Systemic SclerosisPhase 1/2NCT00241189
Rapamycin vs Methotrexate in Diffuse SSc
A Phase 1/2 study testing rapamycin and methotrexate in people with Systemic Sclerosis, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a study to determine the safety of the immunosuppressive rapamycin in patients with systemic sclerosis with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma. The effects (both good and bad) are being compared to another group of systemic sclerosis patients receiving methotrexate Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- rapamycin and methotrexate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2002to Jun 2006
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Satisfy American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic sclerosis
- Have skin thickening proximal to the elbows and/or knees (diffuse scleroderma)
- Cutaneous involvement for less than 5 years from the onset of the first non-Raynaud's manifestation
Who cannot join
- Severe intractable malabsorption
- Chronic debilitation from any underlying disease
- Off putative disease modifying therapies for one month prior to entry
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Philip Clements, MD
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1670
About this study
Official title: A 48-week, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Phase I/II Study of Oral Rapamycin Versus Methotrexate in Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma)
This is a study to determine the safety of the immunosuppressive rapamycin in patients with systemic sclerosis with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma. The effects (both good and bad) are being compared to another group of systemic sclerosis patients receiving methotrexate
Read the detailed description
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a disorder characterized by overproduction and deposition of collagen in the skin and visceral organs, abnormalities of the microcirculation, and autoimmunity. Patients who develop extensive skin thickening (diffuse cutaneous scleroderma) usually do so within the first 5 years. In add tion they are at significant risk of early death, severe involvement of heart (10%), lung (15%) and kidney (15-20%) and loss of functional capacity (moderate to severe disability in about 50% within the first few years). there is as yet no proven cure or treatment which prevents heart, lung or kidney damage, prevents disability or improves survival.
In a previsou study, we treated 10 SSc patients with diffuse cutaneous scleroerma with cyclosporin A (CsA), an agent which suppresses the immune response by reducing production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-2 (IL-2). Significant improvement in skin thickening was noted in 6 of the 10 SSc patients. Unfortuantely, significant reduction in kidney function and/or new onset high blood pressure occurred in 8 of the 10. This frequency and degree of adverse events ina population already at risk of kidney failure and high blood pressure is unacceptable.
More recently an immunosuppressive agent with little kidney toxicity, rapamycin, has been found to block the effects of the same pro-inflammatory cytokine as cyclosporin (IL-2) in transplant patients as part of its immunosuppressive action. Since improvement in skin thickening was seen in our patients who received CsA, we postulate that blocking the effects of IL-2 by rapamycin will also result in improvement in skin thickening in SSc patients with extensive skin thickening. There is growing evidence (from our work and the work of others) that softening thick skin in diffuse SSc is associated with improvement in hand function, joint mobility, arthritis signs, overall functional ability, and survival.
The effectiveness of another immunosuppressive, methotrexate, has been compared to placebo (a dummy) in two SSc studies that had a combined total of 100 patients with estensive skin thickening. In both studies there was a trend to greater softening of the thick scleroderma skin. In one study a greater sense of general well being was also noted in the methotrexate group and in the other study the physician global assessment improved to a greater extent in the methotrexate group. Because there is a suggestion of benefit from methotrexate, the present trial evaluating rapamycin is being compared to methotrexte. During a 48 week period rapamycin and methotrexate will be taken as randomly assigned (9 patients in each arm for a total of 18 patients). Over 48 weeks, the status of these patients' scleroderma will be assessed by simple but validated techniques, including simple palpation of the skin to assess skin thickness; lung function texts, electrocardiogram and chest x-ray to assess heart and lungp; blood pressure and serum creatinine to assess kidney; 3 questionnaires (completed by patients) to assess function, quality of life and shortness of breath; and CBC, chemistries and rapamycin levels to assess safety. Statistical analysis of the courses of the two treatment groups will help us determine whether rapamycin has excessive toxicity and whether there are suggestions of efficacy of rapamycin.
- Conditions
- Systemic Sclerosis
- Being tested
- rapamycin, methotrexate
- Keywords
- Systemic sclerosis, Scleroderma, Rapamycin, Methotrexate
- Medical subject headings
- Scleroderma, Systemic, Scleroderma, Diffuse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rapamycinDrug
Also called rapimmune
methotrexateDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rapamycin | Experimental | Patients take oral rapamycin 6 mg daily (and dose adjusted to keep a serum trough level of 5-15 ng/ml) for one year Receives: Drug: rapamycin |
| Methotrexate | Active comparator | Methotrexate 20 mg taken orally weekly for one year Receives: Drug: methotrexate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adverse events
Modified Rodnan Skin thickness score
Secondary outcomes (11)
Forced vital capacity
Diffusing capacity (DLCO)
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index
Mahler Dyspnea Index
Medical Outcomes Questionnaire SF-36
Patient global (VAS)
Physician global (VAS)
% responders in skin score (=>35% decrease from baseline)
% responders in HAQ-DI(=>0.22 units decrease from baseline)
% responders in FVC (=>10% decrease from baseline)
Serum rapamycin levels
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2002
- Primary completionJun 2006
- Study completionJun 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Systemic SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Philip Clements, University of California, Los Angeles
- Investigators
- Philip J Clements, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00241189
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UCLA IRB Number: 01-10-045
- Status last verified
- Apr 2016
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2005
- Last updated
- 11 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Su TI, Khanna D, Furst DE, Danovitch G, Burger C, Maranian P, Clements PJ. Rapamycin versus methotrexate in early diffuse systemic sclerosis: results from a randomized, single-blind pilot study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Dec;60(12):3821-30. doi: 10.1002/art.24986.
