EpisiotomyMPRNCT07170007
Physiotherapeutic Protocol Compared to Usual Care in the Treatment of Primiparas After Perineal Trauma
A study testing Physiotherapeutic protocol and Usual maternity care in people with Episiotomy and Lacerations Perineal, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) protocol associated with cryotherapy initiated in the immediate postpartum period in relieving pain in primiparous women who suffered perineal trauma during vaginal delivery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Episiotomy, Lacerations Perineal, Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury
- What is being tested?
- Physiotherapeutic protocol and Usual maternity care
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 82 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 11 Nov 2025to 20 Mar 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The study will include female at birth aged 18 years or older, primiparous (no previous pregnancy after 16 weeks), who have suffered a perineal laceration of grade ≥2 or episiotomy, with ≥37 weeks of gestation at the time of delivery, who have not used testosterone in the last 6 months, with preserved cognitive ability, no history of neurological diseases, no symptoms of vaginal or urinary tract infection and no perineal diseases such as fistulas, genital mutilation, previous perineal surgery for pelvic floor dysfunction or Crohn's disease. According to the Robson 10-Group Classification System, only women belonging to group 1 (nulliparous women with a single vital cephalic pregnancy, ≥37 weeks of gestation in spontaneous labor) and group 2a (nulliparous women with a single vital cephalic pregnancy, ≥37 weeks of gestation who had labor induced) will be included in the study.
Who cannot join
- Women with conditions such as severe pre-eclampsia or infections, sick newborns or women who refuse to take part in the study will not be included. Participation is voluntary and participants can withdraw from the study at any time.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900
Cristine Homsi Jorge, +55 16 996217919, cristine@fmrp.usp.br
About this study
Official title: Physiotherapeutic Protocol Compared to Usual Care in the Treatment of Postpartum Primiparas After Perineal Trauma: A Type 1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Controlled Trial With Economic Evaluation
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) protocol associated with cryotherapy initiated in the immediate postpartum period in relieving pain in primiparous women who suffered perineal trauma during vaginal delivery. This is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 1 randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation, which will include 82 primiparous women who suffered a perineal tear of grade 2 or above or episiotomy during vaginal delivery. The study participants will be selected from among the women who gave birth at the Hospital das Clínicas in Ribeirão Preto and will be randomly assigned to participate in one of two study groups: the Control Group will receive the usual maternity care, that includes suturing the injury and analgesic medication, and the Intervention Group will receive the usual care combined with a physiotherapy protocol of PFMT and cryotherapy, starting in the immediate postpartum period and lasting 3 months. The primary outcome of the study will be the change in perineal pain intensity assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale; and the secondary outcomes will be self-reported pelvic floor dysfunction, recovery from injury, functionality, health-related quality of life, use of pain medication, genital self-image and implementation outcomes (satisfaction, acceptability, adequacy, feasibility, equity and adherence to the protocol). Assessments will be carried out by a group of health professionals, including physiotherapists and physicians, at 11 points up to 6 months after delivery. Two doctors from the service will be responsible for carrying out the transperineal ultrasound examination to assess the injury, which will be sent to a third international collaborating physician (SD) to assess the results blindly. The other assessments will be carried out by two physiotherapists.Descriptive statistics will be used, including the ANOVA test to confirm homogeneity between the groups, the chi-square test or Fisher's test for categorical variables and Student's t-test or Wilcoxon's non-parametric test for independent samples for quantitative variables.
Read the detailed description
This study is a type 1 hybrid randomised controlled clinical trial of effectiveness-implementation, with economic evaluation and blinded assessor, which aims to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a physiotherapy protocol that combines pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with cryotherapy, initiated immediately after vaginal delivery in primiparas who have suffered perineal laceration grade 2 or above or episiotomy.
Eighty-two women who gave birth at the Hospital das Clínicas of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School - USP will be recruited. Participants will be randomised into two groups: Control Group, which will receive only the usual maternity care (analgesic medication and sutures); and Intervention Group, which will receive, in addition to the usual care, the physiotherapy protocol.
The physiotherapy protocol consists of one in-person session during hospitalisation, which will include 20 minutes of cryotherapy and initial instructions on pelvic floor muscle contraction (PFM). After hospital discharge, 12 weekly PFMT sessions will be conducted remotely (online), with guidance for daily continuation of home exercises and application of cryotherapy as needed for perineal pain relief.
