Skin BacteriaNCT00247897
Comparing Skin Disinfectants Before Labour Epidural Analgesia
A study testing Skin antisepsis in people with Skin Bacteria, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the current standard skin disinfectant solution for labour epidurals used at BC Women's Hospital to another common skin disinfectant and to the skin disinfectant solution recommended by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) prior to placing special intravenous lines. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Skin Bacteria
- What is being tested?
- Skin antisepsis
- How many people
- 195 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Nov 2005to Oct 2007
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Request labour epidural analgesia. Able to understand English. No antibiotics taken in previous 24 hours. Membranes ruptured less than 24 hours. No current local or systemic infection. No contraindication to labour epidural analgesia
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
BC Women's Hospital Labour and Delivery Suite
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1
About this study
Official title: What is the Best Skin Preparation Solution for Labour Epidural Analgesia? A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing ChloraprepTM, DuraprepTM, and Chlorhexidine 0.5% in 70% Alcohol.
The purpose of this study is to compare the current standard skin disinfectant solution for labour epidurals used at BC Women's Hospital to another common skin disinfectant and to the skin disinfectant solution recommended by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) prior to placing special intravenous lines. There is very little information available to guide doctors in deciding which is the best skin disinfectant for epidural analgesia. The study hypothesis is that the disinfectant solution recommended by the PHAC will be the most effective.
Read the detailed description
Bacterial colonization of epidural catheters is known to occur and it has been suggested that catheter contamination occurs more frequently in the obstetric setting. Epidural catheters are usually colonized by the flora present at the skin insertion site and the rate of colonization varies from 5 to 30%. At present, there is a lack of scientific information available in order to make an evidence-based decision about skin disinfection prior to epidural analgesia. The labouring woman appears to have higher risk for infectious complications of epidural analgesia than other surgical patients.
All parturients considering a labour epidural who are admitted to Labour and Delivery at BC Women's Hospital during daytime weekday hours will be given an information sheet on the study by the Assessment room nurse. The Labour and Delivery Room nurses (which includes the Assessment room) are generally the first healthcare providers with whom women discuss labour epidural analgesia once admitted to hospital. All women interested in labour epidural analgesia who are admitted to Labour and Delivery, either via the Assessment room, or from one of the inpatient wards will be provided with the study information. After adequate time has been given for consideration of the study information, one of the researchers who is not directly involved in the patient's care will approach the patient for consent to participate in the study. This will happen prior to the actual request for labour epidural analgesia, therefore avoiding the point of pain at which the woman requires a labour epidural. Written consent will be obtained at that time. Upon request for a labour epidural, the woman will be randomized into one of 3 groups via a computer-generated randomization table (ZRandom). Group C will be ChloraprepTM, Group D: DuraprepTM, and Group S: chlorhexidine 0.5% in 70% alcohol.
Exclusion criteria include: temperature > 38oC orally at time of epidural request, local skin or generalized infection, systemic antibiotics administered prior to epidural request, presence of ruptured membranes > 24 hours, combined spinal-epidural analgesia planned, unable to speak/understand English, allergy to chlorhexidine or iodine, and patient refusal.
The attending anesthesiologist will wear a clean mask, clean his/her hands with either a wet scrub or alcohol-based antiseptic, and don sterile procedure gloves. Patients will be placed in either the left lateral, or sitting position according to anesthesiologist's preference. The skin overlying the lumbar interspaces will then be cleansed with the antiseptic solution, according to the recommended protocol for each solution.
Specific instructions for skin disinfection will be provided in an envelope to the attending anesthesiologist, according to the randomization group.
- Subjects in the S group will have three applications of chlorhexidine 0.5% in 70% alcohol applied according to standard protocol. The chlorhexidine will be poured from a multi-use bottle into the sterile tray provided in the epidural kit. Sterile prep sponge sticks are part of the tray. Each sponge stick will be saturated with chlorhexidine and a 15 cm square area will be prepared over the L1-L5 interspaces using the centre-out method, allowing time for the solution to air-dry prior to proceeding.
