Deep Vein ThrombosisCaVenTNCT00251771
Catheter-Directed Venous Thrombolysis in Acute Iliofemoral Vein Thrombosis
A study testing catheter-directed venous thrombolysis in people with Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a severe disease, and conventional treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin is associated with some degree of long-term sequelae, i.e. post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Catheter-directed thrombolytic (CDT) therapy has been introduced worldwide the last two decades. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Deep Vein Thrombosis
- What is being tested?
- catheter-directed venous thrombolysis
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 209 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- Jan 2006to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Onset of symptoms <21 days
- Objectively verified DVT of the femoral or common iliac veins or the combined iliofemoral segment
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Anticoagulant therapy prior to trial entry >7 days
- Contraindications to thrombolytic therapy
- Indications for thrombolytic therapy, i.e. phlegmasia coerulea dolens or vena cava thrombosis
- Severe anemia, hemoglobin (hgb)<8 g/dl
- Thrombocytopenia, platelets <80x10^9/l
- Severe renal failure, creatinine clearance <30ml/min
Show all 13Show fewer
- Severe hypertension, systolic (syst) blood pressure (BP)>160 mmHg or diastolic (diast) BP >100 mmHg pregnancy
- Less than 14 days post-surgery or post-trauma
- History of subarachnoidal or intracerebral bleeding
- Disease with life expectancy <24 months
- Drug abuse or mental disease that may interfere with treatment and follow-up
- Former ipsilateral proximal DVT
- Chemotherapy or advanced malignant disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Catheter-directed Venous Thrombolysis in Acute Iliofemoral Vein Thrombosis, an Open Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a severe disease, and conventional treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin is associated with some degree of long-term sequelae, i.e. post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Catheter-directed thrombolytic (CDT) therapy has been introduced worldwide the last two decades. Reports have suggested a beneficial effect of this costly treatment, but there are no randomized clinical trials documenting its short- and long-term efficacy and safety. This multi-center study will randomize patients with acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis to either conventional treatment or CDT in addition to conventional treatment. Main outcome parameters are patency rates at 6 months and prevalence of PTS at 24 months. The main short-term hypothesis is that CDT of first-time acute DVT will increase patency of the affected segments after 6 months from <50% to >80%. The main long-term hypothesis is that CDT will improve long-term functional outcome, i.e. risk of PTS after 2 years from >25% to <10%.
- Conditions
- Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Being tested
- catheter-directed venous thrombolysis
- Keywords
- Thrombolytic therapy, Postphlebitic syndrome, Venous thrombosis
- Medical subject headings
- Venous Thrombosis, Postphlebitic Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
catheter-directed venous thrombolysisProcedure or surgery
catheter-directed continuous intravenous infusion of alteplase 0.01mg/kg/h and low-dose heparin. Max dose 20mg/24 h and up to 96 hrs.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| I | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: catheter-directed venous thrombolysis |
| II | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patency after 6 months
Measured: 6 months
Post-thrombotic syndrome after 2 years (yrs)
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (12)
Frequency of clinically relevant bleeding complications
Measured: 1 year
Effects on quality of life
Measured: 2 and 5 years
Cost-effectiveness of treatment
Measured: 2 years
Procedural success of CDT
Measured: 1 week
Patency at 2 years
Measured: 2 years
PTS at 6, 12, 36, 48 and 60 months
Measured: 6, 12, 36, 48 and 60 months
Relation between PTS and patency
Measured: 2 years
Prevalence of vein anomalies
Measured: 6 months
Prevalence of underlying thrombophilia
Measured: 1 year
Frequency of recurrent venous thrombotic events (VTE)
Measured: 0.5, 2 and 5 years
Markers of importance for recurrent thrombosis
Measured: 0.5, 2 and 5 years
Markers of importance for successful thrombolysis
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2006
- Primary completionDec 2014
- Study completionDec 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Deep Vein ThrombosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Oslo University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 209 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ostfold Hospital Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Per Morten Sandset, MD, Study director, Ullevaal University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00251771
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1.2005.650
- Other IDs
- EUDRACT No.2005-004486-42
- Acronym
- CaVenT
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 9 Nov 2005
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Enden T, Klow NE, Sandset PM. [Catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute deep venous thrombosis]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Jun 22;126(13):1765. No abstract available. Norwegian.
PubMed 16794675Enden T, Sandvik L, Klow NE, Hafsahl G, Holme PA, Holmen LO, Ghanima W, Njaastad AM, Sandbaek G, Slagsvold CE, Sandset PM. Catheter-directed Venous Thrombolysis in acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis--the CaVenT study: rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial (NCT00251771). Am Heart J. 2007 Nov;154(5):808-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Sep 6.
