effectiveness Study - Project 2
Head Injury Trauma, Traumatic Brain Injury, Mild
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Intravenous Metoclopramide Versus Intravenous Acetaminophen for Acute Concussion Treatment
Concussion Post Syndrome, Head Trauma Injury
Recruiting
TES HT100 Clinical Validation for Brain Injury Screening in Patients With Mild Head Trauma or Neurological Symptoms
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Intracranial Lesions
Not yet recruiting
Kids Injury Detection Study Using the i-STAT
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Emerging Indications for Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment
Post-COVID-19 Condition, Ulcerative Colitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Richard I Hall, MD principal investigator
Capital Health- QE II HSC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing morphine in people with Head Trauma and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, run by Dalhousie University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
see the ratios of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/blood increase with time as the inflammation progresses (time frame: prospective). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00196131, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2008; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.