ShockPhase 3NCT00314704
Dopamine and Norepinephrine in Shock Patients
A Phase 3 study testing dopamine versus norepinephrine in people with Shock, run by Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients at 8 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of dopamine and norepinephrine, two commonly used vasopressor agents, in the treatment of shock. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Shock
- What is being tested?
- dopamine versus norepinephrine
- How many people
- 1,679 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2003to Oct 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Mean arterial pressure less than 70 mmHg or systolic pressure less than 100 mmHg persisting despite adequate fluid loading (in example with at least 1000 mL crystalloid or 500 ml colloid) unless central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary artery occluded pressure (PAOP) are elevated (e.g. CVP> 12 mmHg or PAOP > 14 mmHg).
Who cannot join
- Serious arrhythmia such as rapid atrial fibrillation (> 160/min) or ventricular tachycardia.
- Brain death.
- Open label administration of dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine or phenylephrine for more than 4hours.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 3 countries.
8 sites in 3 countries
Belgium6 sites
CHU Saint Pierre
Brussels, 1000
CHU Brugmann
Brussels, 1020
HIS Ixelles
Brussels, 1050
Erasme University Hospital
Brussels, 1070
St Elisabeth
Brussels, 1180
CHU Charleroi
Charleroi, 6000
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine as the First Vasopressor Agent in the Management of Shock
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of dopamine and norepinephrine, two commonly used vasopressor agents, in the treatment of shock.
Read the detailed description
Introduction:
Vasopressor agents are commonly used to correct hypotension in patients with acute circulatory failure. Their variable alpha, beta, or dopaminergic receptor stimulation, may result in different hemodynamic and metabolic effects. Several experimental and human studies have indicated that dopamine and norepinephrine may have different effects on the kidney, the splanchnic region or the pituitary axis, but the implications of these findings have not been assessed. Hence, both agents are widely used, and several consensus or expert recommendations still recommend the use of both agents 1,2. An observational study has reported that dopamine and epinephrine may be associated with a higher mortality rate than norepinephrine 3. In addition, The results of the SOAP study indicated that dopamine may be associated with higher mortality rates than norepinephrine, but various uncontrolled factors may have influenced these results. Therefore, we will address this issue in a prospective, randomized, double blind study. We hypothesize that both agents have similar effects on survival.
Design of the study:
Prospective, randomized, double blind, multicenter.
Patients:
A total of 1600 consecutive patients with hypotension requiring the administration of vasopressors.
Power calculation: Calculation is based on the results of the SOAP study (mortality 43% with dopamine and 36% with norepinephrine), using a two-sided analysis, with a significant p value at 0.05 and a power of 80%, 765 patients are needed in each group. About 40 centers will be recruited.
Inclusion criteria:
Mean arterial pressure less than 70 mmHg or systolic pressure less than 100 mmHg persisting despite adequate fluid loading (in example with at least 1000 mL crystalloid or 500 ml colloid) unless central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary artery occluded pressure (PAOP) are elevated (e.g. CVP> 12 mmHg or PAOP > 14 mmHg).
Exclusions:
- Serious arrhythmia such as rapid atrial fibrillation (> 160/min) or ventricular tachycardia.
- Brain death.
- Open label administration of dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine or phenylephrine for more than 4hours.
Consent:
Patients will be randomized immediately, with the use of sealed envelopes placed near the supplies of dopamine and norepinephrine. If the patient is already being treated with one agent, randomization can still take place provided that it is within a 4 hour period.
Consent will be obtained from the patient before entering the study, if possible, or from the next of kin as soon as possible after starting vasopressor therapy. Indeed, in such cases, vasopressor therapy should anyway be started, either with dopamine or with norepinephrine, and these 2 therapies are currently equally valid 1st choices. As soon as possible, the next of kin will be informed and deferred consent obtained. If the patient recovers, and is able to consent, consent will then be obtained.
