AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney Failure, AcuteCATHEDIANCT00277888

Comparison of Femoral Versus Jugular Routes for Temporary Hemodialysis in Seriously Ill Patients

A study testing Femoral route for hemodialysis and Jugular route for hemodialysis in people with Kidney Failure, Acute and Critical Illness, run by University Hospital, Caen at 10 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a jugular route leads to a lower rate of complications as compared with a femoral route for catheterization in patients admitted in several intensive care units in France who develop acute renal failure requiring hemodiafiltration or hemodialysis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Failure, Acute, Critical Illness
What is being tested?
Femoral route for hemodialysis and Jugular route for hemodialysis
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
750 participants
Where
10 sitesFrance
Study dates
Apr 2004to May 2007
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Admitted in intensive care unit (ICU)
  • Requiring hemodialysis
  • Clinicians have the choice between jugular and femoral routes

Who cannot join

  • Chronic renal failure requiring long term dialysis

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

France10 sites
  • Medical and nephrologic Intensive Care Unit, CHU Amien Sud

    Amiens, 80000

  • CH Argenteuil

    Argenteuil, 95100

  • Medical Intensive Care Unit, CHU de Caen

    Caen, 14000

  • Surgical Intensive Care Unit

    Caen, 14033

  • CHU de Clermont Ferrand

    Clermont-Ferrand

  • CHU Raymond Pointcarré

    Garches, 92380

  • Hôpital Cochin

    Paris, 75679

  • Hôpital Lariboisière

    Paris, 75

  • Hôpital St Joseph

    Paris, 75

  • CH Saint Malo

    St-Malo

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Complications of Jugular and Femoral Venous Catheterization in Critically Ill Patients Requiring Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a jugular route leads to a lower rate of complications as compared with a femoral route for catheterization in patients admitted in several intensive care units in France who develop acute renal failure requiring hemodiafiltration or hemodialysis.

Being tested
Femoral route for hemodialysis, Jugular route for hemodialysis
Keywords
Dialysis, Hemodialysis, Catheterization
Medical subject headings
Acute Kidney Injury, Critical Illness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Femoral route for hemodialysisProcedure or surgery

  • Jugular route for hemodialysisProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT00277888
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Femoral routeExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Femoral route for hemodialysis
Jugular routeExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Jugular route for hemodialysis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time of insertion without complication

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Rates of mechanical complications

  2. Rates of infectious complications including cath-colonization

  3. Quality of hemodialysis by urea extraction ratio

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2004
  3. Primary completionMay 2007
  4. Study completionMay 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
750 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00277888
Sponsor's protocol ID
PHRC-Cathedia
Acronym
CATHEDIA
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
13 Jan 2006
Last updated
14 Nov 2014
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Parienti JJ, Thirion M, Megarbane B, Souweine B, Ouchikhe A, Polito A, Forel JM, Marque S, Misset B, Airapetian N, Daurel C, Mira JP, Ramakers M, du Cheyron D, Le Coutour X, Daubin C, Charbonneau P; Members of the Cathedia Study Group. Femoral vs jugular venous catheterization and risk of nosocomial events in adults requiring acute renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 May 28;299(20):2413-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.20.2413.

    PubMed 18505951
  • Parienti JJ, Megarbane B, Fischer MO, Lautrette A, Gazui N, Marin N, Hanouz JL, Ramakers M, Daubin C, Mira JP, Charbonneau P, du Cheyron D; Cathedia Study Group. Catheter dysfunction and dialysis performance according to vascular access among 736 critically ill adults requiring renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled study. Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):1118-25. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d454b3.

    PubMed 20154599
  • Parienti JJ, Dugue AE, Daurel C, Mira JP, Megarbane B, Mermel LA, Daubin C, du Cheyron D; Members of the Cathedia Study Group. Continuous renal replacement therapy may increase the risk of catheter infection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Aug;5(8):1489-96. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02130310. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

    PubMed 20558562
  • Dugue AE, Levesque SP, Fischer MO, Souweine B, Mira JP, Megarbane B, Daubin C, du Cheyron D, Parienti JJ; Cathedia Study Group. Vascular access sites for acute renal replacement in intensive care units. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Jan;7(1):70-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06570711. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

    PubMed 22076877
  • Parienti JJ, Deryckere S, Megarbane B, Valette X, Seguin A, Sauneuf B, Mira JP, Souweine B, Cattoir V, Daubin C, du Cheyron D; Cathedia Study Group. Quasi-experimental study of sodium citrate locks and the risk of acute hemodialysis catheter infection among critically ill patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Oct;58(10):5666-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03079-14. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

    PubMed 24982071
  • Iachkine J, Buetti N, de Grooth HJ, Briant AR, Mimoz O, Megarbane B, Mira JP, Ruckly S, Souweine B, du Cheyron D, Mermel LA, Timsit JF, Parienti JJ. Development and validation of a multivariable prediction model of central venous catheter-tip colonization in a cohort of five randomized trials. Crit Care. 2022 Jul 7;26(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04078-x.

    PubMed 35799302
  • Tsujimoto Y, Miki S, Shimada H, Tsujimoto H, Yasuda H, Kataoka Y, Fujii T. Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD013330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013330.pub2.

    PubMed 34519356

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Femoral route for hemodialysis and Jugular route for hemodialysis in people with Kidney Failure, Acute and Critical Illness, run by University Hospital, Caen at 10 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time of insertion without complication. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00277888, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in