AzTrials
AzTrials

Systemic SclerosisPhase 1/2NCT00241189

Rapamycin vs Methotrexate in Diffuse SSc

A Phase 1/2 study testing rapamycin and methotrexate in people with Systemic Sclerosis, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study to determine the safety of the immunosuppressive rapamycin in patients with systemic sclerosis with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma. The effects (both good and bad) are being compared to another group of systemic sclerosis patients receiving methotrexate Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Systemic Sclerosis
What is being tested?
rapamycin and methotrexate
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2002to Jun 2006
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Satisfy American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic sclerosis
  • Have skin thickening proximal to the elbows and/or knees (diffuse scleroderma)
  • Cutaneous involvement for less than 5 years from the onset of the first non-Raynaud's manifestation

Who cannot join

  • Severe intractable malabsorption
  • Chronic debilitation from any underlying disease
  • Off putative disease modifying therapies for one month prior to entry

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Philip Clements, MD

    Los Angeles, California, 90095-1670

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A 48-week, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Phase I/II Study of Oral Rapamycin Versus Methotrexate in Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma)

This is a study to determine the safety of the immunosuppressive rapamycin in patients with systemic sclerosis with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma. The effects (both good and bad) are being compared to another group of systemic sclerosis patients receiving methotrexate

Read the detailed description

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a disorder characterized by overproduction and deposition of collagen in the skin and visceral organs, abnormalities of the microcirculation, and autoimmunity. Patients who develop extensive skin thickening (diffuse cutaneous scleroderma) usually do so within the first 5 years. In add tion they are at significant risk of early death, severe involvement of heart (10%), lung (15%) and kidney (15-20%) and loss of functional capacity (moderate to severe disability in about 50% within the first few years). there is as yet no proven cure or treatment which prevents heart, lung or kidney damage, prevents disability or improves survival.

In a previsou study, we treated 10 SSc patients with diffuse cutaneous scleroerma with cyclosporin A (CsA), an agent which suppresses the immune response by reducing production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-2 (IL-2). Significant improvement in skin thickening was noted in 6 of the 10 SSc patients. Unfortuantely, significant reduction in kidney function and/or new onset high blood pressure occurred in 8 of the 10. This frequency and degree of adverse events ina population already at risk of kidney failure and high blood pressure is unacceptable.

More recently an immunosuppressive agent with little kidney toxicity, rapamycin, has been found to block the effects of the same pro-inflammatory cytokine as cyclosporin (IL-2) in transplant patients as part of its immunosuppressive action. Since improvement in skin thickening was seen in our patients who received CsA, we postulate that blocking the effects of IL-2 by rapamycin will also result in improvement in skin thickening in SSc patients with extensive skin thickening. There is growing evidence (from our work and the work of others) that softening thick skin in diffuse SSc is associated with improvement in hand function, joint mobility, arthritis signs, overall functional ability, and survival.

The effectiveness of another immunosuppressive, methotrexate, has been compared to placebo (a dummy) in two SSc studies that had a combined total of 100 patients with estensive skin thickening. In both studies there was a trend to greater softening of the thick scleroderma skin. In one study a greater sense of general well being was also noted in the methotrexate group and in the other study the physician global assessment improved to a greater extent in the methotrexate group. Because there is a suggestion of benefit from methotrexate, the present trial evaluating rapamycin is being compared to methotrexte. During a 48 week period rapamycin and methotrexate will be taken as randomly assigned (9 patients in each arm for a total of 18 patients). Over 48 weeks, the status of these patients' scleroderma will be assessed by simple but validated techniques, including simple palpation of the skin to assess skin thickness; lung function texts, electrocardiogram and chest x-ray to assess heart and lungp; blood pressure and serum creatinine to assess kidney; 3 questionnaires (completed by patients) to assess function, quality of life and shortness of breath; and CBC, chemistries and rapamycin levels to assess safety. Statistical analysis of the courses of the two treatment groups will help us determine whether rapamycin has excessive toxicity and whether there are suggestions of efficacy of rapamycin.

Being tested
rapamycin, methotrexate
Keywords
Systemic sclerosis, Scleroderma, Rapamycin, Methotrexate
Medical subject headings
Scleroderma, Systemic, Scleroderma, Diffuse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00241189
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RapamycinExperimentalPatients take oral rapamycin 6 mg daily (and dose adjusted to keep a serum trough level of 5-15 ng/ml) for one year
Receives: Drug: rapamycin
MethotrexateActive comparatorMethotrexate 20 mg taken orally weekly for one year
Receives: Drug: methotrexate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adverse events

  2. Modified Rodnan Skin thickness score

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Forced vital capacity

  2. Diffusing capacity (DLCO)

  3. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index

  4. Mahler Dyspnea Index

  5. Medical Outcomes Questionnaire SF-36

  6. Patient global (VAS)

  7. Physician global (VAS)

  8. % responders in skin score (=>35% decrease from baseline)

  9. % responders in HAQ-DI(=>0.22 units decrease from baseline)

  10. % responders in FVC (=>10% decrease from baseline)

  11. Serum rapamycin levels

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Oct 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2002
  3. Primary completionJun 2006
  4. Study completionJun 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00241189
Sponsor's protocol ID
UCLA IRB Number: 01-10-045
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
14 Oct 2005
Last updated
11 Apr 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Su TI, Khanna D, Furst DE, Danovitch G, Burger C, Maranian P, Clements PJ. Rapamycin versus methotrexate in early diffuse systemic sclerosis: results from a randomized, single-blind pilot study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Dec;60(12):3821-30. doi: 10.1002/art.24986.

    PubMed 19950289

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing rapamycin and methotrexate in people with Systemic Sclerosis, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adverse events. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00241189, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in