According to local Ethical Committee, oral or signed consents will be obtained.
Protocol:
Blood pressure goal: defined by the physician in charge, according to each unit's recommendations
Administration of vasoactive drugs:
Double blind administration of a solution of norepinephrine or dopamine contained either in vials or syringes according to the ICU's protocol (see appendices I and II for vial and syringe preparations). Each solution will be labeled with its randomly allocated number and will be prepared by the nurses in charge. The rate of administration of the blind solution will be determined according to a scale and using the estimated body weight. The recommended steps for increasing or decreasing the doses of the blinded solution are calculated to be equivalent to 2 µg/kg.min for dopamine and 0.02 mcg/kg.min for norepinephrine, the investigator being free to use multiples of this increment in case of emergency. The maximal dose with the 2 agents will be 20 µg/kg.min for dopamine and 0.19 mcg/kg.min for norepinephrine (these doses have been shown to have similar effects on mean arterial blood pressure 4).
If the patient is already treated with open label vasopressors at baseline, the blinded solution will be rapidly incremented, and, if possible, the open label vasopressor agent will be decreased. If this open label vasopressor consisted in dopamine and if this agent cannot be fully weaned after the introduction of the blinded solution, the open label dopamine will be replaced by an open label norepinephrine infusion.
When the maximal dose of the blinded solution is achieved, an open label perfusion of norepinephrine can be added to achieve the desired blood pressure. Epinephrine or vasopressin may be used only as rescue therapy. Weaning of vasopressor agents will begin by weaning of the open label norepinephrine, followed by weaning of the blinded solution. In case of recurrence of hypotension, the blinded solution will be resumed first (maximal dose with the 2 agents will be 20 µg/kg.min for dopamine and 0.19 mcg/kg.min for norepinephrine) and if needed an open label solution of norepinephrine may be added. Weaning of the vasopressors will be performed as previously described.
Dobutamine, dopexamine, and inhibitors of phosphodiesterase III can be used, if needed, to optimize cardiac output according to local practices.
General therapeutic guidelines:
All therapies will be performed according to local guidelines. The choice of sedative agents, antibiotics, fluids, transfusion threshold, ventilatory modes,…. , will be left to the attending physicians. Likewise, the administration of agents like corticosteroids or drotrecogin-alpha activated (Xigris) is permitted.
Randomization:
Randomization by blocks for each participating ICU, using a computer generated list to allocate treatments A or B, put in sealed envelopes near the drug supplies. In each ICU, sealed envelopes including treatment allocation and a five digit number will be available. The envelope will be opened by the person responsible for preparation of the dopamine and norepinephrine solutions. The random number and treatment allocation will be written on a hidden book, available only for the person responsible for preparation of the dopamine and norepinephrine solutions. The doctors and other nurses will be kept blinded to treatment allocation. On patients' charts only the rate of administration and the dilution (simple or double) of the solution will be written.
Preparation of the solutions:
The solutions of dopamine or norepinephrine will be prepared by the nurse in charge of the patient. The five digit number (allocated by randomization) will be written on the bag. See appendices I and II for details regarding the preparation of the solutions. Different concentrations of these solutions are provided, the choice of the concentration of the solution will be left to the physician in charge.
Definition of the end of the shock period:
Shock will be considered as having resolved when the investigational drug can be stopped for more than 12 hours.
End-points:
Primary end-point: 28 day survival
Secondary end-points:
ICU survival Hospital survival Severity of organ dysfunction in the ICU (SOFA score 5) Duration of ICU stay, time spent on vasopressors (vasopressor free days), on mechanical ventilation (ventilator free days) and on renal replacement (renal replacement free days) Efficacy of dopamine to correct hypotension Hemodynamic effects / concomitant use of dobutamine or other inotropic agents Tolerance: arrhythmia (incidence of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation and atrial fibrillation), myocardial necrosis, skin necrosis, limb or distal extremity ischemia.
