Deep Vein ThrombosisPhase 2/3NCT00225108
The STOP CLOT Pilot Study: Study of Low Molecular Weight Heparin in High Risk Cesarean Section
A Phase 2/3 study testing Tinzaparin in people with Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains the most common cause of maternal death in the developed world. VTE includes two conditions, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Deep Vein Thrombosis
- What is being tested?
- Tinzaparin
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jul 2002to Sep 2006
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria (must meet inclusion criteria 1, 2 and 3):
- At high risk for thromboembolism (any one of the following):
- Age > 35 years
- Obesity (> 80 kg)
- Para \4
- Gross varicose veins
- Current infection
- Pre-eclampsia
- Immobility prior to surgery (> 4 days)
- Major current disease: includes heart or lung disease, cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, and nephrotic syndrome.
- Emergency cesarean section in labour
- Extended major pelvic or abdominal surgery (e.g. cesarean hysterectomy)
- Patients with a family history of VTE
- History of superficial phlebitis
- Delivered by cesarean section (emergency or planned)
- Signed, informed consent
Exclusion Criteria (must not meet any of the following criteria):
- Greater than 36 hours since delivery
- Need for anticoagulation, including:
- Women with a confirmed thrombophilia
- Women with paralysis of lower limbs
- Women with personal history of VTE
- Women with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APLA)
- Women with mechanical heart valves
- Contraindication to heparin therapy, including:
- History of heparin induced thrombocytopenia
- Platelet count of less than 100,000 x 10^6/L
- Hemoglobin <= 90 g/L or a greater than 30 g/L drop in hemoglobin compared to last antepartum result
- History of osteoporosis
- History of steroid use (one week or more)
- Active bleeding
- Documented peptic ulcer within 6 weeks
- Heparin, bisulfite, or fish allergy
- Severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 200 and/or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 120)
- Severe hepatic failure (International Normalized Ratio [INR] > 1.8)
- Women with serum creatinine > 80 and an abnormal 24 hour creatinine clearance.
- Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including:
- Women with electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implants
- Women with claustrophobia
- Women < 18 years of age
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Cesarean Section Thromboprophylaxis Pilot Study:A Randomized Open-Label Controlled Pilot Study of Prophylactic Low Molecular Weight Heparin in High Risk Postpartum Women Following Cesarean Section
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains the most common cause of maternal death in the developed world. VTE includes two conditions, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). DVT refers to a blood clot that has formed in a deep vein, often in the legs and/or pelvis and PE refers to the passage of these clots into the lungs (which can be fatal). VTE is up to 10 times more common in pregnant women than non-pregnant women of comparable age. More than a third of pregnancy related VTE occur during the 6 weeks after delivery. When compared with vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery further increases the risk of pregnancy associated VTE by three-fold.
A medication called low molecular weight heparin is sometimes prescribed during pregnancy and after delivery to prevent VTE. However, clinical practice varies because there hasn't been adequate research to determine that this medication is safe and effective at preventing VTE during this time. The potential benefits of the medication must also be weighed against its cost and possible side effects.
The researchers are conducting a study that will assess the effectiveness and safety of low molecular weight heparin in women who are at moderate to high risk of VTE after a cesarean section. They will monitor these women to determine if those who received the medication have fewer blood clots. Participants will also be monitored closely for any side effects.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains the most common cause of maternal mortality in the developed world. VTE is up to 10 times more common in pregnant women than non-pregnant women of comparable age. More than a third of pregnancy related VTE occur during the brief postpartum period (6 weeks). When compared with vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery further increases the risk of pregnancy associated VTE by three-fold. Pregnancy associated VTE is unique in that isolated iliac vein thrombosis is more likely and long term morbidity (post-phlebitic syndrome) is common.
There is an absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of thromboprophylaxis after C-section to guide practice. Many national societies have guidelines on thromboprophylaxis however these are not evidence based and compliance with these guidelines is poor. Thromboprophylaxis may be associated with adverse effects (bleeding, heparin induced thrombocytopenia, skin reactions), inconvenience and cost. It is critical that the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis following cesarean delivery be assessed in well designed and conducted randomized trials.
