NeuroblastomaPhase 4NCT00336531
Efficacy of Prophylactic Itraconazole in High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
A Phase 4 study testing itraconazole in people with Neuroblastoma and Brain Tumor, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the prophylactic use of itraconazole is a better option than empirical use of itraconazole in the management (prevention and treatment) of fungal infection associated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 15 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuroblastoma, Brain Tumor, Retinoblastoma
- What is being tested?
- itraconazole
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Apr 2006to Oct 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 15 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patients with high risk solid tumors who are going to receive high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Who cannot join
- Significant organ toxicity (National Cancer Institute [NCI] grade > 2) prior to high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Prophylactic Itraconazole in High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Pediatric Solid Tumors
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the prophylactic use of itraconazole is a better option than empirical use of itraconazole in the management (prevention and treatment) of fungal infection associated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with high-risk solid tumor.
Read the detailed description
With the advance of chemoradiotherapy, survival of patients, especially children, with malignant disease has improved. However, prognosis is still poor with conventional chemotherapy if patients have an advanced or high-risk tumor at diagnosis. Outcome in advanced or high-risk pediatric solid tumor such as advanced neuroblastoma, high-risk brain tumor, or recurrent pediatric solid tumor is still not satisfactory with conventional chemotherapy. In this context, investigators have explored the possible efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with high-risk or relapsed pediatric solid tumor. Efficacy of HDCT and ASCT has been well demonstrated in high-risk neuroblastoma, high-risk brain tumor, and recurrent pediatric solid tumors. Therefore, now, HSCT and ASCT is the most important treatment modality in the treatment of a variety of pediatric solid tumors poorly responding to conventional chemotherapy.
However, although HDCT and ASCT has improved the survival of patients with high-risk tumor, a variety of clinical issues associated with HDCT and ASCT are present causing significant morbidity and even mortality. The most frequent cause of morbidity associated with HDCT and ASCT is infection. Once high-dose myeloablative chemotherapeutic agents are administered, most hematopoietic cells in bone marrow die and prolonged marrow aplasia is unavoidable even after autologous hematopoietic stem cells infusion because it takes time for infused stem cells to reconstitute sufficient hematopoietic function. In addition, high-dose chemotherapy results in severe gastrointestinal mucosal damage which facilitates bacterial and/or fungal infection via damaged mucosal barrier. Therefore, infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality associated with HDCT and ASCT. Common pathogens associated with infection during HDCT and ASCT are bacteria and fungi.
To reduce the chance of infection and therefore, to reduce the morbidity and mortality from severe infection, various prophylactic antibiotics including antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral agents have been used according to standard guideline in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, in autologous transplantation for solid tumor in which hematologic recovery is rapid and immune suppression is less severe than allogeneic transplantation, there is no standard guideline for the use of prophylactic antibiotics whereas infection is the most important cause of morbidity. Standard guideline for the use of prophylactic antifungal agent is also not available. While some institutes use anti-fungal agent prophylactically, others use antifungal agent empirically only when neutropenic fever persist despite of empirical use of antibacterial agents.
HDCT in pediatric solid tumor is generally more intensive, and therefore, usually cause more severe mucositis than that in adult tumor. Severe mucositis facilitates fungal infection via damaged mucosal barrier (mainly by Candida species). Therefore, use of prophylactic anti-fungal agent may reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with HDCT and ASCT in pediatric solid tumor. However, there is no randomized clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic use of anti-fungal agent to date.
Itraconazole is one of newly developed antifungal agents and many physicians started to use itraconazole as first-line antifungal agent in the management of neutropenic fever in immunocompromised patients. However, the efficacy of prophylactic itraconazole has not been established in children with solid tumor, especially who receive HDCT and ASCT.
In this context, we are going to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic use of itraconazole in children with high-risk solid tumors during HDCT and ASCT. "Prophylactic" group will be treated with itraconazole once ANC fall below 500/uL regardless of infection and "Empirical" group will be treated with itraconazole only when high fever persists despite of treatment with first-line anti-bacterial agents.
- Conditions
- Neuroblastoma, Brain Tumor, Retinoblastoma, Wilms Tumor, Mycoses
- Being tested
- itraconazole
- Keywords
- prophylactic itraconazole, Relapsed pediatric solid tumors, Embryonal brain tumor
- Medical subject headings
- Neuroblastoma, Brain Neoplasms, Retinoblastoma, Wilms Tumor, Mycoses
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
itraconazoleDrug
2.5 mg/kg twice daily for the first two days --> once daily
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Presence/absence of documented fungal infection
Measured: until post transplant day 30
Presence/absence of clinical fungal infection
Measured: until post transplant day 30
Total duration of high fever
Measured: until post transplant day 30
Total duration of antibiotic treatment
Measured: until post transplant day 30
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jun 2006 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2006
- Primary completionJun 2008
- Study completionOct 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NeuroblastomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Samsung Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- KiWoong Sung, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Samsung Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00336531
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2006-02-069
- Status last verified
- Nov 2008
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2006
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2008
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Kim YJ, Sung KW, Hwang HS, Jung SH, Kim JY, Cho EJ, Lim SJ, Choi YB, Cheuh HW, Lee SH, Yoo KH, Koo HH. Efficacy of itraconazole prophylaxis for autologous stem cell transplantation in children with high-risk solid tumors: a prospective double-blind randomized study. Yonsei Med J. 2011 Mar;52(2):293-300. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.2.293.
