BruisesPhase 4NCT00253396
Patients Preference With Self-Injection: The PRISM Study
A Phase 4 study testing Unfractionated heparin and Enoxaparin in people with Bruises, run by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine which short-acting blood thinner (low-molecular-weight heparin [Enoxaparin] or unfractionated heparin) is associated with less discomfort and bruising when given as a subcutaneous (under the skin) injection before and after a planned surgery or procedure in patients who… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Bruises
- What is being tested?
- Unfractionated heparin and Enoxaparin
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Oct 2005to Jan 2007
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is receiving warfarin therapy with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.5
- Patient requires temporary interruption of warfarin because of elective surgery or procedure.
Who cannot join
- History of allergy to heparin, including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
- Bridging anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) not indicated
- Impaired cognitive function or language barrier
- Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min
- Patient declines consent
- Patient is < 18 years of age.
- Patient is not willing and able to self inject.
- Patient has significant visual or hand motor impairment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: THE PRISM Study-Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin for Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation: the Patient Preference for Self-Injection Study and Related Measurements
The purpose of this study is to determine which short-acting blood thinner (low-molecular-weight heparin [Enoxaparin] or unfractionated heparin) is associated with less discomfort and bruising when given as a subcutaneous (under the skin) injection before and after a planned surgery or procedure in patients who temporarily stop warfarin.
Read the detailed description
Increasing Patient Comfort and Compliance: The Bridging Anticoagulation Clinic strives to provide the highest quality of care to patients who require temporary interruption of warfarin therapy. An important component of optimizing patient care is minimizing patient discomfort with perioperative administration of short-acting anticoagulants (LWMH or UFH) used for bridging therapy, which, in turn, may optimize patient compliance with this treatment. This issue is especially relevant for patients who are receiving out-of-hospital treatment with LMWH or UFH because about 85% of such patients will be taught to self-administer this medication. This study seeks to determine if there is less discomfort and bruising associated with self-injection of LMWH than with UFH.
Minimizing Injection Site Bruising: No studies, to our knowledge, have assessed the characteristics or clinical importance of bruising in patients receiving subcutaneous LMWH or UFH. Thus, there is no evidence to support any association between bruising and discomfort. To bridge this gap in knowledge, we will document each injection site during the course of the study and measure the amount of bruising observed using a standardized photographic methodology. Injection site bruising has the potential to cause medical problems if an injection site hematoma develops, which can become infected or can cause long-term discomfort.
- Conditions
- Bruises
- Being tested
- Unfractionated heparin, Enoxaparin
- Keywords
- warfarin, clinical trial, pain measurement, heparin, heparin, low-molecular-weight, Anticoagulants
- Medical subject headings
- Contusions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Unfractionated heparinDrug
EnoxaparinDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome measure is self-reported comfort score based on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients will complete a 10-point VAS. Patients will complete a VAS at the time of injection.
Secondary outcomes (2)
On the day of the procedure, bruising at injection sites will be evaluated.
Patients will document in a diary each injection before and after the surgery or invasive procedure. On the day of surgery or procedure abdominal bruising measurement will be obtained. A digital photo will be take of the injection site.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2005
- Study completionJan 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BruisesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- St. Joseph's Health Care London
- Investigators
- Co-Investigators Dr. James Douketis and Karen Woods RN, Principal investigator, McMaster University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00253396
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 05-2482
- Status last verified
- May 2007
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2005
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
McConnell EA. Administering subcutaneous heparin. Nursing. 2000 Jun;30(6):17. doi: 10.1097/00152193-200030060-00004. No abstract available.
PubMed 10865654Letizia M, Shenk J, Jones TD. Intermittent subcutaneous injections of pain medication: effectiveness, manageability, and satisfaction. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1999 Jul-Aug;16(4):585-92. doi: 10.1177/104990919901600407.
PubMed 10661066Martin S, Jones JS, Wynn BN. Does warming local anesthetic reduce the pain of subcutaneous injection? Am J Emerg Med. 1996 Jan;14(1):10-2. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90003-0.
