DepressionPhase 3NCT00313573
Telemedicine or Standard Care in Treating Patients With Depression and/or Pain Caused By Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing management of therapy complications, pain therapy and psychosocial assessment and care in people with Depression and Pain, run by Indiana University at 17 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Telemedicine may help in the treatment of depression and/or pain caused by cancer. It is not yet known whether telemedicine is more effective than standard care in treating depression and/or pain caused by cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Depression, Pain, Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific
- What is being tested?
- management of therapy complications, pain therapy and psychosocial assessment and care
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 480 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2006to Jan 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Diagnosis of cancer AND 1 or both of the following:
- Clinical depression
- Depression must be of at least moderate severity (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10)
- Depressed mood and/or anhedonia endorsed
- No depression directly precipitated by cancer therapy for which depression is a well known side effect (e.g., interferon, corticosteroids)
- Cancer-related pain
- Pain must be at least moderate in severity (Brief Pain Inventory score ≥ 6), persisted despite using ≥ 2 analgesics, and cancer-related
- If the only pain is due to a pre-existing condition (e.g., migraine, headache, arthritis, etc), the patient may not be eligible
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
- Must speak English
- Not pregnant
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- No moderately severe cognitive impairment
- No schizophrenia or other psychosis
- No disability claim currently being adjudicated for pain
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- Not in hospice care
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country.
17 sites in 1 country
United States17 sites
Community Cancer Center at Community Hospital of Anderson
Anderson, Indiana, 46011
Community Cancer Care at Bedford Oncology Specialty Clinic
Bedford, Indiana, 47421
Columbus Regional Hospital Cancer Center
Columbus, Indiana, 47201
Community Cancer Care at Putnam County Hospital
Greencastle, Indiana, 46135
Community Cancer Care at Decatur County Hospital
Greensburg, Indiana, 47240
Regenstrief Institute, Incorporated
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-2872
Community Cancer Care
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Indianapolis
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
William N. Wishard Memorial Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Methodist Cancer Center at Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46206-1367
Community Regional Cancer Care at Community Hospital East
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46219
Community Regional Cancer Care at Community Hospital North
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256
Community Cancer Care at Howard Regional Health System
Kokomo, Indiana, 46902
Community Cancer Care at King's Daughters' Hospital
Madison, Indiana, 47250
Schneck Medical Center
Seymour, Indiana, 47274
Community Cancer Care at Perry County Hospital
Tell City, Indiana, 47586
Community Cancer Care at Tipton County Memorial Hospital
Tipton, Indiana, 46072
About this study
Official title: TeleCare Management of Pain and Depression in Cancer
RATIONALE: Telemedicine may help in the treatment of depression and/or pain caused by cancer. It is not yet known whether telemedicine is more effective than standard care in treating depression and/or pain caused by cancer.
PURPOSE: This phase III randomized clinical trial is studying telemedicine to see how well it works compared to standard care in treating patients with depression and/or pain caused by cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the effectiveness of a state-wide, telemedicine intervention with standard care in cancer patients with clinical depression and/or cancer-related pain.
- Compare improvement in clinical depression and/or cancer-related pain in patients undergoing these interventions.
Secondary
- Compare health-related quality of life, functional status, and patient satisfaction with treatment in patients undergoing these interventions.
- Compare the economic benefits of these interventions in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, longitudinal, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to study site and type of symptom (pain only vs depression only vs pain and depression). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I (standard care): Patients receive treatment for pain, depression, and other symptoms from their oncologist.
- Arm II (telemedicine intervention): Patients undergo automated, home-based symptom monitoring either by telephone or the Internet, depending on preference, coupled with telephonic care management by a clinical specialist. Patients complete questionnaires via the Internet or undergo standardized interviews via telephone measuring depression, pain, quality of life, and other patient-reported variables twice weekly for approximately 1 month, once weekly for 2 months, twice a month for 3 months, and then once a month for 6 months. A clinical specialist trained in treating the symptoms of pain and depression also contacts the patient by phone to assess symptom severity and initiate treatment. A follow-up call is made at 1-2 weeks to assess symptom severity, adherence, and adverse effects. Patients with depression receive 2 additional follow-up calls in the first 12 weeks. The clinical specialist also calls the patient when automated monitoring indicates inadequate symptom improvement or side effects, or the patient requests to be contacted. The clinical specialist works with the patient's regular doctor in adjusting medicines and treatment for symptoms as needed. Patients who do not complete their scheduled assessments receive an automated call or e-mail message reminding them to complete the symptoms questionnaires. Patients who do not respond to this reminder within 24 hours are contacted by the clinical specialist.