- Subjects in the D group will have their skin prepared with a single-use 6mL-unit applicator that contains a sterile, crushable ampoule of iodine 0.7% with 74% isopropyl alcohol. The solution is allowed to flow into the sponge tip via gravity and pumping action on the handle following activation of the applicator lever. A 15 cm square area over the L1-L5 interspaces will be covered using the centre-out method with a single application, and the solution will be allowed to air dry prior to proceeding.
- Subjects in the C group will have their skin prepared with a single-use 10.5 mL-unit applicator that contains a sterile crushable ampoule of chlorhexidine gluconate 2% with isopropyl alcohol 70%. Following crushing the ampule with the outer wings of the sponge applicator, the solution will be pumped into the sponge tip until wet. A 15 cm square area over the L1-5 interspaces will be covered using the centre-out method with a single application. The solution will be allowed to air-dry prior to proceeding.
Epidurals will be placed between the L3 and L5 interspaces using a 17 gauge Tuohy needle, by loss of resistance to air or saline depending on operator choice. A 19 gauge Arrow flex tip endhole epidural catheter will be advanced to a depth of 4 to 6 cm within the epidural space. The catheter will be fixed in place by a sterile semi-permeable dressing (Tegaderm TM) and the proximal part of the catheter will be connected to a 0.2 micrometre filter. Standardized solutions of bupivacaine (0.08 or 0.125%) with fentanyl 2 micrograms/mL, prepared aseptically by the hospital pharmacy, will be used via the PCEA technique. Any initiation bolus, manual top-up, or top-up for surgical anesthesia will be prepared aseptically by the attending anesthesiologist as needed and injected into the epidural catheter through the filter.
There are no identifiable risks beyond potential reaction to the skin disinfectant. All of the skin preparation solutions are approved for skin disinfection prior to invasive/surgical procedures. There is no published data on the incidence of reaction to any of these products, and nothing that indicates one solution may have more inherent risk than the others.
Cultures and Microbiology
All skin culture samples will be taken by one of the researchers. All skin cultures will be obtained using sterile culture swabs (Copan Venturi Transport system) pre-moistened in sterile normal saline, taken from a 5 cm square area of skin. A baseline culture of skin flora at the proposed epidural insertion site will be taken prior to epidural insertion. The second culture will be taken immediately following skin antisepsis but before epidural insertion, to determine the initial efficacy of the antiseptic solution. The third culture will be taken following removal of the sterile occlusive dressing, immediately prior to epidural catheter removal. Prior to obtaining the epidural catheter tip for culture, the area of skin around the epidural catheter is disinfected with isopropyl alcohol. This is done to reduce the risk of skin contamination of the epidural catheter tip. Ten seconds later, the epidural catheter is removed by a researcher wearing a mask and sterile gloves, using sterile forceps, and the distal 3-4 cm is transacted with a sterile scissors.
The swabs will be coded, placed into 1.0 ml thioglycolate broth (BBL; Becton-Dickinson) and hand-delivered to the Microbiology lab at BC Children's and Women's Hospital. The tubes will then be spun for 1 minute to suspend organisms. Each swab and 0.1 ml aliquot of the suspension will then be inoculated onto blood agar plates. The epidural catheter tips will be placed in plain C+S containers and hand-delivered to the Microbiology lab where they will be rolled over blood agar plates. Standard culture techniques for the skin swabs and epidural catheter tips will be employed, to semi-quantitatively determine the bacterial count (colony-forming units or CFU's) and identify the micro-organisms. The CDC and PHAC definition for bacterial colonization of intravascular devices is a growth of 15 or more colony forming units/ml. We plan to use this as our definition for colonization of epidural catheters.
- Conditions
- Skin Bacteria
- Being tested
- Skin antisepsis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Skin antisepsisDrug
See Detailed Description
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
25% reduction in skin bacterial colony counts at time of epidural catheter removal
Secondary outcomes (1)
Skin bacterial colony count immediately following skin antisepsis. Bacterial growth on the epidural catheter tip at time of removal. Number of attempts at epidural insertion. Presence of blood in the epidural catheter at time of insertion.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2005
- Primary completionOct 2007
- Study completionOct 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Skin BacteriaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Roanne Preston, MD, Principal investigator, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00247897
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C05-0389
- Status last verified
- Apr 2011
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2005
- Last updated
- 12 Apr 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Apr 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- What is the Best Skin Preparation Solution for Labour Epidural Analgesia? A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing ChloraprepTM, DuraprepTM, and Chlorhexidine 0.5% in 70% Alcohol.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00247897
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C05-0389
- Conditions
- Skin Bacteria
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2005
- Primary completion
- Oct 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the current standard skin disinfectant solution for labour epidurals used at BC Women's Hospital to another common skin disinfectant and to the skin disinfectant solution recommended by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) prior to placing special intravenous lines. There is very little information available to guide doctors in deciding which is the best skin disinfectant for epidural analgesia. The study hypothesis is that the disinfectant solution recommended by the PHAC will be the most effective.