PubMed 8630132Hadley SA, Chang M, Rogers K. Effect of syringe size on bruising following subcutaneous heparin injection. Am J Crit Care. 1996 Jul;5(4):271-6.
PubMed 8811149Douketis JD. Perioperative anticoagulation management in patients who are receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: a practical guide for clinicians. Thromb Res. 2002 Oct 1;108(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(02)00387-0.
PubMed 12586125Dunn AS, Turpie AG. Perioperative management of patients receiving oral anticoagulants: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Apr 28;163(8):901-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.8.901.
PubMed 12719198Jaffer AK, Brotman DJ, Chukwumerije N. When patients on warfarin need surgery. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003 Nov;70(11):973-84. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.70.11.973.
PubMed 14650471Spyropoulos AC, Jenkins P, Bornikova L. A disease management protocol for outpatient perioperative bridge therapy with enoxaparin in patients requiring temporary interruption of long-term oral anticoagulation. Pharmacotherapy. 2004 May;24(5):649-58. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.6.649.34740.
PubMed 15162899Hirsh J, Warkentin TE, Shaughnessy SG, Anand SS, Halperin JL, Raschke R, Granger C, Ohman EM, Dalen JE. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1 Suppl):64S-94S. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.64s. No abstract available.
PubMed 11157643Dolovich LR, Ginsberg JS, Douketis JD, Holbrook AM, Cheah G. A meta-analysis comparing low-molecular-weight heparins with unfractionated heparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolism: examining some unanswered questions regarding location of treatment, product type, and dosing frequency. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jan 24;160(2):181-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.2.181.
PubMed 10647756Buller HR, Agnelli G, Hull RD, Hyers TM, Prins MH, Raskob GE. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):401S-428S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.401S.
PubMed 15383479
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- THE PRISM Study-Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin for Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation: the Patient Preference for Self-Injection Study and Related Measurements
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00253396
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 05-2482
- Conditions
- Bruises
- Keywords
- warfarin, clinical trial, pain measurement, heparin, heparin, low-molecular-weight, Anticoagulants
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- St. Joseph's Health Care London
- Study start
- Oct 2005
- Study completion
- Jan 2007
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine which short-acting blood thinner (low-molecular-weight heparin [Enoxaparin] or unfractionated heparin) is associated with less discomfort and bruising when given as a subcutaneous (under the skin) injection before and after a planned surgery or procedure in patients who temporarily stop warfarin.
Detailed description
Increasing Patient Comfort and Compliance: The Bridging Anticoagulation Clinic strives to provide the highest quality of care to patients who require temporary interruption of warfarin therapy. An important component of optimizing patient care is minimizing patient discomfort with perioperative administration of short-acting anticoagulants (LWMH or UFH) used for bridging therapy, which, in turn, may optimize patient compliance with this treatment. This issue is especially relevant for patients who are receiving out-of-hospital treatment with LMWH or UFH because about 85% of such patients will be taught to self-administer this medication. This study seeks to determine if there is less discomfort and bruising associated with self-injection of LMWH than with UFH.
Minimizing Injection Site Bruising: No studies, to our knowledge, have assessed the characteristics or clinical importance of bruising in patients receiving subcutaneous LMWH or UFH. Thus, there is no evidence to support any association between bruising and discomfort. To bridge this gap in knowledge, we will document each injection site during the course of the study and measure the amount of bruising observed using a standardized photographic methodology. Injection site bruising has the potential to cause medical problems if an injection site hematoma develops, which can become infected or can cause long-term discomfort.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient is receiving warfarin therapy with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.5
- Patient requires temporary interruption of warfarin because of elective surgery or procedure.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- History of allergy to heparin, including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
- Bridging anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) not indicated
- Impaired cognitive function or language barrier
- Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min
- Patient declines consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Unfractionated heparin | Drug | – |
| Enoxaparin | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
The primary outcome measure is self-reported comfort score based on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients will complete a 10-point VAS. Patients will complete a VAS at the time of injection.