PubMed 21319349
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Nov 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Prophylactic Itraconazole in High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Pediatric Solid Tumors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00336531
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2006-02-069
- Conditions
- Neuroblastoma, Brain Tumor, Retinoblastoma, Wilms Tumor, Mycoses
- Keywords
- prophylactic itraconazole, Relapsed pediatric solid tumors, Embryonal brain tumor
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2006
- Primary completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jun 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the prophylactic use of itraconazole is a better option than empirical use of itraconazole in the management (prevention and treatment) of fungal infection associated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with high-risk solid tumor.
Detailed description
With the advance of chemoradiotherapy, survival of patients, especially children, with malignant disease has improved. However, prognosis is still poor with conventional chemotherapy if patients have an advanced or high-risk tumor at diagnosis. Outcome in advanced or high-risk pediatric solid tumor such as advanced neuroblastoma, high-risk brain tumor, or recurrent pediatric solid tumor is still not satisfactory with conventional chemotherapy. In this context, investigators have explored the possible efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with high-risk or relapsed pediatric solid tumor. Efficacy of HDCT and ASCT has been well demonstrated in high-risk neuroblastoma, high-risk brain tumor, and recurrent pediatric solid tumors. Therefore, now, HSCT and ASCT is the most important treatment modality in the treatment of a variety of pediatric solid tumors poorly responding to conventional chemotherapy.
However, although HDCT and ASCT has improved the survival of patients with high-risk tumor, a variety of clinical issues associated with HDCT and ASCT are present causing significant morbidity and even mortality. The most frequent cause of morbidity associated with HDCT and ASCT is infection. Once high-dose myeloablative chemotherapeutic agents are administered, most hematopoietic cells in bone marrow die and prolonged marrow aplasia is unavoidable even after autologous hematopoietic stem cells infusion because it takes time for infused stem cells to reconstitute sufficient hematopoietic function. In addition, high-dose chemotherapy results in severe gastrointestinal mucosal damage which facilitates bacterial and/or fungal infection via damaged mucosal barrier. Therefore, infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality associated with HDCT and ASCT. Common pathogens associated with infection during HDCT and ASCT are bacteria and fungi.
To reduce the chance of infection and therefore, to reduce the morbidity and mortality from severe infection, various prophylactic antibiotics including antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral agents have been used according to standard guideline in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, in autologous transplantation for solid tumor in which hematologic recovery is rapid and immune suppression is less severe than allogeneic transplantation, there is no standard guideline for the use of prophylactic antibiotics whereas infection is the most important cause of morbidity. Standard guideline for the use of prophylactic antifungal agent is also not available. While some institutes use anti-fungal agent prophylactically, others use antifungal agent empirically only when neutropenic fever persist despite of empirical use of antibacterial agents.
HDCT in pediatric solid tumor is generally more intensive, and therefore, usually cause more severe mucositis than that in adult tumor. Severe mucositis facilitates fungal infection via damaged mucosal barrier (mainly by Candida species). Therefore, use of prophylactic anti-fungal agent may reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with HDCT and ASCT in pediatric solid tumor. However, there is no randomized clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic use of anti-fungal agent to date.
Itraconazole is one of newly developed antifungal agents and many physicians started to use itraconazole as first-line antifungal agent in the management of neutropenic fever in immunocompromised patients. However, the efficacy of prophylactic itraconazole has not been established in children with solid tumor, especially who receive HDCT and ASCT.
In this context, we are going to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic use of itraconazole in children with high-risk solid tumors during HDCT and ASCT. "Prophylactic" group will be treated with itraconazole once ANC fall below 500/uL regardless of infection and "Empirical" group will be treated with itraconazole only when high fever persists despite of treatment with first-line anti-bacterial agents.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with high risk solid tumors who are going to receive high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Significant organ toxicity (National Cancer Institute [NCI] grade > 2) prior to high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| itraconazole2.5 mg/kg twice daily for the first two days --> once daily | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Presence/absence of documented fungal infection
Time frame: until post transplant day 30
Presence/absence of clinical fungal infection
Time frame: until post transplant day 30
Total duration of high fever
Time frame: until post transplant day 30
Total duration of antibiotic treatment
Time frame: until post transplant day 30
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Nov 2008.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21319349Kim YJ, Sung KW, Hwang HS, Jung SH, Kim JY, Cho EJ, Lim SJ, Choi YB, Cheuh HW, Lee SH, Yoo KH, Koo HH. Efficacy of itraconazole prophylaxis for autologous stem cell transplantation in children with high-risk solid tumors: a prospective double-blind randomized study. Yonsei Med J. 2011 Mar;52(2):293-300. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.2.293.
Related trials for Neuroblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Testing the Addition of Iberdomide to Therapy in People With Neuroblastoma That Has Come Back, Not Responded to Treatment, or Gotten Worse
Recurrent Ganglioneuroblastoma, Recurrent Neuroblastoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Genomic Structural Variation in Cancer Susceptibility
Breast Cancer, Colon Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Comprehensive Molecular Analysis of Endocrine Neoplasms
Endocrine Tumors, Thyroid Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Enasidenib in IDH2-Mutated Malignant Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumors
Metastatic Chondrosarcoma, Locally Advanced Chondrosarcoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
GD2 Specific CAR and Interleukin-15 Expressing Autologous NKT Cells to Treat Children With Neuroblastoma
Neuroblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
KiWoong Sung, MD, PhD principal investigator
Samsung Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing itraconazole in people with Neuroblastoma and Brain Tumor, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Presence/absence of documented fungal infection (time frame: until post transplant day 30). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00336531, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2008; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.