The primary outcome will be the intensity of perineal pain, assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale at the following times: 6-10 hours postpartum, 30 minutes after initial intervention, weekly in the first month, fortnightly in the second month, and at 3 and 6 months postpartum.
Secondary outcome measures include self-reported pelvic floor dysfunction (Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire and Wexner Scale), anatomical and functional recovery of the PFM (transperineal ultrasound and vaginal palpation using the modified Oxford scale), functionality (International Physical Activity Questionnaire - IPAQ and functional limitation numerical scale), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), use of analgesic medications, genital self-image (Female Genital Self-image Scale), gender-based violence (WHO-adapted questionnaire), and implementation outcomes (acceptability, adequacy, feasibility, and adherence to the protocol).
In addition, a comprehensive economic analysis will be conducted from the perspective of society, with a time horizon of 6 months, including cost-effectiveness analysis (clinical outcome: pain intensity) and cost-utility analysis (QALY). The costs evaluated will include interventions, health resources used (medications, tests, medical consultations, and additional physiotherapy sessions), complementary expenses (transportation and caregiver), and loss of productivity.
This protocol may offer a safe, non-pharmacological, effective, and potentially cost-effective intervention for the relief of perineal pain and prevention of pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women after vaginal delivery with perineal trauma, and may contribute significantly to public policies and clinical practices in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).
- Conditions
- Episiotomy, Lacerations Perineal, Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury, Perineal Injury, Perineal Laceration, Tear, or Rupture During Delivery, Perineal Pain
- Being tested
- Physiotherapeutic protocol, Usual maternity care
- Keywords
- pelvic floor dysfunction, woman's health, perineal pain, vaginal birth, perineal tear, postpartum
- Medical subject headings
- Lacerations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Physiotherapeutic protocolOther
The women randomized to the Intervention Group will receive the following interventions:
During hospitalization: Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction, observing the participant's ability to contract and advising on how to perform it, associated with cryotherapy and information on physiotherapy in women's health, pelvic floor muscles and its dysfunctions, as well as guidance on the care to be taken during hospitalization and after discharge, including guidance on postures to be adopted or avoided, breathing control, load management, intimate hygiene and the use of cryotherapy at home for pain relief.
After hospitalization, up to 3 months after delivery: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in weekly online sessions and guidance to carry out the training daily at home, with the same protocols and without supervision. A total of 12 individual online sessions.
Usual maternity careOther
Participants in the control group will receive standard postpartum care for perineal trauma from the maternity hospital, which includes suturing the injury and oral analgesic medication.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Active comparator | Participants in this group will be selected from among primiparous women aged 18 or over, who have suffered a perineal laceration of grade 2 or above or episiotomy, with ≥37 weeks of gestation at the time of delivery, with no history of neurological diseases, and without perineal diseases. According to the 10-group Robson Classification System, only women belonging to group 1 and group 2a will be included. This arm will receive standard postpartum care for perineal trauma from the maternity hospital. Receives: Other: Usual maternity care |
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Participants in this group will be selected from among primiparous women aged 18 or over, who have suffered a perineal laceration of grade 2 or above or episiotomy, with ≥37 weeks of gestation at the time of delivery, with no history of neurological diseases, and without perineal diseases. According to the 10-group Robson Classification System, only women belonging to group 1 and group 2a will be included. The women randomized to the Intervention Group the physiotherapeutic protocol (pelvic floor muscle training and cryotherapy, starting in the imediate postpartum and lasting 3 months). Receives: Other: Physiotherapeutic protocol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in perineal pain intensity
The change in the intensity of perineal pain will be assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), in which the participant will quantify her level of pain on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain imaginable; a change of 2 points in the NRS will be considered clinically significant. The pain assessment will be done by asking the participants: "What is the level of pain in your intimate area at the moment?" and "Do you believe you have taken any measures that could have improved or worsened your pain today?". If the answer is yes, the participant will be asked to specify the measure she believes has worsened or relieved the pain. The assessment will be carried out in person during hospitalization, and after discharge, via text message at the end of the day (around 6pm).
Measured: Up to 6 months postpartum
Secondary outcomes (19)
Self-reported symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction
Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire, comprising 42 questions in four domains: bladder, bowel, sexual function, and pelvic organ prolapse. The higher the score, the worse the function assessed.
The bladder section consists of 15 questions, resulting in a final score of 0-45. The bowel section consists of 12 questions, resulting in a final score of 0-34, and the prolapse section consists of 5 questions, resulting in a final score of 0-15, and the sexual function section consists of 10 questions, two qualitative and eight quantitative, with variable scores and a final score of 0-21. A change of 1 point in each section of the scale will be considered clinically significant.