PubMed 19950289
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 48-week, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Phase I/II Study of Oral Rapamycin Versus Methotrexate in Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00241189
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UCLA IRB Number: 01-10-045
- Conditions
- Systemic Sclerosis
- Keywords
- Systemic sclerosis, Scleroderma, Rapamycin, Methotrexate
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2002
- Primary completion
- Jun 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a study to determine the safety of the immunosuppressive rapamycin in patients with systemic sclerosis with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma. The effects (both good and bad) are being compared to another group of systemic sclerosis patients receiving methotrexate
Detailed description
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a disorder characterized by overproduction and deposition of collagen in the skin and visceral organs, abnormalities of the microcirculation, and autoimmunity. Patients who develop extensive skin thickening (diffuse cutaneous scleroderma) usually do so within the first 5 years. In add tion they are at significant risk of early death, severe involvement of heart (10%), lung (15%) and kidney (15-20%) and loss of functional capacity (moderate to severe disability in about 50% within the first few years). there is as yet no proven cure or treatment which prevents heart, lung or kidney damage, prevents disability or improves survival.
In a previsou study, we treated 10 SSc patients with diffuse cutaneous scleroerma with cyclosporin A (CsA), an agent which suppresses the immune response by reducing production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-2 (IL-2). Significant improvement in skin thickening was noted in 6 of the 10 SSc patients. Unfortuantely, significant reduction in kidney function and/or new onset high blood pressure occurred in 8 of the 10. This frequency and degree of adverse events ina population already at risk of kidney failure and high blood pressure is unacceptable.
More recently an immunosuppressive agent with little kidney toxicity, rapamycin, has been found to block the effects of the same pro-inflammatory cytokine as cyclosporin (IL-2) in transplant patients as part of its immunosuppressive action. Since improvement in skin thickening was seen in our patients who received CsA, we postulate that blocking the effects of IL-2 by rapamycin will also result in improvement in skin thickening in SSc patients with extensive skin thickening. There is growing evidence (from our work and the work of others) that softening thick skin in diffuse SSc is associated with improvement in hand function, joint mobility, arthritis signs, overall functional ability, and survival.
The effectiveness of another immunosuppressive, methotrexate, has been compared to placebo (a dummy) in two SSc studies that had a combined total of 100 patients with estensive skin thickening. In both studies there was a trend to greater softening of the thick scleroderma skin. In one study a greater sense of general well being was also noted in the methotrexate group and in the other study the physician global assessment improved to a greater extent in the methotrexate group. Because there is a suggestion of benefit from methotrexate, the present trial evaluating rapamycin is being compared to methotrexte. During a 48 week period rapamycin and methotrexate will be taken as randomly assigned (9 patients in each arm for a total of 18 patients). Over 48 weeks, the status of these patients' scleroderma will be assessed by simple but validated techniques, including simple palpation of the skin to assess skin thickness; lung function texts, electrocardiogram and chest x-ray to assess heart and lungp; blood pressure and serum creatinine to assess kidney; 3 questionnaires (completed by patients) to assess function, quality of life and shortness of breath; and CBC, chemistries and rapamycin levels to assess safety. Statistical analysis of the courses of the two treatment groups will help us determine whether rapamycin has excessive toxicity and whether there are suggestions of efficacy of rapamycin.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rapamycin | Experimental | Drug: rapamycinPatients take oral rapamycin 6 mg daily (and dose adjusted to keep a serum trough level of 5-15 ng/ml) for one year |
| Methotrexate | Active comparator | Drug: methotrexateMethotrexate 20 mg taken orally weekly for one year |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Satisfy American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic sclerosis
- Have skin thickening proximal to the elbows and/or knees (diffuse scleroderma)
- Cutaneous involvement for less than 5 years from the onset of the first non-Raynaud's manifestation
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Severe intractable malabsorption
- Chronic debilitation from any underlying disease
- Off putative disease modifying therapies for one month prior to entry
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rapamycinAlso: rapimmune | Drug | Rapamycin |
| methotrexate | Drug | Methotrexate |
Primary outcome
Adverse events
Modified Rodnan Skin thickness score
11 secondary outcomes
Forced vital capacity
Diffusing capacity (DLCO)
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index
Mahler Dyspnea Index
Medical Outcomes Questionnaire SF-36
Patient global (VAS)
Physician global (VAS)
% responders in skin score (=>35% decrease from baseline)
% responders in HAQ-DI(=>0.22 units decrease from baseline)
% responders in FVC (=>10% decrease from baseline)
Serum rapamycin levels
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Apr 2016.
- Results publication: PubMed 19950289Su TI, Khanna D, Furst DE, Danovitch G, Burger C, Maranian P, Clements PJ. Rapamycin versus methotrexate in early diffuse systemic sclerosis: results from a randomized, single-blind pilot study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Dec;60(12):3821-30. doi: 10.1002/art.24986.
Related trials for Systemic Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Rollover Study for Participants Who Have Completed a Previous Clinical Study With Anifrolumab (Saphnelo) and Clinically Benefited From Continued Treatment
Systemic Sclerosis Cutaneous Lupus E Myopathies Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of ATG-201 in Adult Participants With Autoimmune Diseases
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Efficacy Study Evaluating CTX112 in Adult Subjects With Refractory Autoimmune Disease
SLE (Systemic Lupus), Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Active, not recruiting
Patient Reported Outcomes With UVA-1 Therapy for Treatment of Sclerosing Skin Diseases
Scleroderma, Systemic, Morphea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philip J Clements, MD, MPH principal investigator
University of California, Los Angeles
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing rapamycin and methotrexate in people with Systemic Sclerosis, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adverse events. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00241189, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2016.