OBJECTIVES: We are conducting a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. The pilot study seeks to answer the question: Is a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trial of low molecular weight heparin thromboprophylaxis feasible in moderate to high risk women post cesarean section with DVT detected by pelvic vein (MRV) or leg vein (leg compression ultrasound) imaging? Our ultimate goal is to determine:
- Is LMWH effective in preventing postpartum DVT following cesarean section in women at moderate to high risk of VTE?
- Is LMWH safe in preventing postpartum DVT following cesarean section in women at moderate to high risk of VTE?
- Is LMWH cost effective in preventing postpartum DVT following cesarean section in women at moderate to high risk of VTE?
STUDY DESIGN: We propose a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study of prophylactic LMWH in women at moderate to high risk for VTE following cesarean section. Eligible, consenting and randomized participants will receive once-daily injections of study drug (4,500 IU tinzaparin sodium (Innohep®;) or placebo) within 6 to 24 hours postpartum and continue until 3 to 7 days postpartum. On the day of hospital discharge, bilateral leg imaging with compression leg ultrasounds and pelvic vein imaging with MRV will be completed. The primary outcome will be adjudicated DVT documented on ultrasounds or MRV on the day of hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes will include symptomatic DVT and PE, death from PE, major and minor bleeding, HIT during the six week postpartum period. All outcomes will be adjudicated by an independent committee of experts blinded to study drug allocation.
With a sample size of 134 patients we will have over 80% power to detect a 50% relative risk reduction in the primary outcome event rate and a large enough sample to determine the feasibility objectives of the pilot study (i.e. obtain a precise estimate of the primary outcome event rate [DVT], a precise estimate of the multicentre recruitment rate, feasibility and acceptability of blinded study drug and placebo administration, feasibility of obtaining local study centre MRV and central interpretation of MRV and a preliminary relative risk reduction estimate with study drug compared to placebo to inform final study sample size determination).
RELEVANCE: Maternal mortality is a devastating outcome with far reaching emotional and societal implications. Evidence to guide thromboprophylaxis in women at risk for the number 1 cause of maternal mortality is required.
- Conditions
- Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Being tested
- Tinzaparin
- Keywords
- Deep vein thrombosis, bleeding
- Medical subject headings
- Venous Thrombosis, Hemorrhage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TinzaparinDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
VTE on magnetic resonance venography (MRV) or bilateral leg Doppler ultrasound
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2002
- Study completionSep 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Deep Vein ThrombosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- LEO Pharma
- Investigators
- Marc Rodger, MD, Principal investigator, The Ottawa Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00225108
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2002191-01H
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 7 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Rodger MA, Avruch LI, Howley HE, Olivier A, Walker MC. Pelvic magnetic resonance venography reveals high rate of pelvic vein thrombosis after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;194(2):436-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.044.
PubMed 16458642Middleton P, Shepherd E, Gomersall JC. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for women at risk during pregnancy and the early postnatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;3(3):CD001689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001689.pub4.
PubMed 33779986
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Cesarean Section Thromboprophylaxis Pilot Study:A Randomized Open-Label Controlled Pilot Study of Prophylactic Low Molecular Weight Heparin in High Risk Postpartum Women Following Cesarean Section
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00225108
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2002191-01H
- Conditions
- Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Keywords
- Deep vein thrombosis, bleeding
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- LEO Pharma
- Study start
- Jul 2002
- Study completion
- Sep 2006
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains the most common cause of maternal death in the developed world. VTE includes two conditions, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). DVT refers to a blood clot that has formed in a deep vein, often in the legs and/or pelvis and PE refers to the passage of these clots into the lungs (which can be fatal). VTE is up to 10 times more common in pregnant women than non-pregnant women of comparable age. More than a third of pregnancy related VTE occur during the 6 weeks after delivery. When compared with vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery further increases the risk of pregnancy associated VTE by three-fold.
A medication called low molecular weight heparin is sometimes prescribed during pregnancy and after delivery to prevent VTE. However, clinical practice varies because there hasn't been adequate research to determine that this medication is safe and effective at preventing VTE during this time. The potential benefits of the medication must also be weighed against its cost and possible side effects.