Occurrence of secondary infections Impact of target blood pressure on outcome
Measured variables:
Data to be collected every 6 hours for 48 hours and then every 8 hours up to day 5
Hemodynamic variables:
Temperature, systolic and diastolic arterial pressures, heart rate, central venous pressure.
In patients equipped with a pulmonary artery catheter: pulmonary systolic and diastolic pressures, pulmonary artery occluded pressure, cardiac output.
In patients equipped with devices allowing cardiac output measurement: cardiac output, extravascular lung water and global end diastolic volumes (if available)
Biologic variables:
Arterial and mixed-venous (or central venous if pulmonary artery catheter not available) blood gases.
Doses of vasoactive agents: trial drug, open label vasoactive drugs (norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine)
Data to be collected daily for the first 7 days and then on days 14, 21 and 28:
Hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cell count, APTT, glucose levels, urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, GOT, GPT, CPK, LDH, PAL, bilirubin, amylase, lipase, CRP, lactate, PCT (if available) Respiratory conditions (type of ventilation and condition) Fluid balance (In/Out) Microbiological data and antibiotic therapy
Calculation of APACHE II 6 and SAPS II scores on admission and on inclusion in the study and calculation of SOFA score daily for the first 7 days and then on days 14, 21 and 28.
Statistics:
A/ Interim analysis: Sequential analysis every 100 included patients, allowing premature stop of the study in case of significant difference in 28-day survival between the two treatments, or futility
B/ Final analysis:
Intention to treat analysis Kaplan-Meier curves (with log rank test) will be used to assess ICU and 28-day survival as well as the durations of vasopressor therapy (both for labeled and open label drugs) and ICU stay.
Analysis of variance followed by t-test with Bonferroni correction for all continuous variables and chi square for categorial variables.
Significance at p< 0.05.
C/ Additional and subgroup analysis:
- Analysis of subgroup is scheduled for septic shock, cardiogenic shock, and all other types of shock.
- Per protocol analysis, to take into account patients excluded for arrhythmias.
- Subgroup analysis according to the dose of vasoactive agents (trial drug only and trial plus open label drugs)
References:
- Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:639-660.
- Vincent J-L. Hemodynamic support in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27:S80-S92
- Martin C, Viviand X, Leone M, Thirion X. Effect of norepinephrine on the outcome of septic shock. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:2758-2765.
- Marik PE, Mohedin M. The contrasting effects of dopamine and norepinephrine on systemic and splanchnic oxygen utilization in hyperdynamic sepsis. JAMA 1994; 272:1354-1357.
- Vincent JL, Moreno J, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 2000; 22:707-710.
- Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13:818-829.
- Conditions
- Shock
- Being tested
- dopamine versus norepinephrine
- Keywords
- shock, hypotension, circulatory failure, septic shock, cardiogenic shock
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Hypotension, Shock, Septic, Shock, Cardiogenic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
dopamine versus norepinephrineDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
28 day survival
Secondary outcomes (13)
ICU survival
Hospital survival
Severity of organ dysfunction in the ICU (SOFA score)
Duration of ICU stay
Time spent on vasopressors (vasopressor free days)
Time spent on mechanical ventilation (ventilator free days)
Time spent on renal replacement (renal replacement free days)
Efficacy of dopamine to correct hypotension
Hemodynamic effects
Concomitant use of dobutamine or other inotropic agents
Tolerance: arrhythmia (incidence of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation and atrial fibrillation), myocardial necrosis, skin necrosis, limb or distal extremity ischemia.
Occurrence of secondary infections
Impact of target blood pressure on outcome
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2003
- Primary completionOct 2007
- Study completionOct 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,679 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Daniel De Backer, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, SOAP investigators
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00314704
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SOAP vasopressors
- Status last verified
- Apr 2006
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2006
- Last updated
- 1 Feb 2010
- Results posted
- No
Publications
De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C, Brasseur A, Defrance P, Gottignies P, Vincent JL; SOAP II Investigators. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):779-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118.