This assessment will be carried out at four points in time: At baseline; 6-8 weeks after delivery; 3 and 6 months after delivery, remotely.
Measured: Up to 6 months postpartum.
Anal incontinence
The Wexner Scale will be used to assess anal incontinence. The final score ranges from 0 to 20, and the higher the value, the greater the degree of incontinence of the participant. The Wexner scale will be assessed at two points in time: At baseline, and 3 months after delivery.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum.
Integrity of the levator ani muscle
The integrity of the the levator ani muscle will be assessed using four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). This evaluation is performed offline reconstructing an axial view of the pelvis from the beforementioned ultrasound volume. A tomographic view is used, and the levator ani muscle (LAM) is defined as injured if there is a discontinuity between the LAM and the pubic bone in the plane of minimal hiatal dimension and the 2 slices cranially with 2.5 mm slice intervals. This is evaluated during maximum pelvic floor contraction, or at rest if contraction is not possible. The LAM will be classified as normal, unilateral avulsion, bilateral avulsion. This exam will be performed twice; shortly after birth and 3 months post partum.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum
Microtrauma of the levator ani muscle
The integrity of the the levator ani muscle will be assessed using four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). Microtrauma is defined as permanent injury to the muscle fibers without overt avulsion. It is diagnosed during maximum strain (Valsalva maneuver) where a 3D reconstruction of the levator ani muscle (LAM) allows for measuring the levator hiatus (the opening between the puborectalis muscle posterolaterally and the symphysis pubis anteriorly). An area of > 25cm2 is used as a cut off. The results will be presented as total area of the levator hiatus during contraction, relaxation and Valsalva manuever (cm2); anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus during contraction, relaxation and Valsalva manuever (mm); transverse diameter of the levator hiatus during contraction, relaxation and Valsalva manuever (mm) This exam will be performed twice; shortly after birth and 3 months post partum.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum
Obstetric anal sphincter muscle injury (OASI)
The integrity of the the levator ani muscle will be assessed using four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). The examination intends to evaluate the sphincter apparatus to assess signs of scarring indicating an OASI that has been adequately repaired and of muscle defects indicating either an occult OASI, not identified primarily, or a suboptimal healing.
These measures are evaluated through the same sonographic method as described above, though an axial plane where 6 slices of equal intervals will be examined. Diagnosis of a persistent sphincter defect is the loss of continuity of the circular internal and/or external sphincter of more than 30 degrees.
Each slice will be recorded as normal, scar or defect; whenever a defect (>30 degrees) are identified, the size (degrees) are recorded for each of the six slices.
The presence of a defect in 4 or more of the six slices is defined as an occult OASI. It will be performed shortly after birth and 3 months post partum.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum
Self-perception
The self-perception assessment will be carried out using the 'Questionnaire on knowledge and perception of the female pelvic floor', consisting of three parts, which assess the participant's knowledge of the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor muscles, symptoms and treatments for pelvic floor muscle dysfunction, and perception. Each statement has a score ranging from 0 to 3, depending on the statement, generating a maximum score of 40 points. The higher the score obtained, the greater the level of knowledge and perception of contraction and relaxation of the pelvic floor muscles. This assessment will be carried out at baseline and 3 months after delivery.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum
Function of the pelvic floor muscles
The assessment of pelvic floor muscle function will also be performed using the Modified Oxford Scale through vaginal palpation. This scale grades pelvic floor muscle function on a scale of 5 degrees, with degree 0: absence of muscle contraction, degree 1: slight muscle contraction; degree 2: weak contraction; degree 3: moderate contraction; degree 4: good contraction; degree 5: strong contraction. Vaginal palpation will be performed with participants in a supine position with knees and hips flexed and abducted and feet resting on the stretcher. Participants will be asked to perform maximum voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor muscles. Participants will be instructed to perform 3 contractions, and the evaluator will rate the last contraction. The higher the score obtained, the better the function of the pelvic floor muscles. This assessment will be carried out after the end of treatment (3 months postpartum), in person.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum
Functionality
Functionality will be assessed by estimating the limitations and restrictions of the parturient in performing activities during hospitalisation and after discharge of participants due to perineal trauma, using a numerical rating scale where 0 represents no difficulty and 10 represents inability to perform the activity; the higher the score, the worse the functionality. The activities questioned will be: turning over in bed, picking up the baby (lying in bed, sitting in bed, standing), breastfeeding (lying down, sitting on the bed, standing), changing the baby, sitting on the bed, getting out of bed, walking, sitting on the toilet, urinating, defecating, performing intimate hygiene after urinating or defecating, getting up from the toilet, and bathing.