The researchers are conducting a study that will assess the effectiveness and safety of low molecular weight heparin in women who are at moderate to high risk of VTE after a cesarean section. They will monitor these women to determine if those who received the medication have fewer blood clots. Participants will also be monitored closely for any side effects.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains the most common cause of maternal mortality in the developed world. VTE is up to 10 times more common in pregnant women than non-pregnant women of comparable age. More than a third of pregnancy related VTE occur during the brief postpartum period (6 weeks). When compared with vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery further increases the risk of pregnancy associated VTE by three-fold. Pregnancy associated VTE is unique in that isolated iliac vein thrombosis is more likely and long term morbidity (post-phlebitic syndrome) is common.
There is an absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of thromboprophylaxis after C-section to guide practice. Many national societies have guidelines on thromboprophylaxis however these are not evidence based and compliance with these guidelines is poor. Thromboprophylaxis may be associated with adverse effects (bleeding, heparin induced thrombocytopenia, skin reactions), inconvenience and cost. It is critical that the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis following cesarean delivery be assessed in well designed and conducted randomized trials.
OBJECTIVES: We are conducting a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. The pilot study seeks to answer the question: Is a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trial of low molecular weight heparin thromboprophylaxis feasible in moderate to high risk women post cesarean section with DVT detected by pelvic vein (MRV) or leg vein (leg compression ultrasound) imaging? Our ultimate goal is to determine:
- Is LMWH effective in preventing postpartum DVT following cesarean section in women at moderate to high risk of VTE?
- Is LMWH safe in preventing postpartum DVT following cesarean section in women at moderate to high risk of VTE?
- Is LMWH cost effective in preventing postpartum DVT following cesarean section in women at moderate to high risk of VTE?
STUDY DESIGN: We propose a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study of prophylactic LMWH in women at moderate to high risk for VTE following cesarean section. Eligible, consenting and randomized participants will receive once-daily injections of study drug (4,500 IU tinzaparin sodium (Innohep®;) or placebo) within 6 to 24 hours postpartum and continue until 3 to 7 days postpartum. On the day of hospital discharge, bilateral leg imaging with compression leg ultrasounds and pelvic vein imaging with MRV will be completed. The primary outcome will be adjudicated DVT documented on ultrasounds or MRV on the day of hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes will include symptomatic DVT and PE, death from PE, major and minor bleeding, HIT during the six week postpartum period. All outcomes will be adjudicated by an independent committee of experts blinded to study drug allocation.
With a sample size of 134 patients we will have over 80% power to detect a 50% relative risk reduction in the primary outcome event rate and a large enough sample to determine the feasibility objectives of the pilot study (i.e. obtain a precise estimate of the primary outcome event rate [DVT], a precise estimate of the multicentre recruitment rate, feasibility and acceptability of blinded study drug and placebo administration, feasibility of obtaining local study centre MRV and central interpretation of MRV and a preliminary relative risk reduction estimate with study drug compared to placebo to inform final study sample size determination).
RELEVANCE: Maternal mortality is a devastating outcome with far reaching emotional and societal implications. Evidence to guide thromboprophylaxis in women at risk for the number 1 cause of maternal mortality is required.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tinzaparin | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
VTE on magnetic resonance venography (MRV) or bilateral leg Doppler ultrasound
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Feb 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 16458642Rodger MA, Avruch LI, Howley HE, Olivier A, Walker MC. Pelvic magnetic resonance venography reveals high rate of pelvic vein thrombosis after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;194(2):436-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.044.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33779986Middleton P, Shepherd E, Gomersall JC. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for women at risk during pregnancy and the early postnatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;3(3):CD001689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001689.pub4.
Related trials for Deep Vein Thrombosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Active, not recruiting
This Research Proposal Focuses on Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Nursing Care Protocol in Preventing Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in Patients Undergoing On-pump Cardiac Surgery. The Study Will Include an Intervention Group That Receives the Nursing Protocol and a Control Group That Receives Routine
On-pump Cardiac Surgery - Prevention - Intervention - Experimental Group - Control Group - Incidence - Complications, DVT - Deep Vein Thrombosis
Recruiting
DEFIANCE: RCT of ClotTriever System Versus Anticoagulation In Deep Vein Thrombosis
Venous Thromboembolism, Deep Venous Thrombosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marc Rodger, MD principal investigator
The Ottawa Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Tinzaparin in people with Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
VTE on magnetic resonance venography (MRV) or bilateral leg Doppler ultrasound. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00225108, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Feb 2018.