PubMed 20200382
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Feb 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine as the First Vasopressor Agent in the Management of Shock
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00314704
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SOAP vasopressors
- Conditions
- Shock
- Keywords
- shock, hypotension, circulatory failure, septic shock, cardiogenic shock
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,679 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill PatientsUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2003
- Primary completion
- Oct 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of dopamine and norepinephrine, two commonly used vasopressor agents, in the treatment of shock.
Detailed description
Introduction:
Vasopressor agents are commonly used to correct hypotension in patients with acute circulatory failure. Their variable alpha, beta, or dopaminergic receptor stimulation, may result in different hemodynamic and metabolic effects. Several experimental and human studies have indicated that dopamine and norepinephrine may have different effects on the kidney, the splanchnic region or the pituitary axis, but the implications of these findings have not been assessed. Hence, both agents are widely used, and several consensus or expert recommendations still recommend the use of both agents 1,2. An observational study has reported that dopamine and epinephrine may be associated with a higher mortality rate than norepinephrine 3. In addition, The results of the SOAP study indicated that dopamine may be associated with higher mortality rates than norepinephrine, but various uncontrolled factors may have influenced these results. Therefore, we will address this issue in a prospective, randomized, double blind study. We hypothesize that both agents have similar effects on survival.
Design of the study:
Prospective, randomized, double blind, multicenter.
Patients:
A total of 1600 consecutive patients with hypotension requiring the administration of vasopressors.
Power calculation: Calculation is based on the results of the SOAP study (mortality 43% with dopamine and 36% with norepinephrine), using a two-sided analysis, with a significant p value at 0.05 and a power of 80%, 765 patients are needed in each group. About 40 centers will be recruited.
Inclusion criteria:
Mean arterial pressure less than 70 mmHg or systolic pressure less than 100 mmHg persisting despite adequate fluid loading (in example with at least 1000 mL crystalloid or 500 ml colloid) unless central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary artery occluded pressure (PAOP) are elevated (e.g. CVP> 12 mmHg or PAOP > 14 mmHg).
Exclusions:
- Serious arrhythmia such as rapid atrial fibrillation (> 160/min) or ventricular tachycardia.
- Brain death.
- Open label administration of dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine or phenylephrine for more than 4hours.
Consent:
Patients will be randomized immediately, with the use of sealed envelopes placed near the supplies of dopamine and norepinephrine. If the patient is already being treated with one agent, randomization can still take place provided that it is within a 4 hour period.
Consent will be obtained from the patient before entering the study, if possible, or from the next of kin as soon as possible after starting vasopressor therapy. Indeed, in such cases, vasopressor therapy should anyway be started, either with dopamine or with norepinephrine, and these 2 therapies are currently equally valid 1st choices. As soon as possible, the next of kin will be informed and deferred consent obtained. If the patient recovers, and is able to consent, consent will then be obtained.
According to local Ethical Committee, oral or signed consents will be obtained.
Protocol:
Blood pressure goal: defined by the physician in charge, according to each unit's recommendations
Administration of vasoactive drugs:
Double blind administration of a solution of norepinephrine or dopamine contained either in vials or syringes according to the ICU's protocol (see appendices I and II for vial and syringe preparations). Each solution will be labeled with its randomly allocated number and will be prepared by the nurses in charge. The rate of administration of the blind solution will be determined according to a scale and using the estimated body weight. The recommended steps for increasing or decreasing the doses of the blinded solution are calculated to be equivalent to 2 µg/kg.min for dopamine and 0.02 mcg/kg.min for norepinephrine, the investigator being free to use multiples of this increment in case of emergency. The maximal dose with the 2 agents will be 20 µg/kg.min for dopamine and 0.19 mcg/kg.min for norepinephrine (these doses have been shown to have similar effects on mean arterial blood pressure 4).