PubMed 17967583Enden T, Garratt AM, Klow NE, Sandset PM. Assessing burden of illness following acute deep vein thrombosis: data quality, reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of VEINES-QOL/Sym, a disease-specific questionnaire. Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Jun;23(2):369-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00618.x. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
PubMed 19068041Enden T, Sandset PM, Klow NE. Evidence-based practice for patients with severe venous thrombosis. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012 May 29;132(10):1215-6. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0474. No abstract available. English, Norwegian.
PubMed 22669381Enden T, Klow NE, Sandvik L, Slagsvold CE, Ghanima W, Hafsahl G, Holme PA, Holmen LO, Njaastad AM, Sandbaek G, Sandset PM; CaVenT study group. Catheter-directed thrombolysis vs. anticoagulant therapy alone in deep vein thrombosis: results of an open randomized, controlled trial reporting on short-term patency. J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Aug;7(8):1268-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03464.x. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
PubMed 19422443Enden T, Haig Y, Klow NE, Slagsvold CE, Sandvik L, Ghanima W, Hafsahl G, Holme PA, Holmen LO, Njaastad AM, Sandbaek G, Sandset PM; CaVenT Study Group. Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Jan 7;379(9810):31-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61753-4. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
PubMed 22172244Haig Y, Enden T, Slagsvold CE, Sandvik L, Sandset PM, Klow NE. Determinants of early and long-term efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis in proximal deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Jan;24(1):17-24; quiz 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.09.023. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
PubMed 23176966Enden T, Resch S, White C, Wik HS, Klow NE, Sandset PM. Cost-effectiveness of additional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jun;11(6):1032-42. doi: 10.1111/jth.12184.
PubMed 23452204Enden T, Wik HS, Kvam AK, Haig Y, Klow NE, Sandset PM. Health-related quality of life after catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis: secondary outcomes of the randomised, non-blinded, parallel-group CaVenT study. BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 29;3(8):e002984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002984.
PubMed 23988361Enden T, Klow NE, Sandset PM. Symptom burden and job absenteeism after treatment with additional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2013 Sep 16;4:55-9. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S47233. eCollection 2013.
PubMed 24082798Flumignan RL, Nakano LC, Flumignan CD, Baptista-Silva JC. Angioplasty or stenting for deep venous thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 19;2(2):CD011468. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011468.pub2.
PubMed 39968829Broderick C, Watson L, Armon MP. Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 19;1(1):CD002783. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002783.pub5.
PubMed 33464575Haig Y, Enden T, Grotta O, Klow NE, Slagsvold CE, Ghanima W, Sandvik L, Hafsahl G, Holme PA, Holmen LO, Njaaastad AM, Sandbaek G, Sandset PM; CaVenT Study Group. Post-thrombotic syndrome after catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis (CaVenT): 5-year follow-up results of an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2016 Feb;3(2):e64-71. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00248-3. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
PubMed 26853645
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Catheter-directed Venous Thrombolysis in Acute Iliofemoral Vein Thrombosis, an Open Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00251771
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CaVenT / 1.2005.650
- Conditions
- Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Keywords
- Thrombolytic therapy, Postphlebitic syndrome, Venous thrombosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 209 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ostfold Hospital Trust
- Study start
- Jan 2006
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a severe disease, and conventional treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin is associated with some degree of long-term sequelae, i.e. post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Catheter-directed thrombolytic (CDT) therapy has been introduced worldwide the last two decades. Reports have suggested a beneficial effect of this costly treatment, but there are no randomized clinical trials documenting its short- and long-term efficacy and safety. This multi-center study will randomize patients with acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis to either conventional treatment or CDT in addition to conventional treatment. Main outcome parameters are patency rates at 6 months and prevalence of PTS at 24 months. The main short-term hypothesis is that CDT of first-time acute DVT will increase patency of the affected segments after 6 months from <50% to >80%. The main long-term hypothesis is that CDT will improve long-term functional outcome, i.e. risk of PTS after 2 years from >25% to <10%.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| I | Experimental | Procedure: catheter-directed venous thrombolysis |
| II | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Onset of symptoms <21 days
- Objectively verified DVT of the femoral or common iliac veins or the combined iliofemoral segment
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Anticoagulant therapy prior to trial entry >7 days
- Contraindications to thrombolytic therapy
- Indications for thrombolytic therapy, i.e. phlegmasia coerulea dolens or vena cava thrombosis
- Severe anemia, hemoglobin (hgb)<8 g/dl
- Thrombocytopenia, platelets <80x10^9/l
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| catheter-directed venous thrombolysiscatheter-directed continuous intravenous infusion of alteplase 0.01mg/kg/h and low-dose heparin. Max dose 20mg/24 h and up to 96 hrs. | Procedure or surgery | I |
Primary outcome
Patency after 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Post-thrombotic syndrome after 2 years (yrs)
Time frame: 2 years
12 secondary outcomes
Frequency of clinically relevant bleeding complications
Time frame: 1 year
Effects on quality of life
Time frame: 2 and 5 years
Cost-effectiveness of treatment
Time frame: 2 years
Procedural success of CDT
Time frame: 1 week
Patency at 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
PTS at 6, 12, 36, 48 and 60 months
Time frame: 6, 12, 36, 48 and 60 months
Relation between PTS and patency
Time frame: 2 years
Prevalence of vein anomalies
Time frame: 6 months
Prevalence of underlying thrombophilia
Time frame: 1 year
Frequency of recurrent venous thrombotic events (VTE)
Time frame: 0.5, 2 and 5 years
Markers of importance for recurrent thrombosis
Time frame: 0.5, 2 and 5 years
Markers of importance for successful thrombolysis
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2015.