Functionality will be assessed at baseline; 6-8 weeks after delivery; 3 and 6 months after delivery.
Measured: Up to 6 months postpartum.
Level of physical activity
The level of physical activity will be assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Version, which consists of three questions about daily physical activity, in order to determine the frequency and duration of the activity. The first question relates to strenuous activities (running, playing football, heavy housework), the second to moderate activities (swimming, dancing, gardening). The third question asks how often and for how long the person takes a continuous 10-minute walk.
Through this questionnaire, participants will be classified as sedentary, insufficiently active, active, or very active.
This assessment will be carried out at baseline; 6-8 weeks after delivery; 3 and 6 months after delivery.
Measured: Up to 6 months postpartum.
Health-related quality of life
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-3L instrument, which comprises two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analog scale. The descriptive system consists of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression), where health states are classified with a five-digit number representing the level of severity in each dimension, making it possible to identify 243 health states. The health states identified will be converted into utility using the Brazilian tariff. Utility ranges from -0.2 to 1, with -0.2 representing the worst state of health and 1 representing the best state of health. The visual analog scale ranges from 0 to 100, where participants will self-report their state of health. This assessment will be carried out at baseline; 6-8 weeks after delivery; 3 and 6 months after delivery.
Measured: Up to 6 months postpartum.
Use of medication
Medication use will be monitored in a way that all participants will be asked to record the type and dose of medication used, the duration of intervals and pain before and after administration in a self-reported medication diary that will be provided to participants at baseline, and the blinded evaluator will collect this information via phone calls at the following times: 6-8 weeks after randomization; 3 months after delivery; and 6 months after delivery.
Measured: Up to 6 months postpartum.
Genital self-image
The participants' genital self-image will be assessed using the female genital self-image scale, resulting in a final score that ranges from 7 to 28 points. A score higher than 22 classifies women as satisfied with their genital self-image.
Genital self-image will be assessed at baseline and 3 months after delivery.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum.
Acceptability
Acceptability will be assessed using the Intervention Acceptability Measure, which consists of four questions scored from 1 to 5, where 1 means 'strongly disagree' and 5 means 'strongly agree,' resulting in a final score of 4 to 20 points. The higher the score, the better the acceptability. Acceptability will only be assessed 3 months after delivery, or after the last session in the event of dropouts.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum
Appropriateness
Appropriateness will be assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure, which consists of four questions scored from 1 to 5, where 1 means 'strongly disagree' and 5 means 'strongly agree,' resulting in a final score of 4 to 20 points. The higher the score, the better the appropriateness. Appropriateness will only be assessed 3 months after delivery, or after the last session in the event of dropouts.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum
Intervention's feasibility
Feasibility will be assessed using the Intervention Feasibility Measure, which consists of four questions scored from 1 to 5, where 1 means 'strongly disagree' and 5 means 'strongly agree,' resulting in a final score of 4 to 20 points. The higher the score, the better the feasibility. Feasibility will only be assessed 3 months after delivery, or after the last session in the event of dropouts.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum
Participant's satisfaction
The participant's satisfaction with the protocol and its outcome will be assessed using a numerical rating scale scored from 0 to 3, where 0 represents complete dissatisfaction, 1 represents moderate dissatisfaction, 2 represents moderate satisfaction, and 3 represents complete satisfaction, resulting in a final score of 0-15. The higher the score obtained, the greater the satisfaction. Satisfaction will only be assessed 3 months after delivery, or after the last session in the event of dropouts.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum
Participant's adherence
The participant's adherence to treatment will be assessed using a questionnaire with questions about the continuous use of resources, participation in online sessions, and the practice of pelvic floor muscle training at home, whether there are any modifications that the participant believes are necessary to the protocol, as well as the retention and dropout rates of participants. In cases of withdrawal, a question about the reason for withdrawal will be added. Adherence will only be assessed 3 months after delivery, or after the last session in the event of dropouts.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum
Gender-based violence
Gender-based violence will be assessed using the "Adapted Questionnaire: Multi-Country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence (WHO)", composed of 14 questions covering psychological, physical and sexual violence. The assessment of violence will be carried out at baseline and 3 months after delivery, where the latter will include the question "Were you forced to have sexual intercourse before the end of the 40-day protection period?" If the answer is positive, it will be considered sexual violence.