2 secondary outcomes
On the day of the procedure, bruising at injection sites will be evaluated.
Patients will document in a diary each injection before and after the surgery or invasive procedure. On the day of surgery or procedure abdominal bruising measurement will be obtained. A digital photo will be take of the injection site.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2009.
- Background: PubMed 10865654McConnell EA. Administering subcutaneous heparin. Nursing. 2000 Jun;30(6):17. doi: 10.1097/00152193-200030060-00004. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 10661066Letizia M, Shenk J, Jones TD. Intermittent subcutaneous injections of pain medication: effectiveness, manageability, and satisfaction. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1999 Jul-Aug;16(4):585-92. doi: 10.1177/104990919901600407.
- Results publication: PubMed 8630132Martin S, Jones JS, Wynn BN. Does warming local anesthetic reduce the pain of subcutaneous injection? Am J Emerg Med. 1996 Jan;14(1):10-2. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90003-0.
- Results publication: PubMed 8811149Hadley SA, Chang M, Rogers K. Effect of syringe size on bruising following subcutaneous heparin injection. Am J Crit Care. 1996 Jul;5(4):271-6.
- Results publication: PubMed 12586125Douketis JD. Perioperative anticoagulation management in patients who are receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: a practical guide for clinicians. Thromb Res. 2002 Oct 1;108(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(02)00387-0.
- Results publication: PubMed 12719198Dunn AS, Turpie AG. Perioperative management of patients receiving oral anticoagulants: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Apr 28;163(8):901-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.8.901.
- Results publication: PubMed 14650471Jaffer AK, Brotman DJ, Chukwumerije N. When patients on warfarin need surgery. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003 Nov;70(11):973-84. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.70.11.973.
- Results publication: PubMed 15162899Spyropoulos AC, Jenkins P, Bornikova L. A disease management protocol for outpatient perioperative bridge therapy with enoxaparin in patients requiring temporary interruption of long-term oral anticoagulation. Pharmacotherapy. 2004 May;24(5):649-58. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.6.649.34740.
- Results publication: PubMed 11157643Hirsh J, Warkentin TE, Shaughnessy SG, Anand SS, Halperin JL, Raschke R, Granger C, Ohman EM, Dalen JE. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1 Suppl):64S-94S. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.64s. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 10647756Dolovich LR, Ginsberg JS, Douketis JD, Holbrook AM, Cheah G. A meta-analysis comparing low-molecular-weight heparins with unfractionated heparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolism: examining some unanswered questions regarding location of treatment, product type, and dosing frequency. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jan 24;160(2):181-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.2.181.
- Results publication: PubMed 15383479Buller HR, Agnelli G, Hull RD, Hyers TM, Prins MH, Raskob GE. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):401S-428S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.401S.
Related trials for Bruises
Recruiting
The Effect of Standardizing Procedures for SC Injections of LMWH on Patients With CVD
CVD - Cardiovascular Disease, Bruise
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Combined Lung and Diaphragmatic Ultrasound to Predict Respiratory Failure in Blunt Chest Trauma
Blunt Chest Trauma, Respiratory Failure
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Testosterone Therapy With or Without Finasteride After Spinal Cord Injury: TRT-SCI Trial
Spinal Cord Injury, Spinal Cord Injuries
RecruitingPhase 2
Effect of TXA on Reducing Bruising After Filler Injection
Facial Filler Injections, Hyaluronic Acid
RecruitingObservational study
Trauma Molecular Processes
Traumatic Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Co-Investigators Dr. James Douketis and Karen Woods RN principal investigator
McMaster University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Unfractionated heparin and Enoxaparin in people with Bruises, run by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome measure is self-reported comfort score based on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients will complete a 10-point VAS. Patients will complete a VAS at the time of injection.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00253396, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2009.