AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung CancerNCT00323089

Removal of Lung Nodules After Being Marked With a Microcoil

A study testing microcoil insertion and excision in people with Lung Cancer, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to determine if subcentimetre pulmonary nodules can be accurately and safely excised by endoscopic stapling devices after they have been localized using CT and marked with a microcoil device. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
microcoil insertion and excision
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
151 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Apr 2003to 30 Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • subcentimetre lung nodule

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Richard Finley

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V7V3A2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Thoracoscopic Resection of Subcentimetre Lung Nodules After Localization Using Percutaneous Inserted Platinum Microcoil Under CT Guidance: a Pilot Study

The objective of this study is to determine if subcentimetre pulmonary nodules can be accurately and safely excised by endoscopic stapling devices after they have been localized using CT and marked with a microcoil device.

The addition of real-time CT imaging and insertion of platinum microcoil markers to the technique of video assisted thoracoscopic stapled resection of subcentimetre pulmonary nodules, will decrease the rate of open thoracotomies required to completely resect the nodules.

Read the detailed description

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death for both men and women in the industrialized world. Small cell lung cancer accounts for about 25% of lung cancers and is usually widespread when it first presents. The remaining 75% of lung cancers are collectively termed non-small cell lung cancers. When presentation is by symptoms or incidental discovery, about 50 to 60% of non-small cell lung cancers are parenchymal nodules or masses and 40 to 50% are bronchial or hilar. More than 50% of patients with non-small cell cancer will have distant metastases at the time of diagnosis and only 25% will be potentially resectable for cure.1 Overall survival at five years for lung cancer is approximately 15% and has not significantly improved over the last several decades. Prognosis for lung cancer is affected by many factors but one of the most important is the stage of the disease at presentation. Individuals with peripheral lesions less than 3 cm in diameter (T1) at presentation are ideal candidates for surgical resection and have the best outcomes, with 5-year survival rates as high as 60 to 80%.2 Patients with small subcentimeter pulmonary nodes may have even better survival with resection. Computed tomography can now detect cancers less than 4 mm in diameter, and it has been shown that resection of subcentimetre lung cancers results in a survival rate of up to 85%.3 However, Suzuki et al found 54% of 92 patients undergoing video assisted thoracoscopic excision of subcentimetre nodules, required conversion to a thoracotomy. Forty percent of those nodules were found to be malignant.4 The most common reason for this conversion was failure to localize the nodule using thoracoscopic visualization or palpation. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate analysis of eleven variables revealed that if the distance from the pleural surface was greater than 5 mm, the probability of failure to detect the nodule was 63%.

Conditions
Lung Cancer
Being tested
microcoil insertion and excision
Keywords
microcoil, subcentimetre nodules
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • microcoil insertion and excisionProcedure or surgery

    The objective of this study is to determine if subcentimetre pulmonary nodules can be accurately and safely excised by endoscopic stapling devices after they have been localized using CT and marked with a microcoil device.

Study groups in NCT00323089
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Surgical ArmExperimentalPreoperative CT-Guided Microcoil Localization (CTML) and Fluoroscopic-Guided Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic (VATS) Wedge Resection of Small Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules (SPPN)
Receives: Procedure: microcoil insertion and excision

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. pulmonary nodule excision with microcoil

    Thoracotomy and excision rates

    Measured: 6 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Recurrence and death from lung cancer

    Death or CT recurrence of lung cancer

    Measured: 10 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2003
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Preoperative CT-Guided Microcoil Localization (CTML) and Fluoroscopic-Guided Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic (VATS) Wedge Resection of Small Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules (SPPN)
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
151 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00323089
Sponsor's protocol ID
H02-70562
Other IDs
04-0048, 20R42080
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
8 May 2006
Last updated
25 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing microcoil insertion and excision in people with Lung Cancer, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

pulmonary nodule excision with microcoil (time frame: 6 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in