AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaPhase 1/2NCT00270881

Safety and Efficacy of Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation for Adult Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

A Phase 1/2 study testing Cord blood transplantation, TBI and cyclophosphamide in people with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by Keio University at 1 site in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cord blood transplantation for adult patients with hematologic malignancies including refractory acute leukemia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 55 years
What is being tested?
Cord blood transplantation, TBI and cyclophosphamide
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
33 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
Jan 2006to Jan 2011
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of acute leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome
  • Lack of HLA-identical or 1 locus mismatched related donor
  • Age over 20, and under 55
  • Performance status 0 or 1
  • No moderate or sever organ dysfunction (liver, kidney, heart, lungs)
  • No anti-HLA antibody
  • Informed consent was obtained

Who cannot join

  • Uncontrollable diabetes
  • Uncontrollable hypertension
  • Active infection
  • TPHA, HBs-Ag, HCV-Ab positive
  • HTLV-I, HIV positive

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Keio University School of Medicine

    Tokyo, 160-8582

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Phase 1/2 Study of Cord Blood Transplantation From Unrelated Donor for Adult Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Using Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cord blood transplantation for adult patients with hematologic malignancies including refractory acute leukemia. The transplant procedure was determined in detail according to the previously published report showing a high survival, so that the investigators could expect a similar result.

Read the detailed description

Although cord blood is considered as an alternative donor source for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, its procedure has yet to be standardized. Recently, a single institute result of cord blood transplantation for adult patients with hematologic malignancies have been reported by Takahashi et al (Blood 2004:104;3813-3820), in which the survival was significantly better than that of bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donor. The purpose of this study was to reevaluate the safety and efficacy of cord blood transplantation for adult patients with hematologic malignancies using the same transplant procedures in a multi-institutional setting.

Being tested
Cord blood transplantation, TBI, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine
Keywords
cord blood transplantation, myeloablative regimen, hematologic malignancies
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Hematologic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cord blood transplantationProcedure or surgery

    unrelated cord blood transplantation

  • TBIRadiation

    Total body irradiation (TBI) 12Gy

  • cyclophosphamideDrug

    cyclophosphamide 120mg/kg

  • cytarabineDrug

    cytarabine 3g/m2x4

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Non-relapse mortality at 1 year

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Engraftment

    Measured: day 56

  2. Disease free survival

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Overall survival

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease

    Measured: day100 and 1 year

  5. Incidence of infectious complication

    Measured: 1year

  6. Duration of hospitalization

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Immune reconstitution after transplantation

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Dec 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2006
  3. Primary completionJan 2009
  4. Study completionJan 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
33 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00270881
Sponsor's protocol ID
KSGCT-CB2005
Status last verified
Apr 2012
First submitted
28 Dec 2005
Last updated
6 Apr 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Cord blood transplantation, TBI and cyclophosphamide in people with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by Keio University at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Non-relapse mortality at 1 year (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in