Cardiac ArrestNCT00308815
Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine During Ambulance Transport.
A study testing Automatic CPR machine in people with Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
This is a randomized controlled prospective study which assigned patient to receive manual CPR or automatic CPR machine use. The quality and efficacy between manual CPR and machine CPR will be evaluated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- What is being tested?
- Automatic CPR machine
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- Jan 2005to not given
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient in Taipei distric
- Patients sent to National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) through Jhongsiao Emergency medical service (EMS) team
Who cannot join
- Younger than 15 years old
- Traumatic cardia arrest
- Patients not sent to NTUH by Jhongsiao EMS team
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 10002
Wen-Chu Chiang, M.D., 886-2-23123456 ext. 5632, drchiang@ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw
Wen-Chu Chiang, M.D.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine on the CPR Performance for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Ambulance Transport.
This is a randomized controlled prospective study which assigned patient to receive manual CPR or automatic CPR machine use. The quality and efficacy between manual CPR and machine CPR will be evaluated.
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Being tested
- Automatic CPR machine
- Keywords
- Resuscitation, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, cardiac arrest, CPR
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Automatic CPR machineDevice
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of CPR
Secondary outcomes (3)
End-tidal CO2 on arrival at ER
Recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate
Survival rate at 1hr, 24hr, and discharge from hospital
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiac ArrestStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Enrolment
- 100 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Wen-Chu Chiang, M.D., Study director, National Taiwan University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00308815
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 9361701098
- Status last verified
- Oct 2004
- First submitted
- 28 Mar 2006
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2006
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine on the CPR Performance for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Ambulance Transport.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00308815
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 9361701098
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Keywords
- Resuscitation, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, cardiac arrest, CPR
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2005
- First posted
- 30 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized controlled prospective study which assigned patient to receive manual CPR or automatic CPR machine use. The quality and efficacy between manual CPR and machine CPR will be evaluated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient in Taipei distric
- Patients sent to National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) through Jhongsiao Emergency medical service (EMS) team
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Younger than 15 years old
- Traumatic cardia arrest
- Patients not sent to NTUH by Jhongsiao EMS team
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic CPR machine | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Quality of CPR
3 secondary outcomes
End-tidal CO2 on arrival at ER
Recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate
Survival rate at 1hr, 24hr, and discharge from hospital
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2006.
Related trials for Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
CAROTID DOPPLER AND CEREBRAL OXIMERY IN POST CARDIAC ARREST ICU PATIENTS
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Carotid Doppler
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Acid-base Disorders and Ventilation Settings in Cardiogenic Shock and Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: Comparison With VentilO Algorithm
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiogenic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wen-Chu Chiang, M.D. study director
National Taiwan University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Automatic CPR machine in people with Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of CPR. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2006.