In both arms, patients are interviewed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients are asked questions about pain, depression, other physical and emotional symptoms, work activities, quality of life, and satisfaction with treatment.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 480 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Being tested
- management of therapy complications, pain therapy, psychosocial assessment and care, quality-of-life assessment
- Keywords
- unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific, pain, depression
- Medical subject headings
- Depression, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
management of therapy complicationsProcedure or surgery
pain therapyProcedure or surgery
psychosocial assessment and careProcedure or surgery
quality-of-life assessmentProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compare efficacy of 3-component model telemedicine intervention to standard care in terms of depression and pain at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Health-related quality of life at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Cost-effectiveness of care at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Treatment satisfaction at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2006
- Primary completionJan 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Indiana UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 480 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Investigators
- Kurt Kroenke, MD, Study chair, Regenstrief Institute, Incorporated
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00313573
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000466348
- Other IDs
- IUMC-051009
- Status last verified
- May 2009
- First submitted
- 11 Apr 2006
- Last updated
- 20 Sep 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Brown LF, Kroenke K, Theobald DE, Wu J, Tu W. The association of depression and anxiety with health-related quality of life in cancer patients with depression and/or pain. Psychooncology. 2010 Jul;19(7):734-41. doi: 10.1002/pon.1627.
PubMed 19777535Kroenke K, Theobald D, Wu J, Norton K, Morrison G, Carpenter J, Tu W. Effect of telecare management on pain and depression in patients with cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2010 Jul 14;304(2):163-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.944.
PubMed 20628129Kroenke K, Zhong X, Theobald D, Wu J, Tu W, Carpenter JS. Somatic symptoms in patients with cancer experiencing pain or depression: prevalence, disability, and health care use. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Oct 11;170(18):1686-94. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.337.
PubMed 20937930He A, Kroenke K, Stump T, Monahan PO, Connors J, Chernyak Y, Musey P. The patient health questionnaire somatization-anxiety-depression scale: Validation of the PHQ-SAD in 4 clinical trials. J Affect Disord. 2026 Apr 1;398:120906. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.120906. Epub 2025 Dec 21.
PubMed 41436014Cohee AA, Kroenke K, Vachon E, Wu J, Tu W, Johns SA. Predictors of depression outcomes in adults with cancer: A 12 month longitudinal study. J Psychosom Res. 2020 Sep;136:110169. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110169. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
PubMed 32559503Kroenke K, Wu J, Yu Z, Bair MJ, Kean J, Stump T, Monahan PO. Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale: Initial Validation in Three Clinical Trials. Psychosom Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;78(6):716-27. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000322.
PubMed 27187854Choi Yoo SJ, Nyman JA, Cheville AL, Kroenke K. Cost effectiveness of telecare management for pain and depression in patients with cancer: results from a randomized trial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):599-606. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
PubMed 25130518Hayano J, Carney RM, Watanabe E, Kawai K, Kodama I, Stein PK, Watkins LL, Freedland KE, Blumenthal JA. Interactive associations of depression and sleep apnea with adverse clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Psychosom Med. 2012 Oct;74(8):832-9. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31826d2c81. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
PubMed 23023681Wang HL, Kroenke K, Wu J, Tu W, Theobald D, Rawl SM. Predictors of cancer-related pain improvement over time. Psychosom Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;74(6):642-7. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182590904. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
PubMed 22753637Dube P, Kurt K, Bair MJ, Theobald D, Williams LS. The p4 screener: evaluation of a brief measure for assessing potential suicide risk in 2 randomized effectiveness trials of primary care and oncology patients. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;12(6):PCC.10m00978. doi: 10.4088/PCC.10m00978blu.
PubMed 21494337
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Sep 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- TeleCare Management of Pain and Depression in Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00313573
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000466348
- Keywords
- unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific, pain, depression
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 480 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Feb 2006
- Primary completion
- Jan 2010 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Telemedicine may help in the treatment of depression and/or pain caused by cancer. It is not yet known whether telemedicine is more effective than standard care in treating depression and/or pain caused by cancer.
PURPOSE: This phase III randomized clinical trial is studying telemedicine to see how well it works compared to standard care in treating patients with depression and/or pain caused by cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the effectiveness of a state-wide, telemedicine intervention with standard care in cancer patients with clinical depression and/or cancer-related pain.
- Compare improvement in clinical depression and/or cancer-related pain in patients undergoing these interventions.
Secondary
- Compare health-related quality of life, functional status, and patient satisfaction with treatment in patients undergoing these interventions.
- Compare the economic benefits of these interventions in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, longitudinal, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to study site and type of symptom (pain only vs depression only vs pain and depression). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I (standard care): Patients receive treatment for pain, depression, and other symptoms from their oncologist.