Detailed description
Bacterial colonization of epidural catheters is known to occur and it has been suggested that catheter contamination occurs more frequently in the obstetric setting. Epidural catheters are usually colonized by the flora present at the skin insertion site and the rate of colonization varies from 5 to 30%. At present, there is a lack of scientific information available in order to make an evidence-based decision about skin disinfection prior to epidural analgesia. The labouring woman appears to have higher risk for infectious complications of epidural analgesia than other surgical patients.
All parturients considering a labour epidural who are admitted to Labour and Delivery at BC Women's Hospital during daytime weekday hours will be given an information sheet on the study by the Assessment room nurse. The Labour and Delivery Room nurses (which includes the Assessment room) are generally the first healthcare providers with whom women discuss labour epidural analgesia once admitted to hospital. All women interested in labour epidural analgesia who are admitted to Labour and Delivery, either via the Assessment room, or from one of the inpatient wards will be provided with the study information. After adequate time has been given for consideration of the study information, one of the researchers who is not directly involved in the patient's care will approach the patient for consent to participate in the study. This will happen prior to the actual request for labour epidural analgesia, therefore avoiding the point of pain at which the woman requires a labour epidural. Written consent will be obtained at that time. Upon request for a labour epidural, the woman will be randomized into one of 3 groups via a computer-generated randomization table (ZRandom). Group C will be ChloraprepTM, Group D: DuraprepTM, and Group S: chlorhexidine 0.5% in 70% alcohol.
Exclusion criteria include: temperature > 38oC orally at time of epidural request, local skin or generalized infection, systemic antibiotics administered prior to epidural request, presence of ruptured membranes > 24 hours, combined spinal-epidural analgesia planned, unable to speak/understand English, allergy to chlorhexidine or iodine, and patient refusal.
The attending anesthesiologist will wear a clean mask, clean his/her hands with either a wet scrub or alcohol-based antiseptic, and don sterile procedure gloves. Patients will be placed in either the left lateral, or sitting position according to anesthesiologist's preference. The skin overlying the lumbar interspaces will then be cleansed with the antiseptic solution, according to the recommended protocol for each solution.
Specific instructions for skin disinfection will be provided in an envelope to the attending anesthesiologist, according to the randomization group.
- Subjects in the S group will have three applications of chlorhexidine 0.5% in 70% alcohol applied according to standard protocol. The chlorhexidine will be poured from a multi-use bottle into the sterile tray provided in the epidural kit. Sterile prep sponge sticks are part of the tray. Each sponge stick will be saturated with chlorhexidine and a 15 cm square area will be prepared over the L1-L5 interspaces using the centre-out method, allowing time for the solution to air-dry prior to proceeding.
- Subjects in the D group will have their skin prepared with a single-use 6mL-unit applicator that contains a sterile, crushable ampoule of iodine 0.7% with 74% isopropyl alcohol. The solution is allowed to flow into the sponge tip via gravity and pumping action on the handle following activation of the applicator lever. A 15 cm square area over the L1-L5 interspaces will be covered using the centre-out method with a single application, and the solution will be allowed to air dry prior to proceeding.
- Subjects in the C group will have their skin prepared with a single-use 10.5 mL-unit applicator that contains a sterile crushable ampoule of chlorhexidine gluconate 2% with isopropyl alcohol 70%. Following crushing the ampule with the outer wings of the sponge applicator, the solution will be pumped into the sponge tip until wet. A 15 cm square area over the L1-5 interspaces will be covered using the centre-out method with a single application. The solution will be allowed to air-dry prior to proceeding.