Measured: Up to 3 months postpartum
Economic evaluation
The economic evaluation will be carried out from society's perspective. The costs to society will be made up of the costs of the interventions, health care costs (use of resources consumed by the women), patient/family costs (complementary expenses, informal care and transport costs) and lost productivity (estimated from the hours of absenteeism from work, paid and unpaid, of the woman and her companion), and will be identified by a self-reported cost diary, collected 6 to 8 weeks after randomization, 3 and 6 months after delivery.
Measured: Up to 6 months postpartum
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2025
- Study start11 Nov 2025
- Primary completion31 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Mar 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (69)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EpisiotomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with two arms: an intervention group receiving a physiotherapeutic protocol and a control group receiving usual postpartum care. Participants will be randomly allocated, and outcome assessors will be blinded to group assignment. The study follows a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design and includes an economic evaluation.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Caroline Soares de Paula, University of Sao Paulo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07170007
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10750271
- Acronym
- MPR
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 26 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results of this study (after de-identification) will be made available upon reasonable request. Data will include variables related to the primary and secondary outcomes, as well as the study protocol and statistical analysis plan. Requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to assess the scientific merit and credibility of the proposal. Access will be granted only to qualified researchers with appropriate ethical approvals and data protection measures in place. Requests should be submitted to the principal investigator at carolinesoarespaula@gmail.com.
Publications
Frawley HC, Galea MP, Phillips BA, Sherburn M, Bo K. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(3):236-242. doi: 10.1002/nau.20201.
PubMed 16299815Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Pozzi GC, Freitas LM. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2459-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181849dbe.
PubMed 18923324Schraiber LB, Latorre Mdo R, Franca I Jr, Segri NJ, D'Oliveira AF. Validity of the WHO VAW study instrument for estimating gender-based violence against women. Rev Saude Publica. 2010 Aug;44(4):658-66. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102010000400009. English, Portuguese.
PubMed 20676557Fioratti I, Santos VS, Fernandes LG, Rodrigues KA, Soares RJ, Saragiotto BT. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of three implementation measures into Brazilian-Portuguese. Arch Physiother. 2023 Mar 27;13(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40945-023-00160-x.
PubMed 36967380Arruda, G. T. D., Silva, E. V. D., Somavilla, P., Oliveira, M. C. R. D., & Braz, M. M. (2023). Female Genital Self-image Scale (FGSIS): cut-off point, reliability, and validation of measurement properties in Brazilian women. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa, 30, e22015823en.
Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
PubMed 22310560Lu YY, Su ML, Gau ML, Lin KC, Au HK. The efficacy of cold-gel packing for relieving episiotomy pain - a quasi-randomised control trial. Contemp Nurse. 2015;50(1):26-35. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2015.1010257. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
PubMed 26058405Brennen R, Frawley HC, Martin J, Haines TP. Group-based pelvic floor muscle training for all women during pregnancy is more cost-effective than postnatal training for women with urinary incontinence: cost-effectiveness analysis of a systematic review. J Physiother. 2021 Apr;67(2):105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
PubMed 33771484Cacciari LP, Kouakou CR, Poder TG, Vale L, Morin M, Mayrand MH, Tousignant M, Dumoulin C. Group-based pelvic floor muscle training is a more cost-effective approach to treat urinary incontinence in older women: economic analysis of a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2022 Jul;68(3):191-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
PubMed 35753969Beleza ACS, Ferreira CHJ, Driusso P, Dos Santos CB, Nakano AMS. Effect of cryotherapy on relief of perineal pain after vaginal childbirth with episiotomy: a randomized and controlled clinical trial. Physiotherapy. 2017 Dec;103(4):453-458. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
PubMed 27956033van der Roer N, Boos N, van Tulder MW. Economic evaluations: a new avenue of outcome assessment in spinal disorders. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S109-17. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1052-x. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
PubMed 16320029Laranjeira FO, Petramale CA. A avaliação econômica em saúde na tomada de decisão: a experiência da CONITEC. BIS, Bol Inst Saúde. 2013;14(2):165-170.
Black WC. The CE plane: a graphic representation of cost-effectiveness. Med Decis Making. 1990 Jul-Sep;10(3):212-4. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000308.