If the patient is already treated with open label vasopressors at baseline, the blinded solution will be rapidly incremented, and, if possible, the open label vasopressor agent will be decreased. If this open label vasopressor consisted in dopamine and if this agent cannot be fully weaned after the introduction of the blinded solution, the open label dopamine will be replaced by an open label norepinephrine infusion.
When the maximal dose of the blinded solution is achieved, an open label perfusion of norepinephrine can be added to achieve the desired blood pressure. Epinephrine or vasopressin may be used only as rescue therapy. Weaning of vasopressor agents will begin by weaning of the open label norepinephrine, followed by weaning of the blinded solution. In case of recurrence of hypotension, the blinded solution will be resumed first (maximal dose with the 2 agents will be 20 µg/kg.min for dopamine and 0.19 mcg/kg.min for norepinephrine) and if needed an open label solution of norepinephrine may be added. Weaning of the vasopressors will be performed as previously described.
Dobutamine, dopexamine, and inhibitors of phosphodiesterase III can be used, if needed, to optimize cardiac output according to local practices.
General therapeutic guidelines:
All therapies will be performed according to local guidelines. The choice of sedative agents, antibiotics, fluids, transfusion threshold, ventilatory modes,…. , will be left to the attending physicians. Likewise, the administration of agents like corticosteroids or drotrecogin-alpha activated (Xigris) is permitted.
Randomization:
Randomization by blocks for each participating ICU, using a computer generated list to allocate treatments A or B, put in sealed envelopes near the drug supplies. In each ICU, sealed envelopes including treatment allocation and a five digit number will be available. The envelope will be opened by the person responsible for preparation of the dopamine and norepinephrine solutions. The random number and treatment allocation will be written on a hidden book, available only for the person responsible for preparation of the dopamine and norepinephrine solutions. The doctors and other nurses will be kept blinded to treatment allocation. On patients' charts only the rate of administration and the dilution (simple or double) of the solution will be written.
Preparation of the solutions:
The solutions of dopamine or norepinephrine will be prepared by the nurse in charge of the patient. The five digit number (allocated by randomization) will be written on the bag. See appendices I and II for details regarding the preparation of the solutions. Different concentrations of these solutions are provided, the choice of the concentration of the solution will be left to the physician in charge.
Definition of the end of the shock period:
Shock will be considered as having resolved when the investigational drug can be stopped for more than 12 hours.
End-points:
Primary end-point: 28 day survival
Secondary end-points:
ICU survival Hospital survival Severity of organ dysfunction in the ICU (SOFA score 5) Duration of ICU stay, time spent on vasopressors (vasopressor free days), on mechanical ventilation (ventilator free days) and on renal replacement (renal replacement free days) Efficacy of dopamine to correct hypotension Hemodynamic effects / concomitant use of dobutamine or other inotropic agents Tolerance: arrhythmia (incidence of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation and atrial fibrillation), myocardial necrosis, skin necrosis, limb or distal extremity ischemia.
Occurrence of secondary infections Impact of target blood pressure on outcome
Measured variables:
Data to be collected every 6 hours for 48 hours and then every 8 hours up to day 5
Hemodynamic variables:
Temperature, systolic and diastolic arterial pressures, heart rate, central venous pressure.
In patients equipped with a pulmonary artery catheter: pulmonary systolic and diastolic pressures, pulmonary artery occluded pressure, cardiac output.
In patients equipped with devices allowing cardiac output measurement: cardiac output, extravascular lung water and global end diastolic volumes (if available)
Biologic variables:
Arterial and mixed-venous (or central venous if pulmonary artery catheter not available) blood gases.
Doses of vasoactive agents: trial drug, open label vasoactive drugs (norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine)
Data to be collected daily for the first 7 days and then on days 14, 21 and 28:
Hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cell count, APTT, glucose levels, urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, GOT, GPT, CPK, LDH, PAL, bilirubin, amylase, lipase, CRP, lactate, PCT (if available) Respiratory conditions (type of ventilation and condition) Fluid balance (In/Out) Microbiological data and antibiotic therapy
Calculation of APACHE II 6 and SAPS II scores on admission and on inclusion in the study and calculation of SOFA score daily for the first 7 days and then on days 14, 21 and 28.