- Arm II (telemedicine intervention): Patients undergo automated, home-based symptom monitoring either by telephone or the Internet, depending on preference, coupled with telephonic care management by a clinical specialist. Patients complete questionnaires via the Internet or undergo standardized interviews via telephone measuring depression, pain, quality of life, and other patient-reported variables twice weekly for approximately 1 month, once weekly for 2 months, twice a month for 3 months, and then once a month for 6 months. A clinical specialist trained in treating the symptoms of pain and depression also contacts the patient by phone to assess symptom severity and initiate treatment. A follow-up call is made at 1-2 weeks to assess symptom severity, adherence, and adverse effects. Patients with depression receive 2 additional follow-up calls in the first 12 weeks. The clinical specialist also calls the patient when automated monitoring indicates inadequate symptom improvement or side effects, or the patient requests to be contacted. The clinical specialist works with the patient's regular doctor in adjusting medicines and treatment for symptoms as needed. Patients who do not complete their scheduled assessments receive an automated call or e-mail message reminding them to complete the symptoms questionnaires. Patients who do not respond to this reminder within 24 hours are contacted by the clinical specialist.
In both arms, patients are interviewed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients are asked questions about pain, depression, other physical and emotional symptoms, work activities, quality of life, and satisfaction with treatment.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 480 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| management of therapy complications | Procedure or surgery | – |
| pain therapy | Procedure or surgery | – |
| psychosocial assessment and care | Procedure or surgery | – |
| quality-of-life assessment | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Compare efficacy of 3-component model telemedicine intervention to standard care in terms of depression and pain at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
3 secondary outcomes
Health-related quality of life at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Cost-effectiveness of care at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Treatment satisfaction at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Sep 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 19777535Brown LF, Kroenke K, Theobald DE, Wu J, Tu W. The association of depression and anxiety with health-related quality of life in cancer patients with depression and/or pain. Psychooncology. 2010 Jul;19(7):734-41. doi: 10.1002/pon.1627.
- Results publication: PubMed 20628129Kroenke K, Theobald D, Wu J, Norton K, Morrison G, Carpenter J, Tu W. Effect of telecare management on pain and depression in patients with cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2010 Jul 14;304(2):163-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.944.
- Results publication: PubMed 20937930Kroenke K, Zhong X, Theobald D, Wu J, Tu W, Carpenter JS. Somatic symptoms in patients with cancer experiencing pain or depression: prevalence, disability, and health care use. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Oct 11;170(18):1686-94. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.337.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41436014He A, Kroenke K, Stump T, Monahan PO, Connors J, Chernyak Y, Musey P. The patient health questionnaire somatization-anxiety-depression scale: Validation of the PHQ-SAD in 4 clinical trials. J Affect Disord. 2026 Apr 1;398:120906. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.120906. Epub 2025 Dec 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32559503Cohee AA, Kroenke K, Vachon E, Wu J, Tu W, Johns SA. Predictors of depression outcomes in adults with cancer: A 12 month longitudinal study. J Psychosom Res. 2020 Sep;136:110169. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110169. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27187854Kroenke K, Wu J, Yu Z, Bair MJ, Kean J, Stump T, Monahan PO. Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale: Initial Validation in Three Clinical Trials. Psychosom Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;78(6):716-27. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000322.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25130518Choi Yoo SJ, Nyman JA, Cheville AL, Kroenke K. Cost effectiveness of telecare management for pain and depression in patients with cancer: results from a randomized trial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):599-606. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23023681Hayano J, Carney RM, Watanabe E, Kawai K, Kodama I, Stein PK, Watkins LL, Freedland KE, Blumenthal JA. Interactive associations of depression and sleep apnea with adverse clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Psychosom Med. 2012 Oct;74(8):832-9. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31826d2c81. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22753637Wang HL, Kroenke K, Wu J, Tu W, Theobald D, Rawl SM. Predictors of cancer-related pain improvement over time. Psychosom Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;74(6):642-7. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182590904. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21494337Dube P, Kurt K, Bair MJ, Theobald D, Williams LS. The p4 screener: evaluation of a brief measure for assessing potential suicide risk in 2 randomized effectiveness trials of primary care and oncology patients. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;12(6):PCC.10m00978. doi: 10.4088/PCC.10m00978blu.
Related trials for Depression
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Impact of Psychological Symptoms in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SSCD): a National Cross-sectional Study
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Recruiting
Cultural Adaptation of an Online Parenting Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents
Risk of Depression and Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kurt Kroenke, MD study chair
Regenstrief Institute, Incorporated
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing management of therapy complications, pain therapy and psychosocial assessment and care in people with Depression and Pain, run by Indiana University at 17 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compare efficacy of 3-component model telemedicine intervention to standard care in terms of depression and pain at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00313573, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2013.