- Background: PubMed 16794675Enden T, Klow NE, Sandset PM. [Catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute deep venous thrombosis]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Jun 22;126(13):1765. No abstract available. Norwegian.
- Background: PubMed 17967583Enden T, Sandvik L, Klow NE, Hafsahl G, Holme PA, Holmen LO, Ghanima W, Njaastad AM, Sandbaek G, Slagsvold CE, Sandset PM. Catheter-directed Venous Thrombolysis in acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis--the CaVenT study: rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial (NCT00251771). Am Heart J. 2007 Nov;154(5):808-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Sep 6.
- Background: PubMed 19068041Enden T, Garratt AM, Klow NE, Sandset PM. Assessing burden of illness following acute deep vein thrombosis: data quality, reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of VEINES-QOL/Sym, a disease-specific questionnaire. Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Jun;23(2):369-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00618.x. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
- Background: PubMed 22669381Enden T, Sandset PM, Klow NE. Evidence-based practice for patients with severe venous thrombosis. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012 May 29;132(10):1215-6. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0474. No abstract available. English, Norwegian.
- Results publication: PubMed 19422443Enden T, Klow NE, Sandvik L, Slagsvold CE, Ghanima W, Hafsahl G, Holme PA, Holmen LO, Njaastad AM, Sandbaek G, Sandset PM; CaVenT study group. Catheter-directed thrombolysis vs. anticoagulant therapy alone in deep vein thrombosis: results of an open randomized, controlled trial reporting on short-term patency. J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Aug;7(8):1268-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03464.x. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 22172244Enden T, Haig Y, Klow NE, Slagsvold CE, Sandvik L, Ghanima W, Hafsahl G, Holme PA, Holmen LO, Njaastad AM, Sandbaek G, Sandset PM; CaVenT Study Group. Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Jan 7;379(9810):31-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61753-4. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 23176966Haig Y, Enden T, Slagsvold CE, Sandvik L, Sandset PM, Klow NE. Determinants of early and long-term efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis in proximal deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Jan;24(1):17-24; quiz 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.09.023. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 23452204Enden T, Resch S, White C, Wik HS, Klow NE, Sandset PM. Cost-effectiveness of additional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jun;11(6):1032-42. doi: 10.1111/jth.12184.
- Results publication: PubMed 23988361Enden T, Wik HS, Kvam AK, Haig Y, Klow NE, Sandset PM. Health-related quality of life after catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis: secondary outcomes of the randomised, non-blinded, parallel-group CaVenT study. BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 29;3(8):e002984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002984.
- Results publication: PubMed 24082798Enden T, Klow NE, Sandset PM. Symptom burden and job absenteeism after treatment with additional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2013 Sep 16;4:55-9. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S47233. eCollection 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39968829Flumignan RL, Nakano LC, Flumignan CD, Baptista-Silva JC. Angioplasty or stenting for deep venous thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 19;2(2):CD011468. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011468.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33464575Broderick C, Watson L, Armon MP. Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 19;1(1):CD002783. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002783.pub5.
- Protocol Reviews in the Lancet.comLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Deep Vein Thrombosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Active, not recruiting
This Research Proposal Focuses on Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Nursing Care Protocol in Preventing Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in Patients Undergoing On-pump Cardiac Surgery. The Study Will Include an Intervention Group That Receives the Nursing Protocol and a Control Group That Receives Routine
On-pump Cardiac Surgery - Prevention - Intervention - Experimental Group - Control Group - Incidence - Complications, DVT - Deep Vein Thrombosis
Recruiting
DEFIANCE: RCT of ClotTriever System Versus Anticoagulation In Deep Vein Thrombosis
Venous Thromboembolism, Deep Venous Thrombosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Per Morten Sandset, MD study director
Ullevaal University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing catheter-directed venous thrombolysis in people with Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patency after 6 months (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00251771, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2015.