AzTrials
AzTrials

GlaucomaPhase 4NCT00273221

Combined Phacotube vs Phacotrabeculectomy:A Randomized Controlled Trial

A Phase 4 study testing Glaucoma Implant Surgery, trabeculectomy and phacoemulsification in people with Glaucoma and Cataract, run by National University Hospital, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of combined phacoemulsification, posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation , trabeculectomy (phacotrabeculectomy) with phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation and glaucoma drainage device(phacotube) in the early and intermediate control… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Glaucoma, Cataract
What is being tested?
Glaucoma Implant Surgery, trabeculectomy and phacoemulsification
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteSingapore
Study dates
Jul 2005to Jul 2006
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ø 21 years old and above Ø Primary Open Angle Glaucoma with Shaffer grade 2 or better for 360 degrees Ø Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (occludable angles +/- PAS) Ø Inadequate IOP control despite maximum medical treatment (using at least 2 types or more antiglaucoma medications) and/or laser treatment in the presence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy on optic nerve head evaluation and corresponding visual field findings Ø Visually significant cataract with visual acuity of less than or equal to 6/12 Ø No corneal disease Ø Willing to be followed up for 1 year duration post-operatively Ø Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Ø Secondary Glaucoma (Uveitic, Neovascular, traumatic, Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndrome); Congenital Glaucoma Ø Severe ocular disease like Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, Age-related Macular Degeneration Exudative type Ø Prior intraocular surgery(in the study eye) Ø Patients with small central island and temporal field remaining on perimetry Ø One-eyed patients or fellow eye with visual acuity of counting fingers (CF) or worse

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Paul TC Chew, A/Prof. contact

67725317 ext. 5317

ophchew@nus.edu.sg

Maria Cecilia D Aquino, MD contact

67725317 ext. 5317

cel_aq@yahoo.com

Singapore1 site, 1 recruiting
  • National University Hospital

    5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, 119074

    Paul TC Chew, A/Professor, 67725317 ext. 5317, ophchew@nus.edu.sg

    Maria Cecilia D Aquino, MD, 67725317 ext. 5317, cel_aq@yahoo.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: Combined Phacoemulsification and Glaucoma Implant Surgery Versus Combined Phacoemulsification and Trabeculectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of combined phacoemulsification, posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation , trabeculectomy (phacotrabeculectomy) with phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation and glaucoma drainage device(phacotube) in the early and intermediate control of intraocular pressure(IOP) in patients with primary open angle and angle closure glaucoma.

Read the detailed description

Studies have pointed out racial differences in the outcome of conventional filtration surgery. Glaucoma drainage implants have been found to do well in Asian eyes but no randomized controlled trial is available to support this claim. Objectives: It is the aim of this study to compare the effectiveness and safety of combined phacoemulsification, posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation , trabeculectomy (phacotrabeculectomy) versus phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation and glaucoma drainage device(phacotube) in the early and intermediate control of intraocular pressure(IOP) in patients with primary open angle and angle closure glaucoma. The secondary objective is to look into the post-operative complications encountered in phacotrabeculectomy and phacotube including the additional interventions (laser suture lysis, bleb needling, antimetabolite injections, etc.) applied in both procedures being studied Study Design. Randomized controlled trial. Methods. A total of 50 Asian subjects, 21 years old and above diagnosed with primary open/angle closure glaucoma, inadequately controlled by laser and medical treatment, with significant cataract and no previous eye surgery will be randomized to two types of combined procedures, phacotrabeculectomy and phacotube. Primary outcome measure is intraocular pressure and secondary outcome measures will be visual acuity, anterior chamber depth, visual field stability or progression, glaucoma medication requirement, operative and post-operative complications and additional, secondary interventions(e.g. laser suture lysis, bleb needling, 5-FU injections, anterior chamber reformation). All subjects will be followed up for a period of 1 year.This trial may define the role of GDI as a primary surgical option for Asian patients and the first randomized clinical trial in Asia to compare two combined procedures for glaucoma and cataract namely phacotrabeculectomy and phaco-glaucoma drainage implant surgery.﷡

Conditions
Glaucoma, Cataract
Being tested
Glaucoma Implant Surgery, trabeculectomy, phacoemulsification
Keywords
Glaucoma, Cataract
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma, Cataract

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Glaucoma Implant SurgeryProcedure or surgery

  • trabeculectomyProcedure or surgery

  • phacoemulsificationProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. intraocular pressure(IOP).

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. visual acuity,anterior chamber depth,visual field, glaucoma medication requirement, operative and post-operative complications and additional interventions(e.g.laser suture lysis, bleb

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jan 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2005
  3. Study completionJul 2006 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00273221
Sponsor's protocol ID
DSRB-A/05/196
Status last verified
May 2008
First submitted
6 Jan 2006
Last updated
22 May 2008
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Glaucoma Implant Surgery, trabeculectomy and phacoemulsification in people with Glaucoma and Cataract, run by National University Hospital, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Paul TC Chew, A/Prof. (67725317 ext. 5317, ophchew@nus.edu.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

intraocular pressure(IOP).. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in