AzTrials
AzTrials

Post-Vaginal Delivery Perineal PainPhase 4NCT00222976

Oral vs Rectal Admin of Naproxen for Post-Vag Perineal Pain Control

A Phase 4 study testing Naproxen in people with Post-Vaginal Delivery Perineal Pain, run by University of Saskatchewan at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the route of administration of naproxen (either by mouth or rectally) influences post-vaginal delivery perineal pain control. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Post-Vaginal Delivery Perineal Pain
What is being tested?
Naproxen
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Sep 2006to May 2007
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Potential volunteers who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for this study:
  • Active labor, whether spontaneous or induced
  • Age between 18 and 40 years old
  • Nulliparous
  • BMI < 40
  • Single live intrauterine fetus in cephalic presentation
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Term gestation (370 weeks to 416 weeks inclusive) as defined by ultrasound or last menstrual period dating
  • Intrapartum epidural labour analgesia
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Potential volunteers meeting one of more of the following criteria may not be enrolled:
  • Medical conditions including:
  • Naproxen, aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity
  • Asthma
  • Peptic ulcer disease or other inflammatory gastrointestinal disease
  • Renal, hepatic or cardiac disease
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Coagulopathy
  • Rectal or anal pathology including recent (within 1 month) rectal bleeding
  • Prescribed medications including lithium, furosemide, antihypertensives, anticoagulants, aminoglycosides, hydantoins, or sulfonamides
  • Obstetrical conditions including:
  • Multiple pregnancy
  • Extensive perineal trauma (third or fourth degree laceration)
  • Forceps delivery
  • Cesarean section delivery
  • Paracervical or pudendal nerve blocks
  • Vulval or vaginal hematomas
  • Nulliparous women not requiring intrapartum epidural labour analgesia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Department of Anesthesia, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Oral vs Rectal Administration of Naproxen for Post-Vaginal Perineal Pain Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the route of administration of naproxen (either by mouth or rectally) influences post-vaginal delivery perineal pain control.

Read the detailed description

Postpartum perineal pain is common after vaginal delivery. Naproxen suppositories have been shown to be effective at reducing postpartum perineal pain. To date, no studies have investigated the efficacy of oral naproxen for perineal pain control. Currently, rectal naproxen is used postpartum because of an assumption that there is a "local effect" compared to oral administration. However, this effect has never been documented in the literature.

Principles of pharmacology dictate that the least invasive route of drug administration should be used when two or more routes are equally effective. If oral and rectal naproxen are equally efficacious at controlling post-vaginal delivery perineal pain, then current practice would be challenged.

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the route of administration of naproxen influences post-vaginal delivery perineal pain control. Pain scores will be measured using a visual analog scale. The secondary outcome measures are three-fold: patient preference of route of administration, medication adverse effects, and additional requests for analgesia. The working hypothesis is that there is no difference in pain control between oral and rectal administration and that patients will prefer the oral route.

Being tested
Naproxen

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NaproxenDrug

    Treatment allocation either A Naproxen PO + placebo PR or B Placebo PO + Naproxen PR

Study groups in NCT00222976
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalA Naproxen PO + placebo PR
Receives: Drug: Naproxen
2ExperimentalB Placebo PO + Naproxen PR
Receives: Drug: Naproxen

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. post-vaginal delivery perineal pain scores will be measured using a visual analog scale.

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. patient preference of route of administration

    Measured: 1 day

  2. medication adverse effects

    Measured: until completion of study

  3. additional requests for analgesia.

    Measured: until completion of study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2006
  3. Study completionMay 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00222976
Sponsor's protocol ID
Bio-REB 05-96
Status last verified
Nov 2007
First submitted
19 Sep 2005
Last updated
15 Nov 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Naproxen in people with Post-Vaginal Delivery Perineal Pain, run by University of Saskatchewan at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

post-vaginal delivery perineal pain scores will be measured using a visual analog scale. (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in