AzTrials
AzTrials

ScoliosisPhase 2NCT00273598

Comparing Two Instrumentation Systems for the Treatment of Adolescent Scoliosis

A Phase 2 study testing Moss Miami Spine Instrumentation System and Universal Spine Instrumentation System in people with Scoliosis, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Idiopathic scoliosis affects 2-5% of adolescents. This study will compare the quality of life, functional outcome, cosmetic result, and the correction of spinal deformity of two instrumentation systems for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Scoliosis
What is being tested?
Moss Miami Spine Instrumentation System and Universal Spine Instrumentation System
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
126 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Sep 1997to Sep 2002
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 8-18 years
  • Diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis requiring posterior instrumentation and fusion(including those also requiring anterior release with or without anterior instrumentation) who could receive either the USS or the Moss Miami system
  • Patients with scoliosis and an incidental finding of conus < L1-2 disc level, provided they have no symptoms or signs
  • Patients with scoliosis and an incidental finding of a small syrinx (provided the syrinx is non-progressive and does not require neurosurgical treatment)
  • Patients with non-progressive spondylolysis

Who cannot join

  • Spinal cord abnormalities with any neurologic symptoms or signs
  • Spinal cord lesions requiring neurosurgical interventions, such as hydromyelia requiring Arnold Chiari decompression
  • Primary muscle diseases, such as muscular dystrophy
  • Neurologic diseases (e.g. Charcot-Marie Tooth, Guillain-Barre syndrome, cerebral palsy, or spina bifida, etc.)
  • Primary abnormalities of bones(e.g. osteogenesis imperfecta)
  • Congenital scoliosis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • The Hospital for Sick Children

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Comparing the Moss Miami and Universal Spinal Instrumentation Systems for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Idiopathic scoliosis affects 2-5% of adolescents. This study will compare the quality of life, functional outcome, cosmetic result, and the correction of spinal deformity of two instrumentation systems for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Conditions
Scoliosis
Being tested
Moss Miami Spine Instrumentation System, Universal Spine Instrumentation System
Keywords
Scoliosis, spinal disease, pediatrics, Adolescents, Universal Spinal Instrumentation System, Moss Miami Spinal Instrumentation System, Orthopedic Surgery
Medical subject headings
Scoliosis, Spinal Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Moss Miami Spine Instrumentation SystemProcedure or surgery

  • Universal Spine Instrumentation SystemProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. - Quality of life at two years post-surgery, as measured by the self-report Quality of Life Profile for Spinal Disorders

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Physical function

  2. Deformity, based on clinical exam and spinal radiographs

  3. Clinicians' ratings of clinical photographs

  4. Surgical outcomes, as measured by blood transfusions, duration of surgery,and length of hospitalization

  5. Surgeons' global satisfaction with the instrumentation system

  6. Complications of treatment (infection, loss of fixation, neurologic damage, and non-union)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jan 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 1997
  3. Study completionSep 2002

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Enrolment
126 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00273598
Sponsor's protocol ID
0019970040
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
4 Jan 2006
Last updated
12 Oct 2017
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Wright JG, Donaldson S, Howard A, Stephens D, Alman B, Hedden D. Are surgeons' preferences for instrumentation related to patient outcomes? A randomized clinical trial of two implants for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Dec;89(12):2684-93. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00720.

    PubMed 18056501

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Moss Miami Spine Instrumentation System and Universal Spine Instrumentation System in people with Scoliosis, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

- Quality of life at two years post-surgery, as measured by the self-report Quality of Life Profile for Spinal Disorders. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00273598, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in