PubMed 2115096Willan AR, Briggs AH, Hoch JS. Regression methods for covariate adjustment and subgroup analysis for non-censored cost-effectiveness data. Health Econ. 2004 May;13(5):461-75. doi: 10.1002/hec.843.
PubMed 15127426Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, Wood AM, Carpenter JR. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393.
PubMed 19564179
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physiotherapeutic Protocol Compared to Usual Care in the Treatment of Postpartum Primiparas After Perineal Trauma: A Type 1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Controlled Trial With Economic Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07170007
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MPR / 10750271
- Conditions
- Episiotomy, Lacerations Perineal, Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury, Perineal Injury, Perineal Laceration, Tear, or Rupture During Delivery, Perineal Pain
- Keywords
- pelvic floor dysfunction, woman's health, perineal pain, vaginal birth, perineal tear, postpartum
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao PauloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Mar 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) protocol associated with cryotherapy initiated in the immediate postpartum period in relieving pain in primiparous women who suffered perineal trauma during vaginal delivery. This is a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 1 randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation, which will include 82 primiparous women who suffered a perineal tear of grade 2 or above or episiotomy during vaginal delivery. The study participants will be selected from among the women who gave birth at the Hospital das Clínicas in Ribeirão Preto and will be randomly assigned to participate in one of two study groups: the Control Group will receive the usual maternity care, that includes suturing the injury and analgesic medication, and the Intervention Group will receive the usual care combined with a physiotherapy protocol of PFMT and cryotherapy, starting in the immediate postpartum period and lasting 3 months. The primary outcome of the study will be the change in perineal pain intensity assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale; and the secondary outcomes will be self-reported pelvic floor dysfunction, recovery from injury, functionality, health-related quality of life, use of pain medication, genital self-image and implementation outcomes (satisfaction, acceptability, adequacy, feasibility, equity and adherence to the protocol). Assessments will be carried out by a group of health professionals, including physiotherapists and physicians, at 11 points up to 6 months after delivery. Two doctors from the service will be responsible for carrying out the transperineal ultrasound examination to assess the injury, which will be sent to a third international collaborating physician (SD) to assess the results blindly. The other assessments will be carried out by two physiotherapists.Descriptive statistics will be used, including the ANOVA test to confirm homogeneity between the groups, the chi-square test or Fisher's test for categorical variables and Student's t-test or Wilcoxon's non-parametric test for independent samples for quantitative variables.
Detailed description
This study is a type 1 hybrid randomised controlled clinical trial of effectiveness-implementation, with economic evaluation and blinded assessor, which aims to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a physiotherapy protocol that combines pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with cryotherapy, initiated immediately after vaginal delivery in primiparas who have suffered perineal laceration grade 2 or above or episiotomy.
Eighty-two women who gave birth at the Hospital das Clínicas of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School - USP will be recruited. Participants will be randomised into two groups: Control Group, which will receive only the usual maternity care (analgesic medication and sutures); and Intervention Group, which will receive, in addition to the usual care, the physiotherapy protocol.
The physiotherapy protocol consists of one in-person session during hospitalisation, which will include 20 minutes of cryotherapy and initial instructions on pelvic floor muscle contraction (PFM). After hospital discharge, 12 weekly PFMT sessions will be conducted remotely (online), with guidance for daily continuation of home exercises and application of cryotherapy as needed for perineal pain relief.
The primary outcome will be the intensity of perineal pain, assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale at the following times: 6-10 hours postpartum, 30 minutes after initial intervention, weekly in the first month, fortnightly in the second month, and at 3 and 6 months postpartum.
Secondary outcome measures include self-reported pelvic floor dysfunction (Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire and Wexner Scale), anatomical and functional recovery of the PFM (transperineal ultrasound and vaginal palpation using the modified Oxford scale), functionality (International Physical Activity Questionnaire - IPAQ and functional limitation numerical scale), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), use of analgesic medications, genital self-image (Female Genital Self-image Scale), gender-based violence (WHO-adapted questionnaire), and implementation outcomes (acceptability, adequacy, feasibility, and adherence to the protocol).
In addition, a comprehensive economic analysis will be conducted from the perspective of society, with a time horizon of 6 months, including cost-effectiveness analysis (clinical outcome: pain intensity) and cost-utility analysis (QALY). The costs evaluated will include interventions, health resources used (medications, tests, medical consultations, and additional physiotherapy sessions), complementary expenses (transportation and caregiver), and loss of productivity.