Epidurals will be placed between the L3 and L5 interspaces using a 17 gauge Tuohy needle, by loss of resistance to air or saline depending on operator choice. A 19 gauge Arrow flex tip endhole epidural catheter will be advanced to a depth of 4 to 6 cm within the epidural space. The catheter will be fixed in place by a sterile semi-permeable dressing (Tegaderm TM) and the proximal part of the catheter will be connected to a 0.2 micrometre filter. Standardized solutions of bupivacaine (0.08 or 0.125%) with fentanyl 2 micrograms/mL, prepared aseptically by the hospital pharmacy, will be used via the PCEA technique. Any initiation bolus, manual top-up, or top-up for surgical anesthesia will be prepared aseptically by the attending anesthesiologist as needed and injected into the epidural catheter through the filter.
There are no identifiable risks beyond potential reaction to the skin disinfectant. All of the skin preparation solutions are approved for skin disinfection prior to invasive/surgical procedures. There is no published data on the incidence of reaction to any of these products, and nothing that indicates one solution may have more inherent risk than the others.
Cultures and Microbiology
All skin culture samples will be taken by one of the researchers. All skin cultures will be obtained using sterile culture swabs (Copan Venturi Transport system) pre-moistened in sterile normal saline, taken from a 5 cm square area of skin. A baseline culture of skin flora at the proposed epidural insertion site will be taken prior to epidural insertion. The second culture will be taken immediately following skin antisepsis but before epidural insertion, to determine the initial efficacy of the antiseptic solution. The third culture will be taken following removal of the sterile occlusive dressing, immediately prior to epidural catheter removal. Prior to obtaining the epidural catheter tip for culture, the area of skin around the epidural catheter is disinfected with isopropyl alcohol. This is done to reduce the risk of skin contamination of the epidural catheter tip. Ten seconds later, the epidural catheter is removed by a researcher wearing a mask and sterile gloves, using sterile forceps, and the distal 3-4 cm is transacted with a sterile scissors.
The swabs will be coded, placed into 1.0 ml thioglycolate broth (BBL; Becton-Dickinson) and hand-delivered to the Microbiology lab at BC Children's and Women's Hospital. The tubes will then be spun for 1 minute to suspend organisms. Each swab and 0.1 ml aliquot of the suspension will then be inoculated onto blood agar plates. The epidural catheter tips will be placed in plain C+S containers and hand-delivered to the Microbiology lab where they will be rolled over blood agar plates. Standard culture techniques for the skin swabs and epidural catheter tips will be employed, to semi-quantitatively determine the bacterial count (colony-forming units or CFU's) and identify the micro-organisms. The CDC and PHAC definition for bacterial colonization of intravascular devices is a growth of 15 or more colony forming units/ml. We plan to use this as our definition for colonization of epidural catheters.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Request labour epidural analgesia. Able to understand English. No antibiotics taken in previous 24 hours. Membranes ruptured less than 24 hours. No current local or systemic infection. No contraindication to labour epidural analgesia
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Skin antisepsisSee Detailed Description | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
25% reduction in skin bacterial colony counts at time of epidural catheter removal
1 secondary outcome
Skin bacterial colony count immediately following skin antisepsis. Bacterial growth on the epidural catheter tip at time of removal. Number of attempts at epidural insertion. Presence of blood in the epidural catheter at time of insertion.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Apr 2011.
Related trials for Skin Bacteria
RecruitingObservational study
Studies of Skin Microbes in Healthy People and in People With Skin Conditions
Eczema, Atopic Dermatitis
Recruiting
Clinical Investigation of Sorbact® Dressings
Hard-to-heal Wounds, Diabetic Foot Ulcer
RecruitingObservational study
Oral Health, Saliva Bacteria, and Disease Activity in Children With JIA: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial to Evaluate CMS-F021 Following Single and Multiple Doses in Healthy Participants
Superficial Skin and Soft Tissue Infections Caused by Gram-positive Bacteria
Not yet recruiting
Impact of a Daily Application of an Omega-3 Monoglycerides Based Serum and Cream on the Skin Microbiota
Eczema
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Roanne Preston, MD principal investigator
University of British Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Skin antisepsis in people with Skin Bacteria, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
25% reduction in skin bacterial colony counts at time of epidural catheter removal. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2011.