Statistics:
A/ Interim analysis: Sequential analysis every 100 included patients, allowing premature stop of the study in case of significant difference in 28-day survival between the two treatments, or futility
B/ Final analysis:
Intention to treat analysis Kaplan-Meier curves (with log rank test) will be used to assess ICU and 28-day survival as well as the durations of vasopressor therapy (both for labeled and open label drugs) and ICU stay.
Analysis of variance followed by t-test with Bonferroni correction for all continuous variables and chi square for categorial variables.
Significance at p< 0.05.
C/ Additional and subgroup analysis:
- Analysis of subgroup is scheduled for septic shock, cardiogenic shock, and all other types of shock.
- Per protocol analysis, to take into account patients excluded for arrhythmias.
- Subgroup analysis according to the dose of vasoactive agents (trial drug only and trial plus open label drugs)
References:
- Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:639-660.
- Vincent J-L. Hemodynamic support in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27:S80-S92
- Martin C, Viviand X, Leone M, Thirion X. Effect of norepinephrine on the outcome of septic shock. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:2758-2765.
- Marik PE, Mohedin M. The contrasting effects of dopamine and norepinephrine on systemic and splanchnic oxygen utilization in hyperdynamic sepsis. JAMA 1994; 272:1354-1357.
- Vincent JL, Moreno J, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 2000; 22:707-710.
- Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13:818-829.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Mean arterial pressure less than 70 mmHg or systolic pressure less than 100 mmHg persisting despite adequate fluid loading (in example with at least 1000 mL crystalloid or 500 ml colloid) unless central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary artery occluded pressure (PAOP) are elevated (e.g. CVP> 12 mmHg or PAOP > 14 mmHg).
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Serious arrhythmia such as rapid atrial fibrillation (> 160/min) or ventricular tachycardia.
- Brain death.
- Open label administration of dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine or phenylephrine for more than 4hours.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| dopamine versus norepinephrine | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
28 day survival
13 secondary outcomes
ICU survival
Hospital survival
Severity of organ dysfunction in the ICU (SOFA score)
Duration of ICU stay
Time spent on vasopressors (vasopressor free days)
Time spent on mechanical ventilation (ventilator free days)
Time spent on renal replacement (renal replacement free days)
Efficacy of dopamine to correct hypotension
Hemodynamic effects
Concomitant use of dobutamine or other inotropic agents
Tolerance: arrhythmia (incidence of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation and atrial fibrillation), myocardial necrosis, skin necrosis, limb or distal extremity ischemia.
Occurrence of secondary infections
Impact of target blood pressure on outcome
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Feb 2010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20200382De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C, Brasseur A, Defrance P, Gottignies P, Vincent JL; SOAP II Investigators. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):779-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118.
- Click here for more information about this study: Dopamine and norepinephrine as the first vasoactive agentLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Shock
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Serum GDF-15 and LGALS3BP as Prognostic Biomarkers in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Recruiting
Shock Waves in Knee Arthritis
Arthritis of Knee
RecruitingPhase 2
CAlcium and VAsopressin Following Injury Early Resuscitation (CAVALIER) Trial
Trauma, Hemorrhage
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial of Adjunctive Fludrocortisone (50mcg, 100mcg or Placebo) in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock Receiving Hydrocortisone, Evaluating Survival and Functional Recovery and the Influence of Transcriptomic Response
Septic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Physiological Finding in Management of COVID 19 Patients
COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel De Backer, MD, PhD principal investigator
SOAP investigators
8 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing dopamine versus norepinephrine in people with Shock, run by Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients at 8 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in Belgium, Austria, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
28 day survival. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00314704, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2010.