This protocol may offer a safe, non-pharmacological, effective, and potentially cost-effective intervention for the relief of perineal pain and prevention of pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women after vaginal delivery with perineal trauma, and may contribute significantly to public policies and clinical practices in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with two arms: an intervention group receiving a physiotherapeutic protocol and a control group receiving usual postpartum care. Participants will be randomly allocated, and outcome assessors will be blinded to group assignment. The study follows a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design and includes an economic evaluation.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Active comparator | Other: Usual maternity careParticipants in this group will be selected from among primiparous women aged 18 or over, who have suffered a perineal laceration of grade 2 or above or episiotomy, with ≥37 weeks of gestation at the time of delivery, with no history of neurological diseases, and without perineal diseases. According to the 10-group Robson Classification System, only women belonging to group 1 and group 2a will be included. This arm will receive standard postpartum care for perineal trauma from the maternity hospital. |
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: Physiotherapeutic protocolParticipants in this group will be selected from among primiparous women aged 18 or over, who have suffered a perineal laceration of grade 2 or above or episiotomy, with ≥37 weeks of gestation at the time of delivery, with no history of neurological diseases, and without perineal diseases. According to the 10-group Robson Classification System, only women belonging to group 1 and group 2a will be included. The women randomized to the Intervention Group the physiotherapeutic protocol (pelvic floor muscle training and cryotherapy, starting in the imediate postpartum and lasting 3 months). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The study will include female at birth aged 18 years or older, primiparous (no previous pregnancy after 16 weeks), who have suffered a perineal laceration of grade ≥2 or episiotomy, with ≥37 weeks of gestation at the time of delivery, who have not used testosterone in the last 6 months, with preserved cognitive ability, no history of neurological diseases, no symptoms of vaginal or urinary tract infection and no perineal diseases such as fistulas, genital mutilation, previous perineal surgery for pelvic floor dysfunction or Crohn's disease. According to the Robson 10-Group Classification System, only women belonging to group 1 (nulliparous women with a single vital cephalic pregnancy, ≥37 weeks of gestation in spontaneous labor) and group 2a (nulliparous women with a single vital cephalic pregnancy, ≥37 weeks of gestation who had labor induced) will be included in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women with conditions such as severe pre-eclampsia or infections, sick newborns or women who refuse to take part in the study will not be included. Participation is voluntary and participants can withdraw from the study at any time.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Physiotherapeutic protocolThe women randomized to the Intervention Group will receive the following interventions: During hospitalization: Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction, observing the participant's ability to contract and advising on how to perform it, associated with cryotherapy and information on physiotherapy in women's health, pelvic floor muscles and its dysfunctions, as well as guidance on the care to be taken during hospitalization and after discharge, including guidance on postures to be adopted or avoided, breathing control, load management, intimate hygiene and the use of cryotherapy at home for pain relief. After hospitalization, up to 3 months after delivery: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in weekly online sessions and guidance to carry out the training daily at home, with the same protocols and without supervision. A total of 12 individual online sessions. | Other | Intervention Group |
| Usual maternity careParticipants in the control group will receive standard postpartum care for perineal trauma from the maternity hospital, which includes suturing the injury and oral analgesic medication. | Other | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Change in perineal pain intensity
Time frame: Up to 6 months postpartum
The change in the intensity of perineal pain will be assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), in which the participant will quantify her level of pain on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain imaginable; a change of 2 points in the NRS will be considered clinically significant. The pain assessment will be done by asking the participants: "What is the level of pain in your intimate area at the moment?" and "Do you believe you have taken any measures that could have improved or worsened your pain today?". If the answer is yes, the participant will be asked to specify the measure she believes has worsened or relieved the pain. The assessment will be carried out in person during hospitalization, and after discharge, via text message at the end of the day (around 6pm).
19 secondary outcomes
Self-reported symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction
Time frame: Up to 6 months postpartum.
Anal incontinence
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum.
Integrity of the levator ani muscle
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum
Microtrauma of the levator ani muscle
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum
Obstetric anal sphincter muscle injury (OASI)
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum
Self-perception
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum
Function of the pelvic floor muscles
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum
Functionality
Time frame: Up to 6 months postpartum.
Level of physical activity
Time frame: Up to 6 months postpartum.
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: Up to 6 months postpartum.
Use of medication
Time frame: Up to 6 months postpartum.
Genital self-image
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum.
Acceptability
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum
Appropriateness
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum
Intervention's feasibility
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum
Participant's satisfaction
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum
Participant's adherence
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum
Gender-based violence
Time frame: Up to 3 months postpartum
Economic evaluation
Time frame: Up to 6 months postpartum
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Nov 2025.
