AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 1 DiabetesNCT00308256

Effects of Nurse-counselling in the Improvement of the type1 Diabetes Control in Adolescents

A study testing nurse-counselling in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The incidence of type 1 diabetes is increasing in France. A recent cross sectional study has shown that in France, only 15% of children and 26% of adults had HbA1c<7%. Adolescents seem to need particularly a better metabolic control. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Type 1 Diabetes
What is being tested?
nurse-counselling
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
77 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Mar 2006to Aug 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 13 to 18 years with a type1 diabetes diagnosed at least one year earlier,
  • HbA1c rate > 8 %.

Who cannot join

  • HbA1c < 8 %;
  • patients participating in another study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Marc Nicolino

    Lyon, 69005

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Effects of Nurse-counselling in the Improvement of the type1 Diabetes Control in Adolescents: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The incidence of type 1 diabetes is increasing in France. A recent cross sectional study has shown that in France, only 15% of children and 26% of adults had HbA1c<7%. Adolescents seem to need particularly a better metabolic control.

Working Hypothesis:

Read more

We hypothesized that a stricter control of glycaemia by nurse-counselling could probably improve metabolic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Objectives:

To show that nurse-counselling may improve levels of patient satisfaction.

Methodology:

The main criterion is the patient acceptance of diabetes measured by an analogical visual scale rated from 0 (I cope very well with my diabetes, I cope very badly with my diabetes) to 10 cm. The scale will be measured every quarter within 12 months follow-up. We wish to improve patient's appreciation by 10 mm, near to "I cope very well with my diabetes".

This is a randomised parallel group study with 36 subjects in each group. During the follow-up, the "routine follow-up" group will continue its routine care. The "complementary follow-up" group will be called by nurses every 15 days and consult monthly. HbA1c is the secondary criterion and will be measured every 3 months.

The total study duration is 18 months including 6 months for the recruitment and 12 months for the patients follow-up

Conditions
Type 1 Diabetes
Being tested
nurse-counselling
Keywords
Type1 diabetes;, nurse-counselling;, adolescent
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • nurse-counsellingBehavioural

    Phone calls performed by nurse 15 days after each monthly visit

Study groups in NCT00308256
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nurse counselingExperimentalPhone calls performed by nurse 15 days after each monthly visit
Receives: Behavioral: nurse-counselling
ControlNo interventionNormal monthly follow-up without phone calls

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient's acceptance of the disease evaluated by an analogical visual scale rating

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Glycaemic equilibrium by measuring the rate of glycosylated haemoglobin

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Number of diabetic acidosis having required hospitalization,

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Episodes number of severe hypoglycaemia having required an intervention of a third party or a hospitalization.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Mar 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2006
  3. Primary completionAug 2011
  4. Study completionAug 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
77 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00308256
Sponsor's protocol ID
2005.395
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
28 Mar 2006
Last updated
19 Dec 2025
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Kassai B, Rabilloud M, Bernoux D, Michal C, Riche B, Ginhoux T, Laudy V, Terral D, Didier-Wright C, Maire V, Dumont C, Cottancin G, Plasse M, Jeannoel GP, Khoury J, Bony C, Lievre M, Drai J, Nicolino M. Management of adolescents with very poorly controlled type 1 diabetes by nurses: a parallel group randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Sep 8;16:399. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0923-7.

    PubMed 26350209

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing nurse-counselling in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient's acceptance of the disease evaluated by an analogical visual scale rating (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00308256, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in