- Background: PubMed 16299815Frawley HC, Galea MP, Phillips BA, Sherburn M, Bo K. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(3):236-242. doi: 10.1002/nau.20201.
- Background: PubMed 18923324Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Pozzi GC, Freitas LM. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2459-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181849dbe.
- Background: PubMed 20676557Schraiber LB, Latorre Mdo R, Franca I Jr, Segri NJ, D'Oliveira AF. Validity of the WHO VAW study instrument for estimating gender-based violence against women. Rev Saude Publica. 2010 Aug;44(4):658-66. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102010000400009. English, Portuguese.
- Background: PubMed 36967380Fioratti I, Santos VS, Fernandes LG, Rodrigues KA, Soares RJ, Saragiotto BT. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of three implementation measures into Brazilian-Portuguese. Arch Physiother. 2023 Mar 27;13(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40945-023-00160-x.
- BackgroundArruda, G. T. D., Silva, E. V. D., Somavilla, P., Oliveira, M. C. R. D., & Braz, M. M. (2023). Female Genital Self-image Scale (FGSIS): cut-off point, reliability, and validation of measurement properties in Brazilian women. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa, 30, e22015823en.
- Background: PubMed 22310560Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
- Background: PubMed 26058405Lu YY, Su ML, Gau ML, Lin KC, Au HK. The efficacy of cold-gel packing for relieving episiotomy pain - a quasi-randomised control trial. Contemp Nurse. 2015;50(1):26-35. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2015.1010257. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
- Background: PubMed 33771484Brennen R, Frawley HC, Martin J, Haines TP. Group-based pelvic floor muscle training for all women during pregnancy is more cost-effective than postnatal training for women with urinary incontinence: cost-effectiveness analysis of a systematic review. J Physiother. 2021 Apr;67(2):105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
- Background: PubMed 35753969Cacciari LP, Kouakou CR, Poder TG, Vale L, Morin M, Mayrand MH, Tousignant M, Dumoulin C. Group-based pelvic floor muscle training is a more cost-effective approach to treat urinary incontinence in older women: economic analysis of a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2022 Jul;68(3):191-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
- Background: PubMed 27956033Beleza ACS, Ferreira CHJ, Driusso P, Dos Santos CB, Nakano AMS. Effect of cryotherapy on relief of perineal pain after vaginal childbirth with episiotomy: a randomized and controlled clinical trial. Physiotherapy. 2017 Dec;103(4):453-458. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 16320029van der Roer N, Boos N, van Tulder MW. Economic evaluations: a new avenue of outcome assessment in spinal disorders. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S109-17. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1052-x. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
- BackgroundLaranjeira FO, Petramale CA. A avaliação econômica em saúde na tomada de decisão: a experiência da CONITEC. BIS, Bol Inst Saúde. 2013;14(2):165-170.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results of this study (after de-identification) will be made available upon reasonable request. Data will include variables related to the primary and secondary outcomes, as well as the study protocol and statistical analysis plan. Requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to assess the scientific merit and credibility of the proposal. Access will be granted only to qualified researchers with appropriate ethical approvals and data protection measures in place. Requests should be submitted to the principal investigator at carolinesoarespaula@gmail.com.
Related trials for Episiotomy
Not yet recruiting
Pudendal Nerve Block for Pain Relief During Episiotomy Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Episiotomy , Perineal Pain
Not yet recruiting
Perineal Protection Device for Reducing Perineal Trauma During Vaginal Delivery in First-time Mothers: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Perineal Laceration
Recruiting
Impact of Early Physiotherapy on Pain, Quality of Life, Pelvic Floor Function, and Sexual Health Post-Episiotomy
Gynecological; Surgery (Previous), Causing Obstructed Labor
Not yet recruiting
Repeated Pudendal Nerve Block and Physiotherapy for Prevention of Chronic Post-Episiotomy Pain
Chronic Post-episiotomy Pain, Postpartum Dyspareunia
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Mosaic Art on Episiotomy Repair Skills, Anxiety, and Learning Attitudes in Midwifery Students
Education, Nursing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Physiotherapeutic protocol and Usual maternity care in people with Episiotomy and Lacerations Perineal, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Caroline Soares de Paula (+55 19 996307633, carolinesoarespaula@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in perineal pain intensity (time frame: Up to 6 months postpartum). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07170007, which also lists 69 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Nov 2025.